Sincerity is better than bullshit

Fri 09/30/05 at 2:53 pm

I’d rather read 10 letters like this one from Jerry Wright or the earlier one by Sheila Harris, both restauranteurs, than one by the ingrate Vern Raburn, CEO of Eclipse Aviation in Albuquerque, New Mexico, or the xenophobic Pfeffer. These are thoughtful and sincere and less about frightening people with nonsense about school invaders and lost constitutional rights.

I do not want to put Wright or Harris out of business; I don’t want them to have to fire anyone. Nevertheless, I’m willing to risk that on the chance that the cumulative effects will be better than the status quo. When did “conservative” come to mean “afraid”? mjh

Living Wage Counterpoint

A business is nothing but its bottom line, and if it shows a profit, we get to continue the game for another fiscal quarter. Behind each business are people. I am our business. My family is this business. Those who choose to work with me to accomplish our goals are our business. In my case, this means 60 employees get to take home a paycheck. Sixty souls can pay rent, pay a bill, buy some food. And if this law costs me more than I can bring in, then there are 60 families I have failed.

This law picks on my industry: restaurants. … Jerry Wright
[full letter here]


Panel debates wage increase

Thu 09/29/05 at 5:45 pm

This is all I could find about the debate a few days ago. I still find it very hard to believe a Lowe’s or Chili’s would relocate. How can it possibly be economical to do so? mjh

Panel debates wage increase

Heinrich and five others discussed the pros and cons of the proposed local minimum wage increase at the UNM Continuing Education building on Tuesday night. The proposed increase of the minimum wage in Albuquerque from $5.15 per hour to $7.50 per hour will appear on the Oct. 4 ballot.

About 20 people came to the event, which was sponsored by the Anderson Schools of Management. …

Jerry Easley, chairman of the Albuquerque Employment Growth Initiative, said he was against the increase. He said $7.50 per hour will not help workers enough.

“To characterize $7.50 as a living wage is disingenuous,” he said. “It will never support a family.” [mjh: so it isn’t enough and this opponent wants more?]

He said the increase would push employers out of Albuquerque. He said after the 2003 minimum wage increase in Santa Fe, several businesses including Lowe’s and Chili’s relocated or started businesses outside the city limit.


Los Lunas Commuter van halts rides to Albuquerque

Thu 09/29/05 at 5:41 pm

The News-Bulletin: Commuter van halts rides to Albuquerque by Jane Moorman News-Bulletin Staff Writer; jmoorman@news-bulletin.com

Los Lunas Commuters using the Village of Los Lunas’ transportation van to travel to jobs or school in Albuquerque each day are having to scramble to find rides. …

The commuter van had a limited route into Albuquerque with stops at the University of New Mexico and the hospitals.

Otero said there was light use by area residents but there were several established riders who depended upon it. …

“We are working as hard as we can to get the Rail Runner up and running,” said Chris Blewett, director of transportation and planning services for Mid-Region Council of Governments, which is coordinating the commuter rail project.

Originally Gov. Bill Richardson set the start-up date as November of this year, but now that date has been moved to late 2005 or early 2006.

Work on the rail platforms in Los Lunas and Belen has not begun. Blewett said construction should begin in early October in Los Lunas for sure, but negotiation with the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad could delay the Belen construction.

Meanwhile, Otero said his department is canceling the commuter van in preparation for developing additional routes within the Los Lunas area to take commuters to the rail station, which will be located at Courthouse Road and the railroad tracks.
—–
RailRunner Home Page

Los Lunas Station

Google Maps - Courthouse Road and N.M. 314, Los Lunas, New Mexico


More Science, Less Nonsense

Thu 09/29/05 at 12:40 pm

This entire article (read it!) seems to do more justice to the science of Evolution, without having to give equal weight to the mysticism of Inteligent Creationism. mjh

New Analyses Bolster Central Tenets of Evolution Theory By Rick Weiss and David Brown, Washington Post Staff Writers

That a mechanism driven by random events should result in perfectly adapted organisms — and so many different types — seems illogical.

