ThinkProgress » Scalia Slaps Down GOP’s Tentherism
[I]it is a sad commentary on the state of the modern GOP that ultra-conservative Justice Scalia has transformed into a voice of moderation against the even more radical Tea Party.
ThinkProgress » Scalia Slaps Down GOP’s Tentherism
[I]it is a sad commentary on the state of the modern GOP that ultra-conservative Justice Scalia has transformed into a voice of moderation against the even more radical Tea Party.
ABQJOURNAL OPINION/LETTERS: Letters To the Editor
So-called progressives, or leftists, prey on the group that feels entitled to benefits, offering them more and more to ensnare them in their addiction, while conservatives try to cater to and encourage those who appreciate opportunities by lowering the obstructions.
Eventually the progressive left’s policy is self-defeating or, as Margaret Thatcher said, "pretty soon you run out of other people’s money."
LAWRENCE FORD
Albuquerque
ABQJOURNAL OPINION/LETTERS: Letters To the Editor
Right. Progressives, like drug dealers, ensnare lazy, greedy people. Whereas Conservatives are hard-working and long-suffering. This self-serving, self-satisfied, self-congratulatory attitude seems full of a sense of entitlement: ie, you deserve what you have and, surely, other people want more than they deserve. Good for you.
So-called conservatives ensnare people with vague promises of opportunity even as an ever smaller percentage of the population gets absurdly rich, while the rest of us fight over the scraps. Then, the super-rich keep followers in line by assuring them it is the government and the foreigners who have prevented them from getting rich, as well. The Right Wing maintains a constant state of fear: The government, the foreigners, the different are all going to take your guns and make you accept things you just can’t accept. Stay angry and afraid and mistrustful. It keeps you from asking who profits from your misery. It’s not the progressives.
Eat more doves! http://www.flickr.com/photos/mjhinton/tags/birds/
Think of me then, those of you who are still around.
I think I prefer the Japanese title of this movie: Salamander. Reign of Fire (2002) takes place in the near future (2020), after dragons re-emerge from hiding and destroy the world. (Oops, am I spoiling this for you?) You gotta wonder about the evolution of mammoth fire-breathing dragons, how they stayed dormant for centuries, how they had a population boom, then fall off in 20 years. And, I’m not even spoiling the most preposterous aspect of dragon reproduction. Evolution may make mistakes like this, but they don’t dominate the planet (unless you’re thinking of humans).
I was intrigued by the prospect of seeing Christian Bale and Gerard Butler together, and they were quite enjoyable as buddies. I figured I’d turn the movie off when Matthew McConaughey showed up, but he didn’t look or sound anything like MM, so, I stuck with it. Not that I’m recommending that to anyone else.
OMG^2. How can my mind be blown, yet again. Franklyn (2008) seems to be about religion/faith/fate, madness, loss, fate (again), father figures, imagination / madness (again). There are a few great lines I cannot quote here, and great ideas. Another thought-provoking and, yes, challenging movie; and interesting follow up to The Butterfly Effect. Makes me hate Inception’s popularity all the more.
If you stream Netflix, be aware this movie is only available “until” (through?) 1/22/2011. What are you waiting for?
BTW, the poster used by IMDB (shown here) is not the one used by Netflix, which I think is the better one. Moreover, I might quibble with the summaries on both IMDB and Netflix.

OMG! The Butterfly Effect (2004) is a mind-blowing moving. It is a little challenging at times, but it presents a unique twist on time travel – so unique, it isn’t about time travel, at all. It’s kinda sci-fi, but not really. I didn’t see the ending coming (as it appeared in the Director’s Cut). Amazing movie.