Conservative Ecstasy
Mon 10/31/05 at 6:55 pmIt is a remarkable sign of the times that within hours of the nomination of Alito we can read a kind
of point-counterpoint in which he references O’Connor in a decision and she references that decision in a later rejection. There is no
doubt: he’s no O’Connor. mjh
Samuel A. Alito Jr., 55, is a jurist in the
mold of Justice Antonin Scalia. Nicknamed “Scalito,” or “little Scalia,” by some lawyers, the federal appeals court judge is a frequent
dissenter with a reputation for having one of the sharpest conservative minds in the country. …
In 1991, he was the lone
dissenter in a 3rd Circuit decision striking down a Pennsylvania law’s requirement that women tell their husbands before having an
abortion.
Bush Selects Alito for Supreme Court
Citing previous opinions of
O’Connor, Alito wrote that an abortion regulation is unconstitutional only if it imposes an undue burden on a woman’s access to the
procedure. The spousal notification provision, he wrote, does not constitute such a burden and must therefore only meet the requirement
that it be rationally related to some legitimate government purpose. …
“In addition,” he wrote, “the legislature could have
reasonably concluded that Section 3209 [the spousal provision] would lead to such discussion and thereby properly further a husband’s
interests in the fetus in a sufficient percentage of the affected cases to justify enactment of this measure. . . . The Pennsylvania
legislature presumably decided that the law on balance would be beneficial. We have no authority to overrule that legislative judgment
even if we deem it “unwise” or worse.”
The case ultimately reached the Supreme Court, which upheld the appeals court decision,
disagreed with Alito and used the case to reaffirm its support for Roe v. Wade , the 1973 decision legalizing abortion.
On the
spousal notification provision, O’Connor wrote for the court that it did indeed constitute an obstacle. The “spousal notification
requirement is . . . likely to prevent a significant number of women from obtaining an abortion,” she wrote.
“It does not merely
make abortions a little more difficult or expensive to obtain; for many women, it will impose a substantial obstacle. We must not blind
ourselves to the fact that the significant number of women who fear for their safety and the safety of their children are likely to be
deterred from procuring an abortion as surely as if the Commonwealth had outlawed abortion in all cases,” she said.
Plus, it
“embodies a view of marriage consonant with the common law status of married women, but repugnant to our present understanding of
marriage and of the nature of the rights secured by the Constitution. Women do not lose their constitutionally protected liberty when
they marry, ” she said.
“The Constitution protects all individuals, male or female, married or unmarried, from the abuse of
governmental power, even where that power is employed for the supposed benefit of a member of the individual’s family.”
title="Newsday.com: Alito provoked no controversy at confirmation hearing 15 years ago" href="http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newjersey/ny-bc-nj--alito-firstconfir1031oct31,0,2859586.story?coll=ny-region- apnewjersey">Newsday.com: Alito provoked no controversy at confirmation hearing 15 years ago
Writer
WASHINGTON — Fifteen years ago, Samuel Alito told senators at his confirmation hearing that judges shouldn’t “step over
the line” into lawmaking or “try to pigeonhole the case or to import a judge’s own view of the law into the law,” records showed Monday.
…
Alito’s confirmation to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was noncontroversial, with the full Senate approving his
nomination on April 27, 1990, by unanimous consent, which meant that there was no opposition among the 100 senators. Nominated on Feb.
20, Alito was rated well qualified by the American Bar Association.
Remarks on Alito Nomination
A preliminary review of his record raises real questions about Judge Alito’s judicial philosophy
and his commitment to civil rights, workers’ rights, women’s rights, the rights of average Americans which the courts have always
looked out for.
Now, it’s sad that the president felt he had to pick a nominee likely to divide America instead of choosing a
nominee in the mold of Sandra Day O’Connor who would unify us.
America needs unity now. America needs reaching out to one another
more than ever. But the president seems to want to hunker down in his bunker and is more concerned about smoothing the ruffled feathers
of the extreme wing of his party than about governing all of America and changing history for the better.
SCHUMER: This
controversial nominee, who would make the court less diverse and far more conservative, will get very careful scrutiny from the Senate
and the American people.
