Who Cares What You Think?

Salon.com | ‘Who cares what you think?’ By Bill Hangley Jr., Salon.com

It has been almost three years since I spoke with the president of the United States, and I still get mail about it.

It was July 4, 2001, and we were both at one of those things that the late historian Daniel Boorstin would have labeled a ”pseudo-event:” A church picnic in Philadelphia, designed to help George W. Bush promote his faith-based policies. I was working at the time for a local nonprofit that had helped set it up, but I had some serious misgivings about the president’s performance up to that point, and being a part of the whole operation had left me feeling a bit like a pseudo-person. So when I had the chance to shake Bush’s hand, I said, ”Mr. President, I’m very disappointed in your work so far. I hope you only serve four years.”

His smiling response was swift: ”Who cares what you think?”

Democrats FOR Bush?

Democrats for Bush/Cheney 2004

I am a lifelong Democrat, and yes, I do work for a Democrat in the Arizona Legislature.

I started this site after talking with a former college friend and classmate, Josh from BushBlog2004, about how I’ve just been dismayed at how my party swayed from the ideals I hold so dear. He set up the site at my request, and when I see a story in the news or on the internet that proves my point again, I bring it here to share with a small corner of the world. I’m an avowed Democrat, I voted for Clinton twice as well as Gore. If some of my fellow Democrats could get passed their absolute hatred, they would be surprised to see how central Bush’s agenda really is. Do I agree with the President on every issue? No – I’m pro-choice, and I’m not happy at many of the environmental restrictions that have been rolled back, and the fiscal mismanagement is reason to be angry. But are we better off with him at the helm, are we a safer nation because of his actions in Iraq and the war on Terror. You bet your ass we are. The next time you want to shout AWOL – remember that merely 12 years ago we were screaming at Republicans for attacking our candidate for avoiding the draft. The next time you want to scream about the War in Iraq being an act of unilateralism, remember how we backed our Democratic President for going to NATO, not the UN, to oust Milosevic in the Bosnia.

It’s a reminder of just how far the Radical Right has pushed its agenda that a Democrat can refer to Bush as a Centrist. mjh

Right’s Wrong

Right’s right: His domestic failings aside, the

president is focused on this basic truth: We’re a nation at war by Jeff Gardner, Albuquerque Tribune Online

[The Left]

disingenuously raged about ”W’s rush to war” or deceitfully claimed W ”lied” about weapons.

Well, let me say this about that….[I]f the president believed the weapons were there, he wasn’t lying…. [Duhbya] is dead right about

the most important thing: We’re at war.

It’s so frustrating to read right-wing columnists like Jeff

Gardner. First, conservatives act as if they don’t run everything: the House, the Senate, and the White House (ie, all of the Executive

and Legislative Branches). As for the Judiciary, the radical right rails against ”activist judges” while doing their best to stack

the bench their way (while using the Legislature to curtail numerous rights). With a tight grip on all three branches of government,

arch-conservatives turn their ire on the media, the supposed liberal media that puts someone like Gardner on the front of the section and

may, just may, print someone like me a few pages back.

If Bush wasn’t lying about WMD (or tax cuts or the Patriot Act, ad nauseum),

then he is ill-informed, even ignorant and incurious (widely acknowledged). Why is that so much better in a President?

For at least 20

years, conservatives have framed and determined every aspect of public discourse. Everything must be expressed in their terms, by their

rules. We are at war because they say we are. Gardner uses two standard reactionary tactics: put words in your opponents’ mouths

(ridicule them for things they never said — reread his column to note all the little digs and jibes) and repeat exactly what other

conservatives say (stay on target, consistent and loyal). These are powerful techniques that the radical right uses to stifle discussion.

You’re with them or you’re against them.

Bush’s presidency is the crowning achievement of the radical Christian fundamentalist

right — our Taliban. And still they feel the need to berate, belittle and bully the Left. Real nice folks. It’s a shame they can’t

enjoy their near-total victory (and all the spoils). Better get what you can before the pendulum swings again, as we all know it will —

maybe even in November. mjh

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." — Sam Adams