I pass along this Flash animation recommended by Lisa T: God is not
a Republican (Or a Democrat.) Sojourners : Election 2004. I’ll add a link to Mark Fiore’s Animated Political Cartoons! (Fiore did the ‘god’ animation —
he has something new every week).
All this god-crap pushes me deeper into atheism. Do ‘take back your faith’ — and get it out of my
face. mjh
Category Archives: Election
Two Good Letters RE: The Not-So-Swift
Opinion > Kerry and the Swift Boat Ads (6 Letters)”
href=”http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/24/opinion/l24swift.html?
ex=1251086400&en=4c94acc5b848c744&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland”>The New York Times > Opinion > Kerry and the Swift
Boat Ads (6 Letters)
To the Editor:
John Kerry fought in the war and then returned to try to convince our government to stop
the endless and needless bloodshed.
That was an honorable thing to do. Those who criticize him for learning from his experience in the
field and then using that experience to help the antiwar effort do a great disservice to those patriots who forced our government to end
an unjust war.
Marc J. Osterweil
New Kingston, N.Y., Aug. 22, 2004
—
To the Editor:
An Aug. 21 news analysis suggests that
John Kerry made a strategic error by not promptly rebutting the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth’s attacks. But might not he have made a
principled decision to stick to the high road and to resist efforts to drag his campaign into the mud? More important is why many news
outlets reported the Swift boat veterans’ allegations as if they were true, or why tapes of veterans “speaking coolly and directly to
the camera” found their way into TV news reports.
The real problem is not with Mr. Kerry’s decision but with the fact that the press
effectively provided free campaign advertising for his attackers. Perhaps hoping to appear balanced, the press has once again failed to
investigate and report the facts.
Richard B. Miller
Bloomington, Ind., Aug. 21, 2004
The writer is the director of the Poynter
Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions, Indiana University.
Quote of the Week
Washington > Nemesis: In a New Book, Buchanan Chastises
Another Bush” href=”http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/22/politics/22buchanan.html?pagewanted=print&position=”>The New York Times >
Washington > Nemesis: In a New Book, Buchanan Chastises Another Bush
Calling the invasion “the greatest strategic blunder in 40
years,” Mr. Buchanan writes, “If prudence is the mark of a conservative, Mr. Bush has ceased to be a conservative.” …
“He has
a following in conservative circles,” said Paul Weyrich, a veteran conservative organizer. “It is not what it once was just because the
religious right is not particularly enamored with him. But it is going to have an effect.”
Even Libertarians Make Mistakes
Left and Right, seen as polarized, in same sorry rut by David Boaz
And the No.
1 way liberals and conservatives are alike: Both think they can run your life better than you can.
Liberals want to raise taxes
because they can spend your money better than you can. They don’t believe in school choice because you’re not capable of choosing a
school for your children. They think they can handle your healthcare, your retirement and your charitable contributions better than you
can.
—
David Boaz is executive vice president of the Cato Institute and author of ”Libertarianism: A Primer” (Free Press,
1997). This article first appeared in the Los Angeles Times.
Bullshit, Boaz. I don’t speak for anyone but myself.
However, as a liberal, I have no interest in running anyone else’s life. I do believe there are some things best done by government and
that everyone who can should pay some share of those costs. I believe in the commonwealth. I’m certain that Duhbya has disproven the
trickle-down, rising tide, piss-on-you-Jack theory.
You may want to read the rest of Boaz’s column. He is very balanced in
discrediting liberals and conservatives; only he knows and speaks the truth. mjh
Far From Balanced
The Albuquerque Journal, like many
publications and TV news operations, attempts to be balanced in their election coverage. Often an article about Bush will appear next to
an article about Kerry. In each article, the other side will get a paragraph or two for rebuttal. Balance is measured in number of words
(or seconds on the TV).