The president had an opportunity to nominate someone in the mold of Sandra Day O’Connor, a mainstream,
albeit conservative, who would unite the country, not further decide us. At first blush, Judge Alito does not appear to be a Sandra Day
O’Connor.
It is an immutable law of history that when a president tries to govern from the extreme, his presidency and the
country end up losing. Democrats learned this when we governed from the far left. President Bush will learn this as well. …
QUESTION: Why do you think the president nominated Judge Alito?
SCHUMER: Well, as I said, I think that the president received so
much criticism from the extreme wing of his party that he felt, in his position right now, that he couldn’t afford to alienate them
further. And they demanded fidelity to their viewpoint.
previous in this category: WWSD? What Would Scooter Do?
WWSD? What Would Scooter Do?
Mon 10/31/05 at 3:45 pmRemember that Duhbya was
going to restore dignity and honor to the White House, at the same time he united the country. Missions unaccomplished.
class="sig">mjh
White House Ethics, Honesty Questioned
55% in Survey Say Libby Case Signals
Broader Problems
By Richard Morin and Claudia Deane, Washington Post Staff Writers
A majority of Americans say the indictment
of senior White House aide I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby signals broader ethical problems in the Bush administration, and nearly half say the
overall level of honesty and ethics in the federal government has fallen since President Bush took office, according to a new Washington
Post-ABC News survey.
The poll, conducted Friday night and yesterday, found that 55 percent of the public believes the Libby case
indicates wider problems “with ethical wrongdoing” in the White House, while 41 percent believes it was an “isolated incident.” And by a
3 to 1 ratio, 46 percent to 15 percent, Americans say the level of honesty and ethics in the government has declined rather than risen
under Bush.
In the aftermath of the latest crisis to confront the White House, Bush’s overall job approval rating has fallen to
39 percent, the lowest of his presidency in Post-ABC polls. Barely a third of Americans — 34 percent — think Bush is doing a
good job ensuring high ethics in government, which is slightly lower than President Bill Clinton’s standing on this issue when he left
office. …
The survey of 600 randomly selected Americans represents a snapshot of initial reactions to the Libby
indictment.
Criminalizing politics by Robert
Novak [Yes, THE Robert Novak]
In today’s polarized climate, both parties have contributed to the criminalization of politics.
But Democrats, losers in both elections and the world of ideas, have turned to using the criminal process over the last two decades. …
Big of Novak, whose central role in the “Plame Affair” is still undercover, to allow that “both parties”
have had a role in something he despises the Democrats for doing. Yes, indicting Scooby (sic) Libby for perjury is the same as impeaching
the President. mjh
The Criminalization of Criminals by James Moore
Leaking the names of CIA agents is not politics; it is
a crime. Lying to congress about evidence for a war is not politics; it is a crime. Failing to tell a grand jury that you met
with a reporter and talked about the CIA agent is not forgetfulness; it is a crime. Deceiving your entire nation and frightening children
and adults with images of nuclear explosions in order to get them to support a bloody invasion of another country is not politics; it is
a crime. Anyone other than Karl Rove and Lewis Libby and Tom Delay who does not get this, please raise your hand. The three of you will
need to stay after class for further instruction in civics.
previous in this category: Wilson Favors Anti-Torture Rules
Wilson Favors Anti-Torture Rules
Mon 10/31/05 at 3:34 pmI’m no fan of Wilson, but I am happy to see her break with the House
leadership and the White House. Duhbya wants the CIA to remain free to torture as needed — and surely wants more than just the CIA to be
free to torture. How can anyone doubt that torture isn’t supported from the top down. mjh
ABQjournal: Rep. Wilson Favors Anti-Torture Rules By Michael
Coleman
On Tuesday, the Washington Post reported that the Bush administration wants to exempt the Central Intelligence Agency
from new anti-torture rules under consideration in the Senate.
The Senate voted 90 to 9 earlier this month to change a defense
spending bill in a way that would prohibit harsh or degrading treatment of prisoners in U.S. custody anywhere in the world. According to
the Post, the Senate wanted to close a loophole in current law.
