Is That a Bottle of Viagra in Your Pocket Or Are You Just Happy to See Me?

Can there be a better poster child for the Radical Right than Lush Limbaugh? I’m not talking about his impotence — there’s no shame in that, unless you’ve built your entire culture around your “strength.” I’m not talking about his repeated drug abuse — we’re all one pill away from that, which is precisely where the Drug Industry wants us. I’m talking about deception, both self- and public. It’s not just hypocrisy, which is what we call flexibility we can’t stand. It’s LYING, endless lying. It’s like Wm Bennett berating us all for our declining morals but having no trouble excusing his own gambling addiction. It’s like Tom DeLay moralizing and genuflecting while filling his own pockets and subverting democracy. This isn’t just “A Culture of Corruption,” this is a gang of out of control thugs and thieves. It’s the Puritans At Tammany Hall. It’s disgusting.

At the same time, the only thing that makes incipient American Fascism tolerable is seeing Conservatives fall victim to it. Gotta check every prescription — you could be an Enemy Combatant in the War On Whatever. Anything you do can and will be used against you. mjh

PS: I don’t really want to know, and yet, I can’t help but think about the missing pills and Lush’s time in the Dominican Republic. Anybody know where Ann Coulter was this weekend?

MiamiHerald.com | 06/27/2006 | Rush Limbaugh halted over Viagra at airport BY CASEY WOODS, The Miami Herald

A Customs inspector going through the baggage of conservative radio show host Rush Limbaugh on Monday afternoon found 29 small blue tablets — a supply of the impotence drug Viagra.

Trouble is, the name on the bottle wasn’t Limbaugh’s.

”Limbaugh said it was for his own personal use and that the name on it was his doctor’s,” said Sgt. Pete Palenzuela, a spokesman for the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office.

Possession of drugs prescribed to someone else is a second-degree misdemeanor.

Limbaugh, 55, arrived on a private plane at Palm Beach International Airport from the Dominican Republic at 2 p.m. U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents discovered the drug while making a routine inspection of his bags. The agents turned the investigation over to deputies from the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office.

Dendahl Is For Drilling Valle Vidal — And Out of Touch With Most of Us

Valle Vidal Vote
House Panel Votes to Protect Valle Vidal

A key House committee voted Wednesday to protect the Valle Vidal— 102,000 acres in New Mexico’s Carson National Forest— from gas drilling.

“This is a huge step forward in the process to protect one of New Mexico’s most precious gems,” said Rep. Tom Udall, D-N.M., who authored the measure. “Protecting the Valle Vidal means preserving for New Mexico and the nation a land rich in history and culture and abundant in wildlife.”

The U.S. Forest Service, which manages the Valle Vidal, has been considering whether to open 40,000 acres of the land to coal-bed methane drilling.

The Forest Service solicited public opinion on the proposal and received 54,000 responses, only nine of which supported drilling in the area, according to an analysis by the Coalition for the Valle Vidal, which opposes opening up the Valle Vidal to gas drilling.

The Valle Vidal, located in Taos and Colfax counties, is home to one of the largest elk herds in the state and has been described as an outdoorsman’s paradise.

Udall also said the Valle Vidal was home to some of America’s earliest inhabitants— including Native Americans, Spanish settlers and myriad forms of wildlife.

“I believe we have a responsibility to protect it for future generations,” he said.

The Valle Vidal tract was donated to the Forest Service in 1982 by Pennzoil Co., which never drilled in the area.

Rep. Steve Pearce, R-N.M., who sits on the resources committee, said Wednesday he supported the protection.

Rep. Heather Wilson, R-N.M., became a co-sponsor of the measure after it passed the committee Wednesday. She had previously declined to publicly support or oppose the legislation, saying she wanted to study the matter and hear public feedback.

Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M, has sponsored similar legislation in the Senate, but Sen. Pete Domenici, chairman of the Senate Energy Natural Resources Committee, has not yet declared a position on the Valle Vidal Protection Act.

With so many in favor of preserving and protecting Valle Vidal, read what John Dendahl thinks. mjh

mjh’s blog — Perspectives

Dendahl wrote:

There are myriad reasons familiar to nearly all of us why we should develop domestic sources of oil and natural gas. Despite dated, obstructionist hype, the needed development can — and will — go hand-in-hand with sound environmental protection.

If Ted Turner and the Audubon Society can write contracts with producers that protect their land and water, so can the U.S. Forest Service and the BLM.

Richardson needs to tell his “environmentalist” pals to take a long, enjoyable hike…

mjh’s blog — I’m not laughing with Dimdahl, I’m laughing at him

Dendahl wrote:

Laugh of the Month: Richardson remains obstinate. Despite environment-friendly natural gas production on super-enviro Ted Turner’s Vermejo Park Ranch next door, drilling for natural gas in the Valle Vidal is vigorously opposed by some special interests. Vowing to do all he can to prevent Valle Vidal drilling, Richardson recently told the opponents, “We are not going to stand for special-interest management of the public domain.” Say what?

mjh’s blog — we know 21st-century technology guarantees the land’s protection

Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski said:

But if Arctic oil development was going to harm the environment or wildlife, then I would agree opening it would not be worth the cost. But the vast majority of Alaskans, including Alaska’s Eskimos who know it best, support ANWR’s development because we know 21st-century technology guarantees the land’s protection.

