Category Archives: Election

Feel Better, New Mexico?

New York City Still Tallying Votes | The Trail | washingtonpost.com 

By Robin Shulman
NEW YORK — It’s been 15 days since Super Tuesday, but New York City is still waiting to find out if Sen. Barack Obama or Sen. Hillary Clinton won the most-contested areas.

The Board of Elections has acknowledged that errors in reporting the election day tallies made it appear that Obama had received not a single vote in 55 election districts, when in reality his votes had simply not been counted, said Valerie Vazquez-Rivera, a spokeswoman for the board. In another 27 districts, Obama actually received no votes, she said.

Vazquez-Rivera attributed the discrepancies to human error as exhausted inspectors rushed to copy columns of numbers to be delivered to the police and then to the press.

“People have been working 16 and 17 hour days,” she said. “There were instances where they just left the Obama field blank.”

But Tuesday, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, described the results as “fraud.”

“If you want to call it significant undercounting, I guess that’s a euphemism for fraud,” the mayor said.

No election districts reported that Clinton received no votes.

New York City Still Tallying Votes | The Trail | washingtonpost.com

“Senator Hothead”

McCain’s Sharp Tongue: An Achilles heel? – TIME By AP/LIBBY QUAID

(WASHINGTON) — Temper, temper. Republican John McCain is known for his. He’s been dubbed “Senator Hothead” by more than one publication, but he’s also had some success extracting his hatchet from several foreheads.

Even his Republican Senate colleagues are not spared his sharp tongue.

“F— you,” he shouted at Texas Sen. John Cornyn last year.

“Only an a—— would put together a budget like this,” he told the former Budget Committee chairman, Sen. Pete Domenici, in 1999.

“I’m calling you a f—— jerk!” he once retorted to Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley.

With Cornyn, he smoothed things over quickly. The two argued during a meeting on immigration legislation; Cornyn complained that McCain seemed to parachute in during the final stages of negotiations. “F— you. I know more about this than anyone else in the room,” McCain reportedly shouted.

Cornyn chuckled at the memory of what he called McCain’s “aggressive expressions of differences.” The Texan has endorsed McCain.

“He almost immediately apologized to me,” Cornyn said last week. “I accepted his apology, and as far as I’m concerned, we’ve moved on down the road.”

The political landscape in Arizona, McCain’s home state, is littered with those who have incurred his wrath. Former Gov. Jane Hull pretended to hold a telephone receiver away from her ear to demonstrate a typical outburst from McCain in a 1999 interview with The New York Times.

McCain has even blown up at volunteers and, on occasion, the average Joe.

He often pokes fun at his reputation: “Thanks for the question, you little jerk,” he said last year to a New Hampshire high school student wondering if McCain, at 71, was too old to be president.

Other times, his ire is all too real. This has prompted questions about whether his temperament is suited to the office of commander-in-chief or whether it might handicap him in a presidential campaign against either Barack Obama or Hillary Rodham Clinton, who are not known for such outbursts.

“I decided I didn’t want this guy anywhere near a trigger,” Domenici told Newsweek in 2000.

His irascibility fits with McCain’s proud image as a straight talker willing to say what people don’t want to hear.

Yet McCain’s temper hinders his efforts to make peace with his critics and rally Republicans behind his candidacy for president. That could be a big problem, because his most persistent foes — conservative radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh and Focus on the Family founder James Dobson — talk to tens of millions of people each day.

McCain and his advisers insist the acrimony is about matters of policy: “We have disagreements on specific issues from time to time,” McCain recently said of his critics.

In fact, the disputes often are as much about style as they are about substance.

McCain’s tone was certainly on Dobson’s mind when he issued a stinging anti-endorsement on Super Tuesday. He mentioned various issues, but Dobson also said the senator “has a legendary temper and often uses foul and obscene language.”

Privately, some conservatives grouse that McCain can seem more convivial toward his liberal colleagues. Just last week, McCain had an animated conversation and shared a belly laugh with liberal Democratic Sen. Ted Kennedy, his partner on controversial immigration reforms, on the Senate floor.

And then there is his choice of words – not just the expletives, but also the use of dismissive phrases such as “agents of intolerance” to describe televangelists Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell during the 2000 presidential campaign.

Yet McCain reconciled with Falwell before his death in 2007 and has done so with many others.

McCain has also smoothed things over with Sen. Thad Cochran, who had said very recently that the idea of McCain as GOP nominee sent a chill down his spine. McCain has battled for years with the Mississippi Republican, a senior member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, over pet projects or “earmarks” inserted by committee members into spending bills.

On the Senate floor last Tuesday, Cochran greeted McCain warmly, with a broad smile and a hug.

Grassley described his relations with McCain as “friendly, but not close.”

“John’s a person that I have a lot of disagreements with, but you’ve got to have a lot of respect for him,” Grassley told reporters recently. “For what he’s done to defend freedom, as a Navy pilot and as a POW, you’ve got to have a lot of respect for him for sticking to his guns, being way out ahead of the president that the policy needed to change in Iraq.”