The White House reportedly opposes the Senate’s broad
definition of what is and isn’t acceptable treatment of those detained by the United States. The House defense spending bill contains no
such change.
Wilson, a New Mexico Republican, Air Force veteran and member of the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence, said the news report troubled her.
“It makes no sense to me,” Wilson said. “The United States government has a
responsibility to live up to our obligations in both the Convention on Torture and the Geneva Conventions.”
href='http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9865301/site/newsweek/'>Truth About Torture
The Bush administration has
consistently maintained that it is not U.S. policy to abuse prisoners. But Bush has threatened to veto the entire appropriations bill if
it contains McCain’s language — all in an effort to preserve the right to treat prisoners in whatever way the president decides
is necessary. Last week Vice President Dick Cheney, with CIA Director Porter Goss in tow, met with McCain to try to persuade him
to exclude the CIA from any restrictions. The administration also sought to cut out the term “regardless of physical location,” McCain
said in an interview. The Washington Post, in a harsh editorial, later branded Cheney “the vice president for torture.”
Cheney’s spokeswoman, Lea Anne McBride, said she had no comment on the McCain meeting. CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Dyck also declined to
talk about it. But John Yoo, a former Justice Department official who drafted an August 2002 memo that justified rough methods, said last
week that the administration should continue to treat terrorists differently overseas because they “do not operate according to the
Geneva Conventions.”
previous in this category: Alleged Desecration of Bodies Investigated
Silver Flu Bullets
Mon 10/31/05 at 3:31 pmSilver Flu Bullets By Anne Applebaum
Americans and their leaders
will have to get over their love affair with intelligent design. Polls show that most don’t believe in evolution. But
it is actually impossible to talk logically about bird flu, or any other rapidly evolving and constantly changing virus, without
using the language of evolution — specific words such as “mutant,” “recombination,” “genome” and “selection.” Without that
language, a sensible popular or political discussion, let alone a scientific discussion, is impossible: We’re stuck talking about the
virus “jumping” from birds to humans, as if it were a magic bug with a mind of its own. We’re stuck thinking that a virus is a hex that
can be lifted with a single lucky charm, not something that will change over time.
We’re also stuck with magic solutions: silver
bullets, protective amulets, Tamiflu prescriptions. And until we are willing to elect the politicians, pay the businessmen, and support
the scientists and science educators who can come up with something better, that, I’m afraid, is all the flu preparedness we’ll ever
have.
previous in this category: Don’t Bank on ID Fading
ABQ RIDE – City of Albuquerque
Fri 10/28/05 at 12:55 amI rode the Rapid Ride bus today. I parked for free
at the Uptown Station (between NMEFCU and Coronado Shopping Mall (I saw a
bike chained to a fence, but did not see a bike rack). When I arrived at 12:27pm, a bus was waiting; it left a minute or so after I
boarded. At Uptown, there may have been half a dozen folks. Along Central we picked up quite a few more, including bike commuters; it
felt half-full, but I didn’t count heads (or make much eye contact, except when a women on a neighboring bus made me smile).
The
trip from Uptown to the Downtown Library at 5th and Copper took about 1/2 hour, but I was busy with the newness of the experience and
with the wireless connection, which worked great for me. Sitting with my TabletPC, the infinite newstand/library of the Web at my
fingers. I even sent email to my wife, telling her I was on my way.
All for one buck (each way). Highly recommended.
When I
exited the bus, I was surprised to see the library partly surrounded by a fence. Even more surprised by the picket line. Between 30 and
50 men and women marched with signs for a carpenter’s union. They had a lively chant, demanding many good things like decent wages and
health care for all, plus “no justice, no peace!” Right on! I don’t expect to see a word of this in the Journal or on TV. You got to get
out of your car to meet the people.
It has been a few years since I walked around downtown as much as today. Great to see several
large murals — we need more. We walked from the City-County Building on the Plaza to the new Flying Star on Silver near Eighth.
