Right’s Wrong

Right’s right: His domestic failings aside, the

president is focused on this basic truth: We’re a nation at war by Jeff Gardner, Albuquerque Tribune Online

[The Left]

disingenuously raged about ”W’s rush to war” or deceitfully claimed W ”lied” about weapons.

Well, let me say this about that….[I]f the president believed the weapons were there, he wasn’t lying…. [Duhbya] is dead right about

the most important thing: We’re at war.

It’s so frustrating to read right-wing columnists like Jeff

Gardner. First, conservatives act as if they don’t run everything: the House, the Senate, and the White House (ie, all of the Executive

and Legislative Branches). As for the Judiciary, the radical right rails against ”activist judges” while doing their best to stack

the bench their way (while using the Legislature to curtail numerous rights). With a tight grip on all three branches of government,

arch-conservatives turn their ire on the media, the supposed liberal media that puts someone like Gardner on the front of the section and

may, just may, print someone like me a few pages back.

If Bush wasn’t lying about WMD (or tax cuts or the Patriot Act, ad nauseum),

then he is ill-informed, even ignorant and incurious (widely acknowledged). Why is that so much better in a President?

For at least 20

years, conservatives have framed and determined every aspect of public discourse. Everything must be expressed in their terms, by their

rules. We are at war because they say we are. Gardner uses two standard reactionary tactics: put words in your opponents’ mouths

(ridicule them for things they never said — reread his column to note all the little digs and jibes) and repeat exactly what other

conservatives say (stay on target, consistent and loyal). These are powerful techniques that the radical right uses to stifle discussion.

You’re with them or you’re against them.

Bush’s presidency is the crowning achievement of the radical Christian fundamentalist

right — our Taliban. And still they feel the need to berate, belittle and bully the Left. Real nice folks. It’s a shame they can’t

enjoy their near-total victory (and all the spoils). Better get what you can before the pendulum swings again, as we all know it will —

maybe even in November. mjh

Hey, Feds, Butt Out!

FBI Petitions for Broad Wiretapping Rights By Sebastian Rupley

The Bush Administration has asked the Federal Communications Commission to require broadband service providers to introduce new architecture in their networks that would facilitate eavesdropping by law enforcement officials. The 85-page proposal was filed March 12 by the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the Drug Enforcement Administration. Experts are saying that if it is approved, it could dramatically hinder both emerging and existing technologies. [mjh: not to mention its impact on our freedom and privacy] …

The proposal specifically calls for giving police easy access to all forms of “switched” Internet communications, including communications conducted over Voice-over-IP (VoIP) systems, instant messaging systems, and communications taking place over cable modem and DSL networks. The language of the proposal, which is posted online, implies that backdoors should be integrated in networked systems to allow law enforcement officials eavesdropping rights.

You may recall ”Carnivore”, a Big Brother snooper from the Clinton administration. Though it was renamed to something less honest, it was a system that would be put in place on a specific ISP to spy on specific suspects (so they said) under a wiretap warrant. Now the Feds want to read every single byte you and I exchange. Every single byte — no warrants; just trolling for whatever they want. I’m not at all sure that getting rid of Asskraft (sic) or Bush will stop this, but keeping them means much worse intrusion in the future. mjh

Equal Treatment?

Talking Points Memo: by Joshua Micah Marshall: March 07, 2004 – March 13, 2004 Archives

How soon we forget…
Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), said Kerry should apologize for a comment ”outside the bounds of where people who want to hold the highest office in this country should be making.”

Washington Post
March 11th, 2004

Bush, standing on a stage outside of Naperville North High School, pointed reporter Adam Clymer out to his running mate, former Defense Secretary Dick Cheney. Then Bush described Clymer using a common obscenity.

”There’s Adam Clymer, major-league asshole from the New York Times,” Bush said.

”Oh, yeah, he is, big-time,” Cheney responded.

Houston Chronicle
September 5th, 2000

A major-league Santorum …
— Josh Marshall

Nebraska Democrat Bob Kerrey:
Santorum? Is that Latin for asshole?”

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." — Sam Adams