What People Are Looking For

image

This is the current ranking of my flickr photos in terms of number of times viewed. Just in the last week, pasque flower shot ahead of the long-time leader, Albuquerque Wetlands. Strangely, I don’t know why people are suddenly interested in pasque flowers (other than the recent occurrence of Easter). It is not my favorite pasque flower photo. (My favorite sightings of pasque flowers have all occurred above 11,000 feet.)

It is more than likely that Albuquerque wetlands was the leader thanks to John Fleck, my virtual and physical neighbor. (Well, stretching physically, but not in the least, virtually.)

Ironically, two of my most widely viewed photos aren’t even mine, except as subject. (I’m not sure who took The Big Day; Merri took After the Kiss.) I like the others, but don’t love them as I do most of these and many others.

What do you think?

peace,
mjh

Hug a Hippie

My buddy, Kris — #1 of my 5 regular readers — expressed surprise that I didn’t write anything on Earth Day. Of course, my first thought was to recycle a blog entry from prior years. In part, I was distracted by teaching and, in part, I was distracted by thoughts of the Pennsylvania primary (more later).

Earth Day was like every other day, I’m happy to say, in so far as I had moments being there, loving the Earth, if not the world. Our wysteria (as I prefer to spell it) is past peak but still magnificent. It may be the best display of redolent purple bunches in 20 years. The bees certainly think so — those that take time out from the rosemary bushes. The vibrant red to orange to yellow Austrian copper rose by the door is just peaking — its time is much shorter than the wysteria. Birds are everywhere. The hummingbirds are back. Hawks abound (perhaps because of all the damn doves). I nest between a great river and greater mountains beneath a stunning sky. I think Frank Zappa said it best when he said, “It’s fucking great to be alive.” (There goes my parental rating. Sorry, kids.)

It’s not that I’m always high on life. It is obvious that it is far easier — more natural — for humans to destroy than preserve. And the End of Days are going to be hideous and slow. But, optimist that I am, I believe the Earth will rebound and return without out the infection of humankind. (To our successors: Learn from our mistakes, even though we could not.)

Thirty-eight years ago, Earth Day began as an extension of the hippie movement. Yes — thank the hippies! Thank the liberals. Thank Tricky Dick Nixon — whose daughter, Julie Nixon Eisenhower, supports Obama — for bowing to democracy momentarily to support the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts and the establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Endangered Species Act. Every one of those things *infuriates* the Radically Wrong, who would condemn Nixon for his liberalism. (Such insanity may be a consequence of environmental degradation, ironically.)

Peace, love and happiness,
mjh

our arbor

flower

The Party of Fear

Contradicting His Hero Ben Franklin, Gingrich Says Americans ‘Will Give Up All Their Liberties’ For Safety»

gingrich.jpg Yesterday, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich visited Drew University in New Jersey, where he took questions from 20 political science majors there. When one asked him how the government could justify stripping rights from Americans in such pieces of legislation as the Patriot Act, Gingrich said that the government has a “right to defend society,” and when under threat, “people will give up all their liberties“:

“If there’s a threat, you have a right to defend society,” Gingrich said.People will give up all their liberties to avoid that level of threat.

Gingrich is directly contradicted by Benjamin Franklin, who rejected the notion that one should give up one’s liberties out of fear:

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

Can You Choose Between Elitism and Lying?

New Mexico’s GOP is attacking Barack Obama, who hasn’t even won the nomination yet. The attacks are in the hinterlands, aimed at small town residents who, of course, are the natural constituency of the party of Big Business and the Rich. Of course, Republicans share your values, especially the prime directive of “every man for himself” and “anything goes if it gets you ahead of the next chump.” Gawd bless Das Volk for buying that (and literally paying for it in the process).

Is this early attack a first? Where did the Democratic Party pay for attack ads before McCain (aka Duhbya Too) became the presumptive nominee? Must be a proud moment for Minister of Truth, Scott Darnell, who is the picture of “wet behind the ears.” It was Darnell who explained some months ago that the NM GOP waits until June for its primary because they have better things to spend their money on: i.e., let the public fund the GOP’s contest while the Dems pay their own way. Sound hypocritical? In effect, the taxpayers are paying for these attack ads.