Beautiful place, great service, OK food. I felt so urban/urbane, sitting on the balcony, browsing the Web for the cost of the new lofts
across the road (up to $360K!). Felt like visiting a big city, though I had to stop myself from saying hello to everyone I passed.
class="sig">mjh
Rapid Ride travels an 11-mile route along Central Avenue from Unser to Wyoming, then north on Wyoming to the Uptown shopping district.
ABQ RIDE – City of Albuquerque
Rapid Ride Now Has Wireless Web Access
Using
the Rapid Ride just got a lot more interesting for the business commuter and college student. All of the city’s 12 Rapid Ride vehicles
now have wireless web access. There are 83 hot spots along the route that allow the buses to establish a connection from zone to zone.
This new technology will allow passengers with laptop computers to surf the internet, check email, send reports to work or chat with
friends. Now, many people will find their commute time to be productive time.
Map of Route href="http://www.cabq.gov/transit/pdf/05aprrapidram.pdf">http://www.cabq.gov/transit/pdf/05aprrapidram.pdf
previous in this category: Commuter rail gains support
Commuter rail gains support
Fri 10/28/05 at 12:53 amCommuter rail gains support by Bob Golfen, The
Arizona Republic
A commuter rail system that uses existing freight-train routes throughout the Phoenix area is being touted as the
future backbone of public transportation in the Valley. …
A lot of the current discussion about commuter rail is fueled by the
success of new systems throughout the West, Dickey said, including New Mexico and Utah, which are building passenger systems on former
freight track beds.
previous in this category: Keep Judge Rudd Campaign
Don’t Bank on ID Fading
Thu 10/27/05 at 11:14 amI don’t read Winthrop Quigley every week, but I have found a
couple of his columns informative and worth reading. He’s not just an AmeriCog stoking the Capitalist Machine. That’s why it’s too bad
his column today is effectively buried in Business Outlook (it’s standard location). Though he includes a business reference, his topic
transcends it.
Quigley offers his own decent take on the fallacy of equating Intelligent Design with science. I consider it anti-
science new-speak — “dumbing down” taken to a new aggressiveness. Still, I’m happy to see Quigley weigh in on the side of light in the
struggle against the New American Dark Ages (NADA).
ABQjournal: Why Intelligent Design Is Wrong in Science Class By Winthrop Quigley, Journal Staff Writer
Intelligent
design has no long-run future in America’s science curricula because the dominant philosophy of the United States is not evangelical
Christianity, it is capitalism.
American business simply will not tolerate the further dumbing down of its future workforce’s
science education with metaphysical speculation masquerading as biology. It cannot afford to. …
Regardless of any spiritual
angst one might feel, the fact remains that ID is bad for business.
Corporate America, especially its technology companies, is
very worried about losing its competitive advantage over India, China and other Asian countries because of a poorly educated workforce.
…
And here is Quigley’s logical flaw, made worse by ignoring the true meaning of the quote he then
takes from Friedman.
Thomas L. Friedman in his book “The World Is Flat” said every major company he interviewed for
the book “is investing significantly in research and development abroad. It is not ‘follow the money.’ It is ‘follow the brains.’
”
In our current global economy, it is cheaper to go to the PhD’s than hire them here. Heartless and
soulless, corporations build their headquarters where the tax structure benefits them (which is also where their executives and boards
live) and they build their offices and factories where they find the optimal combination of cheap but just-adequately skilled
labor.
While Rio Rancho schools are working to put non-science into their science program, a kid in India is
preparing to take our kids’ technology jobs. I promise you, the Indian kid is not wasting his time studying ID. …
[Intel] will
build its new plants where the workforce is properly trained.
When that happens in enough communities, watch ID quietly leave
the science classroom
Though I enjoyed and respect the piece and encourage you to read the whole
thing, I think Quigley makes an important mistake. He believes Capitalism will save the day (perhaps he is an AmeriCog, after all).
Yes, business will realize that slack-jawed workers aren’t good for the company. Unfortunately, Quigley overlooks the value of slack-
jawed consumers (isn’t that why we have Channel One in schools?). It may be that it is in business’s interest to employ cheaper and
smarter Chinese PhD’s to come up with new products for rich and ignorant American buyers.
