{"id":91,"date":"2005-10-27T11:14:29","date_gmt":"2005-10-27T17:14:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/?p=91"},"modified":"2005-11-04T00:05:43","modified_gmt":"2005-11-04T06:05:43","slug":"dont-bank-on-id-fading","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/nada\/id\/dont-bank-on-id-fading\/","title":{"rendered":"Don&#8217;t Bank on ID Fading"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote class=\"mine\"><p>I don&#8217;t read Winthrop Quigley every week, but I have found a <\/p>\n<p>couple of his columns informative and worth reading. He&#8217;s not just an AmeriCog stoking the Capitalist Machine. That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s too bad <\/p>\n<p>his column today is effectively buried in Business Outlook (it&#8217;s standard location). Though he includes a business reference, his topic <\/p>\n<p>transcends it.<\/p>\n<p>Quigley offers his own decent take on the fallacy of equating Intelligent Design with science. I consider it anti-<\/p>\n<p>science new-speak &#8212; &#8220;dumbing down&#8221; taken to a new aggressiveness. Still, I&#8217;m happy to see Quigley weigh in on the side of light in the <\/p>\n<p>struggle against the New American Dark Ages (NADA).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.abqjournal.com\/biz\/402186outlook10-27-\n\n05.htm\">ABQjournal: Why Intelligent Design Is Wrong in Science Class<\/a> By Winthrop Quigley, Journal Staff Writer<\/p>\n<p>Intelligent <\/p>\n<p>design has no long-run future in America&#8217;s science curricula because the dominant philosophy of the United States is not evangelical <\/p>\n<p>Christianity, it is capitalism.<\/p>\n<p>    American business simply will not tolerate the further dumbing down of its future workforce&#8217;s <\/p>\n<p>science education with metaphysical speculation masquerading as biology. It cannot afford to. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Regardless of any spiritual <\/p>\n<p>angst one might feel, the fact remains that ID is bad for business.<\/p>\n<p>    Corporate America, especially its technology companies, is <\/p>\n<p>very worried about losing its competitive advantage over India, China and other Asian countries because of a poorly educated workforce. <\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"mine\"><p>And here is Quigley&#8217;s logical flaw, made worse by ignoring the true meaning of the quote he then <\/p>\n<p>takes from Friedman.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Thomas L. Friedman in his book &#8220;The World Is Flat&#8221; said every major company he interviewed for <\/p>\n<p>the book &#8220;is investing significantly in research and development abroad. It is not &#8216;follow the money.&#8217; It is &#8216;follow the brains.&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"mine\"><p>In our current global economy, it is cheaper to go to the PhD&#8217;s than hire them here. Heartless and <\/p>\n<p>soulless, corporations build their headquarters where the tax structure benefits them (which is also where their executives and boards <\/p>\n<p>live) and they build their offices and factories where they find the optimal combination of cheap but just-adequately skilled <\/p>\n<p>labor.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>    While Rio Rancho schools are working to put non-science into their science program, a kid in India is <\/p>\n<p>preparing to take our kids&#8217; technology jobs. I promise you, the Indian kid is not wasting his time studying ID. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>[Intel] will <\/p>\n<p>build its new plants where the workforce is properly trained.<\/p>\n<p>    When that happens in enough communities, watch ID quietly leave <\/p>\n<p>the science classroom<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"mine\"><p>Though I enjoyed and respect the piece and encourage you to <a title=\"ABQjournal: \n\nWhy Intelligent Design Is Wrong in Science Class\" href=\"http:\/\/www.abqjournal.com\/biz\/402186outlook10-27-05.htm\">read the whole <\/p>\n<p>thing<\/a>, I think Quigley makes an important mistake. He believes Capitalism will save the day (perhaps he is an AmeriCog, after all). <\/p>\n<p>Yes, business will realize that slack-jawed workers aren&#8217;t good for the company. Unfortunately, Quigley overlooks the value of slack-<\/p>\n<p>jawed consumers (isn&#8217;t that why we have Channel One in schools?). It may be that it is in business&#8217;s interest to employ cheaper and <\/p>\n<p>smarter Chinese PhD&#8217;s to come up with new products for rich and ignorant American buyers.<\/p>\n<p>Or, perhaps we should look to <a \n\ntitle=\"mjh's blog -- Evangelical Colorado Springs\" href=\"http:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/loco\/evangelical-colorado-springs\/\">Evangelical <\/p>\n<p>Colorado Springs<\/a> for the model of business in the <acronym class=\"define\" title=\"New American Dark Ages\">NADA<\/acronym>. Super-zealot <\/p>\n<p>employees <em>and<\/em> consumers must yield the highest profits.<\/p>\n<p>Get your <strong>authentic replica<\/strong> of Jesus on a <\/p>\n<p>dinosaur <em>now!<\/em> <span class=\"sig\">mjh<\/span><\/p>\n<p>See <a title=\"Bypass Compulsory Web Registration\" \n\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.bugmenot.com\/\">BugMeNot.com<\/a> if you are not a Journal subscriber.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I don&#8217;t read Winthrop Quigley every week, but I have found a couple of his columns informative and worth reading. He&#8217;s not just an AmeriCog stoking the Capitalist Machine. That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s too bad his column today is effectively buried in Business Outlook (it&#8217;s standard location). Though he includes a business reference, his topic transcends &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/nada\/id\/dont-bank-on-id-fading\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Don&#8217;t Bank on ID Fading<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-91","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=91"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=91"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=91"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=91"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}