“Even today a good many distinguished minds seem unable to accept or even to understand that from a source of noise, natural selection alone and unaided could have drawn all the music of the biosphere,” Jacques Monod, a French biologist and Nobel Prize winner, wrote in 1970 in the book “Chance and Necessity.”

Natural selection was really hard to accept in Darwin’s day. But it has become easier with the discovery of genes, DNA and techniques that have made it possible to watch natural selection happen. …

DNA is a stringlike molecule made up of paired beads called nucleotides. It carries the instructions for making proteins and RNA, the chief building materials of life. Individually, these instructions are called genes.

The random changes Darwin knew must be happening are accidents that happen to DNA and genes. Today, they can be documented and catalogued in real time, inside cells.

Cells sometimes make errors when they copy their DNA before dividing. These mutations can disable a gene — or change its action. Occasionally cells also duplicate an entire gene by mistake, providing offspring with two copies instead of one. Both these events provide raw material for new genes with new and potentially useful functions — and ultimately raw material for new organisms and species.

Richard E. Lenski, a biologist at Michigan State University, has been following 12 cultures of the bacterium Escherichia coli since 1988, comprising more than 25,000 generations. All 12 cultures were genetically identical at the start. For years he gave each the same daily stress: six hours of food (glucose) and 18 hours of starvation. All 12 strains adapted to this by becoming faster consumers of glucose and developing bigger cell size than their 1988 “parents.” …

When Lenski and his colleagues examined each strain’s genes, they found that the strains had not acquired the same mutations. Instead, there was some variety in the happy accidents that had allowed each culture to survive. And when the 12 strains were then subjected to a different stress — a new food source — they did not fare equally well. In some, the changes from the first round of adaptation stood in the way of adaptation to the new conditions. The 12 strains had started to diverge, taking the first evolutionary steps that might eventually make them different species — just as Darwin and Wallace predicted.

In fact, one of the more exciting developments in biology in the past 25 years has been how much DNA alone can teach about the evolutionary history of life on Earth. …

As scientists have identified the totality of DNA — the genomes — of many species, they have unearthed the molecular equivalent of the fossil record.

It is now clear from fossil and molecular evidence that certain patterns of growth in multicellular organisms appeared about 600 million years ago. Those patterns proved so useful that versions of the genes governing them are carried by nearly every species that has arisen since.


take a stand for Jesus

Thu 09/29/05 at 6:37 am

Intelligent design tied to creationism in Dover trial By Bill Toland, Post-Gazette Harrisburg Bureau

HARRISBURG — Board members who succeeded in introducing “intelligent design” to students in Dover Area School District were wary of evolutionary theory and explicit in their desire to balance the teaching of evolution with a more Christian-friendly philosophy, three plaintiffs testified yesterday during the second day of a landmark federal trial. …

“If evolution was part of the biology curriculum, creationism should be shared 50-50,” [Aralene] Callahan quoted [Alan] Bonsell as saying.

[William] Buckingham, according to the testimony, expressed fears that the biology textbooks he’d reviewed were “laced with Darwinism,” and too one-sided in their deference to evolution. At a board meeting, Buckingham criticized a college student who studied evolution, saying the man had been “brainwashed.”

Buckingham said somebody needed to take a stand for Jesus, witnesses said. His wife, Charlotte, quoted Old Testament verses during public board meetings, one plaintiff testified.

The Globe and Mail: By accident or design?

As governor of Texas, George W. Bush said students should be exposed to both creationism and evolution. Last month, he said intelligent design should be taught alongside evolution. “Both sides ought to be properly taught,” he said, “so people can understand what the debate is about.”