Or, perhaps we should look to
title="mjh's blog -- Evangelical Colorado Springs" href="http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/loco/evangelical-colorado-springs/">Evangelical
Colorado Springs
for the model of business in the NADA. Super-zealotemployees and consumers must yield the highest profits.
Get your authentic replica of Jesus on a
dinosaur now! mjh
See
href="http://www.bugmenot.com/">BugMeNot.com
if you are not a Journal subscriber.
previous in this category: Majority of Americans Reject Theory of Evolution
Keep Judge Rudd Campaign
Wed 10/26/05 at 10:52 am
href="http://www.keepjudgerudd.com/index.htm">Keep Judge Rudd Campaign
Judge Rudd will seek her second four-year term in 2006.
She needs your support. During her first term, she has increased the court’s caseload 60%, started a major computer automation of the
court’s docket system, proved her commitment to public awareness and outreach through her “Judge is In” TV show, Albuquerque Journal
column, and numerous speaking engagements. She has served our community with integrity, dedication, and hard work.
Note: I
developed the campaign website and MRudd is my long-time companion of 24 years (as of this week).
previous in this category: Human Uncertainty Principle
Majority of Americans Reject Theory of Evolution
Tue 10/25/05 at 7:51 pmMost Americans do not accept the theory of
evolution. Instead, 51 percent of Americans say God created humans in their present form, and another three in 10 say that while humans
evolved, God guided the process. Just 15 percent say humans evolved, and that God was not involved.
For
the record, I am with that 15 percent. And, though I sincerely believe in a diversity of views and mutual tolerance, I see that 51
percent as part of a New American Dark Ages (NADA). I know they aren’t all bible-thumping literalists who believe there were dinosaurs
in Eden and on the Ark; but a frightening number of them are and this ignorance is clearly contagious and
spreading.
This poll was conducted among a nationwide random sample of 808 adults, interviewed by
telephone October 3-5, 2005. The error due to sampling for results based on the entire sample could be plus or minus four percentage
points.
next in this category: Don’t Bank on ID FadingOn the other hand, I’ll believe in god before I put too much stock in divining the views of 300
million people from the responses of 808. Those who trust polls and statistics are welcome to explain their validity in comments. You’ll
find me as hard to move as Jesus on a dinosaur. mjh
previous in this category: Evangelical Colorado Springs
The Week After Wolf Awareness Week
Tue 10/25/05 at 6:46 pmCompare
the following stories and note that wolves were re-introduced in Yellowstone 10 years ago. In that whole region, they number around 900.
Wolves were released in New Mexico about 5 years ago. We’re supposed to believe that 6 pairs will sustain the population. Nonsense.
mjh
Feds study gray wolf delisting – billingsgazette.com
By
MIKE STARK Of The Gazette Staff
Federal officials on Monday said it may be time to remove gray wolves in the northern Rocky
Mountains from the endangered species list. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced that it will begin an in-depth look at the wolf
population and decide whether to propose delisting the wolf. …
In order for wolves to be delisted, Montana, Idaho and Wyoming
need approved plans to manage wolves once responsibility is passed to the states from the federal government. …
Wolves
were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park and portions of Idaho in 1995 and 1996.
Today, the population is
estimated to be around 900. Numbers have declined recently in Yellowstone, Wyoming and portions of Montana, according to some of the
latest numbers. The population appears to be still growing in Idaho, Bangs said.
href="http://www.abqjournal.com/news/state/399914nm10-19-05.htm">ABQjournal: Mexican Gray Wolf Treated for Injuries After Being Hurt by Trap
An endangered Mexican gray wolf was being treated by a veterinarian
Tuesday after she was spotted running around in the wild with a steel leg-hold trap stuck on a front leg. A researcher
working with the wolf reintroduction program saw the alpha female of the Luna Pack with her mate and two 6-month-old pups feeding on an
elk carcass in a large meadow southeast of Reserve on Saturday. He tried unsuccessfully to shoot her with a tranquilizer dart.
On
Monday, a helicopter with a professional gunner aboard was able to catch her in a net gun, said wolf recovery coordinator John Morgart of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Albuquerque.