Darnell has been tapped by Gene Grant of *public* TV’s In Focus (ironic) to fill the shoes of Whitney Cheshire (Gene’s bud from the Wilson camp), who had stepped into the the huge void left by John Dimdahl, the great dragon of the NM GOP. Darnell’s no Dimdahl (I’m not sure who that insults), but maybe he can grow up to be a mini-Rove, former Minister of Disinformation. peace, mjh

ABQJOURNALNEWS/STATE: NM GOP Airs Ads Criticizing Obama’s ‘Working Class’ Comments By Deborah Baker/Associated Press
SANTA FE — The state Republican Party is airing radio ads in eight New Mexico communities criticizing Barack Obama for his recent comments about bitter working-class voters who “cling to guns or religion.”
The first of the ads began Thursday, and they’ll continue through April 25, said Scott Darnell, the party’s director of communications.
Darnell said the GOP wants to make sure rural voters know what the Democratic presidential candidate said, characterizing his comments as “out of touch with them and possibly not respectful of their values.”
He declined to say what the party is spending on the ads.

PS: On this week’s In Focus, Scotty D sported a very cool trace mustache and proto-chin hairs. I’m sure the graybeards of his party share his values on facial hair. More importantly, Scotty made the same case made in those radio ads, but nobody called him on it or mentioned the ads.

‘Elistist’? Puh-lease!

The word “elitist” has always seemed rather elitist to me. I mean, do “regular people” (the salt of the Earth; das Volk; mi gente) really use the word “elitist”? Does elitism come up regularly in _____ [insert situation that to you best represents the noblest context of “regular people” — is it a bowling alley, a barbershop, a union hall, a foxhole?].

For nearly eight years, America has suffered mightily under the clumsy thumb of Duhbya, born on third base with a silver spoon in his mouth, a spoiled rich kid who caught every break every step of the way. Duhbya is an elitist masquerading as Joe Sixpack, a guy rich enough to have a ranch in the desert on which all he does is clear brush and entertain Saudi royalty.

Every time a brouhaha arises in the next 6 months, ask yourself, what are you being distracted from? Recently, Barack Obama said a lot of Americans are pissed off. OK, he said, “bitter.” They’re pissed off at being lied to and used as canon fodder by elitists who run everything in AmeriCo. And rather than rise up in revolution, as Thomas Jefferson hoped we would, the pissed-off self-medicate with all the opiates of the people. If there is anyone who should be grateful for that fact, it is the Republican Party, the prime purveyor of said opiates.

But, it appears that if you actually do disdain “ordinary people,” you may have good reason for that. If The People let the two richest, most privileged (oldest and whitest) candidates convince them that the poorest, least privileged candidate is “out of touch,” then, once again, The People get what they deserve.

Anyone who votes for John McCain is voting for George Duhbya Bush. It’s that simple. And Hilary Clinton has proved herself to be McCain’s doppleganger in terms of shape-shifting to mesh with the next group of voters. McCain and Clinton are rich. They are elite. They are more of the same.

Is this election another bout of smoke and mirrors? Smash the status quo. Make *real* change.

Obama Substance

Beyond the noise, listen to the substance of the candidates. peace, mjh

Peter Beinart – Obama at the Helm

Luckily, Obama doesn’t have to rely on his legislative resume to prove he’s capable of running the government. He can point to something more germane: the way he’s run his campaign.

Presidents tend to govern the way they campaigned. Jimmy Carter ran as a moralistic outsider in 1976, and he governed that way as well, refusing to compromise with a Washington establishment that he distrusted (and that distrusted him). Ronald Reagan‘s campaign looked harsh on paper but warm and fuzzy on TV, as did his presidency. The 1992 Clinton campaign was like the Clinton administration: brilliant and chaotic, with a penchant for near-death experiences. And the 2000 Bush campaign presaged the Bush presidency: disciplined, hierarchical, loyal and ruthless.

Of the three candidates still in the 2008 race, Obama has run the best campaign by far. McCain’s was a top-heavy, slow-moving, money-hemorrhaging Hindenburg that eventually exploded, leaving the Arizona senator to resurrect his bankrupt candidacy through sheer force of will. Clinton’s campaign has been marked by vicious infighting and organizational weakness, as manifested by her terrible performance in caucus states.

Obama’s, by contrast, has been an organizational wonder, the political equivalent of crossing a Lamborghini with a Hummer. From the beginning, the Obama campaign has run circles around its foes on the Internet, using MySpace, Facebook and other Web tools to develop a virtual army of more than 1 million donors. The result has been fundraising numbers that have left opponents slack-jawed (last month Obama raised $40 million, compared with Clinton’s $20 million).

Peter Beinart – Obama at the Helm – washingtonpost.com

– – – – –

For one thing, under an Obama presidency, Americans will be able to leave behind the era of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and “wiretaps without warrants,” he said. (He was referring to the lingering legal fallout over reports that the National Security Agency scooped up Americans’ phone and Internet activities without court orders, ostensibly to monitor terrorist plots, in the years after the September 11 attacks.)

