Yard Signs Belong in Yards

yard signs belong in yards

A couple of things about these yard signs on public property.

Steel’s was the first sign I saw

there, though I couldn’t remember his name. Says a lot about effectiveness of yard signs.

Don’t know Steel, but the other two

are Republicans, who worship private property rights but seem to disdain public property.

Since that picture was

taken, the situation has, of course, gotten worse. Johnson, another Republican, has joined the group. And Winter and MyA (aka MIA) have

doubled their signs — god knows why, and he only talks to Republicans.

Unfortunately, a zealous volunteer has responded to

Mayer’s sign by putting up one for Marianne Dickensen. See how these things snowball. A progressive should see this is no group to

imitate. I hope her campaign will take down this sign, though I know if her’s is the only one to disappear, suspicions will be raised.

mjh

mjh’s Blog: Political Yard Signs Belong in YARDS

Why We’re Angry

Advance Men in Charge – New York Times

Political patronage has always been a hallmark of Washington life. But President Bill Clinton appointed political pals at FEMA who

actually knew something about disaster management. The former FEMA director James Lee Witt, whose tenure is widely considered a major

success, was a friend of Mr. Clinton’s when he took office in 1993, but he had run the Arkansas Office of Emergency Services. His top

staff came from regional FEMA offices.

Surely there are loyal Republicans among the 50 directors of state emergency services. But

President Bush chose to make FEMA a dumping ground for unqualified cronies – a sure sign that he wanted to hasten the degradation of an

agency that conservative Republicans have long considered an evil of big government. Katrina has proved that federal disaster help is

vital, and that Mr. Brown and his team of advance men can’t do the job. What America needs are federal disaster relief people who

actually know something about disaster relief.

Point Those Fingers – New York Times By

PAUL KRUGMAN

The administration followed the same principles in staffing FEMA. The agency had become a highly professional

organization during the Clinton years, but under Mr. Bush it reverted to its former status as a “turkey farm,” a source of patronage

jobs.

As Bloomberg News puts it, the agency’s “upper ranks are mostly staffed with people who share two traits: loyalty to

President George W. Bush and little or no background in emergency management.” By now everyone knows FEMA’s current head went from

overseeing horse shows to overseeing the nation’s response to disaster, with no obvious qualifications other than the fact that he was

Mr. Allbaugh’s college roommate.

All that’s missing from the Katrina story is an expensive reconstruction effort, with lucrative

deals for politically connected companies, that fails to deliver essential services. But give it time – they’re working on that, too.

Why did the administration make the same mistakes twice? Because it paid no political price the first time. …

Will this be

enough to let the administration get away with another failure? Let’s hope not: if the administration isn’t held accountable for what

just happened, it will keep repeating its mistakes. Michael Brown and Michael Chertoff will receive presidential medals, and the next

disaster will be even worse.

Osama and Katrina – New York Times By THOMAS

L. FRIEDMAN

And then there are the president’s standard lines: “It’s not the government’s money; it’s your money,” and, “One

of the last things that we need to do to this economy is to take money out of your pocket and fuel government.” Maybe Mr. Bush will now

also tell us: “It’s not the government’s hurricane – it’s your hurricane.”

An administration whose tax policy has been

dominated by the toweringly selfish Grover Norquist – who has been quoted as saying: “I don’t want to abolish government. I simply want

to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub” – doesn’t have the instincts for this

moment. …

The Bush team has engaged in a tax giveaway since 9/11 that has had one underlying assumption: There will never be

another rainy day. Just spend money. You knew that sooner or later there would be a rainy day, but Karl Rove has assumed it wouldn’t

happen on Mr. Bush’s watch – that someone else would have to clean it up. Well, it did happen on his watch.

What Does the NRA Think?

class="mine">Isn’t this the NRA’s worst nightmare? mjh

Police Begin Seizing Guns of Civilians – New York Times By ALEX BERENSON and JOHN M. BRODER

Local police officers began confiscating weapons from civilians in preparation for a forced evacuation of the last

holdouts still living here, as President Bush steeled the nation for the grisly scenes of recovering the dead that will unfold in coming

days.

Police officers and federal law enforcement agents scoured the city carrying assault rifles seeking residents who have holed

up to avoid forcible eviction, as well as those who are still considering evacuating voluntarily to escape the city’s putrid waters.

Mr. Compass, the police superintendent, said that after a week of near anarchy in the city, no civilians in New

Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols, shotguns, or other firearms of any kind. “Only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons,” he

said.

