The Buck Stops — Sorta

Update 13: Bush Takes Blame for Iraq Invasion, Intel –

Forbes.com

Bush has repeatedly noted that the decision to go to war was his responsibility. And he has acknowledged for more

than a year that most of the intelligence behind the claims of Saddam’s weapons programs turned out to be faulty. But he has

never linked the two so clearly and so personally.

Aw, he’s so noble. All if forgiven,

Duhbya. So what if the same team that misread and misled is still running the show — and as badly as ever. So what if before the

election you never recognized a single mistake in your presidency. Now a little humility/humanity plays well. mjh

One of Our Own Does Good

Jon KnudsenAfter a little cruise around the local

blogosphere, it appears I may get to be the first to congratulate amigo johnny_mango for

appearing in today’s Albuquerque Journal — on the front of a section, above the fold and with color photos, mind you. Damn, I even

scooped the Fix! (Though thousands will never know.)

Jim Scarantino calls Jon Knudsen

“the Damon Runyon of Nob Hill.” And while that’s almost lost on me, Jon has found the gold in the straw of daily life.

Mazel tov,

Jon.
peace, mjh

ABQjournal: Blogger Finds the Tidbits of Daily Life Fascinating By Isabel Sanchez

Jon Knudsen surveys life in its

details. Historical details, prosaic details, human-scale details, sunset-scale details.

mjh’s Blog: Local Man Makes Good

Albloggerque

In Christ We Trust?

In the paper this morning, a comics character tells Santa she wishes people would recognize

our nation was founded on “Christian principles with a broad tolerance towards other faiths.” I’m touched by that right-wing politically

correct notion of “broad tolerance” — ie, mind your place and we’ll put up with you.

Where exactly in the Constitution does one

read “In Christ We Trust” or “Christ Bless America”? I am aware of the very few references to god and a creator in our founding

documents, but where is Christ mentioned?

You understand the confusion. Christians aren’t merely monotheists, they’re monopoly-

theists. They accept the notion that the only way to god is through Jesus. Frankly, I find it hard to believe the gentle Jesus was so

arrogant. Still, with Jesus as the gatekeeper, all references to god must implicitly include Jesus. So it is that a nation that makes the

blandest references to an unspecified god must really worship Jesus.

Or maybe it’s just that Christians, like the Radical Right,

associate all that is good with themselves and all that is evil with others. That is, they deny their humanity and the humanity of others

— we are all flawed in good and bad ways. But, if you only have good on your side and, we agree, the Constitution is a “good” document,

it must be a “Christian” document. Nonsense.

I’ve never understood why anyone worships the god of the Old Testement — just read

Job or Issac. The old god is one mean and demanding being. Good news, everybody, there’s a New Testement with a sweet nice guy as it’s

protagonist. You’ll go to hell if you don’t fully accept that as fact.

My Messiah would surpass the very best teachers I’ve

ever had. S/he would say, “good for you for finding your own solution.” My Buddha would say, “damn, I wish I’d thought of that as a way

to enlightenment.” My Muhommad would say to the others, “you should see this kid — no one has ever asked that question before.”

Or, more likely, “where the hell did you get the idea that it is OK to push others around and take their stuff?” mjh

Mission Accomplished?

Read the following polls of

Iraqis and Americans (3 different polls). Note that half of Iraqis say the US invasion was wrong; about the same number of Americans

agree. But more than 2/3rds of Iraqis oppose our continued presence (77% according to the DOD).

Yet, we will stay and continue

dying and killing — adding to the ranks of those who hate us. Maybe BushCo shouldn’t be allowed to fuck things up further. Impeach the

whole incompetent gang. mjh

ABC News: Poll: Most Iraqis Oppose Troops’ Presence

More than

two-thirds of those [Iraqis] surveyed oppose the presence of troops from the United States and its coalition partners and less than half,

44 percent, say their country is better off now than it was before the war, according to an ABC News poll conducted with Time magazine

and other media partners. …

Half now say the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq was wrong, up from 39 percent in February 2004. …

A fourth of those surveyed, 26 percent, say U.S. forces should leave now, and another 19 percent say troops should leave after those

chosen in this week’s election take office. …

The poll was conducted by Oxford Research International face-to-face with 1,711

Iraqis age 15 and over from Oct. 8 to Nov. 22. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 2.5 percentage points.

DefenseLINK News: Poll Shows Nine in 10 Iraqis Want to Vote Dec.

15

A total of 77 percent of those [Iraqis] surveyed oppose the presence of coalition forces in Iraq, and almost half said they

believe there is a rationale for attacks on coalition forces, with 40 percent saying there is no excuse for such attacks.

CNN.com –

Poll: U.S. can win war, but won’t – Dec 13, 2005

Forty-eight percent of those [Americans] polled said they thought it was a

mistake to send U.S. troops to Iraq, as opposed to 54 percent of those polled last month. Fifty percent said it was not a mistake,

compared to 45 percent last month. …

The poll, released Tuesday, was conducted with 1,003 Americans who were interviewed by

phone. The sampling error varied from question to question, but none had a margin of error exceeding 4.5 percentage points.

Beyond The War Spin

Beyond The War Spin By E. J. Dionne Jr.

[T]he Democrats’ problem is not

just one of political tactics. It’s also rooted in a simple reality: Democrats in both houses of Congress have been divided on this war

from the very beginning. House Democrats are, on the whole, more dovish than Senate Democrats. And the party’s rank and file are, on the

whole, more dovish than its congressional wing.

There is no magic solution to this problem, and Republicans will continue to

exploit it. But if they do nothing else, Democrats have to stop being defensive in the face of Republican attacks. …

In any

event, why shouldn’t Democrats be divided on the war? So is the rest of the country. And so are Republicans.

What’s gone largely

unnoticed is that while Democrats show their divisions on the war in Congress, Republicans are more divided at the grass roots. …

Lush Limbaugh Really IS a Big Fat Idiot

class="mine">Obviously, I don’t agree with Lush Limbaugh’s political views. More importantly, I consider him an odious, vile being —

beyond a scoundrel. That anyone hangs on his words shocks me and saddens me about my fellow citizens. Dittoheads might as well tattoo

“moron” on their foreheads as allow this chump to shape their worldview. If you get all of your “information” from Lush and/or Fox,

you’re filling your mind with shit.

When I heard that peace advocates had been kidnapped by a previously unknown group, I

considered it might be the US government engaged in some PsyOps. See what happens when you govern through lies and deception? mjh

Christians Kidnapped in Iraq; Rush Limbaugh

is Pleased

Well, here’s why I like it. I like any time a bunch of leftist feel-good hand-wringers are shown

reality. So here we have these peace activists over there. I don’t care whether they’re Christian or not; they’re over there,

and as peace activists they’ve got one purpose. They’re over there trying to stop the violence. [mjh:

in reading this, you’re missing the appalling “fag” lisp Lush affected. He’s a pig.]

Follow the

link below if you want to read some comments. In particular, from the dittohead who marvels that Lush foresaw that people would quote

him. Duh.

Media Matters – Limbaugh on kidnapping of peace

activists in Iraq: “I’m telling you, folks, there’s a part of me that likes this”

It’s comical how all of these people can

get so worked up when they hear he said/she said bunk. It’s perpetual, and doesn’t hurt him in the least bit. If I were him I wouldn’t

give it a second thought either, I mean, who are you people anyway? – pharmd

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." — Sam Adams