{"id":1025,"date":"2004-01-14T15:42:04","date_gmt":"2004-01-14T22:42:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/uncategorized\/the-war-college-criticizes-bush\/"},"modified":"2006-02-27T18:42:49","modified_gmt":"2006-02-28T01:42:49","slug":"the-war-college-criticizes-bush","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/nada\/dump-duhbya\/the-war-college-criticizes-bush\/","title":{"rendered":"The War College Criticizes Bush"},"content":{"rendered":"

Study Published by Army Criticizes War on Terror’s Scope<\/a> By Thomas E. Ricks, Washington Post Staff Writer<\/p>\n

A scathing<\/b> new report published by the Army War College broadly criticizes the Bush administration’s handling of the war on terrorism<\/b>, accusing it of taking a detour into an ”unnecessary” war in Iraq<\/b> and pursuing an ”unrealistic” quest against terrorism<\/b> that may lead to U.S. wars with states that pose no serious threat. <\/p>\n

The report, by Jeffrey Record, a visiting professor at the Air War College at Maxwell Air Force Base in Alabama, warns that as a result of those mistakes, the Army is “near the breaking point.”<\/b> <\/p>\n

It recommends, among other things, scaling back the scope of the “global war on terrorism” and instead focusing on the narrower threat posed by the al Qaeda terrorist network. <\/p>\n

“[T]he global war on terrorism as currently defined and waged is dangerously indiscriminate and ambitious<\/b>, and accordingly . . . its parameters should be readjusted,” Record writes. Currently, he adds, the anti-terrorism campaign “is strategically unfocused, promises more than it can deliver, and threatens to dissipate U.S. military resources in an endless and hopeless search for absolute security.” <\/p>\n

Record, a veteran defense specialist and author of six books on military strategy and related issues, was an aide to then-Sen. Sam Nunn when the Georgia Democrat was chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. <\/p>\n

In discussing his political background, Record also noted that in 1999 while on the staff of the Air War College, he published work critical of the Clinton administration. …<\/p>\n

But retired Army Col. Douglas C. Lovelace Jr., director of the Strategic Studies Institute, whose Web site carries Record’s 56-page monograph, hardly distanced himself from it. “I think that the substance that Jeff brings out in the article really, really<\/i> needs to be considered,”<\/b> he said. <\/p>\n

Publication of the essay was approved by the Army War College’s commandant, Maj. Gen. David H. Huntoon Jr., Lovelace said. He said he and Huntoon expected the study to be controversial, but added, “He considers it to be under the umbrella of academic freedom.” <\/p>\n

Larry DiRita, the top Pentagon spokesman, said he had not read the Record study. He added: “If the conclusion is that we need to be scaling back in the global war on terrorism, it’s not likely to be on my reading list anytime soon.”<\/p>\n

The Pentagon spokesman mimics his boss by saying he’s not interested in anyone who disagrees with the ‘one true view.’ mjh<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

[I]t is unusual to have such views published by the War College, the Army’s premier academic institution. <\/p>\n

In addition, the essay goes further than many critics in examining the Bush administration’s handling of the war on terrorism. <\/p>\n

Record’s core criticism is that the administration is biting off more than it can chew. <\/p>\n

He also scoffs at the administration’s policy, laid out by Bush in a November speech, of seeking to transform and democratize the Middle East.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Study Published by Army Criticizes War on Terror’s Scope By Thomas E. Ricks, Washington Post Staff Writer A scathing new report published by the Army War College broadly criticizes the Bush administration’s handling of the war on terrorism, accusing it of taking a detour into an ”unnecessary” war in Iraq and pursuing an ”unrealistic” quest … Continue reading The War College Criticizes Bush<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dump-duhbya"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1025","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1025"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1025\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.edgewiseblog.com\/mjh\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}