The Republican War on Science by Chris Mooney — and how the Media plays into the Radical Wrong’s hands

Thu 09/29/05 at 1:28 am

I know of Chris Mooney (and others) thanks to links from John Fleck. The title of Mooney’s new book seems apt (mjh to jfleck — a review?). mjh

An interview with Chris Mooney, author of The Republican War on Science | By David Roberts | Grist Magazine | Books Unbound | 27 Sep 2005

My thesis is that this is a political phenomenon that is unique to Republican rule in the United States, and which is epitomized by the Bush administration. This administration is constantly doing favors for its big-business and religious-right constituents. That prejudice drives distortions of science on issues ranging from global warming to sex education. …

Poor science education doesn’t help matters, but I wouldn’t link it directly to the kinds of abuses we’re seeing. The role of fundamentalist religiosity — and particularly, politically conservative Christianity — is, I think, more significant.

On evolution, on embryonic stem cell research, on alleged health risks from abortion, and much else, religious conservatives have their own spin on the science, and even their own “experts.” For instance, they deny evolution and have come up with a scientific-sounding alternative, “intelligent design.” Because of this phenomenon of science appropriation, Republican politicians sympathetic to the religious right can easily cite their own favored experts, in the process distorting mainstream scientific understanding. This sets in motion a wide array of abuses. …

Through their instinctive tendency to create a “balance” between two sides, journalists repeatedly allow science abusers to create phony “controversies,” even though the scientific merits of the issue may exclusively be with one side.

Here’s my real fear when it comes to the press. Suppose there’s some mainstream scientific view that you want to set up a think tank to challenge — to undermine, to controversialize. Suppose further that you have a lot of money, as well as an interested and politically influential constituency on board with your agenda. In this situation, it seems to me that as long as you are clever enough, you should be able to set your political machine in motion and then sit back and watch the national media do the rest of your work for you. The press will help you create precisely the controversy that lies at the heart of your political and public relations strategy — and not only that. It will do a far better job than the best PR firm, and its services will be entirely free of charge.

I think we have actually seen this happen repeatedly. A good example is the issue of evolution. …

We have to drive a wedge between moderate Republicans and conservative ones on matters of science, because only the moderates can rescue their party from its current, destructive addiction to abusing and distorting scientific information.

The Republican War on Science by Chris Mooney [mjh: numerous copies on order at the Albuquerque Public Library but not yet received.]

CJR September/October 2005 - Undoing Darwin

The [evolution trial … in Pennsylvania over intelligent design] is likely to be a media circus. And, unfortunately, there’s ample reason to expect that the spectacle will lend an entirely undeserved p.r. boost to the carefully honed issue-framing techniques employed by today’s anti-evolutionists. …

As evolution, driven by such events, shifts out of scientific realms and into political and legal ones, it ceases to be covered by context-oriented science reporters and is instead bounced to political pages, opinion pages, and television news. And all these venues, in their various ways, tend to deemphasize the strong scientific case in favor of evolution and instead lend credence to the notion that a growing “controversyâ€� exists over evolutionary science. This notion may be politically convenient, but it is false. …

Without a doubt, then, political reporting, television news, and opinion pages are all generally fanning the flames of a “controversy” over evolution. Not surprisingly, in light of this coverage, we simultaneously find that the public is deeply confused about evolution.

In a November 2004 Gallup poll, respondents were asked: “Just your opinion, do you think that Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution is: a scientific theory that has been well supported by evidence, or just one of many theories and one that has not been well-supported by evidence, or don’t you know enough to say?” Only 35 percent of Americans answered a scientific theory supported by evidence, whereas another 35 percent indicated that evolution was just one among many theories, and 29 percent answered that they didn’t know. Meanwhile a national survey this spring (conducted by Matthew Nisbet, one of the authors of this article, in collaboration with the Survey Research Institute at Cornell University), found similar public confusion about the scientific basis for intelligent design. A bare majority of adult Americans (56.3 percent) agreed that evolution is supported by an overwhelming body of scientific evidence; a sizeable proportion (44.2 percent) thought precisely the same thing of intelligent design. …

One thing, above all, is clear: a full-fledged national debate has been reawakened over an issue that once seemed settled. This new fight may not simmer down again until the U.S. Supreme Court is forced (for the third time) to weigh in. In these circumstances, the media have a profound responsibility — to the public, and to knowledge itself.

