“The Republicans are now the ‘How great is it to be stupid?’ party.”

Egghead and Blockheads – NYTimes.com

By MAUREEN DOWD Published: September 17, 2011

The Republicans are now the “How great is it to be stupid?” party. In perpetrating the idea that there’s no intellectual requirement for the office of the presidency, the right wing of the party offers a Farrelly Brothers “Dumb and Dumber” primary in which evolution is avant-garde. …

The occupational hazard of democracy is know-nothing voters. It shouldn’t be know-nothing candidates.

Egghead and Blockheads – NYTimes.com [hat tip to NewMexiken and to Pat]

Where are the compassionate conservatives? – The Washington Post

By Eugene Robinson, Published: September 15

Blitzer interrupted: “But Congressman, are you saying that society should just let [someone without insurance] die?” There were enthusiastic shouts of “Yeah!” from the crowd. You’d think one of the other candidates might jump in with a word about Christian kindness. Not a peep. ..

I believe the Republican candidates’ pinched, crabby view of government’s nature and role is immoral. I believe the fact that poverty has risen sharply over the past decade — as shown by new census data — while the richest Americans have seen their incomes soar is unacceptable. I believe that writing off whole classes of citizens — the long-term unemployed whose skills are becoming out of date, thousands of former offenders who have paid their debt to society, millions of low-income youth ill-served by inadequate schools — is unconscionable.

Perry, who is leading in the polls, wants to make the federal government “inconsequential.” He thinks Social Security is a “Ponzi scheme” and a “monstrous lie.” He doesn’t much like Medicare, either.

Where are the compassionate conservatives? – The Washington Post

When I hear “Ponzi” I assume the speaker is an idiot …

“The first modern social insurance program began in Germany in 1889 and has been in continuous operation for more than 100 years. The American Social Security system has been in continuous successful operation since 1935. Charles Ponzi’s scheme lasted barely 200 days.”

Social Security [via NewMexiKen]

Yesterday, Krauthammer wrote a column about the SSA Ponzi scheme. In the last paragraph, he concluded it was morally necessary and good. That’s the paragraph no conservative will quote.

I remember …

DUHbya solemnly declaring the “first war of the new millennium.” My heart fell: the first, meaning he knew there would be more war. Endless war. Hope for a new age died with those words.

“You’re either with us or against us.” Swaggering idiot.

The thugs who raged against dissent. How many of those same people openly hate the president today?

The odious un-American “PATRIOT” Act, unread by those who rushed to make it law. "Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism." (Renewed under Obama.)

My shock at first hearing “Homeland Security.” It still appalls me.

The militarization of the police. Heavily armored “cops” with tear gas masks and bayonets lunging at peaceful protestors. A local sheriff sneering, “Let me at them.”

Machine guns in a backwater airport like Albuquerque’s. I didn’t fly again for eight years – not for fear of terrorists, but disgust at our response.

Free Speech Zones in cages.

You cannot be free and afraid. You cannot have peace and rage. Wounded, we made many wrong choices. We’ll never fix the worst of our mistakes.

A gnat bit a giant, which proceeded to flail angrily for years. We went mad with fear and anger.

Post-9/11 permanent state of war should have ended long ago – The Washington Post

By Eugene Robinson, Published: September 8

There never was a “war on terrorism.” It wasn’t “terrorism” that crashed airliners into buildings on that brilliant Tuesday morning. The attacks were carried out by a 19-member assault team from al-Qaeda [mjh: largely Saudis, our “good friends”], a terrorist organization then being sheltered by the Taliban regime in Afghanistan. There most definitely was a war against al-Qaeda, and we won.

[W]e’re stuck in a dour, wartime mind-set that in many ways resembles clinical depression. … Yet here we are — for all intents and purposes, paralyzed. …

It’s hard to overstate the extent to which the 9/11 attacks magnified the nation’s anxieties — not just about terrorism but more generally about the future. Perpetual war produces a state of mind in which differences of opinion become questions of patriotism, adversaries become enemies and ideological territory must be defended inch by inch. Now, after 10 long years, perhaps we can finally get unstuck. Bin Laden is dead, his terrorist organization in shreds. The al-Qaeda that attacked us on 9/11 is defeated.

Post-9/11 permanent state of war should have ended long ago – The Washington Post

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." — Sam Adams