"She was very mobile," he said. "She was running around and
dragging this trap." The wolf was tranquilized and the trap removed, but there was extensive damage just above her
paw. She is being evaluated by a vet in Arizona and likely will be returned to the wild soon. Even if her paw or leg has to be
amputated, she could go back to her pack, Morgart said.
"Canines in general do adapt very quickly to life on three
legs," he said. The trap could have been set legally to capture a coyote or other animal, but Fish and Wildlife Service law
enforcement officers are conducting a routine investigation to make sure there was no foul play involved, Morgart said.
Soussan Journal Staff Writer
Releases of endangered Mexican gray wolves likely will be severely
restricted next year under a policy approved recently by the multiagency group overseeing wolf reintroduction in the
Southwest. The Adaptive Management Oversight Committee adopted a moratorium on releases and several program
rules during a meeting Thursday in Arizona, said wolf recovery coordinator John Morgart of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in
Albuquerque.
If there are at least six pairs of successfully breeding wolves in the wild at the end of
this year, no new wolf packs without experience in the wild will be released in 2006 In addition, a controversial new
rule says wolves that have killed livestock three times must be permanently removed from the wild, either by trapping or shooting.
previous in this category: Spy Cops
Evangelical Colorado Springs
Tue 10/25/05 at 1:39 pm
href="http://www.courierpress.com/ecp/gleaner_lifestyles/article/0,1626,ECP_4479_4165662,00.html" target="_self">Political kingpin: Focus on Family leader’s influence quietly spreading
By STEPHANIE SIMON, Los Angeles Times
A recent poll for PBS
found that 77 percent of white evangelicals view Dobson favorably. Other Christian leaders were far less widely trusted; Pat
Robertson’s approval rating stood at 55 percent and Jerry Falwell’s at 46 percent. …
A campaign against Sen. Ken Salazar last
spring, on the issue of judicial filibusters, provoked such a barrage of calls and e-mails that the Colorado Democrat called Focus on the
Family "the Antichrist of the world." (Salazar later apologized, saying he meant only that the ministry’s approach was
"unchristian.")
Dobson devoted just 7 percent of his $142 million budget last year to explicitly political activities,
such as the Salazar campaign. This year, 5 percent of the budget has been set aside for politics. …
Some references are subtle; a
pamphlet called "When a Loved One Says ‘I’m Gay’" attributes same-sex at tractions to unhealthy family dynamics, but also
lays some blame on "today’s ‘gay-affirmative culture."’
Other political references are overt: A recent
edition of the ministry’s flagship Focus on the Family magazine defined conservatives as championing democracy, human rights and
"the cause of freedom around the world" while "liberals defend civil rights, abortion, pornography and
homosexuality." …
Don’t you love it when the Radical Right calls themselves
everything good and the left everything wrong. mjh
The calls reinforce the ministry’s
view that America’s moral foundation is crumbling — and must be shored up with political action to curb pornography, end abortion,
revoke no-fault divorce laws and stop recognizing gay relationships as legitimate.
href="http://www.gazette.com/display.php?id=1311503">Gazette.com
Religion is big
business in Colorado Springs, and business is booming. More than 80 national Christian nonprofit organizations with combined
revenue of nearly $1 billion make their headquarters in El Paso County [Colorado]. …
Other cities — including
Chicago, Dallas and Atlanta — have more Christian nonprofits than Colorado Springs. But this city is unusual because of its smaller
population, and because of the size, profile and influence of some of the ministries located here.
These ministries are more than
big fish swimming in a midsized pond: They’re leviathans.
Of the more than 80 Christian nonprofit headquarters in the region,
four (Compassion International, Young Life, Focus on the Family and The Navigators) have revenues of $100 million or more.
Their
influence is far-reaching….
Fourteen Springs-based ministries each have revenue above $10 million; 32 earn more than $1 million.
All the 80-some groups The Gazette studied have a national or worldwide focus, and many are household names — at least in
evangelical households.
