{"id":231,"date":"2006-01-07T16:56:29","date_gmt":"2006-01-07T22:56:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/nada\/dump-duhbya\/bush-will-lie-to-save-himself\/"},"modified":"2006-01-07T17:06:43","modified_gmt":"2006-01-07T23:06:43","slug":"bush-will-lie-to-save-himself","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/nada\/dump-duhbya\/bush-will-lie-to-save-himself\/","title":{"rendered":"Disgorge Bush"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote class=\"mine\"><p>Listen closely as BushCo tries to paint the Abramoff Scandal as bipartisan. Abramoff was created by <\/p>\n<p>Tom DeLay&#8217;s goal to freeze-out Democrats on K-Street &#8212; to refuse to meet anyone who gave to both parties and to demand that only <\/p>\n<p>Republican&#8217;s benefit from the bribes.<\/p>\n<p>Key point: Abramoff was a major fund-raiser for Duhbya. LOTS more than $6,000. <span \n\nclass=\"sig\">mjh<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/upi\/?feed=TopNews&#038;article=UPI-1-20060106-07551800-\n\nbc-us-abramoff-crn.xml\">Bush to give up $6,000 in Abramoff gifts<\/a><br \/>\nPresident Bush plans to donate $6,000 in campaign contributions <\/p>\n<p>from one-time lobbyist Jack Abramoff to the American Heart Association.<\/p>\n<p>Abramoff was a Bush-Cheney Pioneer, someone who raised <\/p>\n<p>more than $100,000 for the Republican presidential ticket. But The Washington Post said that the president will give up only money <\/p>\n<p>donated directly by Abramoff, his wife and one of the Indian tribes he lobbied for.<\/p>\n<p><a \n\nhref=\"http:\/\/releases.usnewswire.com\/GetRelease.asp?id=58947\">U.S. Newswire : Releases : &#8220;Dean: White House Must Tell the Truth About <\/p>\n<p>Abramoff Ties&#8221;<\/a><\/p>\n<p>One day after former Republican mega-lobbyist and major Bush fundraiser Jack Abramoff pleaded guilty to three <\/p>\n<p>federal crimes, the White House gave back merely $6,000 in donations made by Abramoff to the President&#8217;s re-election campaign, but kept <\/p>\n<p>the more than $100,000 that Abramoff personally and directly raised for Bush-Cheney &#8217;04. Given what we now know, Abramoff&#8217;s shady <\/p>\n<p>business practices and influence peddling calls into question what meetings he set up or organized for his clients with Administration <\/p>\n<p>officials.<\/p>\n<p>Based on news reports alone, it&#8217;s clear Abramoff&#8217;s network reached deep into the White House and was used to reap <\/p>\n<p>significant fees from his clients. Specifically, Abramoff charged multi-million dollar fees to arrange meetings with Bush as well as <\/p>\n<p>access to senior White House officials for his clients. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean called on the Bush <\/p>\n<p>White House to come clean regarding the extent of the contact between Abramoff and senior White House officials:<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;<strong>As a <\/p>\n<p>Bush Pioneer, Abramoff bragged about the influence he held at the White House<\/strong>, as did his former lobbying partner who claimed <\/p>\n<p>that Abramoff had direct access to the President. Abramoff also arranged meetings with the President and members of the Bush <\/p>\n<p>Administration for his clients, who later received favorable treatment.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Until he was charged with committing three federal <\/p>\n<p>crimes, Abramoff used his Republican contacts, including his ties to the White House, to create an extensive pay-to-play system where <\/p>\n<p>political money was exchanged for policy outcomes. To begin to clear the growing ethical cloud over the White House, President Bush must <\/p>\n<p>disclose his Administration&#8217;s contacts and detail their relationship with this admitted felon. The American people deserve the truth.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Abramoff Was A Republican Insider And Who Had Strong Pull With Bush White House. Abramoff&#8217;s lobbying partner boasted that he <\/p>\n<p>is a phone call away from the President. &#8220;Jack has a relationship with the President,&#8221; Abramoff&#8217;s former spokesman and fellow lobbyist <\/p>\n<p>Michael Scanlon once said. &#8220;He doesn&#8217;t have a bat phone or anything, but if he wanted an appointment, he would have one.