{"id":31,"date":"2005-09-27T01:16:36","date_gmt":"2005-09-27T07:16:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/?p=31"},"modified":"2005-09-27T13:48:21","modified_gmt":"2005-09-27T19:48:21","slug":"the-disaster-president","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/nada\/dump-duhbya\/the-disaster-president\/","title":{"rendered":"The Disaster President"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/09\/24\/AR2005092401538.html?\n\nreferrer=email\">Storm and Bush On the Move<\/a><\/p>\n<p>President Bush was not going to get caught off guard by Hurricane Rita this <\/p>\n<p>weekend.<\/p>\n<p>The president who refused to cut short a working vacation three weeks ago to prepare for the fury of Hurricane Katrina <\/p>\n<p>was sitting at the U.S. Northern Command post in Colorado on Saturday morning monitoring what had become a more timid storm.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I&#8217;ve come here,&#8221; Bush explained, &#8220;to watch NORTHCOM in action, to see firsthand <strong>the capacity of our <\/p>\n<p><em>military<\/em><\/strong> to plan, organize and move equipment to help the people in the affected areas.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Bush&#8217;s government was <\/p>\n<p>on <strong>war footing<\/strong> for Rita&#8217;s arrival&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>At an afternoon news conference here, House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-<\/p>\n<p>Tex.) praised Bush. &#8220;The president is hands-on and knows what&#8217;s going on,&#8221; he said. &#8220;The president is a take-charge type of guy.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"mine\"><p>Barf. <span class=\"sig\">mjh<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a \n\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.newsday.com\/news\/nationworld\/nation\/ny-usbush26,0,3017289.story?coll=ny-nation-big-pix\">Newsday.com: Bush urges larger <\/p>\n<p>role for military<\/a> BY CRAIG GORDON<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->President George W. Bush yesterday called on Congress to consider giving the U.S. <\/p>\n<p>military a leading role in recovery efforts in a catastrophic natural disaster or terrorist attack, a break with precedent sure to spark <\/p>\n<p>controversy. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Still, any move to put more U.S. military control over disaster response is sure to prove controversial, both to <\/p>\n<p>state officials who now run the National Guard troops usually involved in those operations, but also to conservatives in Bush&#8217;s party <\/p>\n<p>suspicious of federal trampling on state&#8217;s rights. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>[S]uch a move might require an amendment to a Civil-War-era law known as <\/p>\n<p>Posse Comitatus that bars armed forces from engaging in law-enforcement activities inside the United States except in extreme <\/p>\n<p>circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>At least one leading conservative in Congress, Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Texas), signaled yesterday he would be <\/p>\n<p>uncomfortable with any significant expansion of the federal role that didn&#8217;t allow local fire and rescue crews to be in charge.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t want the federal government to take over disaster response, believe me,&#8221; DeLay told The Associated Press.<\/p>\n<p><a \n\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/09\/26\/AR2005092600821.html\">Bill Would Give Bush $50B More for Wars<\/a>By <\/p>\n<p>LIZ SIDOTI, The Associated Press<\/p>\n<p>WASHINGTON &#8212; The Senate would give President Bush $50 billion more for wars in Iraq and <\/p>\n<p>Afghanistan as part of a $440 billion defense spending measure a panel approved Monday.<\/p>\n<p><a \n\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/09\/23\/AR2005092301695.html?referrer=email\">Why Baton Rouge Is Still Bush <\/p>\n<p>Country<\/a> By Jennifer Moses<\/p>\n<p>[I]n the prosperous white neighborhoods [of Baton Rouge] where solid brick houses sit well back on <\/p>\n<p>lush lawns, the president&#8217;s reputation remains largely intact, so much so that if the Bush-Kerry election of last November were replayed <\/p>\n<p>here tomorrow, Bush would probably win again, though perhaps with a smaller margin.<\/p>\n<p>The question is: Why now? Why, after five <\/p>\n<p>years of extraordinary ineptitude, culminating in the shameful spectacle of Americans dying from lack of emergency resources, does Bush <\/p>\n<p>continue to inspire any loyalty at all&#8230;?<\/p>\n<p>[The answer]&#8230; lies in cultural and social identification, overlaid with a patina of <\/p>\n<p>Christianity and fueled by raw, largely social, fear. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Of course, not all the support for Bush in Baton Rouge comes from as <\/p>\n<p>benign a position as that of my neighbors &#8212; we have plenty of plain old-fashioned greed here, as well as the usual assortment of racism, <\/p>\n<p>xenophobia, anti-intellectualism, homophobia and religious self-righteousness, which the Bush team has played so brilliantly.