That order apparently does not apply to the hundreds of security guards whom businesses and some wealthy

individuals have hired to protect their property. The guards, who are civilians working for private security firms like Blackwater, are

openly carrying M-16s and other assault rifles.

Mr. Compass said that he was aware of the private guards but that the police had

no plans to make them give up their weapons.

Katrina’s Silver Lining – New

York Times By DAVID BROOKS

There may be local resistance to the new arrivals – in Baton Rouge there were three-

hour lines at gun shops as locals armed themselves against the hurricane victims moving to their area – but if there has

ever been a moment when people may open their hearts, this is it.

Down the ID Rabbit Hole

class="mine">This link was sent by a friend. A little heady, but lots ‘o links from here to fallacious creationist claims. mjh

Argument from incredulity – EvoWiki

There are two types of

this fallacy [an appeal to ignorance], depending on whether it’s the arguer’s own incredulity:

* “This is unexplainable”

(meaning, of course, “I can’t explain this”). This is the argument from personal incredulity, and it contains the unwritten assumption

that the speaker is a superhuman genius who should be able to understand everything unless he is missing an assumption. So the superhuman

genius concludes that some assumption (God, aliens, psi, whatever) is true.

* “Scientists cannot explain this” (meaning, of

course, “as far as I know, science can’t explain this”). This variation contains the unwritten assumption that scientists are superhuman

geniuses and should be able to understand everything unless they are missing an assumption. This undue veneration of scientists is a form

of scientism, or using science as an ersatz religion. On top of that, it is simply not true in many cases – scientists do have an

explanation, and the speaker just doesn’t know it.

mjh’s Blog: Vox populi and mundus vult decipi

mjh’s blog

I’m

moving to new blogging software (WordPress — new RSS feed). If you would like to see what

has gone before, please follow the old archives links below (the look and functions have changed a bit). mjh

ps: add a comment here if you have any feedback on the overall blog look/function. Thanks.

mjh’s Blog 2005 to present
Old archives: mjh’s Blog 2004-2005
mjh’s Weblog Archives 2002-2003

a shameless effort to tear us apart — Mehlman would know

I’m really bothered by the sing-song “blame-game” tossed about by the Right. There is, indeed, blame here. I was recently lectured by someone about other people’s failure to accept “personal responsibility.” Oh, like “the buck stops here”?

Bush seemed so inept not because he was on vacation but because Cheney and Rove were on vacation. Now we see “Bush’s brain” back on the attack.

Standing in a warehouse, Bush’s arms stuck out from his sides as if he were a weightlifter; he moved as if recovering from a stroke.

I saw Bush at a cabinet meeting explaining “we’ll solve these problems because that’s what we are — problem solvers.” And articulate, too. mjh

Parties Scramble for Post-Katrina Leverage
Hill GOP Sets Investigative Commission; Democrats Criticize Panel’s Makeup
By Charles Babington and Shailagh Murray

House and Senate GOP leaders announced the “Hurricane Katrina Joint Review Committee,” which will include only members of Congress, with Republicans outnumbering Democrats by a yet-to-be-determined ratio. The commission, which will have subpoena powers, will investigate the actions of local, state and federal governments before and after the storm that devastated New Orleans and other portions of the Gulf Coast.

They rejected Democratic appeals to model the panel after the Sept. 11 commission, which was made up of non-lawmakers and was equally balanced between Republicans and Democrats. That commission won wide praise for assessing how the 2001 terrorist attacks occurred, and for recommending changes in the government’s anti-terrorism structure. …

A Republican-led Congress cannot be trusted to make a thorough investigation of a Republican administration, said Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.). “Democrats strongly prefer that the response to Hurricane Katrina be investigated by a commission of independent experts like the 9/11 commission,” he said.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said the new commission “is not truly bipartisan, will not be made up of equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans, cannot write legislation and will not have bipartisan subpoena power.”

Bush Requests $51.8 Billion More for Relief
GOP Leaders Launch Inquiry on Katrina Preparation and Response
By Jonathan Weisman and Amy Goldstein

“While countless Americans are pulling together to lend a helping hand, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are pointing fingers in a shameless effort to tear us apart,” Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman responded.

[mjh: I hear Mrs Lovejoy crying, “think of the children; won’t somebody think of the children?” Somebody should remind Mehlman they won the election through shameless efforts to tear us apart.]