Chris C Mooney


DefCon — The Campaign to Defend the Constitution

Wed 09/28/05 at 5:27 pm

DefCon Blog
DefCon celebrates all of our First Amendment freedoms, and this blog is an open invitation to speak your mind on the topics we cover. Join DefCon’s Blogger-in-Chief Clark and a rotating host of provocative guest bloggers for discussion, debate, and news.

The Campaign to Defend the Constitution encourages all visitors to post to our blog. We hope for a lively discussion and debate. …

DefCon is a new organization dedicated to confronting the power of the religious right. We are a diverse group of individuals from an array of backgrounds united by the belief that the religious right is a threat to America.

We are dealing with a powerful group driven by a specific agenda, who seek to control many different facets of our culture. As their power has grown, the religious right has alienated, frightened, or infuriated millions of Americans along the way. DefCon is here to unite these Americans. Regardless of what drove you to fight the religious right, it is imperative we realize that advancements of their agenda anywhere increase their power everywhere.


With Supporters like Pfeffer, Who needs Enemies?

Wed 09/28/05 at 3:01 pm

To its credit, the Albuquerque Journal has granted space to a number of opinion pieces on the upcoming vote to increase the Minimum Wage.

ABQjournal: Lack of Data Foils Minimum Wage Evaluation By David Pfeffer, Santa Fe City Councilor

High toned phrases highlighted Santa Fe’s “living wage” debate. Proponents haughtily blamed business for getting rich off “the backs of the poor.” One adult working in two jobs or two adults working in one family proved reason enough to “do something about it.” Articulate opposition could not hold against this supposedly moral stand. …

We do know that some employers have relocated. The local newspaper’s printing plant has left town, leaving only the white collar staff within the city limits. We know of businesses that have opted not to come here. …

[W]e may be kicking up by another dollar an hour this fact-blind insistence on a supposedly moral stand— a stand taken, not only without regard to “immigrant status,” but without regard to the damage it is doing to the very people it is supposedly designed to help.

David Pfeffer, a Republican running for the U.S. Senate, was the only Santa Fe city councilor to vote against the wage ordinance.

The sniveling tone of the preceding may be all the reason one needs to vote against Pfeffer in any election. I’m amazed any business finds it cheaper to relocate; such a business cares as little about its customers as it does about its employees. Read the whole thing to see just how important the “immigrant status” issue is to him (and a block of xenophobic Republicans).

In spite of Pfeffer’s claim that there is no data on Santa Fe (which hardly supports voting against the issue in Albuquerque), what do you know, here’s some data….

ABQjournal: Higher Pay Good for Santa Fe Workers, Economy By Monsignor Jerome Martinez and City Councilor David Coss, Living Wage Advocates

Here are some key facts:

# We have reduced poverty. According to a report just issued by the state Human Services Department, recipients of Temporary Aid to Needy Families have fallen 9.7 percent in the last year, while in the state as a whole it has only gone down 0.6 percent.

# We have gained jobs. According to a Sept. 22 report from the New Mexico Department of Labor, 1,400 jobs have been added to the Santa Fe work force since the living wage came into effect. This 2.3 percent rate of job growth is a little more than the state’s 2.1 percent job growth rate during this same period. Santa Fe’s 2.3 percent growth rate is very high, as the state’s job growth, at 2.1 percent, ranked 12th highest in the country.

The hospitality industry in Santa Fe did even better, adding 300 jobs, a 3.2 percent growth rate. The unemployment rate in Santa Fe in August was 3.8 percent, down from 4.1 percent a year ago. The Santa Fe rate is much better than the state as a whole, which had 5.3 percent unemployment last month. …

Low-wage workers often have to choose between putting food on the table or leaving their children alone and working a second or third job.