<\/p>\n<p><a \n\nhref=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/09\/24\/AR2005092400253.html?referrer=email\">Gas Profit Guzzlers<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Refiners Captured The Biggest Part Of the Price Increase<br \/>\nBy Justin Blum<br \/>\nWashington Post Staff Writer<br \/>\nSunday, September 25, <\/p>\n<p>2005; Page F01<\/p>\n<p>When the average price of a gallon of regular gasoline peaked at $3.07 recently, it was partly because the <\/p>\n<p>nation&#8217;s refineries were getting an <strong>estimated 99 cents on each gallon sold<\/strong>. That was more than three times the amount <\/p>\n<p>they earned a year ago when regular unleaded was selling for $1.87. [In all, the companies that distribute, market and sell gasoline to <\/p>\n<p>the public took about <strong>18 cents on each gallon of gas<\/strong> when the average price hit a peak of $3.07 a gallon on Sept. 5 in <\/p>\n<p>an Energy Department survey, analysts estimated. A year ago, they took 17 cents of each gallon, according to Energy Department data.]<\/p>\n<p>The companies that pump oil from the ground swept in <strong>an additional 47 cents on each gallon, a 46 percent jump<\/strong> over <\/p>\n<p>the same period. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Exxon Mobil Corp., the Irving, Tex., behemoth that produces and refines oil, reported in July that its <\/p>\n<p><strong>second-quarter profit was up 32 percent<\/strong>, to $7.64 billion. Analysts expect Exxon&#8217;s profit to soar again this quarter. <\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>For a company like Exxon, producing a barrel of oil from an existing well <strong>costs about $20<\/strong>, according to <\/p>\n<p>analysts. When the selling price rises above that, the increase is almost all profit, they said. After Katrina bore down on the Gulf <\/p>\n<p>Coast, the price of oil set a new high, <strong>approaching $70<\/strong>. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Refiners, particularly those with most of their <\/p>\n<p>facilities outside the path of Katrina, cashed in. Analysts predicted a windfall for companies such as Philadelphia-based Sunoco Inc., <\/p>\n<p>which continued operating normally during the hurricane.<\/p>\n<p>After gasoline leaves refineries, the profit margin becomes narrower, <\/p>\n<p>even when prices are high. Many motorists direct their anger at gas station owners when the higher market prices for oil and gasoline <\/p>\n<p>show up at the pump. But the bulk of the increases at the pump typically is not making station owners rich, analysts said.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"mine\"><p>Martha Stewart went to prison for lying to a Fed while not under oath. <span \n\nclass=\"sig\">mjh<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-\n\ndyn\/content\/article\/2005\/09\/24\/AR2005092401379.html?referrer=email\">Frist Issue Adds to GOP&#8217;s Ethics Troubles<\/a><br \/>\nSale of Stock <\/p>\n<p>Before Its Price Fell Gives Critics Opening to Target Senate Leadership<br \/>\nBy Charles Babington and Jeffrey H. Birnbaum<br \/>\nWashington <\/p>\n<p>Post Staff Writers<br \/>\nSunday, September 25, 2005; Page A06<\/p>\n<p>Two federal inquiries into Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist&#8217;s stock <\/p>\n<p>sales have handed Democrats a chance to broaden their long-stated claim that <strong>Republicans push ethical boundaries and focus on <\/p>\n<p>laws that help the rich<\/strong>, political analysts said yesterday.<\/p>\n<p>Until now, such accusations have centered on the House and <\/p>\n<p>White House. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (Tex.) has been chastised three times by the chamber&#8217;s ethics committee, and a Texas grand <\/p>\n<p>jury recently indicted a political action committee he had organized. The Bush administration&#8217;s top federal procurement official, David <\/p>\n<p>H. Safavian, was arrested last week on charges of obstructing a criminal investigation into lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who has close ties to <\/p>\n<p>DeLay and other prominent GOP lawmakers. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Activists in both parties agree it is much too early to say whether Frist (R-Tenn.) <\/p>\n<p>engaged in insider trading, a charge that could cripple his 2008 presidential hopes. But the mere launch of inquiries by the SEC and the <\/p>\n<p>Justice Department allows Democrats to claim that both House and Senate majority leaders operate under ethical clouds. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Average <\/p>\n<p>Americans, [Democratic consultant Jenny Backus] said, understand <strong>the notion of powerful and privileged people getting sweetheart <\/p>\n<p>deals<\/strong>. Many are already suspicious of <strong>a Republican Party that pushes tax cuts, bankruptcy policies and other measures <\/p>\n<p>that disproportionately benefit the wealthy<\/strong>, she said. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>People will more readily grasp the implications of a &#8220;less-<\/p>\n<p>than-blind trust&#8221; and GOP leaders who seem more intent on &#8220;the interests of their friends than the interests of the American people.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The biggest toll,&#8221; Cook said, &#8220;is for Frist&#8217;s presidential aspirations. They were already on the ropes. He&#8217;s not gotten <\/p>\n<p>good reviews as the Republican leader in the Senate. . . . The guy is pretty damaged merchandise in terms of presidential aspirations.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Storm and Bush On the Move President Bush was not going to get caught off guard by Hurricane Rita this weekend. The president who refused to cut short a working vacation three weeks ago to prepare for the fury of Hurricane Katrina was sitting at the U.S. Northern Command post in Colorado on Saturday morning &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/nada\/dump-duhbya\/the-disaster-president\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The Disaster President<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dump-duhbya"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}