Oh, Joy! More billboards, not fewer

Fri 08/31/07 at 5:59 am

ABQjournal Metro: City Adding Bus Shelters, By Lloyd Jojola, Journal Staff Writer

Albuquerque will get new bus shelters as part of an agreement with Lamar Transit Advertising.

“We’ve really had a great need for shelters, and funding has always been problematic,” Mayor Martin Chávez said at a Thursday news conference.

The City Council earlier this month approved a bus advertising contract with Lamar. As part of the deal, Lamar will build new bus shelters.

“In return,” Chávez said, “they get to put advertisements on them…”

Of the 2,814 bus stops in the city, 155 have shelters, according to the Transit Department.

About 100 new shelters will be built over the year. They will be lighted at night, using energy collected from the sun. [mjh: making this a *green* thumb in your eye!]

At the very least, the lighting on these eyesores should be restricted to times the buses run, not 24 hours a day. mjh


Repressed Republicans

Thu 08/30/07 at 7:25 am

Mr. Craig’s Secret - washingtonpost.com

Idaho voters could have a say in whether Mr. Craig continues in office, since his term is up next year. He has not yet announced whether he will run for reelection. But some in the Republican Party can’t seem to push him under a bus fast enough. Maybe that’s because the affair is another nightmare of hypocrisy come true: Once again, the party that embraces a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage and blocks laws that would stop discrimination against homosexuals finds itself with a loyal foot soldier who votes one way and allegedly acts another. Mr. Craig voted for the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996. He voted for a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage in 2004. Last year, he supported an Idaho constitutional amendment that prohibits gay marriage and civil unions. Mr. Craig is yet another willing accomplice in the machinery of intolerance that has stunted the lives of many gay men and lesbians. Maybe even his own.


Tonguex-tried

Thu 08/30/07 at 6:47 am

ABQjournal Opinion: Letters to the Editor
Let’s Pronounce ‘Tiguex’ Right

THE SAD passing of my longtime friend Millie Santillanes has brought to mind another sadness, which I would like to see rectified at long last.

In conjunction with Millie’s many civic accomplishments, it has been mentioned that she was connected to Tiguex Park. In stating that, once again news anchors and reporters are afforded the chance to perpetuate an incorrect pronunciation of the park’s name in calling it “Tee-gway!”

To do so dishonors not only Millie, but also the late historian Eleanor Sewell, who named it to celebrate the original people and settlement on the site, and it is offensive the many modern day descendants of that ancient civilization. …

People— including media people— living here should honor the true founders and first settlers of this place. They were the Tiguex (Tee-wesh), that was the name of their settlement here and “Tee-wesh” is the only pronunciation. …

RICK HUFF
Albuquerque

www.abqjournal.com/opinion/letters/588943opinion08-25-07.htm

New Mexico is fraught with pronunciation landmines like Madrid and Thoreau (in case you thought it was limited to anglo mangling of Spanish.) I’ve always avoided talking about “that park near the Albuquerque Museum” because it looks like a French word, and French spelling and pronunciation have no connection in my mind. Still, I like the modern sound of “to go.” mjh

PS: I’ve also heard “Jemez” as “Jemesh.”

Tiguex pueblo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tiguex, also referred to as Coofor or Alcanfor, was the pueblo commandeered by the army of Francisco Vásquez de Coronado for the winters of 1540-41 and 1541-42 on the west bank of the Rio Grande, north of present-day Albuquerque, N.M. The ruins of that pueblo are now known as Santiago, located on the boundary between housing developments of Bernalillo and Rio Rancho, N.M. About 300 yards to the west is the site of the only proven Coronado campsite, discovered in a road-widening project in 1986.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiguex_pueblo


Home, Sweet Home

Wed 08/29/07 at 6:06 am

Twenty years ago today, we moved into our new home. Two decades! Like every oldtimer, I shake my head in wonder at the passage of time. It’s still great to be here. mjh


No Voter Left Behind

Tue 08/28/07 at 6:06 am

As we try to fix the madness that could result in primaries at the Winter Solstice, I think past voting should be a factor. For example, in which states is the highest percentage of eligible voters registered? Of registered voters, which states had the highest percentage participation in the previous presidential election? Aren’t those states full of good citizens? Let’s reward participation (and punish lack of it): If you want a voice in the primaries *next* time, then vote *this* time.

