York Worthy of ‘Honorable’ Title

ABQjournal: Letters to the Editor

I HAVE KNOWN Judge Wendy York for many years. She is, without a doubt, one of the finest, most qualified judges New Mexico has ever had. She is smart, wise, dedicated, efficient and judicious.

Her ethics are impeccable; her integrity without reproach. In a past judicial poll, her ratings by all who appeared before her were 96 percent to 98 percent in every category. Despite her many professional accomplishments, she conducts herself without a trace of arrogance.

If those who unfairly malign her over one decision out of thousands had done any research, they would have found that Judge York is eminently worthy of the title “honorable.”

MERRI RUDD
Bernalillo County Probate Judge, Albuquerque

When campaign finance reform was being debated, Republicans bellowed that money was equal to free speech, that limiting anyone’s right to give money to any cause was a violation of free speech (even though this means rich people have more free speech than poor people). Funny, I don’t see Republicans coming to the defense of York’s free speech right. mjh

The “Willie Horton” Ad Of 2004?

FactCheck.org The “Willie Horton” Ad Of 2004?

Republican group’s ad shows Osama, Kerry. It appeals to fear, and twists Kerry’s record on defense, intelligence, Iraq.

Summary

An ad by the Republican group “Progress for America Voter Fund ,” mostly funded by wealthy GOP donors, suggests Kerry can’t defend against terrorists “who want to kill us.” It shows images of Osama bin Laden and the attacks of September 11, 2001.

The ad claims Kerry has “a 30-year record of supporting cuts in defense and intelligence,” misleading charges that we’ve de-bunked before. It also accuses Kerry of “endlessly changing positions on Iraq,” a claim that is without factual basis.

Kerry responded with his own ad, quoting a New York Times editorial calling the Bush campaign’s recent statements about Kerry and terrorism “despicable.”

evangelical Christians control everything — god help us

Falwell says evangelicals control GOP, Bush’s fate By Scott Shepard, COX NEWS SERVICE

The Rev. Jerry Falwell said yesterday that evangelical Christians, after nearly 25 years of increasing political activism, now control the Republican Party and the fate of President Bush in the November election.

“The Republican Party does not have the head count to elect a president without the support of religious conservatives,” Falwell said at an election training conference of the Christian Coalition.

Falwell said evangelical Christians are now “by far the largest constituency” within the Republican Party, their route to dominance beginning in 1979 with his founding of the Moral Majority, a precursor to the Christian Coalition. …

Falwell expressed confidence in a Bush victory over Democratic Sen. John Kerry, adding, “You cannot be a sincere, committed born-again believer who takes the Bible seriously and vote for a pro-choice, anti-family candidate.” …

The speakers included:

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who said Bush’s re-election is critical because “the next president is going to appoint two, perhaps four, Supreme Court justices,” making it possible to reverse the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion-rights ruling.

‘this highly misleading ad’

FactCheck.org Bush Ad Twists Kerry’s Words on Iraq

Selective use of Kerry’s own words makes him look inconsistent on Iraq. A closer look gives a different picture.

Summary

Kerry has never wavered from his support for giving Bush authority to use force in Iraq, nor has he changed his position that he, as President, would not have gone to war without greater international support. But a Bush ad released Sept. 27 takes many of Kerry’s words out of context to make him appear to be alternately praising the war and condemning it.

Here we present this highly misleading ad, along with what Kerry actually said, in full context. [read more]

‘Bush for president of Iraq’

DodgeGlobe.com:Harris: Kerry’s message needs to be ‘It’s America, stupid’ 09/25/04

The real message is that Bush’s obsession with Iraq has left America off the radar in terms of our security, economy, health care and the rest. If Kerry can drill this point home, even if things improve in Iraq – and there is no indication that they will – things will get worse for Bush as voters react not with gratitude but with a wholly reasonable – and selfish – question: “What about us?”

Kerry can argue convincingly that for every dollar spent improving the lives of Iraqis, an American state, town or family has been shortchanged. And if terrorists strike again before the election, the ultimate effect of Bush’s misdirection of effort and money will be vividly apparent. Kerry will not have to say a word.

In short, Kerry’s message should be “It’s America, stupid.” It’s short, sweet and memorable, and it pivots well off the enduring ambiguity many Americans feel about the shifting justifications for the war in Iraq. …

In essence, Kerry should attempt to convince voters that he and Bush are effectively running for two different offices: Kerry for president of the United States, Bush for president of Iraq.

Bush’s syntactical slip-ups and factual vagueness

Bush still master of debating game – The Times of India

The biggest danger for Bush is no doubt his own syntactical slip-ups and factual vagueness. Several times during a press conference with Iraqi prime minister Iyad Allawi on Thursday, he referred to the “Afghan army” when he meant “Iraqi”. He confused terrorists Abu Nidal and Abu Abbas and even spoke of the “Soviet dinar” as the currency in Saddam’s Iraq.

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." — Sam Adams