“In my book, I would put it (Colorado Springs) as the (nation’s) most influential Christian
city,” said Rusty Leonard, founder of the charity watchdog MinistryWatch, based in Charlotte, N.C. …
BUT WHAT DOES
THAT MEAN TO COLORADO SPRINGS? Very little of that nearly $1 billion finds its way into the local economy. …
But all that
activism has its negative side. Many residents bemoan Colorado Springs’ evangelical reputation.
“We’re so known as a
community that’s dominated by a certain socially conservative philosophy,” Skorman said. Those who don’t share that philosophy,
he added, feel unwelcome. A few companies have shied away from locating here because of its evangelical presence.
That evangelical
unease extends to more secular charities, too, who believe that many of the city’s Christian organizations only support like-minded
charities.
“I think there’s a lot of backlash against the cause of Christ because Christians don’t seem to care
about anything but proselytization or evangelism,” said Yonker, of Elevation Group.
These Christian nonprofits
often like to do business with Christian-oriented companies, too.
previous in this category: Misplaced Moralizing
Spy Cops
Tue 10/25/05 at 12:02 pmSome people will read the following and dismiss it as small town politics. I see it as a tale of
using police to intimidate citizens. Note the mayor took this police tape and gave a transcript to the paper’s major advertizer — he
could only have wanted them to stop advertizing, in hopes of damaging the paper financially. So much for a free press.
Sure, this
mayor is a pissant and the cop a willing stooge, but this is a story being played out all across the New and Improved AmeriCo, where the
police are merely the security guards for those with power. mjh
href="http://www.abqjournal.com/news/state/401368nm10-23-05.htm">ABQjournal: Publisher: Taping, Report Payback class="popup">By Martin Salazar
Journal Northern Bureau
Wood was never brought in for questioning over the comments that she says
were made in jest. And the Colfax County District Attorney’s Office in Raton declined to pursue any charges against Wood after reviewing
the information, said Bill Kitts, chief of the Angel Fire Police Department.
"I think they were taping me to harass
me," Wood said in an interview Thursday.
Kitts denies the taping was politically motivated.
This
isn’t the first time the village government has been accused of retaliation.
Earlier this year, the village severed
ties with the local Chamber of Commerce in part because the chamber refused to sign a contract that would have banned it and
anyone associated with it from criticizing the village or its officials.
The latest incident occurred Sept. 22.
Marcia Wood had gone to Village Hall that afternoon in hopes of getting information for a story the paper was working on. Wood claims
Village Administrator John Pape told her he would never talk to her. Wood then went to see Mayor A.L. "Bubba" Clanton. She said
she complained that the village had been stonewalling the paper for months, and at some point told the mayor, "Bull(expletive),
Bubba." The mayor called for an officer, and officer Christina Roth showed up. The Sept. 23 report, which describes
the office visit and the recording later that night, says Wood called the mayor a liar and was escorted out. …
The report does not say why the conversation was being recorded. … Kitts said the two weren’t told they
were being recorded, and under state law, there was no obligation to do so. …
Wood said a few
days later she got a call from a friend telling her about rumors concerning the conversation. She said she later learned
that the mayor had given the report to an Angel Fire Resort employee and had instructed the employee to give it to the company’s
chief executive officer. The resort is the paper’s major advertiser, she added.
Wood said she
got a copy of the report from the resort CEO.
previous in this category: Demagogue Domenici
Alleged Desecration of Bodies Investigated
Tue 10/25/05 at 6:56 amI think the important part of this story is not that bodies were burned — our culture says that’s hygienic, notdesecration. What’s important it that we turned that against the Taliban, that we taunted them for being "women" — yes,
repeatedly. We have a "Psy-Ops", a concept worthy of 1984, a corp whose job it is to fuck with people heads. Who is to say we
don’t have a domestic version of the same?