Look at the front page of today’s Albuquerque Journal:
front page
As you see for yourself, we have a huge, flattering picture of Bush above which he is quoted in a huge headline:
‘We’re Making Progress.’ Now, to balance this, on the same page, above the fold, we also have an article that might seem to be
about Kerry — at least his name is prominently in the headline: Kerry’s Visit Costs Drivers. Read the article to learn that it
has almost nothing to do with Kerry, though the headline does manage to convey something negative about him. This article barely deserves
to be in the A section; it is certainly not front-page news.
I’m not quite blaming the reporter, who could have written a more
interesting article if he extended his story to account for what all of these political visits cost everyone. It is the editor who choses
to put this trivial article on the front page and who writes the headline (‘Security Measures Cost Some Citizens More Than Others’ is
more accurate) — it’s the editors who control what you and I see and the impressions we take away from the news.
Fair and balanced?
Far from it. mjh
Dick, Go ‘Cheney’ Yourself!
Dick Cheney came to town — to
insular, conservative Rio Rancho (which could be anywhere in Arizona or Texas) — not the University of New Mexico campus. I had to say
hello with a new sign on my roof: Dick, Go Cheney Yourself! mjh
Sharpton Had Something Important to Say
Sharpton didn’t get much coverage, except to say that he departed from his
script and roused the crowd. His prepared speech is worth reading, but his departures are also important. mjh
[scripted] DNC speech Rocky Mountain News: Election
Tonight, we stand with those freedoms at risk and our security as citizens in
question. I have come here tonight to say, that the only choice we have to protect and preserve our freedoms at this point in history
is the election of John Kerry as the president of the United States.
I stood with both John Kerry and John Edwards on over 30
occasions during the primary season. I debated them. I watched them. I observed their deeds. I am convinced that they are men who say
what they mean and mean what they say.
I am also convinced that at a time, when there is a vicious spirit in the body politic of
this country that attempts to undermine America’s freedoms — our civil rights, and civil liberties — we must leave this city and go
forth and organize this nation toward victory for John Kerry and John Edwards in November. This is not just about winning an election,
it’s about preserving the principles upon which this nation was founded. …
We are also faced with the prospect, in the next
four years, that two or more of the Supreme Court Justice seats will become available. This year, as we celebrated the anniversary of
Brown vs. the Board of Education, this court voted 5 to 4 on critical issues of women’s rights and civil rights. It is frightening to
think that the gains of the civil and women’s rights movements of the last century could be reversed if this administration sits in the
White House for four more years.
This is not about a party. It is about living up to the promise of America.
Ex-Kerry rivals rouse the crowd By Marc Humbert,
The Associated Press
[In his unscripted remarks, he] repeatedly slammed the Republican administration.
”Mr. President, the
reason we are fighting so hard, the reason we took Florida so seriously, is our right to vote wasn’t gained because of our age,”
Sharpton said. ”Our vote was soaked in the blood of martyrs, soaked in the blood of (civil rights activists) Goodman, Chaney and
Schwerner, soaked in the blood of four little girls in Birmingham. This vote is sacred to us. This vote can’t be bargained away. This
vote can’t be given away.
”In all due respect, Mr. President, read my lips: Our vote is not for sale.”
He drew one of the
biggest responses when he said: ”The issue of government is not to determine who may sleep together in the bedroom, it’s to help
those that might not be eating in the kitchen.”
BET.com – Sharpton’s Long Speech Left Them Jumping for Joy
and Wanting More
”Mr. President, you said would we have more leverage if both parties got our votes, but we didn’t come this
far playing political games,” Sharp said, referring to Bush’s recent remarks to African Americans at the National Urban League.
”It was those that earned our vote that got our vote. We got the Civil Rights Act under a Democrat. We got the Voting Rights Act
under a Democrat. We got the right to organize under Democrats.”
For the past 30 years, African-Americans have given at least 80 percent of their vote – 90 percent in 2000 – to the Democratic
nominee for president. The more the GOP has veered to the right, the less successful it has been in appealing to Black voters. Bush
was elected with 8 percent of the African-American vote in 2000, the lowest percentage since the 1964 campaign of Arizona Sen. Barry
Goldwater.