“I’m not speaking as if I’m a born-again supporter of John McCain, I’m just trying to express it the way that I see him, and maybe some aspects of him being a good president,” Grassley said.

McCain’s defenders are weary of talk about his temperament. They point out that for all the decorum of the Senate, many members are known for raging at colleagues or even throwing shoes and other objects at aides.

For that matter, Dobson, the Focus on the Family founder so concerned about McCain’s “legendary temper,” apparently has a temper of his own. “He once berated one of our staffers to tears because he simply had to wait a few minutes to see the member,” said a Capitol Hill aide who requested anonymity out of deference to his boss. Another aide said he witnessed the scene.

Since he rolled up big victories on Super Tuesday and forced his main rival, Mitt Romney, from the race, McCain has worked quickly to win over his enemies.

He delivered a well-received speech at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, and he met last week with some of his biggest congressional foes, the uniformly conservative House Republican leadership.

Progress won’t happen overnight, said conservative Republican strategist Greg Mueller.

“I hope they’ll be resolved by the time we all go to convention, but it’s going to take a while to mend some of the wounds and get everybody back together,” Mueller said.

– – –

Think Progress » Bob Corker Refuses To Say That McCain Is ‘Temperamentally Suited To Be President’

Last night on Hannity & Colmes, Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) coyly suggested that Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) does not have the temperament to be president. When asked by Alan Colmes whether McCain is “temperamentally suited to be President of the United States,” Corker refused to say yes.

“You know, his temperamental issues have been written about,” Corker said. Sometimes, McCain “says some things that I’m sure he doesn’t mean, walks away, and goes, why did I say that!” Colmes remarked, “I noticed that when I asked you if he was temperamentally suited, you didn’t automatically say yes.” Corker avoided the issue by saying, “Well I think he is an American hero.”

Corker acknowledged in the interview that he’s “had his moments” with McCain. Watch it:

McCain’s temperamental issues have most often been raised in dealings with his own Republican colleagues.

Earlier this year, Sen. Thad Cochran (R-MS) said that the thought of McCain as president “sends a cold chill down my spine. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and he worries me.” McCain once called Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) “a f—ing jerk” during a debate over the fate of Vietnam MIAs. And in a heated dispute over immigration, McCain screamed, “F— you!” at Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), who had been raising concerns about the legislation.

Shadenfreude

I fully understand the shadenfreude Republicans in New Mexico feel over troubles with the Democratic caucus. I hope conservatives will continue to hoot, snort and cat-call. Their letters to the editor serve as an unneeded reminder of just how mean-spirited and uncharitable true conservatives are. Laugh your asses off — perhaps that will take the sting away from landslide losses for conservatives in the Fall. Snicker all you like — it may distract you from your own party’s collapse and the premature end of the “generation of conservative rule” envisioned just 4 years ago by BushCo.

Every primary and caucus has shown one thing: Democrats are fired up as never before. Twice as many Dems are voting as Republicans. Unless the Republicans find a way to suppress voter turn out or totally disgust everyone — still possible; call Karl Rove — Republicans should hang on to anything that makes them happy for the time being. Democrats won’t begrudge you one last haw-haw. mjh

THE DEMOCRATS can’t run their own primary, but they want to run our country?— S.S. [mjh: Right, there’ no difference between volunteers and professionals, which may be why conservatives want an all volunteer government.]

WHEN NO ONE’S there to bail them out, it’s interesting to see just how inept the Democrats are.— M.L.C.

I THINK IT was Will Rogers that said, “I don’t belong to an organized political party. I’m a Democrat.” It must be an embarrassment to be a New Mexico Democrat. I’m glad I’m not one.— A.J. [mjh: Not half as glad as we are that you aren’t one.]

In the last election we were reduced to banana-republic status with the mandate by the Democrats we had to use paper ballots. There are a lot of things you can fix, but stupid is not one of them.— J.M. [mjh: Straight from the horse’s mouth.]

Bill & Marty are Shocked — Shocked, I say!

Bill Richard is the titular head of New Mexico’s Democratic Party. Until 2 weeks ago, he expected to benefit from the early caucus in New Mexico which he pushed for four years ago. Now, a day late, he appears to say there will be six more weeks of winter. No, wait, to say someone else is responsible for the problem — not him. That’s leadership. By comparison, Colón — who did screw up by failing to realize how fired up and ready to go we all are — has been a grown-up and shouldered the blame. No doubt, Richardson will set fire to a bag of poop on Colón’s doorstep.

I was lucky. We went early and made it through a system that looked fraught with weaknesses. No, I didn’t volunteer to fix them nor am I now. I’m also not throwing turds at those who did volunteer and did the best they could under the circumstances.

Republicans — who let the state pick up the tab for their meaningless June primary, god bless them — felt as cheated as Democrats did prior to 2004. Why not make an official New Mexico State Primary for both parties set for a date agreed to by both parties? A primary managed by paid professionals, including someone paid to prepare for rising storms.

Governor, do you want to take the lead on this or just blame others? mjh

Heath Haussamen on New Mexico Politics: Party seeks accurate tally; Madrid doesn’t trust vote

Criticism has been harsh and widespread, and has come from people and organizations including The Albuquerque Tribune, Gov. Bill Richardson and Albuquerque Mayor Martin Chávez. Colón has taken responsibility.