I would further propose 5 sets of primaries with 10 states in each.

Finally, let’s experiment in the primaries with instant runoffs (you vote for your first, second and third choice) and a “none of the above” option (abstaining, if you prefer). I’d love to see the totals for “none of the above” in any election. mjh

A race to the start | Dallas Morning News by Carl P. Leubsdorf

“This might be the last gasp of the current system,” says veteran Democratic activist Mark Siegel. “The question is: What are the parties going to do about it?”

To do something, they’d have to start by spring. Republicans set their rules four years ahead, so next September’s Republican National Convention would have to approve any 2012 changes. The Democrats can wait, but, ultimately, both parties have to agree.

In the first sign that something might actually happen, a top Republican rules expert said this week that GOP officials hope to push approval next year of the so-called Delaware plan. It divides the states into four groups by size and schedules primaries and caucuses at one-month intervals, starting in early March with the smallest ones and ending with the 12 biggest, including Texas.

It is designed to keep the nomination fight open until the big states vote, making more states meaningful players and taking away the advantage the best-known, most heavily funded candidates now have. Lesser-known hopefuls would be able to become contenders with strong showings in smaller, less-expensive states.

And it would prevent one of the current system’s biggest dangers, that someone could win a nomination without sufficient scrutiny.

Tom Sansonetti, who headed the GOP’s rules committee when a similar effort was blocked in 2000 by Bush strategist Karl Rove, said he expects the rules panel to discuss the Delaware plan at January’s Republican National Committee meeting.


Random Flickr Photos

Sun 08/26/07 at 6:06 am

Someone created a tool that generates a random set of flickr photos that changes daily. I look at my random set each day — perhaps you’ll enjoy it, too. mjh

www.flickr.com

mjhinton's random set photoset mjhinton’s random set photoset

random set - a photoset on Flickr
www.flickr.com/photos/mjhinton/sets/72157601322709182/


Blind to Protest, Dissent or Disagreement: You are with Duhbya or you are against him

Thu 08/23/07 at 8:21 pm

White House Manual Details How to Deal With Protesters - By Peter Baker, Washington Post Staff Writer

Not that they’re worried or anything. But the White House evidently leaves little to chance when it comes to protests within eyesight of the president. As in, it doesn’t want any.

A White House manual that came to light recently gives presidential advance staffers extensive instructions in the art of “deterring potential protestors” from President Bush’s public appearances around the country.

Among other things, any event must be open only to those with tickets tightly controlled by organizers. Those entering must be screened in case they are hiding secret signs. Any anti-Bush demonstrators who manage to get in anyway should be shouted down by “rally squads” stationed in strategic locations. And if that does not work, they should be thrown out.

But that does not mean the White House is against dissent — just so long as the president does not see it. In fact, the manual outlines a specific system for those who disagree with the president to voice their views. It directs the White House advance staff to ask local police “to designate a protest area where demonstrators can be placed, preferably not in the view of the event site or motorcade route.” [mjh: ALL of America is a “Free Speech Zone.”]

Not bragging, but I may have gotten closer to Bush with a protest sign than anyone else in America. I stepped out into the street with my hastily made sign and thrust it towards his car that passed within 10 feet. Granted, the sign was small. Read the whole excellent adventure: mjh’s blog — Send Bush to Mars!. mjh

Patriot Act is UnAmerican


Brutal ‘Dog Men’

Thu 08/23/07 at 9:31 am

A Blood Sport Exposed - washingtonpost.com

“Dog men,” they call themselves, the untold numbers of breeders and fighters. With their pastime illegal everywhere in the country, they stay in touch through secret networks and underground magazines. They say they love to compete. They tell themselves the pit bulls love it, too.

“The reason for the Michael Vick thing . . . is because athletes have a keen insight into courage and determination, which is what pit bulls possess,” said Bill Stewart, a breeder in Romance, Ark., who publishes the Pit Bull Reporter. “Athletes understand better than anyone what dogfighting is about. It’s about two highly conditioned athletes going at each other with everything they have to try to win. It’s the purest form of combat on earth.”

To dog men, all dogs are curs except the American pit bull terrier, descended from canines used in English blood sports centuries ago.

