Category Archives: NADA – New American Dark Ages

New American Dark Ages

In South Dakota, at least the pretense is finally over

Keep in mind that after abortion is illegal, the next step is outlawing birth control. After that? Re-read The Handmaid’s Tale” or take a good look at Sharia. mjh

In South Dakota, at least the pretense is finally over By Ellen Goodman

The ban passed with the clear, stated intention of overturning Roe in a changed Supreme Court. This is a ban so extreme that it outflanks the prolife president. It’s a confrontation so direct that even many in the antiabortion leadership are uneasy with the strategy and the timing. Though not, you will note, with the goal. …

Even this week, with superb irony, Governor Rounds promised tender care for the women he would force to continue their pregnancies. Representative Hunt explained that women themselves would not be prosecuted under the law because any woman choosing abortion was ”not thinking clearly.” …

This is what it looks like in front of the curtain. South Dakota’s law would make felons out of doctors who perform nearly any abortion. The government would replace women as moral decision-makers. And it would trump doctors as medical decision-makers. …

The ban, slated to go into effect July 1, will be challenged in court and possibly by a statewide vote. But hopes of prolife purists are clearly pinned on the belief in a Supreme Court majority ready to reverse Roe. The hopes of the rest of us are pinned on seeing, really seeing, extremists in the spotlights.

”I think the South Dakota issue reflects the divisiveness that Americans are tired of,” says NARAL’s Keenan. Much political chatter this year has urged prochoice advocates and politicians to move to the right. How many more times are they required to recite the pledge — ”We want abortion to be safe, legal, and rare” — while prolife purists fight to make it unsafe and illegal?

On Tuesday, NARAL Pro-Choice America launched a Prevention First Day of Action. The press release of the day read optimistically: ”Birth Control, Something We Can All Agree On.” But the subject of the day was the ban and the battle.

Common ground, anyone? South Dakota just put another torch to it.

Poll: U.S. inconsistent on abortion – MSNBC.com

AP Ipsos Poll on AbortionIn 2005, states enacted 52 measures to restrict access to abortion, according to the private Guttmacher Institute, and more are pending. …

52 percent of those surveyed thought abortion should be legal in most or all cases; 43 percent said it should be illegal most or all of the time.

The survey, taken Feb. 28-March 2, found that men’s and women’s views were similar, although men were a little more likely to be undecided.

With slight shifts one way or another, this is about where Americans have been for decades.

we know 21st-century technology guarantees the land’s protection

adn.com | environment : Oil spill is the North Slope’s biggest ever By RACHEL D’ORO, Associated Press Writer

More than 200,000 gallons of crude leaked from a ruptured transit line onto the tundra in Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay, making the spill discovered earlier this month the largest ever on the North Slope, according to an official estimate released Friday.

The estimated spill size of 202,000 to 267,000 gallons far surpasses the 38,000 gallons spilled in 2001, officials said. …

[I]t was not expected to be as large as the BP spill, said DEC spokesman John Dixon.

“I’d be surprised if it even exceeds 500 gallons,” he said. [mjh: Surprise!] …

To date, workers have recovered 52,920 gallons — or 1,260 barrels — of crude.

mjh’s blog

Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski:

But if Arctic oil development was going to harm the environment or wildlife, then I would agree opening it would not be worth the cost. But the vast majority of Alaskans, including Alaska’s Eskimos who know it best, support ANWR’s development because we know 21st-century technology guarantees the land’s protection.

ABQjournal: Wilson Record a Maverick Streak, Not GOP Buckin’ By Michael Coleman, Of the Journal

Those who oppose oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge have won some nail-biter victories in Congress in recent years, but Sen. Pete Domenici keeps demanding a rematch.

The New Mexico Republican and chairman of the Senate energy committee maneuvered again last week to open the refuge to oil companies by putting the measure in the federal budget. Domenici keeps using that tactic because the federal spending blueprint is immune to a filibuster….

Domenici told me late last week that America needs Alaska’s oil and he’s willing to take the political heat to get it.

“For those who can’t vote for it because of political reasons, that’s their prerogative,” Domenici said. “But I don’t want to let another opportunity pass on my watch.”

mjh’s blog — Oil and Gas Contributes $179.7 million – 74 percent to Republicans
The Money Behind the Debate Over Drilling in ANWR

Oil companies are hoping their considerable political clout, built up over years of generous campaign giving and lobbying, will put drilling in ANWR over the top. The oil and gas industry has contributed $179.7 million since 1989 to federal candidates and political parties, 74 percent to Republicans. … [mjh: Coincidence?]

Safety does not erode

ABQjournal: Bomb Designer Questions U.S. Nuclear PolicyBy John Fleck, Journal Staff Writer

The history of U.S. nuclear weapons policy looks to Richard Garwin like an alcoholic for whom the answer to any problem is another drink: “More nuclear weapons, please.”

