Listen to Bloggers (Updated 3/19/05)

No, seriously, listen to four of us on Saturday, when “progressive” Republican, While the Radical Right Arrests Them Both” href=”http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/000743.htm”>Jim Scarantino, launches his brand new local talk radio show by having as guests the outrageous Pika Brittlebush (yes, from the BK commercial!), the playful poet Johnny_Mango and the simply outraged Mark Justice Hinton (he’ll be the crazed-looking one). Four Bloggers in Search of a Playwright. We’ll talk a bit about blogging, including how-to’s, and how we all came to the blogosphere. We’ll be answering phone calls from listeners — please, please! Remember, it’s easier to write than to do, and easier to listen than to read. Take it easy with us. Come see if it only takes one “progressive” Republican to outwit 3 unrepentant liberals and save the Republic! All the fun of poking a caged bear with a sharp stick with none of the environmental impact. mjh

The Real Side
KAGM 106.3 FM
11am to 12 noon
Sat, 3/19/05

Registered liberal Martin Heinrich says of Jim Scarantino, fellow WWF fan, “he’ll tear anyone apart whose ideology is stronger than their ideas. In other words chuck the party line crap and intelligently defend what you believe in.” These guys eat at BK every week after their testosterone treatments.

Updated 3/18/05

rebecca blood :: weblogs: a history and perspective

In 1998 there were just a handful of sites of the type that are now identified as weblogs (so named by Jorn Barger in December 1997).

Update 3/19/05

mjh’s Blog: Radio Postscript

The Short List of Noteworthy Senators (updated 3/19/05)

Arctic Senate Vote

Below is a list of U.S. Senators and their votes on the Cantwell amendment to keep Arctic Refuge drilling from the Senate Budget Resolution.

A “y” indicates the person voted for the Cantwell amendment and for Arctic Refuge protection.

A “n” indicates the person voted against the Cantwell amendement and against Arctic Refuge protection.

Please call your senators on Thursday, March 17, 2005, to tell them thank you or to express your outrage: 202-224-3121

[mjh: follow the link above for the full list; this abridged list includes the Republicans and Democrats that voted against their parties.]

State Party Senator Vote on Cantwell
AZ R McCain Y
ME R Collins Y
ME R Snowe Y
MN R Coleman Y
OH R DeWine Y
OR R Smith Y
RI R Chafee Y
VT I Jeffords Y
HI D Akaka n
HI D Inouye n
LA D Landrieu n

Update 3/17/05:
[mjh: As a native Hawai’ian, my heart breaks.]

Democratic Sens. Dan Inouye and Daniel Akaka were joined by Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., in the coalition with 48 Republicans to override an attempt by other Democrats and moderate Republicans to remove a provision in next year’s budget that would allow drilling in the refuge.

Inouye and Akaka said that they believe their votes represent the position of a majority of the native peoples in the region. Both senators have a history of voting to support the Inupiat Eskimos, some of whom want the refuge opened to oil and gas exploration and drilling, although environmental groups said that support has been waning.

Inouye has said that since Hawai’i is an oil-dependent state, it is imperative that new oil deposits be found and developed to ensure a steady access to meet the state’s energy needs.

Hawai’i senators help open Arctic to drilling

Update 3/18/05:
[mjh: follow the money]
Opensecrets.org–Money in politics data

Update 3/19/05:
[via The Daily Outrage]

The Nation | Blog | The Daily Outrage | Ari Berman

Democrats Daniel Akaka and Daniel Inouye of Hawaii and Mary Landrieu of Louisiana handed Bush a huge victory–and the environment a huge loss–this week by voting to open up Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) for oil drilling. The Hawaii delegation made a shrewd political compromise: they’d support the ANWR provision if Alaska’s Ted Stevens co-sponsored a bill recognizing Native Hawaiians as indigenous peoples. Mary Landrieu, on the other hand, is the darling of her state’s oil and gas interests, who contributed $303,000 to her 2002 campaign. Before the vote, a Kerry staffer told me that Landrieu would vote with her fellow Democrats. Apparently, there’s nothing quite like stabbing your own kind in the back.