Animal-protection workers and others who have infiltrated the underworld of pit bull fighting say dog men train their animals for weeks before bouts, perverting the dietary and fitness sciences to build ferocious canine maulers.

They perform unlicensed veterinary surgery on the grievously wounded and stud their battle-scarred champs, often for fees in the hundreds of dollars. A pit bull in its prime with a string of victories can fetch $10,000 or more. To save on upkeep and preserve the breed, weaklings are destroyed, either painlessly or with a vengeance.

The illegal bouts, in carpeted 16-by-16-foot pits surrounded by four-foot walls, are staged in hidden venues, usually with no more than a few dozen spectators allowed. Elaborate, decades-old rules are followed. Bets are posted in cash, sometimes five figures. Afterward, dog men tend to their pit bulls’ injuries, provided the animals fought gamely. They won’t tolerate dogs that quit.

Young pit bulls that survive training become “match dogs,” weighing 35 to 55 pounds and fighting in weight classes. With a pile of cash riding on the outcome, a regulation match is officiated by a referee. A typical bout lasts 45 minutes to an hour, usually ending when one of the bloodied combatants is too torn and gouged to go on.

Dog men have too much invested in their animals to let them fight to the death, so fatalities in the pit are rare. But grave, disfiguring wounds are the norm.

“At the top level, there are probably several thousand guys,” said John Goodwin, manager of animal-fighting issues for the Humane Society of the United States. “When you include the guys who are part of organized dogfighting but don’t have quite as sophisticated an operation as we saw in Surry County, we’re talking about upwards of 40,000.” …

About 15 years ago, after it became fashionable in the urban thug life to be seen with a menacing pit bull, spur-of-the-moment street fights became common. [One gang member strutting with his nasty pit bull sees another, egos swell, and soon they’re in a vacant building, the dogs ripping into each other while still on leash chains. “Street fighting,” these impromptu bouts are called.]

In this realm, to train them, owners often whip their pit bulls, burn them with cigarettes, feed them gunpowder and jalapeño peppers until they turn unremittingly vicious. Authorities said a dog man’s pit bulls normally are safe for people to handle, while a street dog usually will attack anything that moves, except the “alpha male” who abused it. …

Because urban pit bull fights usually are spontaneous, police said, making arrests is difficult unless owners are caught in the act. Based on the dozens of battered and scarred pit bulls abandoned or seized in the Washington area every year, however, animal-protection advocates say street fighting is common. …

Generally, the process of turning a well-bred pit bull pup into a fighter begins when the dog is 16 months old, said Sakach, who witnessed a dozen organized dogfights as an undercover investigator in the 1980s and 1990s. He now trains enforcement agencies on how to root out dog men.

The “prospect” is pitted in bouts against an over-the-hill fighter in the kennel, sometimes with filed-down teeth, a dog unable to do much damage.

“These are short combats, about 10 to 15 minutes,” said Sakach, “during which the prospect is going to get lots and lots of lavish praise. The point is, you want the dog to start associating praise with what its master wants it to do, which is fight.”

After a few months, this “schooling” process turns deadly serious, as the dog begins preparing for its “game test,” a full-fledged bout with a kennel-mate in its prime, to measure how much punishment the young pit bull can take. The prospect trains for six to eight weeks, hour upon hour — running, swimming, jumping, chomping — until test day arrives.

“The idea here is, you want your prospect to get hurt,” Sakach said. “You don’t want it hurt so bad that it’s going to die. But you want it hurt badly enough so that it really understands pain and exhaustion. Because you want to know if your dog’s going to quit.”

For a prospect that fails, life is short. “If they’re not going to make money for you,” Sakach said, “then you don’t want them around.”
- - - - -

mjh’s blog — “Barbaric! Hear me!”


How Does a Bestseller Happen?

Wed 08/22/07 at 2:24 pm

Tim Ferriss: How Does a Bestseller Happen? A Case Study in Hitting #1 on The New York Times - Media on The Huffington Post

The odds seem impossible: there are more than 200,000 books published each year in the U.S., and less than five percent ever sell more than 5,000 copies.