The typical low-wage worker is not a teenager and is not new to the workforce. Forty percent are single moms. The average age of low-wage workers is 31 years. They have been working an average of over 13 years.

Note improvements in the hospitality industry, which depends a lot on low-wage workers.

No one can be surprised the Journal comes out against the measure. Their support of public campaign financing does stun me, though.

ABQjournal: Recommendations On Ballot Propositions

Living Wage, No: Albuquerque should avoid being at the bleeding edge of economic actions more appropriately taken by federal or state government. And voters should be wary of a clause inside the Trojan Horse measure that sacks employers’ right to control access to their work place.

Public Campaign Finance, Yes: The municipal campaign trail is being repaved in gold every four years. … The price tag: one-tenth of 1 percent of the city’s operational budget.

Ripping up the golden campaign trail may have unintended and unfortunate consequences, just like McCain-Feingold got hijacked by the independent “527″ committees. But restraining political inflation is worth a try.

“Worth a try.” Wow, the Journal backs an experiment and its attendant risks. Surely the same argument supports raising the Minimum Wage and tweaking it as we see its impact. mjh

ABQjournal: Guest Columns [mjh: in some strange lottery-fashion, various pages at the Journal are free now and then — as the pro-ordinance article quoted above is today.]


May god damn these fools

Wed 09/28/05 at 2:28 am

Remember, you can’t spell Bibles without lies.

A nation where nearly half the people believe the world is only 6000 years old and dinosaurs were in Eden and on the Ark probably doesn’t deserve to be saved. Certainly, as more people willingly embrace ignorance every year, there isn’t much hope.

Religion is the lobotomy of the people. mjh

In Evolution Debate, Creationists Are Breaking New Ground
Museum Dedicated to Biblical Interpretation Of the World Is Being Built Near Cincinnati
By Michael Powell, Washington Post Staff Writer

PETERSBURG, Ky. — The guide, a soft-spoken fellow with a scholarly aspect, walks through the halls of this handsome, half-finished museum and points to the sculpture of a young velociraptor.

“We’re placing this one in the hall that explains the post-Flood world,” explains the guide. “When dinosaurs lived with man.” …

Mark Looy [mjh: pronounced “Looney”] — the guide and a vice president at the museum … [says], “We call him our ‘missionary lizard,’ ” Looy says. “When people realize the T. rex lived in Eden, it will lead us to a discussion of the gospel. The T. rex once was a vegetarian, too.”

The nation’s largest museum devoted to the alternative reality that is biblical creation science is rising just outside Cincinnati. Set amid a park and three-acre artificial lake, the 50,000-square-foot museum features animatronic dinosaurs, state-of-the-art models and graphics, and a half-dozen staff scientists. It holds that the world and the universe are but 6,000 years old and that baby dinosaurs rode in Noah’s ark.

The $25 million Creation Museum stands much of modern science on its head and might cause a paleontologist or three to rend their garments. But officials expect to attract hundreds of thousands of visitors when the museum opens in early 2007.

“Evolutionary Darwinists need to understand we are taking the dinosaurs back,” says Kenneth Ham, president of Answers in Genesis-USA, which is building the museum. “This is a battle cry to recognize the science in the revealed truth of God.” …

[B]y any measure, Young Earth Creationism — which holds that the Bible is the literal word of God and that He created the universe in seven days– has a more powerful hold on the beliefs of Americans than evolutionary theory or intelligent design. That grip grows stronger by the year.

Polls taken last year showed that 45 percent of Americans believe that God created humans in their present form 10,000 years ago (or less) and that man shares no common ancestor with the ape. Only 26 percent believe in the central tenet of evolution, that all life descended from a single ancestor.

Another poll showed that 65 percent of Americans want creationism taught alongside evolution. …

Another creationist museum launches expeditions to the Papua New Guinea highlands in search of living pterodactyls.

All of this — creationist zoology, paleontology, archaeology — is framed in a distinctive academic language.

