Destroying Whom?

”Those who threaten us and kill innocents around the world do not need to be treated more sensitively. They need to be destroyed,” he said.

mjhQuick — who said that: bin Laden or Cheney?

The Advertiser: Cheney’s terror attack on Kerry backfires [14aug04]

Dick Cheney’s desperate misleading attacks now have him criticising George Bush’s own words, who called for America to be `sensitive about expressing our power and influence’,” a [Kerry] spokesman said.

Dick Cheney doesn’t understand arrogance isn’t a virtue. Alienating allies makes it harder to hunt terrorists and bring them to justice.”

Bush’s Sales Tax

Tri-Valley Herald Online – Local & Regional News

Bush has suggested that overhauling the tax code would be a second-term priority if he is re-elected. While campaigning in Florida on Tuesday, he said replacing the income tax with a federal sales tax is “an interesting idea that we ought to explore seriously.”

Kerry seized on Bush’s comments even as White House officials denied that any such plan is under consideration.

Do you really want Bush and a Republican Congress overhauling the tax code and Social Security? mjh

Never Trust Anyone Over 30 (we said 35 years ago)

The Poll Watchers
Youth Is Fleeting for Bush (washingtonpost.com)
By Richard Morin, Claudia Deane and Christopher Muste, Washington Post Staff Writers

Four years ago, network exit polls found that Bush and Democrat Al Gore split the vote of 18- to 29-year-olds, with Gore claiming 48 percent and Bush getting 46 percent — the best showing by a Republican presidential candidate in more than a decade.

But that was then. In the latest Post-ABC News poll taken immediately after the Democratic convention, Kerry led Bush 2-1 among registered voters younger than 30. Among older voters, the race was virtually tied. …

Surveys suggest that Bush’s popularity has plummeted among 18- to 29-year-olds in the past four months, posing a new obstacle to the president’s bid to win reelection and an immediate challenge to Republicans seeking to win over impressionable and lightly committed young people during their upcoming convention.

[Thanks, Jas.]

Before 9/11

Youth Is Fleeting for Bush (washingtonpost.com)

As President Bush took office in January 2001, Newsweek asked: “Which one of the following do you think should be Bush’s top defense and national security priority? Should his top priority be: Developing a high-tech missile defense system to protect the United States from nuclear attack (34 percent); reconfiguring US military forces so they can move more quickly to deal with crisis situations around the world (29 percent); or improving our ability to identify and counteract terrorist threats (31 percent)?”

And in May 2001, the Pew Research Center asked: “Do you think that international terrorism is a major threat, a minor threat, or not a threat to the well being of the United States?” Prescient answer: 64% major threat, 27% minor threat, 4% not a threat.

Yet some say we had no idea about the threat of terrorism before 9/11. mjh

Far From Balanced

The Albuquerque Journal, like many

publications and TV news operations, attempts to be balanced in their election coverage. Often an article about Bush will appear next to

an article about Kerry. In each article, the other side will get a paragraph or two for rebuttal. Balance is measured in number of words

(or seconds on the TV).

Look at the front page of today’s Albuquerque Journal:

Albuquerque Journal front page
popup abqjoural.com’s

front page

As you see for yourself, we have a huge, flattering picture of Bush above which he is quoted in a huge headline:

‘We’re Making Progress.’ Now, to balance this, on the same page, above the fold, we also have an article that might seem to be

about Kerry — at least his name is prominently in the headline: Kerry’s Visit Costs Drivers. Read the article to learn that it

has almost nothing to do with Kerry, though the headline does manage to convey something negative about him. This article barely deserves

to be in the A section; it is certainly not front-page news.

I’m not quite blaming the reporter, who could have written a more

interesting article if he extended his story to account for what all of these political visits cost everyone. It is the editor who choses

to put this trivial article on the front page and who writes the headline (‘Security Measures Cost Some Citizens More Than Others’ is

more accurate) — it’s the editors who control what you and I see and the impressions we take away from the news.

Fair and balanced?

Far from it. mjh

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." — Sam Adams