{"id":985,"date":"2003-12-27T14:18:06","date_gmt":"2003-12-27T21:18:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/uncategorized\/rumsfeld-40-years-ago-vs-today\/"},"modified":"2003-12-27T14:18:06","modified_gmt":"2003-12-27T21:18:06","slug":"rumsfeld-40-years-ago-vs-today","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/nada\/dump-duhbya\/rumsfeld-40-years-ago-vs-today\/","title":{"rendered":"Rumsfeld 40 Years Ago vs Today"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a title=\"Government Executive Magazine - 1\/30\/01 Rumsfeld faces big choices in second tour at Pentagon\" href=\"http:\/\/www.govexec.com\/dailyfed\/0101\/013001nj.htm\">Government Executive Magazine &#8211; <b>1\/30\/01<\/b> Rumsfeld faces big choices in second tour at Pentagon<\/a> By George C. Wilson, National Journal <\/p>\n<p>[Rumsfeld&#8217;s] first [tour as Secretary of Defense] ran only 14 months from Nov. 20, 1975, to Jan. 20, 1977&#8230; <\/p>\n<p>On the basis of his 14-month tour, Pentagon reporters in a survey conducted by Armed Forces Journal in 1979 <b>voted him the worst Defense Secretary up to that time<\/b>; they voted fellow Republican Melvin R. Laird, formerly a Congressman from Wisconsin, the best. <\/p>\n<p>[Rumsfeld was a congressman representing] Illinois&#8217; 13th District (Chicago) from 1963-69. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>In 1966, he was <b>one of only 38 Republicans to vote against increasing the minimum wage<\/b> from $1.25 to $1.60 an hour. He also opposed spending federal money to establish the National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities, and he opposed such Great Society initiatives as Medicare, mass transit, and anti-poverty programs. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>During the Vietnam War-on Aug. 30, 1966-Rumsfeld told his House colleagues that it &#8220;is beyond me&#8221; why the huge contract awarded to Brown and Root [now a subsidiary of Halliburton!] of Houston and other U.S. firms to build air fields and other facilities in South Vietnam <b>&#8220;has not been and <i>is not now being adequately audited<\/i>. The potential for waste and profiteering under such a contract is substantial.&#8221;<\/b> [I guess he got over that.] &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>He believed while a lawmaker that Congress, especially the House, should have a larger say in military and foreign affairs. He declared, for example, on March 18, 1968, while the Vietnam War was raging: &#8220;The executive needs parcels of extraordinary power to deal with extraordinary situations. <b>However, I question whether the executive should have the range of powers in the range of situations that is the case today<\/b>.&#8221; Three years earlier he said: <b>&#8220;Congress must be able to do more than merely nod yes or no to presidential proposals-whether out of apelike obedience or uninformed obstinacy.&#8221;<\/b>  [Clearly, he got over this.] &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The point, I think, that I feel so strongly about is the fact that certain people of this country, in order for them to support something, requires that there is an understanding of it,&#8221; Rumsfeld said on July 10, 1967.<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Windfalls of War - The Center for Public Integrity\" href=\"http:\/\/www.publicintegrity.org\/wow\/bio.aspx?act=pro&amp;ddlC=31\">Windfalls of War &#8211; The Center for Public Integrity<\/a><br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nKellogg, Brown &amp; Root is the engineering and construction arm of the Halliburton Company, which calls itself &#8220;the world&#8217;s largest diversified energy services, engineering and construction company&#8221; with operations in more than 100 countries and 2002 sales of $12.4 billion. <\/p>\n<p><a title=\"A Contract to Spend\" href=\"http:\/\/www.motherjones.com\/news\/feature\/2002\/05\/halliburton.html\">A Contract to Spend<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The result, says Danielle Brian, executive director of the non-profit Project on Government Oversight, is a &#8220;pay-now, review-later&#8221; approach to contracting.<br \/>\n&#8220;Really what it is, is making the flow of tax payer money to these favorite contractors easier and easier with less oversight and less guarantee that we&#8217;re getting what we&#8217;re paying for,&#8221; Brian charges. &#8220;We no longer know what we&#8217;re going to get for our money. And it really opens up the government for being taken for a ride.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Halliburton Deals Recall Vietnam-Era Controversy\" href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/display_pages\/features\/feature_1569483.html\">NPR : Halliburton Deals Recall Vietnam-Era Controversy<\/a><\/p>\n<p>By the mid-1960s, newspaper columnists and the Republican minority in Congress began to suggest that the company&#8217;s good luck was tied to its sizable contributions to Johnson&#8217;s political campaign.<\/p>\n<p>More questions were raised when a consortium of which Brown &amp; Root was a part won a $380 million contract to build airports, bases, hospitals and other facilities for the U.S. Navy in South Vietnam. By 1967, the General Accounting Office had faulted the &#8220;Vietnam builders&#8221; &#8212; as they were known &#8212; for <b>massive accounting lapses<\/b> and allowing thefts of materials.<\/p>\n<p>Brown &amp; Root also became a target for anti-war protesters: <b>they called the firm the embodiment of the &#8220;military-industrial complex&#8221;<\/b> and denounced it for building detention cells to hold Viet Cong prisoners in South Vietnam. [Brown &amp; Root constructed the prisons at Guantanemo, too.]<\/p>\n<p>Today, Brown &amp; Root is called Kellogg, Brown &amp; Root &#8212; a Halliburton subsidiary better known as KBR.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Government Executive Magazine &#8211; 1\/30\/01 Rumsfeld faces big choices in second tour at Pentagon By George C. Wilson, National Journal [Rumsfeld&#8217;s] first [tour as Secretary of Defense] ran only 14 months from Nov. 20, 1975, to Jan. 20, 1977&#8230; On the basis of his 14-month tour, Pentagon reporters in a survey conducted by Armed Forces &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/nada\/dump-duhbya\/rumsfeld-40-years-ago-vs-today\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Rumsfeld 40 Years Ago vs Today<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-985","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dump-duhbya"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/985","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=985"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/985\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=985"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=985"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=985"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}