So one reads of post-Babel studies, and floodology and post-diluvium studies, these being the study of the world after Noah and the Great Flood, which is regarded as purest fact. …

the creationist bottom line is a through-the-looking-glass version of science. The scientific method of theory, experiment and assumptions upended does not apply. Ask Ham if he could accept evidence that conflicts with his reading of Genesis — proof, say, that a fossil is more than 6,000 years old — and he shakes his head.

Creationists believe man became mortal when God cast Adam and Eve out of Eden 6,000 years ago. Death did not exist before that.

“We admit we have an axiom: We have a book and it’s the Bible and it’s revealed history,” says Ham. “Where the Bible teaches on science, we can trust it as the word of God.” …

Scientists place the age of Earth at 4.5 billion years. Many tend to act resigned at the mention of creationists, seeing a worldview so different as to defy debate.

“There are people who are prepared to accept that the universe is a pretty untidy place,” said Ian Tattersall, a curator at the American Museum of Natural History. “And there are people, like the creationists, whose minds rebel at this notion.”

“Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynihan

ABQjournal: Museum of Natural History Takes T. Rex’s Story to Dramatic Proportions By John Fleck, Journal Staff Writer

The story of T. rex is dramatic for many reasons. In addition to being Earth’s “most horrific predator,” it was the last of its family line, ripping and tearing its way into the extinction of the dinosaurs.

“It’s the end of an evolutionary story,” said Lucas, a curator at the New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science.

But beyond the drama of T. rex is a tale as scientifically beguiling as it is dramatic.

For a moment in Earth’s history that was brief in geologic terms, evolution gave the planet a family of killer dinosaurs— the Tyrannosaurids— different from anything before or since.

The sharp-toothed dinosaurs wandered a world very different from our own. Called the Cretaceous (kruh-TAY-shus) period, it was in geologic terms the dawn of our modern world, as the ancient supercontinent of Pangea broke into the pieces that became the continents we see today.

Flowers and bees first appeared on the planetary stage during the Cretaceous. Mammals played only bit parts, while dinosaurs, after 100 million years of evolution, reached their apex.

Picking Over the Bones by John Fleck

Here’s a little challenge to the Intelligence of the Design. mjh

Creationism Still Blows! at Jalenack

Octopi have their optic nerves attached to the backs of their retina. They have no blind spot. Their eyes are the perfect ones. Ours still have flaws. [The Intelligent Designer] decided that we weren’t good enough to have perfect eyes.

We didn’t evolve from Octopi, so we didn’t get the non-blind eye that evolved after our common ancestor (probably a jellyfish, or something).


The Sky Will Fall

Wed 09/28/05 at 1:07 am

My thoughts on the Living Wage vote are seriously provoked by a letter to the editor by a local restaurant owner. I feel for her as she explains how much she has put into her business which she feels is threatened by paying people a decent wage.

I understand her point about tipped employees doing well, as they can at an expensive or popular place. Still, even tipped employees have a minimum wage and fewer benefits than regular employees. It’s always struck me as odd that restaurants don’t have to pay their employees because they count on the customers to do so.

Harris writes of her 17 employees, but how many currently make minimum wage? Not all 17, I am quite sure.

But it is at the end of her letter that I think she blows it by using Chicken Little language. Entrepreneurs cannot avoid risk.

ABQjournal: Letters to the Editor
Should the proposed living wage law be passed, we will be forced to make reductions in staff, either to exempt ourselves from its terms or to avoid closing altogether. If you are happily picturing your “yes” vote to be creating a higher wage for certain starting workers, stop a moment to realize you are also inevitably leaving a lot of very skilled, deserving workers with no wage at all.
SHEILA SCOTT HARRIS
Perennials Restaurant, Albuquerque

Heartfelt. “Inevitably” (no one seems to know what the impact will be); “a lot”; “no wage at all” (wow — anyone familiar with the restaurant business knows servers land on their feet — not that I want any of them to have to). mjh

PS: It’s not terribly relevant, but Ms Harris is the mother of Neil Patrick Harris, formerly TV’s Doogie Houser.