But Madrid said those who pushed for the creation of the early caucus in New Mexico,
which was first implemented in 2004, share the blame. She was one of
the leading opponents of the caucus at the time, arguing that, as the
state’s attorney general, she would have no jurisdiction to investigate
problems because state election law doesn’t apply to a party-run
caucus. In addition, a party-run caucus puts a critical vote in the
hands of volunteers instead of paid, trained election workers.

“It doesn’t have all the checks and balances and the years of experience of a proper election,” Madrid said.

Richardson
on Wednesday pointed the finger at the party officials and Democrats
who didn’t help fund and volunteer with Tuesday’s caucus. He secured
the funding for the caucus in 2004, but said he was too busy running
for president and focusing on the Legislature to do it this time.

Madrid said the governor and others who pushed for the caucus share some of the blame for Tuesday’s problems.

“It
seems to me it’s the responsibility of the governor and the other
officials who got this through to properly fund it and make sure it’s
well-run,” she said. “I’m very concerned that the election was not
conducted properly and fairly.”

He’ll be back

Read Romney’s words closely:

Romney suspends presidential campaign – CNN.com

(CNN) — Mitt Romney suspended his bid for the Republican presidential nomination Thursday, saying if he continued it would “forestall the launch of a national campaign and be making it easier for Sen. Clinton or Obama to win.”

art.mitt.romney.20.ap.jpg “In this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign be a part of aiding a surrender to terror. This is not an easy decision. I hate to lose,” the former Massachusetts governor said.

“If this were only about me, I’d go on. But it’s never been only about me. I entered this race because I love America, and because I love America, in this time of war I feel I have to now stand aside for our party and for our country.”

Romney just said that anything that might help Democrats is “aiding a surrender to terror.” If you read the entire transcript of Romney’s speech to the hard core conservatives (the same group that booed McCain), it’s much worse:

The Page – by Mark Halperin – TIME

“Soon, the face of liberalism in America will have a new name. Whether it is Barack or Hillary, the result would be the same if they were to win the Presidency. The opponents of American culture would push the throttle, devising new justifications for judges to depart from the constitution. Economic neophytes would layer heavier and heavier burdens on employers and families, slowing our economy and opening the way for foreign competition to further erode our lead. …

“And Barack and Hillary have made their intentions clear regarding Iraq and the war on terror. They would retreat and declare defeat. And the consequence of that would be devastating. It would mean attacks on America, launched from safe havens that make Afghanistan under the Taliban look like child’s play. About this, I have no doubt.

http://thepage.time.com/transcript-of-romneys-speech-withdrawing-from-the-race/

Perhaps you recognize the claim that ‘a vote for Democrats is a vote for America’s death’:

CNN.com – Cheney: Kerry win risks terror attack – Sep 7, 2004

Cheney told Republican supporters at a town hall meeting in Des Moines that they needed to make “the right choice” in the November 2 election.

“If we make the wrong choice, then the danger is that we’ll get hit again — that we’ll be hit in a way that will be devastating from the standpoint of the United States,” Cheney said.

“And then we’ll fall back into the pre-9/11 mindset, if you will, that in fact these terrorist attacks are just criminal acts and that we’re not really at war. I think that would be a terrible mistake for us.”

Edwards told reporters that “Dick Cheney’s scare tactics crossed the line.”

“What he said to the American people was that if you go to the polls in November and elect anyone other than us, and another terrorist attack occurs, then it’s your fault,” Edwards said during a stop in Chillicothe, Ohio.

“This is un-American. The truth is that it proves once again that they will do anything and say anything to keep their jobs.”

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/09/07/cheney.terror/

There you have the fall campaign summed up: A Vote For Obama Is A Vote for Terror! mjh

PS: Several news reports said Romney is “suspending” his campaign. Until when? Is suspending a nicer word than quitting? I had been looking forward to Romney as the Republican nominee because he was so good at making second place sound like victory. (“We got another Silver!”) If McCain picks Romney as Veep it will be the best proof they’ll both do anything to win.

Screw the Base?

McCain has to persuade conservatives he’s Ronnie Raygun and the rest of us he isn’t Duhbya. mjh

E. J. Dionne Jr. – Division Problems – washingtonpost.com

Despite his impressive victories, McCain continued to fare poorly on
Tuesday among the conservatives who have defined the Republican Party
since the rise of Ronald Reagan.

McCain won, as he has all year, because moderates and liberals, opponents of President Bush, and critics of the Iraq war continued to rally to him despite his stands on many of the issues that arouse their ire. And he prevailed because Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney continued to divide the right.

Huckabee became the champion of the Old South, winning in Arkansas, Tennessee, Georgia and Alabama, and he nearly defeated McCain in Missouri and Oklahoma. Romney won a swath of states in the Midwest and mountain West.

McCain, in other words, lost the core Republican states and instead piled up delegates in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Illinois and California. All are traditionally Democratic states unlikely to vote for him in November.