Testosterone poisoning

Bush grows increasingly distant from women’s issues By Myriam Marquez, ORLANDO SENTINEL

Look at all that gloating testosterone. If ever there was an image that testifies to President Bush’s growing disconnect with women voters, it’s the bill-signing ceremony last week to ban a type of late-term abortion that Republicans have dubbed partial-birth abortion.

There was the president surrounded by smiling white men, all members of Congress. Not one woman in the bunch, even though this law will affect women with problem pregnancies first and foremost.

Where were women from Feminists for Life or other female-led groups that sought this ban? In their place – in the audience. …

The bill signing had Bush aide Karl Rove’s decidedly ham-handed imprints all over it. Rove is the darling of the religious right, and it looks as if the Bush administration has made a calculation to turn off independents and even some Democratic women who gave Bush their vote in 2000. Such a strategy seeks to capture about 4 million religious conservatives who stayed away in the last presidential election.

Eroding rights and freedoms

ABQjournal: Bush’s Abortion Ban Targets Pro-Choice
By Giovanna H. Rossi
Executive Director, NARAL Pro-Choice New Mexico

With the simple stroke of his pen last week, President Bush became the first president in American history to threaten doctors with jail terms for giving women sound medical advice.

The so-called ”Partial-Birth Abortion” Ban Act of 2003 signed Wednesday substitutes the ideology of anti-choice politicians for the judgment of medical professionals. In signing this deceptive legislation, President Bush has moved one step closer to ending a women’s freedom to choose.
Continue reading Eroding rights and freedoms

Ever expanding executive power

F.B.I.’s Reach Into Records Is Set to Grow By ERIC LICHTBLAU, NYTimes

A little-noticed measure approved by both the House and Senate would significantly expand the F.B.I.’s power to demand financial records, without a judge’s approval, from car dealers, travel agents, pawnbrokers and many other businesses, officials said on Tuesday. …

Officials said the measure, which is tucked away in the intelligence community’s authorization bill for 2004, gives agents greater flexibility and speed in seeking to trace the financial assets of people suspected of terrorism and espionage. It mirrors a proposal that President Bush outlined in a speech two months ago to expand the use of administrative subpoenas in terrorism cases.

Critics said the measure would give the federal government greater power to pry into people’s private lives.

This dramatically expands the government’s authority to get private business records,” said Timothy H. Edgar, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. “You buy a ring for your grandmother from a pawnbroker, and the record on that will now be considered a financial record that the government can get.”

Many changes go unnoticed

The Road to Preserving History

[T]he 1966 Department of Transportation Act say[s] that a federal highway project cannot destroy any historic area if there is a ”prudent and feasible alternative.” These words have blocked, for example, highways from paving parts of the French Quarter in New Orleans and Fisherman’s Wharf in San Francisco.

But as Congress begins negotiating a new transportation bill, the Bush administration and the highway lobby are trying to weaken those protections in the name of “streamlining” the process of building the nation’s roads.

Remember: Bush and the Radical Right aren’t out to change ONE thing; they are bent on changing everything as quickly as possible, before they lose power. mjh

More Republican Power

FOXNews.com – Politics – Senate Stalled by Partisan Divide

Senate Minority Whip Harry Reid (search), D-Nev., seized the floor and made it clear that he had no intention of relinquishing it. …

Reid’s move seeks to demonstrate the displeasure Democrats have over a Republican plan to force Democrats later this week to attend 30 hours of debate over judicial nominations in which they will not be allowed to speak.

Republicans said the goal of the 30-hour session, set to start Wednesday at 6:00 p.m., is to bring public attention to the fact that Democrats are blocking a handful of Bush nominees. …

Republicans were hoping the session would open up an opportunity for votes on Texas Supreme Court Justice Priscilla Owen, California Supreme Court Judge Janice Rogers Brown and California Superior Court Judge Carolyn Kuhl. Owen has already been blocked several times by Democratic procedural delays.

Alabama Attorney General William Pryor, Mississippi judge Charles Pickering and lawyer Miguel Estrada have also been prevented by Democrats from appellate court seats. Estrada withdrew his nomination after Republicans failed to break the Democratic blockade seven times.

Reid’s mini-marathon was a pre-emptive strike and a chance to give Republicans a little taste of their own medicine.

What are we going to spend 30 hours on? Not on the national debt, not on the budget deficit, not on the unemployed, not on poor people, not on the uninsured, but on four judges who we’ve turned down,” Reid said.

[Democrats point out that they’re approved more than 160 other judicial nominees and they say Republicans are only trying to make political points.]

See also Only 4 out of 172 Nominees

From the New York Times:

Lost amid the grandstanding about a ”crisis” in judicial nominations are the facts: 168 Bush nominees have been confirmed and only four rejected, a far better percentage than for President Bill Clinton.

The Republicans have no graciousness nor restraint in power; they simply have greed for more power. You’re either with them or you’re against them. So be it. mjh

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." — Sam Adams