Just before this happened:

More than 200,000 gallons of crude leaked from a ruptured transit line onto the tundra in Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay, making the spill discovered earlier this month the largest ever on the North Slope, according to an official estimate released Friday.

The estimated spill size of 202,000 to 267,000 gallons far surpasses the 38,000 gallons spilled in 2001, officials said. …

Ignorant of History? Say Anything

In Hungary, Bush Salutes Anti-Soviet Revolt of ’56 By Michael Abramowitz, Washington Post Staff Writer

The president sought to draw parallels between Hungary’s transition from dictatorship to democracy and the U.S. enterprise in Iraq, where the administration is struggling to help launch a democratically elected government. …

Aniko Kellner, a 34-year-old graduate student at Central European University, noted how the Western powers failed to come to the aid of Hungary when the popular rebellion was crushed by the Soviet Union. At the time, the United States was preoccupied with the Suez crisis and had no interest in pressing for a confrontation with Moscow.

For Bush to praise a revolt that the United States did not support “is a very tricky thing,” Kellner observed. “For Hungarians, it could be seen as unintentional cynicism.” …

“There is a contradiction here,” said Tibor Varady, a Budapest lawyer who helped organize protests Thursday while Bush was speaking. “The revolution in 1956 ended with occupation by the Soviets. The problem is today George Bush stands for occupation. He has not represented freedom.”
– – – – –

World War II and Iraq: Polls Apart? By Al Kamen

White House press secretary Tony Snow , on CNN’s “Late Edition” on Sunday, said: “The president understands peoples’ impatience — not impatience, but how a war can wear on a nation. He understands that. If somebody had taken a poll in the Battle of the Bulge, I dare say people would have said, ‘Wow, my goodness, what are we doing here?’ But you cannot conduct a war based on polls.”

In fact, there was a poll taken by Gallup from Dec. 31, 1944, to Jan. 4, 1945 — three years into that war and right in the middle of the bloody Battle of the Bulge, where U.S. casualties were estimated between 70,000 and 80,000. It found that 73 percent of Americans would refuse to make peace with Adolf Hitler if he offered it and that 86 percent of Americans thought there was no chance that we would lose the war in Europe.

Burn, Baby, Burn

Alter: Flag Burning Ban is a Bad Idea By Jonathan Alter. Newsweek

Our understandable outrage at flag burning shouldn’t turn our brains to mush. “I feel the same sense of outrage, but I would not amend that great shield of democracy [the Constitution] to hammer a few miscreants,” Colin Powell said when the issue last came up (his position has not changed). “The flag will be flying proudly long after they have slunk away.” Powell argues that a constitutional ban on flag burning is a sign of weakness and fear. Note: The other countries that have banned flag burning include Cuba, China, Iran and Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. …

Actually, even during the Vietnam War, flag burning was rare. By one count, there have been only 45 such incidents in 200 years, and fewer than half a dozen since it was outlawed in 1989. Should the Constitution be amended, however, the incidence of flag burning is expected to surge as a form of civil disobedience. What began as a phony issue designed to prove patriotism (usually on the part of those who never served, the primary sponsors) could become a real concern. …

Banning flag burning, in the words of Justice Antonin Scalia, “dilutes the very freedom that makes this emblem so revered.” …

Democrats mostly oppose the amendment. But at last count, 13 will support it: Max Baucus of Montana, Evan Bayh of Indiana, Mark Dayton of Minnesota, Dianne Feinstein of California, Tim Johnson of South Dakota, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Bill Nelson of Florida, Harry Reid of Nevada, Ken Salazar of Colorado, Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, and Debbie Stabenow of Michigan. Bob Menendez [of New Jersey] is on the fence and leaning toward supporting the amendment. [mjh: I’m stunned Feinstein is for this constitutional amendment.]

John Prine – Your Flag Decal Won’t Get You Into Heaven Lyrics — John Prine

But, you flag decal won’t get you
Into Heaven anymore.
They’re already overcrowded
From your dirty little war
Now Jesus don’t like Killin’
No matter what the reasons for.
And your flag decal won’t get you into Heaven anymore.

News From the Past: Abramoff in 2002

Indianz.com > News > Headlines
GOP lobbyist scores big with tribes
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 3, 2002

Financially successful tribes are more than happy to pay Jack Abramoff, a Republican lobbyist, $500 an hour to argue their cause in Washington, D.C.

Report details extent of Abramoff fraud of Sandia Pueblo By JENNIFER TALHELM | Associated Press
June 23, 2006

Leaders of New Mexico’s Sandia Pueblo were initially impressed by lobbyist Jack Abramoff when they went looking for help convincing Congress in 2002 to make the main ridge of Sandia Mountain the pueblo’s eastern boundary.