To Garwin, the latest effort to design a new generation of nukes— the “Reliable Replacement Warhead”— has the appearance of another binge coming on.

The Reliable Replacement Warhead, Garwin told a packed audience Friday at the University of New Mexico, “is not necessary.”

This is no peacenik talking. Garwin, a physicist who helped design the first U.S. H-bomb, has advised the federal government on nuclear policy and technology for much of the past five decades. …

While no decision has been made to go beyond paper design studies, the managers of the National Nuclear Security Administration have quickly made the Reliable Replacement Warhead the centerpiece of their plans for the future. …

“The Reliable Replacement Warhead is the rage this year,” Garwin said during his UNM talk. …

Garwin said there was also no reason to think aging weapons posed greater risks of accidental detonation.

“There’s no question of safety,” he said. “Safety does not erode.”

Former top judge says US risks edging near to dictatorship

Former top judge says US risks edging near to dictatorship by Julian Borger

Sandra Day O’Connor, a Republican-appointed judge who retired last month after 24 years on the supreme court, has said the US is in danger of edging towards dictatorship if the party’s rightwingers continue to attack the judiciary.

In a strongly worded speech at Georgetown University, reported by National Public Radio and the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Ms O’Connor took aim at Republican leaders whose repeated denunciations of the courts for alleged liberal bias could, she said, be contributing to a climate of violence against judges. …

She pointed to autocracies in the developing world and former Communist countries as lessons on where interference with the judiciary might lead. “It takes a lot of degeneration before a country falls into dictatorship, but we should avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings.” …

[During the Schiavo affair,] DeLay later called for the impeachment of judges involved in the Schiavo case, and called for more scrutiny of “an arrogant, out-of-control, unaccountable judiciary that thumbed their nose at Congress and the president”.

Such threats, Ms O’Connor said, “pose a direct threat to our constitutional freedom”, and she told the lawyers in her audience: “I want you to tune your ears to these attacks … You have an obligation to speak up.

“Statutes and constitutions do not protect judicial independence – people do,” the retired supreme court justice said.

She noted death threats against judges were on the rise and added that the situation was not helped by a senior senator’s suggestion that there might be a connection between the violence against judges and the decisions they make.

The senator she was referring to was John Cornyn, a Bush loyalist from Texas….

From the Gas Bag

Truth Detector: Dubai Waves Good-Bye, Hello Halliburton & Wal-Mart!

[mjh: More of the wit & wisdom of Lush Limbaugh, gas bag.]

They’re pulling out of there, saying, “Screw you! To hell with it.” Now, we’ve got an opportunity here, folks. You know me: I always try to look at events and say what is the opportunity. The opportunity is, all right, everybody wants an American company to run these ports. Take advantage of this, make a move. Get Halliburton in there today. Make a move, and ram this right down Chuck Schumer’s throat…

That company is Halliburton. Wal-Mart could do it, too. They’ve shown ability to manage and move large amounts of goods with security and a good health care program for the employees.

[mjh: In the midst of this, he vaguely accuses Bill Clinton of being involved in this, especially the 45 day waiting period. Yawn. Lush, Clinton isn’t president anymore. And Bob Dole was just as involved.]

What’s Old Is New Again

Government subverts its own ideals By ALLAN M. JALON

Thirty-five years ago Wednesday, a group of anonymous activists broke into the small, two-person office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Media, Pa., and stole more than 1,000 FBI documents that revealed years of systematic wiretapping, infiltration and media manipulation designed to suppress dissent.

The Citizens’ Commission to Investigate the FBI, as the group called itself, forced its way in at night with a crowbar while much of the country was watching the Muhammad Ali-Joe Frazier fight. When agents arrived for work the next morning, they found the file cabinets virtually emptied.

[This break-in] remains one of the most lasting consequential (although underemphasized) watersheds of political awareness in recent American history, one that poses tough questions even today for our national leaders who argue that fighting foreign enemies requires the government to spy on its citizens. The break-in is far less well-known than Daniel Ellsberg’s leak of the Pentagon Papers three months later, but in my opinion it deserves equal stature.

Found among the Media documents was a new word, “COINTELPRO,” short for the FBI’s “secret counterintelligence program,” created to investigate and disrupt dissident political groups in the United States. Under these programs, beginning in 1956, the bureau worked to “enhance the paranoia endemic in these circles,” as one COINTELPRO memo put it, “to get the point across there is an FBI agent behind every mailbox.”

The Media documents — along with further revelations about COINTELPRO in the months and years that followed — made it clear that the bureau had gone beyond mere intelligence-gathering to discredit, destabilize and demoralize groups — many of them peaceful, legal civil rights organizations and anti-war groups — that the FBI and Director J. Edgar Hoover found offensive or threatening. …

The sheer reach of a completely politicized FBI was one of the most frightening revelations of the Media documents. … “Neutralize them in the same manner they are trying to destroy and neutralize the U.S.,” one memo said.