Avis Habilis

Wed 08/22/07 at 11:21 am

I’ve written about the peanut-loving scrub jays in our backyard (mjh’s blog — m jay h). This week, I watched a young grackle use a respectable level of ingenuity. Following the lead of the scrub jays, the grackle landed on the patio table and picked up a nut. It pecked at the shell briefly. Then it carried the shell over to a bowl of water and dropped it in. It pulled the shell out, shook it, dropped it in again. The grackle repeated this a few times until the shell began to open. Voila! This may explain the empty shells in the birdbath. mjh

smart grackle

(Two more photos with this one on Flickr.)


I found a way to agree with Samuelson

Wed 08/22/07 at 8:56 am

The gist of Robert Samuelson’s message on Global Warming seems to be: We’ve done nothing so far, so let’s not start doing something now! And stop picking on the naysayers!

That last part is hard to take. Mercifully, I don’t recall anything Samuelson has written about Iraq. Did I miss him saying we’ve accomplished nothing in the Middle East, so why start (a war) now? Was he singing in praise of dissent when others of his ilk were raging against the traitors in their midst?

To find a way to agree with Samuelson, I’ve replace “climate change” and “global warming” in this essay with “the War on Terror.” mjh

Robert J. Samuelson - Global WarmingWar on Terror Simplicities - washingtonpost.com

If you missed Newsweek’s story, here’s the gist. A “well-coordinated, well-funded campaign by contrarian scientists, free-market think tanks and industry has created a paralyzing fog of doubt around the War on Terror.” This “denial machine” has obstructed action against the War on Terror and is still “running at full throttle.” The story’s thrust: Discredit the “denial machine,” and the country can start the serious business of fighting the War on Terror. The story was a wonderful read, marred only by its being fundamentally misleading.

The War on Terror debate’s great unmentionable is this: We lack the technology to get from here to there. Just because Arnold Schwarzenegger wants to cut terrorism 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 doesn’t mean it can happen. At best, we might curb the growth of terrorists.

Consider a 2006 study from the International Energy Agency. Using present policies, it projected that the War on Terror would more than double by 2050; developing countries would account for almost 70 percent of the increase. The IEA then simulated an aggressive, global program in the War on Terror Under this admitted fantasy, the War on Terror in 2050 would still slightly exceed 2003 levels.

Even the fantasy would be a stretch. In the United States, it would take massive regulations, higher energy taxes or both. Democracies don’t easily adopt painful measures in the present to avert possible future problems. Examples abound. Since the 1973 Arab oil embargo, we’ve been on notice to limit dependence on insecure foreign oil. We’ve done little. In 1973, imports were 35 percent of U.S. oil use; in 2006, they were 60 percent. For decades we’ve known of the huge retirement costs of baby boomers. Little has been done. One way or another, our War on Terror is likely to be symbolic, ineffective or both. …

But the overriding reality seems almost un-American: We simply don’t have a solution for this problem of terrorism. As we debate it, journalists should resist the temptation to portray the War on Terror as a morality tale — as Newsweek did — in which anyone who questions its gravity or proposed solutions may be ridiculed as a fool, a crank or an industry stooge. Dissent is, or should be, the lifeblood of a free society.
- - - - -

Samuelson is impressive for how much mendacity he can fit into just one column.  See Mary’s excellent Global Warming Naysayers for a discussion of other areas where we should say, “Robert J Samuelson, J’Accuse”.  

  • Samuelson, sadly, often merits being called out.  Just over a year ago, J’accuse! Distorting reality in “Global Warming’s Real Inconvenient Truth”, which was about a Samuelson OPED that “has factual errors, misleading statements and conclusions, and provides a counterproductive path for thinking about and achieving change for a better future.”
    - - - - -

    [mjh: I feel closest to Samuelson when I read the following.]