PRE-ELECTION DEBATE ON MINIMUM WAGE BALLOT

Tue 09/27/05 at 2:46 pm

ANDERSON SCHOOLS HOST PRE-ELECTION DEBATE ON MINIMUM WAGE BALLOT
INITIATIVE

(Albuquerque, NM) On October 4, 2005, Albuquerque voters will have
the opportunity to decide on an increase in the local minimum wage to
$7.50/hour. The proposed increase, which has sparked considerable
debate in the Albuquerque business community, will be the subject of a
discussion hosted by the Anderson Schools of Management at the
University of New Mexico.

WHAT: Anderson Issues Forum: Albuquerque Minimum Wage Debate

WHO: Martin Heinrich, Albuquerque City Councilor
Melissa Binder, UNM Economics Professor
Allen Parkman, UNM Business Professor
Jerry Easley, Chairman, Albuquerque Employment Growth
Initiative

WHEN: Tuesday, September 27, 7:30-9:30 pm

WHERE: UNM Continuing Education Auditorium
1634 University Blvd. NE

ADMISSION: Free and open to the public


The Storm King

Tue 09/27/05 at 1:50 pm

Thus begins the rewriting of history.

ABQjournal: Letters to the Editor
President Bush is to be commended. Not since Harry S. Truman has any president had to make such crucial decisions in history, from the tragic events of 9/11 to the war in Iraq, and now this most current tragedy.
RITA ZACCARDI
Albuquerque

All hail our benevolent great and glorious leader. The Storm King doth battle the very elements. mjh


Deception Is All They’ve Got

Tue 09/27/05 at 12:43 pm

Got a mailing from “www.stopthedeception.org,” which, like the Clear Skies Initiative, the Healthy Forest Act and the USA Patriot Act, effects the opposite of its name

Promoting deception, this postcard says the “so-called ‘living wage’ is only bait.” The deceivers note the “ordinance is 10 pages long and includes a clause you don’t know about.” If there is only one troublesome clause, how relevant is it that the ordinance is 10 pages long?

Of course, we know about that clause, which was introduced after it became clear that unscrupulous businesses in Santa Fe would do whatever they could to keep their employees from knowing their rights.

The fearful flyer claims the clause would allow:

• Complete strangers to enter your child’s school. [mjh: ie, child molesters]
• Special interest groups to invade your privacy in doctor’s offices or hospitals.
• Protesters and organizers to invade private property, badger customers and bring business to a complete standstill.

Nothing should cost us our constitutional rights, because our liberties are priceless.

What’s priceless is how many scoundrels wrap themselves in the flag. Nothing like turning this into a constitutional issue. Clever to frighten even those who might benefit from the increase with such nonsense. mjh

PS: a quick Google Search shows I’m a bit late to the party on the “Coalition to Exhort Ballot Deception”, as SWOP calls it.

Continue reading Deception Is All They’ve Got…


The Disaster President

Tue 09/27/05 at 1:16 am

Storm and Bush On the Move

President Bush was not going to get caught off guard by Hurricane Rita this weekend.

The president who refused to cut short a working vacation three weeks ago to prepare for the fury of Hurricane Katrina was sitting at the U.S. Northern Command post in Colorado on Saturday morning monitoring what had become a more timid storm.

“I’ve come here,” Bush explained, “to watch NORTHCOM in action, to see firsthand the capacity of our military to plan, organize and move equipment to help the people in the affected areas.”

Bush’s government was on war footing for Rita’s arrival….

At an afternoon news conference here, House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) praised Bush. “The president is hands-on and knows what’s going on,” he said. “The president is a take-charge type of guy.”

Barf. mjh

Newsday.com: Bush urges larger role for military BY CRAIG GORDON

Continue reading The Disaster President…


#