The Democratic presidential candidate is probably <\/p>\n
oblivious<\/i> to the inconvenience and expense visited on hapless citizens. [S]ince the mistake<\/i> was committed on Kerry’s <\/p>\n
behalf [mjh: in an effort to protect his life], his campaign ought to reimburse passengers who were railroaded<\/i> into paying tow <\/p>\n
fee. — The Mighty Albuquerque Journal<\/p>\n
”Oblivious”?<\/i> How do you even spell that without a duhbya<\/b>?<\/p>\n
I’m puzzled by the Journal’s outrage on behalf of 6 citizens who were inconvenienced by the Secret Service’s decision to tow their <\/p>\n
vehicles. I’m more puzzled still how the Journal hangs this on John Kerry (on the front page, no less, and, days later, the editorial <\/p>\n
page). Is it possible that more than 6 people have been inconvenienced by the frequent visits of Dick Cheney and George Bush? Is it <\/p>\n
possible that more than 6 people have paid a steep price in terms of loss of freedom, especially free speech and free association? We’ll <\/p>\n
never know from the Journal, which isn’t about to investigate such matters. mjh<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
[published 8\/24\/04]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The Democratic presidential candidate is probably oblivious to the inconvenience and expense visited on hapless citizens. [S]ince the mistake was committed on Kerry’s behalf [mjh: in an effort to protect his life], his campaign ought to reimburse passengers who were railroaded into paying tow fee. — The Mighty Albuquerque Journal ”Oblivious”? How do you even … Continue reading Cheap Shots<\/span>