    Robert J. Samuelson - Farewell, Comma, He Said - washingtonpost.com


    • Point Proved

    Wed 08/22/07 at 7:57 am

    ABQjournal Opinion: Letters to the Editor
    NCLB Goes Against Laws of Statistics
    I JUST READ the Journal article providing dire warnings that “most schools fail” because they aren’t meeting the standards set by the Republicans’ fiendishly clever No Child Left Behind Act. Have you really not figured it out or is this just sensationalistic journalism?
    For one thing, the statute should be called the “Repeal the Laws of Statistics Act.” Every year, no matter how well a school does, it has to do better next year or it “fails.” If 100 percent of Sandia High students meet the goals for 2007, then Sandia will “fail” every year after that, even if they do exactly as well each year because they aren’t “improving.” How do you improve from 100 percent?
    The act has 37 measures and if a school misses even one measure, it “fails.” Think about that. A school meets 36 goals, misses one, for an overall percentage of 97.3 percent. That’s an “A” in most grading scales, but under No Child Left Behind the school “fails!” …
    Every year, as more and more schools inevitably “fail” to meet the act’s ridiculous criteria, gullible newspapers like the Journal will tell all their readers “your schools are failing!” Seen as a recruitment strategy for convincing voters to distrust the school system generally and the teachers’ union specifically, the act finally makes a little bit of sense. Cynical, vicious, Karl Rovian sense, that is.
    Enough of this and maybe the voters will eventually be more receptive to spending their tax dollars to subsidize expensive private schools for the rich. Oh, I’m sorry, the Republican label is “school vouchers”— what was I thinking. …
    MIKE DANIELS
    Albuquerque
    www.abqjournal.com/opinion/letters/587798opinion08-21-07.htm

    ABQjournal Opinion: Speak Up!
    OUR SECRETARY of education has the same old solution to failing schools— deny there is a problem, dumb down the grading, blame the messenger. Another failing grade for the high paid educational bureaucrats.— J.L.P.
    www.abqjournal.com/opinion/speak/587799opinion08-21-07.htm


    Grasp Gaps

    Mon 08/20/07 at 11:16 am

    I took an online IQ test today. I usually avoid such things — they threaten the delicate balance between arrogance and shame. I will say that the verbal stuff — analogies, in particular — was easy. The math was harder. The SATs told me that years ago. But there were several spatial/graphical examples that I never grasped. I truly had no clue what was expected of me. At times like that, my left brain punts to my right brain: Here, you figure this out! Perhaps I should have used my left hand to make those selections. For all I know, my right brain pulled it off — he can’t say, really. My left brain is still miffed. He’ll be in his room for hours throwing books and toys to let the whole house know he’s suffered a grave injustice. Ah, but nothing coaxes him out of his corner quite like a tasty metaphor. mjh


    Around the ’sphere

    Mon 08/20/07 at 11:08 am

    Been catching up on some blog reading and, in the custom of our cohort, have some recommendations for you.

    I feel for the sense of injustice over at ABQrising (abqrising.wordpress.com/). As one listed twice (in your face!) in the Alibi’s recent list of local blogs, I extend a welcoming hand to another local blog with potential. This, even though none of my blogs appear in its blogroll. (Is there a blogroll big enough for me and Mario Burgos?)

    It says something that I enjoyed the cartoons more than anything else at irReligion.org (particularly, Jesus - Meet Prometheus from russellsteapot.com). Unlike Believers, atheists don’t seem to congregate, even virtually. This site looks like it gets a lot of visits, FWIW.

    This one is just too cool and I wonder how long it can keep it up: strange maps (hat tip to my homie jfleck).

    Harry Potter: Pronunciation Guide | Scholastic
    www.scholastic.com/harrypotter/books/pronunciation.htm

    GRE Vocabulary Word Scramble
    www.studystack.com/wordscramble-9097

    National Novel Writing Month - National Novel Writing Month
    www.nanowrimo.org/

    Finally, via Albloggerque, a Sunday Poem. I was ready to forget this until I read the last 4 lines. Damn, that’s fine. mjh

    Found Letter, by Joshua Weiner

    What makes for a happier life, Josh, comes to this:
    Gifts freely given, that you never earned;
    Open affection with your wife and kids;
    Clear pipes in winter, in summer screens that fit;
    Few days in court, with little consequence;
    A quiet mind, a strong body, short hours
    In the office; close friends who speak the truth;
    Good food, cooked simply; a memory that’s rich
    Enough to build the future with; a bed
    In which to love, read, dream, and re-imagine love;
    A warm, dry field for laying down in sleep,
    And sleep to trim the long night coming;
    Knowledge of who you are, the wish to be
    None other; freedom to forget the time;
    To know the soul exceeds where it’s confined
    Yet does not seek the terms of its release,
    Like a child’s kite catching at the wind
    That flies because the hand holds tight the line.


    #
    Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
    Entries and comments feeds. 47 queries. 1.702 seconds. Back to Top