Category Archives: loco

As Tip O’Neill never said, “All politics is loco.”

Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano

Synchronicity. Follow the first link for a dicussion of a new bill allowing Christians to refuse to serve others, which is sponsored by Dick Santorum (“‘Santorum? Is that Latin for asshole?'”), Clinton and Kerry. Follow the second for a discussion of Napolitano.

Napolitano is originally a New Mexican. I’m sure Richardson would rather people ignore her — there won’t be a Southwestern Ticket. mjh

The Nation | Blog | The Daily Outrage | Ari Berman

Instead of pandering to the get-right-with-God crowd, [Kerry] could instead follow the lead of Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano, who recently vetoed conscience clause legislation….

Colorado Luis

I can’t imagine that if Napolitano were a man, we wouldn’t be hearing her name as one of the top possible candidates in 2008, and with good reason given her electoral record.

Oh, The Payne

Greg Payne makes a big deal about Eric Griego’s campaign’s failure to include occupations of donors. Isn’t it odd that a state rep doesn’t know that the Campaign Reporting Act only requires occupations for donors of $250 or more (http://www.sos.state.nm.us/pdf/campaign.pdf, page 9)? I wonder what Payne’s paperwork looks like (http://www.docs.sos.state.nm.us/, click ETHICS Login). mjh

Wolf Haters

Boo-hoo for the poor wolf-haters who couldn’t get adequate representation in public meetings like the one held in Reserve, in Catron county, not a liberal hotbed. But, fortunately, they didn’t need public meetings if politicians will rush to kiss their asses.

The late Joe Skeen was a tireless wolf opponent. Steve Pearce may feel the same way, or he may just realize how valuable those non-conserving conservative supporters can be. Money buys access to power. mjh

ABQjournal: Wolf Recovery Plan Update on Hold By Tania Soussan, Journal Staff Writer

Efforts to update a recovery plan for endangered Mexican gray wolves have been put on hold indefinitely, delaying decisions about whether to relax rules of the Southwest’s wolf reintroduction program.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service suspended meetings of the recovery planning team and has no date set to resume the work, said Tracy Scheffler, a recovery biologist and primary liaison for the team. …

[E]nvironmentalists also are criticizing the Fish and Wildlife Service for sending high-level staff to meetings called by Rep. Steve Pearce, R-N.M., to discuss a five-year review of the wolf program.

Pearce’s staff organized the meetings in Glenwood and Socorro for ranchers, hunters and guides who said they couldn’t express their concerns and opinions adequately at earlier public open houses held by the wolf recovery team.

Dave Parsons, a biologist and former leader of the wolf program, said the meetings gave wolf opponents access to higher-level decision makers than other members of the public got at the open houses.

Craig Miller of Defenders of Wildlife said the meetings illustrate the “sweetheart relationship” between the livestock industry and the Bush administration.

A Poke in the Eye

Albuquerque sits in a magical location under a perfect sky. The Sandia Mountains loom large and close, the crest a mile above us and not 10 miles away, defining our eastern limit. Light and shadow play over that convoluted face all day. Where else do people look east at sunset?

From all over town, one can see the great divide of the Rio Grande flanked by the bosque, the riparian woods that survive because they are in the city, while much of the rest has perished. That fertile band slowly changes from chartreuse to green to gold then brown and gray before starting over.

To the north we see Christ’s Blood, and Redondo amid the mountains of Jemez, and, perhaps, the severed head of Cabezon.

Looking west, we see the escarpment, a lava wall, and the 5 volcanoes that produced it (from south to north: JA cone, Black Cone, Vulcan (the largest), Butte and Bond [thanks, APS!]). Volcanoes! This isn’t Hawai’i or Italy. That lava made rich soil and drew the artists whose works are in the way of someone’s faster commute.

Beyond our little volcanoes, 80 miles away, Turquoise Mountain, one of the four pillars of Dine’tah, stands above El Malpais, the dried blood of Big Monster (whose head is Cabezon), and the Zuni Mountains, recovered now from clear-cutting a century ago.

The eye glides south, stealing past Sierra Ladrones, Tomé Hill and Cielo Los Lunas. Lost in the layers, beyond sight but in mind, lie the San Mateos, San Augustin and Grandfather Gila, whose wolves have come home. Listen for a moment.

With so much timeless beauty around us, flowing into us even in the middle of town, why do we let someone poke us in the eye with a sharp stick? I’m talking about the billboards and cell towers that puncture this magnificent vista every way you turn.

These landmarks are our ancient heritage and our commonwealth. They nurture each of us every day. The landscape makes our home unique. Why do we let anyone diminish this magic? How can we sacrifice our communal good like this?

The Pragmatist will say, hey, it goes with the territory, just another feature of urban life (even though billboards and stunningly-ugly cell towers spread across empty terrain in all directions). Why do we have to give up the good that was here before us to have the benefits of a city? What kind of city requires destruction of the long view? Do people select their homes for the really great billboards nearby? Do you plan your drive to be sure you don’t miss that great billboard along Menaul? Do you think billboards contribute more to your life than they take from it? I don’t.

Billboards aren’t just along the Interstates. A block from my home a three-sided billboard hawks crap I’ll never buy. What about the irony of the beer billboards? They should have a note asking drinking drivers not to throw their bottles on the street. Don’t know where your next bland meal is coming from? Just keep one eye on the billboards, one eye on the road.

beautiful?As for the newer scourge of cell towers, why do they seem untouched by human hands? Does efficiency have to be ugly? Can’t we have an Eiffel Cell Tower or, better, repeaters hidden in street lamps and on top of buildings?
Oh, but ingenuity requires money and care. Don’t expect someone who thinks of your eyeballs as a commodity, your attention as an asset, to care about the long view.