&#8221; Scanlon has <\/p>\n<p>since pleaded guilty to conspiring to bribe a congressman and other public officials. (New Times Broward-Palm Beach, 2\/22\/01; Washington <\/p>\n<p>Post, 11\/29\/05)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/01\/03\/AR2006010301536.html?referrer=email\">Case <\/p>\n<p>Bringing New Scrutiny To a System and a Profession<\/a> By Jeffrey H. Birnbaum and Dan Balz<\/p>\n<p>Jack Abramoff represented the most <\/p>\n<p>flamboyant and extreme example of a brand of influence trading that flourished after the Republican takeover of the House of <\/p>\n<p>Representatives 11 years ago. Now, some GOP strategists fear that the fallout from his case could affect the party&#8217;s efforts to keep <\/p>\n<p>control in the November midterm elections.<\/p>\n<p>Abramoff was among the lobbyists most closely associated with the K Street Project, <\/p>\n<p>which was initiated by his friend Tom DeLay (R-Tex.), now the former House majority leader, once the GOP vaulted to power. It was an <\/p>\n<p>aggressive program designed to force corporations and trade associations to hire more GOP-connected lobbyists in what at times became an <\/p>\n<p>almost seamless relationship between Capitol Hill lawmakers and some firms that sought to influence them.<\/p>\n<p>Now Abramoff has become <\/p>\n<p>a symbol of a system out of control. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>With an eye on November&#8217;s elections, Republicans have sought to limit the damage to <\/p>\n<p>themselves by portraying the scandal as bipartisan, describing Abramoff as an equal-opportunity dispenser of campaign cash and largess.<\/p>\n<p>So far, the public has not identified corruption as solely a Republican problem. A Washington Post-ABC News poll in November <\/p>\n<p>asked Americans whether they thought Democrats or Republicans were better on ethical matters; 16 percent said Democrats, 12 percent said <\/p>\n<p>Republicans, and 71 percent said there was not much difference between the parties.<\/p>\n<p>But Republicans worry about two possibilities. <\/p>\n<p>The first is that Abramoff, known for his close ties to DeLay, mostly implicates Republicans as a result of his plea agreement. That <\/p>\n<p>could shift public attitudes sharply against the GOP. &#8220;People are uneasy about what else is out there,&#8221; said one GOP strategist who <\/p>\n<p>requested anonymity to speak more candidly about the possible political fallout.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-\n\ndyn\/content\/article\/2006\/01\/03\/AR2006010301609.html?referrer=email\">GOP Leaders Seek Distance From Abramoff<\/a><br \/>\nBy Jonathan Weisman<\/p>\n<p>With &#8230; the highest echelons of the Republican Party increasingly vulnerable to charges, GOP leaders moved yesterday to distance <\/p>\n<p>themselves from disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff and prepare to combat a growing corruption scandal. &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Republican strategists <\/p>\n<p>expressed some relief that the damage could be limited. Carl Forti, a spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee, said <\/p>\n<p>that if Abramoff&#8217;s revelations ensnare only one lawmaker and some unknown staff members, Democrats will have little chance of sparking a <\/p>\n<p>political revolt when voters go to the polls in November to elect a new Congress.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Listen closely as BushCo tries to paint the Abramoff Scandal as bipartisan. Abramoff was created by Tom DeLay&#8217;s goal to freeze-out Democrats on K-Street &#8212; to refuse to meet anyone who gave to both parties and to demand that only Republican&#8217;s benefit from the bribes. Key point: Abramoff was a major fund-raiser for Duhbya. LOTS &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/nada\/dump-duhbya\/bush-will-lie-to-save-himself\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Disgorge Bush<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-231","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dump-duhbya"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=231"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/231\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=231"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=231"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=231"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}