{"id":60,"date":"2005-10-06T09:07:34","date_gmt":"2005-10-06T15:07:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/?p=60"},"modified":"2005-10-05T15:14:40","modified_gmt":"2005-10-05T21:14:40","slug":"neither-compassionate-nor-conservative","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/nada\/dump-duhbya\/neither-compassionate-nor-conservative\/","title":{"rendered":"Neither Compassionate Nor Conservative"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/10\/05\/politics\/05bush.html?th&#038;emc=th\">Bush Says He&#8217;ll Press <\/p>\n<p>Ahead With Broad Political Agenda &#8211; New York Times<\/a><br \/>\nBy RICHARD W. STEVENSON<br \/>\nPublished: October 5, 2005<\/p>\n<p>WASHINGTON, Oct. 4 <\/p>\n<p>&#8211; President Bush said Tuesday that he still had <strong>&#8220;plenty&#8221;<\/strong> of political capital and that he intended to spend it on <\/p>\n<p>battles over government spending, energy policy, Social Security and other issues that have so far proven difficult for him. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8220;I&#8217;m still a conservative, proudly so, proudly so,&#8221; Mr. Bush said<\/strong> in response to a question about whether he could <\/p>\n<p>still claim that identity after presiding over a rapid increase in the size and cost of the government.<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"The Right's \n\nDissed Intellectuals\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/10\/04\/AR2005100401301.html?referrer=email\">The <\/p>\n<p>Right&#8217;s Dissed Intellectuals<\/a> By Harold Meyerson<\/p>\n<p>You could cut the disappointment with a knife. &#8220;This is the moment for which <\/p>\n<p>the conservative legal movement has been waiting for two decades,&#8221; David Frum, the right-wing activist and former Bush speechwriter, <\/p>\n<p>wrote on his blog a few moments after the president dashed conservative hopes by nominating Harriet Miers to succeed Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor <\/p>\n<p>on the Supreme Court. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>In one fell swoop, Bush flouted both his supporters&#8217; ideology and their sense of <\/p>\n<p>meritocracy.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Worse, he bypassed the opportunity to demonstrate their intellectual seriousness &#8212; conservatism&#8217;s <\/p>\n<p>intellectual seriousness. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>But the conservative intellectuals have misread their president and misread their country. Four and <\/p>\n<p>a half years into the presidency of George W. Bush, <strong>how could they still entertain the idea that the president takes merit, much <\/p>\n<p>less intellectual seriousness, seriously?<\/strong> The one in-house White House intellectual, John DiIulio, ran screaming from the <\/p>\n<p>premises after a few months on the job. Bush has long since banished all those, such as Army chief of staff Gen. Eric Shinseki, who <\/p>\n<p>accurately predicted the price of taking over Iraq. Yet Donald Rumsfeld &#8212; with Bush, the author of the Iraqi disaster &#8212; remains, as do <\/p>\n<p><strong>scores of lesser lights<\/strong> whose sole virtue has been a <strong>dogged loyalty to Bush and his blunders<\/strong>. Loyalty <\/p>\n<p>and familiarity count for more with this president than brilliance (or even competence) and conviction.<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Cynical \n\nConservatism\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/10\/04\/AR2005100400981.html?referrer=email\">Cynical <\/p>\n<p>Conservatism<\/a> By Robert J. Samuelson<\/p>\n<p>George W. Bush entered the White House preaching &#8220;compassionate conservatism,&#8221; but he may <\/p>\n<p>leave known for <strong>cynical conservatism<\/strong>. &#8230; In practice, Bush has taken the most self-serving aspect of modern liberalism <\/p>\n<p>(its instinct to buy public support with massive government handouts) and fused it with the most self-serving aspect of modern <\/p>\n<p>conservatism (its instinct to buy support with massive tax cuts). &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Spend more, tax less. That&#8217;s a brazen political strategy, <\/p>\n<p>not a serious governing philosophy. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>The outlook is for tokenism. Just what conservative values Bush&#8217;s approach embodies is <\/p>\n<p>unclear. He has not tried to purge government of ineffective or unneeded programs. He has not laid a foundation for permanent tax <\/p>\n<p>reductions. He has not been straightforward with the public. He has not shown a true regard for the future. He has mostly been expedient <\/p>\n<p>or, more pointedly, cynical.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/i.a.cnn.net\/cnn\/2005\/POLITICS\/10\/05\/bush.reax\/story.bush.tue.ap.jpg\" alt=\"smile\" \n\nalign=\"right\"\/><a href=\"http:\/\/edition.cnn.com\/2005\/POLITICS\/10\/05\/bush.reax\/\">CNN.com &#8211; Bush military bird flu role slammed &#8211; Oct 5, <\/p>\n<p>2005<\/a><\/p>\n<p>A call by President George W. Bush for Congress to give him the power to use the military in law enforcement roles in the <\/p>\n<p>event of a bird flu pandemic has been criticized as <strong>akin to introducing martial law<\/strong>&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>Gene Healy, a senior <\/p>\n<p>editor at the conservative Cato Institute, said <strong>Bush would risk undermining &#8220;a fundamental principle of American law&#8221;<\/strong> by <\/p>\n<p>tinkering with the act, which does not hinder the military&#8217;s ability to respond to a crisis. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Bush began discussing the <\/p>\n<p>possibility of changing the law banning the military from participating in police-type activity last month, in the aftermath of the <\/p>\n<p>government&#8217;s sluggish response to civil unrest following Hurricane Katrina.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bush Says He&#8217;ll Press Ahead With Broad Political Agenda &#8211; New York Times By RICHARD W. STEVENSON Published: October 5, 2005 WASHINGTON, Oct. 4 &#8211; President Bush said Tuesday that he still had &#8220;plenty&#8221; of political capital and that he intended to spend it on battles over government spending, energy policy, Social Security and other &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/nada\/dump-duhbya\/neither-compassionate-nor-conservative\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Neither Compassionate Nor Conservative<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dump-duhbya"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}