It’s hardly a new stance for Obama, who has made similar statements in previous campaign speeches, but mention of the issue in a stump speech, alongside more frequently discussed topics like Iraq and education, may give some clue to his priorities.

In our own Technology Voters’ Guide, when asked whether he supports shielding telecommunications and Internet companies from lawsuits accusing them of illegal spying, Obama gave us a one-word response: “No.”

(Democrats Hillary Clinton and John Edwards and Republican Ron Paul, for their part, came to the same conclusion in our survey.)

Obama: No warrantless wiretaps if you elect me | Tech news blog – CNET News.com

– – – – –

Obama pledges Net neutrality laws if elected president | Tech news blog – CNET News.com
Posted by Anne Broache

If elected president, Barack Obama plans to prioritize, well, barring broadband providers like AT&T and Comcast from prioritizing Internet content.

Affixing his signature to federal Net neutrality rules would be high on the list during his first year in the Oval Office, the junior senator from Illinois said during an interactive forum Monday afternoon with the popular contender put on by MTV and MySpace at Coe College in Iowa.  

Net neutrality, of course, is the idea that broadband operators shouldn’t be allowed to block or degrade Internet content and services–or charge content providers an extra fee for speedier delivery or more favorable placement.

The question, selected through an online video contest, was posed via video by small-business owner and former AT&T engineer Joe Niederberger, a member of the liberal advocacy group MoveOn.org. He asked Obama: “Would you make it a priority in your first year of office to reinstate Net neutrality as the law of the land? And would you pledge to only appoint FCC commissioners that support open Internet principles like Net neutrality?”

“The answer is yes,” Obama replied. “I am a strong supporter of Net neutrality.”

Obama pledges Net neutrality laws if elected president | Tech news blog – CNET News.com

– – – – –

When Barry Became Barack | Print Article | Newsweek.com

Obama had made up his mind that he wanted to move to a more urban, intense and polyglot place. “He said something to the effect that he needed a bigger and more stimulating environment intellectually.”

Obama wanted a clean slate. “Going to New York was really a significant break. It’s when I left a lot of stuff behind,” he says. “I think there was a lot of stuff going on in me. By the end of that year at Occidental, I think I was starting to work it through, and I think part of the attraction of transferring was, it’s hard to remake yourself around people who have known you for a long time.” It was when he got to New York that, as he recalls it, he began to ask people to call him Barack: “It was not some assertion of my African roots … not a racial assertion. It was much more of an assertion that I was coming of age. An assertion of being comfortable with the fact that I was different and that I didn’t need to try to fit in in a certain way.”

He stopped drinking and partying, leading what he calls “a hermetic existence” for two years. “When I look back on it, it was a pretty grim and humorless time that I went through,” he recalls. “I literally went to class, came home, read books, took long walks, wrote.” Politics was a passion, but he was disillusioned by radicals who claimed to have all the answers. At one point after graduation, he went “in search of some inspiration” to hear Kwame Toure (the former Stokely Carmichael) speak at Columbia. A thin young woman stood up to question Toure’s push to establish economic ties between Africa and Harlem: was that practical, given the difficult state of African economies? Toure cut her off, calling her brainwashed, and others shouted her down. “It was like a bad dream,” Obama wrote later.

Obama kept detailed journals in New York. It was good practice. “Writing journals during those two years gave me not only the raw material for the book, but also taught me to shape a narrative in ways that would work,” he says. When he later became a community organizer in Chicago, part of his job was storytelling. “His job largely consisted of interviewing community members and creating a narrative out of their experiences, the problems the community faced,” says his boss at that time, Gerald Kellman. Eventually, even Chicago would seem too small a stage. He told Kellman “he did not feel there would be large-scale change brought about by organizing.” Large-scale change was what Obama was aiming for.

When Barry Became Barack | Print Article | Newsweek.com

What’s Going On?

There’s something happening here.
What it is, ain’t exactly clear.
— Buffalo Springfield (a long time ago)

In recognition of National Poetry Month and my tenuous connection to the art, I resolved to publish a poem a day for the month of April. I hoped that in the process, I would feel inspired to (1) gather my poems from various scraps and journals and (2) WRITE!

As a further demonstration of my devotion, I decided to stop posting anything but poetry during this period.

Ah, plans — gotta love ’em.

Reality has conspired to hold me back from gathering those disparate poems. Further, I can’t imagine holding my tongue for a month on matters non-poetical.

So, for a few days, the blog has been on hold as I reconcile my motivations and energies.

If you want to see the blog as purely a poetry blog, use this category or this RSS feed. (There are 42 of my poems on the blog at this writing.)

peace,
mjh