2016 is going to be ugly as hell. But discouraging, dispiriting, disgusting, and disenfranchising voters are all strategies of the Radical Wrong. <\/p>\n
Scott Walker\u2019s insidious agnosticism – The Washington Post<\/a> By Dana Milbank<\/a> Opinion writer<\/p>\n Here is what one of those meet-the-candidate Q&As might look like if the answers were drawn from actual demurrals Walker has used in other contexts in recent weeks: <\/p>\n Why does Scott Walker hate America?<\/strong> <\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019ve never asked him that.\u201d <\/p>\n When did he stop beating his wife? <\/p>\n \u201cHe can speak for himself.\u201d <\/p>\n Does Walker love his children? <\/p>\n \u201cFor me, I\u2019m going to punt on that one as well.\u201d <\/p>\n Does he have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood? <\/p>\n \u201cI don\u2019t know. I honestly don\u2019t know, one way or the other. I\u2019ve said that 100 times, too.\u201d <\/p>\n I\u2019ll go out on a limb and stipulate that Walker loves his country and his family, and I have no reason to think he isn\u2019t a good Christian and a decent man. But he\u2019d be a better man if he didn\u2019t insinuate with his demurrals that his political opponents are not<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Scott Walker\u2019s insidious agnosticism – The Washington Post<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" 2016 is going to be ugly as hell. But discouraging, dispiriting, disgusting, and disenfranchising voters are all strategies of the Radical Wrong. Scott Walker\u2019s insidious agnosticism – The Washington Post By Dana Milbank Opinion writer Here is what one of those meet-the-candidate Q&As might look like if the answers were drawn from actual demurrals Walker … Continue reading Scott Walker is yet another Conservative jackass who needs to be honest or shut up<\/span> \n