It is stunning and almost hilarious that Rumsfeld has said he wants to get to the
bottom of this. The taunts could have been written by him and, whichever commanding officer did write them must have thought he was doing
what his bosses — Rumsfeld and Duhbya — want. We need for officers and soldiers to come forward, to say, to hell with the Commander-
in-Chief, your loyalty is to the nation. Tell us what these bastards are making you do! mjh
U.S. Military Acts to Control Muslim Backlash After Incident in Afghanistan
By Bradley Graham,
Washington Post Staff Writer
Stephen Dupont, the Australian journalist who took the video, said the airborne troops who burned
the bodies indicated they had been ordered to do so purely to dispose of them. "They said to me, ‘We’ve been told to burn the
bodies because the bodies have been here for 24 hours and they’re starting to stink,’ " Dupont said in an interview on the
network’s Web site. "So for hygiene purposes, this is what we’ve got to do." It was later, he said, that the
psychological operations team decided to use the event for propaganda purposes. "They deliberately wanted to incite that much anger
from the Taliban, so the Taliban could attack them," he said. [mjh: who gave the order?]
USATODAY.com – Pentagon probing taped burning of bodies
Stephen Dupont, an Australian cameraman who shot the
video, said the troops who burned the bodies were U.S. Army paratroopers he joined during combat missions. He said that other American
soldiers used a loudspeaker later to goad Taliban members, calling them “cowardly dogs” and “lady boys” for not retrieving the bodies.
… Later, Dupont said, psychological operations troops gave the taunting statements over loudspeakers to anger and flush out other
Taliban.
previous in this category: Making Their Own Reality
Making Their Own Reality
Mon 10/24/05 at 8:53 pmA few conservative blogs take some delight in Democratic frustration at not
having the usual mugshot of Tom "The Hammer" DeLay ("I am the federal government"). Must be nice for DeLay to have
connections protecting him.
Actually, I’ll take the picture of the grinning fool who thinks he can fake his way out of this.
There are limits to "making your own reality." DeLay is a certifiable scoundrel who deserves shunning, if not imprisonment.
mjh
RedState.org
This is the best-looking mug shot I have ever seen. As such, it is an oddly compelling portrait of this oddly
compelling man at this oddly compelling moment in his life. On CNN this morning, correspondant (sic) Sean Callebs said, "[b]ut think
about it, at some point later today, pictures of DeLay’s mug shot could be plastered all over the TV, plastered all over the Internet.
Certainly something the GOP doesn’t want to see." Gosh, I’m not so sure. Tom DeLay has never looked better. He looks
bright, personable, confident–certainly not guilty. Who would have thunk a mug shot could turn out to be
good propaganda?
Smile May Foil Democrat Campaign Ads
DeLay, an 11-term Texas congressman and former pest exterminator famous for enforcing
GOP loyalty, faced a tough reelection campaign even before the indictment.
In the 2004 elections, DeLay won 55 percent of the
vote, a relatively weak showing for a veteran House leader. His challenger next year is expected to be former Rep. Nick Lampson,
who lost his seat in 2004 after he was forced to run in a new district under a redistricting plan pushed by DeLay.
For his mandatory booking Thursday, which caused him to miss voting on a gun industry bill popular in his home state, DeLay
did everything he could to prevent images of the event from being committed to film.
href="http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/000317.htm">mjh’s Blog: Counterpoint to Eulogies
It’s why a bona fide
moron like Tom Delay can brag about not having a passport (because, after all, why would anyone want to travel abroad and leave
”Amur’ca,” even for a day) and not be seen as the epitome of a blithering idiot, and why he could probably be elected again and
again in thousands of white dominated congressional districts in this country, and not merely in Texas.
Paul Krugman
Another answer may be that in modern America, style trumps substance. Here’s what Tom DeLay, the House majority
leader, said in a speech last week: "To gauge just how out of touch the Democrat leadership is on the war on terror, just close your
eyes and try to imagine Ted Kennedy landing that Navy jet on the deck of that aircraft carrier." To say the obvious, that remark
reveals a powerful contempt for the public: Mr. DeLay apparently believes that the nation will trust a man, independent of the facts,
because he looks good dressed up as a pilot. But it’s possible that he’s right.
[Speaker of the House Tom] DeLay recently revealed how he felt about rules of general applicability.
When he tried smoking a cigar in a restaurant on federal property, the manager told him it violated federal law. His response, according
to The Washington Post, was, "I am the federal government."
previous in this category: For President Under Duress, Body Language Speaks Volumes
Entries and comments feeds. 232 queries. 12.062 seconds. Back to Top