But Congressional Republican Approval of Themselves is at an All Time High!

Gallup: Only 37% Approve of Congress, a ‘Surprising Drop’

A new Gallup Poll released today finds what Frank Newport, its director, calls a “surprising drop in Americans’ approval of the way Congress is handling its job.”

A poll completed last week found only 37% of American approve of Congress’ job performance, down from 45% just one month ago, and its lowest rating since 1999. “My guess,” Newport reports, “is that congressional approval is suffering from a generalized reaction to the bickering about Social Security.”

In the same poll, only 42% said they were “satisfied with the way things are going in the U.S.” This is down from 45% in February. A closer look finds a dramatic partisan divide, with 69% of Republicans saying they are satisfied and only 18% of Democrats.

At the same time, President Bush’s approval rating stands at 52%, the same as last month.

Asked to rank the biggest problems facing the country, 28% mentioned various economic problems, 25% the war in Iraq, 12% Social Security, and 9% terrorism or health care. Among the issues mentioned by less than 1%: the energy crisis, gay issues, abortion, racism.

‘he did his best to confuse, mislead and scare them’

The Daily Howler

Like so many other Republicans, [Senator Judd Gregg (R-NH)] was looking for a way to pretend that Social Security’s day of reckoning was disturbingly near at hand. According to the CBO, Social Security can pay full benefits through the year 2052. But it’s hard to get people worked up about that, so fakers like Gregg keep torturing facts to produce a sense of impending disaster. …

The surplus will be getting smaller each year—but duh! At this point, it will still be a surplus! In 2015, the surplus will be $85 billion, which is bigger than the surplus this year! But Gregg wanted to produce a sense of disaster. So that’s when he started to torture his facts to produce a disturbing conclusion:

GREGG: This is significant because every dollar collected in payroll taxes is spent, including the surplus. So in 2011, when budget writers are looking at the fiscal 2012 budget, they can count on less Social Security dollars to pad other spending, and the rest of the budget will begin to feel the pinch.

That means defense, education, federal highways, environmental programs—every other area of government will be impacted.

This will happen not in 2018, not in 2042, but just six years from now when Congress will have to make choices between Social Security benefits and other programs. People need to understand this reality.

“People need to understand this reality,” Gregg said—even as he did his best to confuse, mislead and scare them. …

Say what? If you know anything at all about the SS debate, you know [this] claim is inaccurate. Everyone has read, a thousand times, the current projection of the SS trustees—the payroll tax will produce an annual surplus through the year 2018. The CBO says 2020.

Don’t Feel Sorry for Drillers

ABQjournal: Talk of the Town

Don’t Feel Sorry for Drillers

THERE IS AN arrogance that comes with being the biggest bully on the block. Chuck Moran, president of the Independent Petroleum Association of New Mexico, plays that bully perfectly in his recent commentary, “Otero Mesa Drilling No Longer Economical.”

Moran writes that pressure to preserve Otero Mesa, and subsequent dissatisfaction with BLM’s final decision to permanently protect less than 10 percent of the arena from drilling, comes from “they (grassroots environmental organizations) and their yacht and caviar foundations.”

Underhandedly, he suggests nonprofit environmental groups are rolling in cash, while the oil and gas firms he represents deserve the sympathy usually reserved for those down on their luck.

It reminds you of the bully that would push and push, and then run crying for a teacher when they were finally pushed back. Moran represents an incredibly powerful and rich lobby in New Mexico. They are required to pay the $1.3 billion in taxes that Moran mentions, and yet recently still cleared record profits.

Groups working to protect Otero Mesa operate with limited budgets, rely on volunteers and receive significant funding from members throughout New Mexico. Implying otherwise is doing a disservice to the real issue? whether a few days of energy from lands like Otero Mesa is worth the drilling of oil and gas wells all over that land.