The Albuquerque Tribune: National Government
Lobbyist made 1.17M off pueblo
By James W. Brosnan
Scripps Howard News Service
January 4, 2006

Sandia Pueblo’s dealings with Abramoff and Scanlon have not drawn as much attention in Washington as the two men’s efforts to help the Mississippi Choctaws and Louisiana block a rival tribe’s casino, but the Sandia case is typical of their methods.

Former Sandia Pueblo Gov. Stuwart Paisano hired Abramoff in February 2002 to lobby for federal legislation to settle the pueblo’s long-standing claim to Sandia Mountain.

At $500 an Hour, Lobbyist’s Influence Rises With G.O.P. By DAVID E. ROSENBAUM

April 3, 2002 [mjh: at most 2 months after Sandia hired Abramoff.]

In the last six months of 2001, the Coushatta Indians, a tribe with 800 members and a large casino in southwest Louisiana, paid $1.76 million to the law firm of Jack Abramoff, a Republican lobbyist here.

Last month, the Bush administration handed the tribe a big victory by blocking construction of a casino by a rival tribe that would have drained off much of the Coushattas’ business.

William Worfel, vice chairman of the Coushattas, views the administration’s decision as a direct benefit of the eye-popping lobbying fees his tribe paid Mr. Abramoff, more money than many giant corporations like AOL Time Warner and American Airlines paid lobbyists in the same period.

“I call Jack Abramoff, and I get results,” Mr. Worfel said. “You get everything you pay for.”

In the seven years since Republicans gained control of the House of Representatives, Mr. Abramoff, 43, has used his close ties to Representative Tom DeLay of Texas, the Republican whip, and other conservatives in the House to become one of the most influential — and, at $500 an hour, best compensated — lobbyists in Washington.

He is also an important Republican fund-raiser.

Mr. Abramoff’s recent success and importance in Republican circles is a reminder that … the business of lobbying has been humming along quite nicely, more out of the spotlight than usual but more profitable than ever for those with the right connections.

Unlike many lobbyists who take almost any client who is willing to pay their fee, Mr. Abramoff says he represents only those who stand for conservative principles. They include three Indian tribes with big casinos and, until recently, the Northern Mariana Islands.

“All of my political work,” he said, “is driven by philosophical interests, not by a desire to gain wealth.”

Mr. Abramoff argues that Indian reservations and the island territory, which is exempt from United States labor laws, are “just what conservatives have always wanted, which is enterprise zones — tax-free, regulation-free zones where with the right motivation, great industry could take place and spill out into the general communities.”

His success in making this case to Republicans in the House has paid off handsomely. …

For lobbyists, perception of influence can often be as valuable as actual influence. …

Mr. Abramoff’s background and personality hardly fit the mold of the typical Washington lobbyist. … [H]is religion is a central element of his life. …

Most unusual, he is, by his own description, a committed ideologue.

In the early 1980’s, Mr. Abramoff was chairman of the College Republican National Committee, where he made important contacts. Among those on his staff were Grover Norquist, now a leading conservative strategist here and president of Americans for Tax Reform, and Ralph Reed, the former director of the Christian Coalition, who is a prominent Republican political consultant. …

Mr. Abramoff’s rising influence is also illustrative of another trend in lobbying: success can be built on a strong relationship between a lobbyist and a single, powerful lawmaker. His interest in raising money for Republicans and conservative causes is the foundation of Mr. Abramoff’s relationship with Mr. DeLay, who is determined to meld the lobbyists on K Street here into the Republican Party’s political, legislative and fund-raising operations.

Mr. Abramoff described the bond this way: “We are the same politically and philosophically. Tom’s goal is specific — to keep Republicans in power and advance the conservative movement. I have Tom’s goal precisely.”

Mr. Norquist, who is friendly with both men, said of Mr. Abramoff, “He walks in to see DeLay and DeLay knows that he is representing clients whose views are in sync with DeLay’s views.”

The Albuquerque Tribune: National

What is puzzling to the New Mexico delegation is why Sandia Pueblo paid $2.7 million to Abramoff and Scanlon – two men they never saw – over a strictly local, albeit contentious, bill.

Washington and the West » Duped by Abramoff, tribe still smiling

Of the several tribes Abramoff is accused to have cheated, the Sandia have perhaps received the least attention. And Sandia’s association with one of the most vilified men in Washington raises few eyebrows here — perhaps because they won. They now control the craggy peaks that play a central role in the pueblo’s spiritual life, and are the location of sacred sites that are important to the tribe’s religious ceremonies.

For 20 years, the tribe sued the Interior Department and sent attorneys into courtrooms without a clear victory. Within a year of hiring Abramoff, they had their mountain….

The tribe’s governors and lieutenant governors — always men — are picked by religious leaders after a period of seclusion.

Paisano was replaced two days before Abramoff’s plea agreement made many of the tribe’s dealings with the lobbyist public.

But the former governor said he has no idea why he was replaced or if it has anything to do with the scandal.
“Out of respect … for my culture, I didn’t ask,” he said.