At this point, someone mutters “socialist,” perhaps while drawing a flag tighter around his shoulders. “Private property rights,” he snarls, “the power of the market,” as if Capitalism is pure good. You don’t have the right to poke me in the eye. No one has the right to turn this great place into just another place. What are the moral values of someone who would destroy la vista? Or one who would let it be destroyed.

We are letting a few take our unique place from all of us. They will not stop until every square inch produces holy revenue. The place means nothing to them. They cannot value anything without a price.

The small group that opposes you counts on your apathy, your lethargy, and their well-placed investments. Tell them our home isn’t adspace. We have to stop them and reverse the damage, restore the public space. Love it or lose it.

The mayoral race has started. Where do the candidates stand on this?

This is our commonwealth ? don’t sell it, don’t give it away. mjh

Over at www.dukecityfix.com, my friend Johnny_Mango has written about a huge new billboard on Central and others around the State Fair Grounds (“Expo”). He said it well and with the love of someone who thinks we can do better. Read his entry for a soothing antidote to my screed.

See also The Cosmic Twins Battle on Turquoise Mountain.

The Duke City Fix Blog Collective

It’s official. A new blog collective (like a borg collective but with less hardware) has started:
Duke City Fix

You’ll recognize many of the names involved, including mine. I’ll be writing a weekly column called “Media Watch” (I’ve already got a few entries there). Look for it every Thursday — but check out TheFix every day for diverse writing and photos all around Albuquerque, New Mexico. mjh

Right and Wrong at Once

It’s not cheap to defend the constitution,” Mike McEntee said without a trace of irony.

Remember McEntee? It’s been years since he violated city law by running a blatantly partisan campaign as “the only real conservative” Republican in the race. He also got in trouble for violating federal law, which limits federal employees from engaging in PARTISAN campaigns. Note he broke two laws at once, while trying to capitalize on the Radical Right’s advances.

McEntee seems to be a right-winger who flaunts local and federal law and continues to battle in court long after it is over while covering his self-serving with lofty invocations of The Constitution (give that man a flag to wrap himself in). I’m surprised Bush hasn’t nominated him as a judge and DeLay hasn’t hired him as an aide. mjh

Federal Times

Employees as candidates

The rules on seeking political office are more complex. Employees can run for office only if the election is nonpartisan. But there are exceptions. If an employee lives in Washington, or one of its surrounding suburbs, or in one of 12 other communities in Alaska, Arizona, California, Georgia, Tennessee and Washington state where a large number of residents are federal employees, he can run for office in partisan campaigns, but only as an independent.

Even when an election is nonpartisan, the Hatch Act can trip up federal employees.

For instance, Mike McEntee, an air traffic controller for the Federal Aviation Administration ran for mayor of Albuquerque, N.M., in 2001. Candidates for local office in that city are listed on the ballot without party affiliation, so McEntee’s campaign was within the bounds of the Hatch Act. In fact, he had already served on the city council after being elected in a nonpartisan election.

But the race for mayor was competitive, and McEntee’s opponents began emphasizing their republican — not Republican Party — ideology. In response, McEntee identified himself as a republican in his campaign literature after local newspapers began referring to him as a conservative republican.

OSC charged McEntee with violating the Hatch Act. He ultimately served a four-month suspension and since has spent more than $100,000 on attorneys to appeal his suspension. His appeal is pending before the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.

McEntee said that when he referred to himself as a conservative republican, he did not mean he was running as a member of the Republican Party. “In a partisan race, the parties choose the candidate to represent them. The party was not involved in selecting me to run,”? McEntee said. “I used the term republican as a way of describing my ideology.”

transmission lines across the caldera

ABQjournal: Caldera Case Now in Fed CourtBy Adam Rankin

The energy company that wants to build a geothermal power plant in the heart of the Valles Caldera National Preserve is taking its case to federal court in an effort to gain access to geothermal wells drilled decades ago.

In an ongoing property rights conflict that has attracted the attention of Congress, GeoProducts of New Mexico filed the lawsuit on Thursday in federal court seeking to force the trust that manages the land to allow the company to use the wells it considers integral to its plan to develop the energy source.

“The trust has consistently claimed that we don’t have the right to use those wells, which is nonsense, we think,” said Ken Boren, president of GeoProducts of New Mexico. …

The trust is adamantly opposed to any energy development on the preserve and argues that building a power plant and associated transmission lines across the caldera would run counter to the intent of Congress, which paid $101 million in 2000 for 89,000 acres to establish the land as a working ranch and natural preserve. …

GeoProducts holds the lease on about 12.5 percent of the mineral rights beneath the caldera. Boren said unless the government agrees to what he and the mineral rights owners feel is a fair market price for their share of the minerals, GeoProducts plans to go ahead with its intention of building a full-scale power plant in the preserve’s southwest corner.

So, these folks are blackmailing you and me: give us $15 million for mineral rights or we’ll build a huge power plant and power lines in this beautiful area. Mineral rights they acquired for pennies from you and me. This kind of scam shames all capitalists. Have some decency, please.

Still, we must enjoy the irony that they will use “alternative energy” to screw everything up. mjh