NATHAN SMALL
Los Lunas

Drilling Debate Is All Talk

I HAVE TOURED several major oil and gas fields in New Mexico and have seen the industry’s standards and practices firsthand.

I challenge Chuck Moran and representatives from the Independent Petroleum Association of New Mexico to tour these existing (oil and gas) fields with the “self-indulgent, perverted,” environmentalists and with reporters from the Journal. Wouldn’t it be ideal for Moran to confront his foes on the battlefield, to prove their dishonesty, right in front of journalists?

The Journal seems satisfied doing nothing at all, while presenting a stream of neverending, point-counterpoint editorial rhetoric on the drilling issue. The Journal seems completely incurious about the truth, which is most un-journalistic. Isn’t it time to report on drilling and production standards and impacts in New Mexico firsthand, with the opposing sides there to defend their positions?

JOE ADAIR
Albuquerque

mjh’s Blog: We Pay Taxes, So You Shut Up!
mjh’s Blog: anti-environmentalists

Every facet of humanity

Liberal Bloggers Reaching Out to Major Media By JONATHAN D. GLATER

[Bob Fertik, president of Democrats.com,] maintains that the blurring of boundaries has benefited left-wing bloggers less than their adversaries on the right, saying that reports posted on conservative blogs more easily make the jump to the main news media. “The way we perceive it,” he said, “is that right-wing bloggers are able to invent stories, get them out on Drudge, get them on Rush Limbaugh, get them on Fox, and pretty soon that spills over into the mainstream media. We, the progressives, we don’t have that kind of network to work with.”

Some on the right disagree, arguing that the news reported by traditional media is tainted by liberal bias. “We learned years ago that the mainstream media just weren’t going to pay attention to us,” said Kristinn Taylor of the Web site FreeRepublic.com.

But bloggers on all sides agree that the left has made less effective use of the opportunities to organize and wield influence afforded by the Internet. [mjh: what about the phenomenal online fundraising of Dean and Kerry?] The reasons, though, are more complex than they might appear. “It’s not just a story about the blogosphere,” said Jack M. Balkin, a professor and director of the Information Society Project at Yale Law School. “It’s a story about the conservative social networks of which the blogosphere is a part. The important thing is the network – and I mean the social network.” [via dangerousmeta!]

As usual, Conservatives control the discussion. What evidence is there that there are more conservative bloggers or that they are more successful (is success simply ‘being read’ or more than that?). Conservatives coined Rathergate and pat themselves on the back mightily for slaying their enemy. BFD.

Remember that the Radical Right has been on the warpath for ages, perhaps back to the New Deal, certainly since Goldwater and Wallace. They have worked very hard, very aggressively, to takeover. They thought they had with Raygun. They were dismayed with Clinton’s success and worked like devils to undo that (even though Clinton was the perfect response to Raygun, two sides of the same coin). They regained their footing with Gingrich and the Contract On America. They triumphed in Florida and Ohio. They will destroy themselves. The blogosphere will document that.

The Internet and the Web belong to humanity. Every facet of humanity will find a place in cyberspace — our best qualities and our worst, in the same proportions found within us collectively wherever we go. mjh

Governator is taking PR cues from Duhbya

The Nation | Blog | The Daily Outrage | Ari Berman

Amazingly, the Governator is taking PR cues from George W. Bush.

Last week the California Governor’s office admitted to sending at least five fake news segments hyping Arnold’s policies to local TV stations under the guise of real news. The mock news spots–sent out to stations in December–promote an end to mandatory lunch breaks for workers, cuts in the number of nurses at hospitals, a revised pay scheme for teachers and stricter tenure track for professors.

Here’s the Los Angeles Times’ description of the segments: “A written introduction offers suggested opening lines to be read by television news anchors. A state employee, who previously worked as a reporter for a Sacramento television station, is the narrator. Each video includes interviews with advocates for the proposals. The tapes do not acknowledge dissenting views or offer balance as required in news accounts.”