Happy Birthday, Wilderness Act!

Wilderness Act’s birthday worth celebrating –

greatfallstribune.com

On this date 40 years ago, President Lyndon Johnson signed S.4013 “to establish on public lands of the

United States a National Wilderness Preservation System for the permanent good of the whole people. …”

Said the president:

“If

future generations are to remember us with gratitude rather than contempt, we must leave them more than the miracles of technology. We

must leave them a glimpse of the world as it was in the beginning, not just after we got through with it.”

One hundred and thirteen

times since then, eight presidents — including, on four occasions, George W. Bush — have signed laws designating additional wilderness,

from the five-acre Pelican Island in Florida to the more than 9 million-acre Wrangell-St. Elias Wilderness in Alaska.

Today, thanks to

this pathfinding, grassroots and bipartisan legislation, 106 million acres of American public land in 44 states is protected from

development.

But there’s more to be done.

For one thing, eight times as much public land, mostly in the West, remains roadless and

undeveloped, but it isn’t protected by wilderness designation. Some of it should be.

Despite the economic, aesthetic and even

theological value of leaving some places alone, the pressure to develop those last unprotected areas is intense, and it has not decreased

during the Bush administration.

Wilderness Act turns 40, and people are still

arguing about it

The federal act designated 9.1 million acres as wilderness, described by the bill’s framers as land “where the

earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain.”

More than anything else,

the 1964 bill planted the concept in the American consciousness that wilderness has innate public value, that it contributes to the

common good.

40th Anniversary of Wilderness

Protection Act / Our great American wilderness needs better protection

Wilderness Facts

Under the 1964 Wilderness Act:

There are now 106 million acres protected as wilderness. Alaska accounts for more than half of them, 58 million acres, which is 16

percent of the state. California has 14 million acres, or 14 percent of the state. Other states with more than 4 million acres of

wilderness are Arizona, Washington and Idaho.

— President Bush so far has signed four wilderness bills by Congress adding 529,604

acres, nearly all in Nevada. The most acreage was added by President Carter, who signed 14 wilderness bills covering a total of 66.3

million acres, mostly in Alaska. Ronald Reagan signed 43 bills adding 10.6 million acres. Bill Clinton signed 13 bills adding 9.5 million

acres. George H. W. Bush signed 10 bills adding 4 million acres.

— California has the most wilderness areas, 130, followed by

Arizona, 90; Alaska, 48; Nevada, 42; Colorado, 41; Oregon, 40; and Washington, 30. [663 areas nationwide]

Sources: The Interior

Department; The Wilderness Society; Wilderness.net

Wilderness protection’s enduring

U.S. legacy

These days, with the nation divided over so many things, it is easy to forget that once, not so long ago, wilderness

protection was not seen as predominantly a Republican or a Democratic issue, but as a valuable legacy for both parties. In fact, while

Jimmy Carter can claim the largest amount of wilderness (66 million acres) signed into law by any administration, Ronald Reagan signed

more wilderness bills (43) than any other president.

Venerable Wilderness Act stands test of time

Only

Congress can designate wilderness, although the president has to sign laws doing it. The acreage added so far in Bush’s tenure is the

least of any president since Lyndon Johnson signed the Wilderness Act on Sept. 3, 1964.

Motorized vehicles and equipment, such as

chain saws, are prohibited in wilderness areas. Camping, hiking, climbing, fishing, hunting, canoeing and horseback riding are allowed;

grazing livestock is generally allowed. Off-limits are mountain biking, commercial logging, road-building, oil and gas leasing and

mining, except for pre-existing claims. …

Last year the Bush administration directed the Interior Department to quit barring oil and

gas drilling on land proposed for wilderness but not yet designated by Congress. Since then, the department has issued oil and gas leases

on tens of thousands of these acres, mainly in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming. …

Few of the 114 bills signed by Johnson and successive

presidents creating 663 wilderness areas around the nation have been tinkered with, and there never has been an attempt to undo a

wilderness designation.

“The magic is it requires Congress, which in turn requires the citizenry, to be engaged. That’s where it gets

its power,” said William Meadows, president of The Wilderness Society.

His group believes another 200 million acres, much of it in

Alaska, should be considered for wilderness protections. …

Utah author and naturalist Terry Tempest Williams sees poetry in a law

that defines wilderness as “an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who

does not remain.”

“Those who wrote this legislation into being understood the crucial and subtle relationship between language and

landscape,” Williams said. “How we speak about wild, open country is closely aligned with how we treat it. Open lands open minds.”

THE

Wilderness Society

Radical Right Writer Rants

“They are not journalists, but rather

propagandists…working for a third-rate socialist ‘newspaper.’ … These are writers who would be considered liberal whackos in

Holland, for God’s sake!” — Paul Linkenheimer, Rio Rancho, in Crosswinds Weekly

Thank you for printing the

perfect example of right wing deep thought. I am happy to read ignorant rants that broadcast the real nature of such people. Linkenheimer

thoroughly denigrates the Crosswind staff in complete ignorance of your experience (and ages). While Duhbya pays lip-service to ‘small

business entrepreneurs’ we see the respect his worshippers grant the real thing. As for freedom of the press, well, just you wait.

Finally, Linkenheimer attacks every single Democrat over 40 as leeches (no doubt worthy of extermination, or, at least, internment) —

and crows about his contribution to political discourse. Ah, the open arms of the diversity-loving Republicans!

We’re not afraid of

the views of people we disagree with. Let them make fools of themselves. Please devote an entire issue to such BUllSHit

before the election. mjh

Secret Society

Bush Secrecy Introduction

‘Secrecy and a free, democratic government don’t mix.’ Harry S. Truman

Harry Truman understood the importance of open government in a free society. George W. Bush does not.

From the first days of his administration, President Bush has taken steps to tighten the government’s hold on information and limit public scrutiny of its activities. … Here, Public Citizen chronicles and documents the administration’s obsession with secrecy, as well as the steps we, and others, are taking to fight it. … In the long run, we don’t think Americans will put up with a government that operates on the principle of keeping them in ignorance. The more light we shine on these actions, the less likely they are to succeed.

Ah, Yes, The Party of Nixon

Text of Schwarzenegger’s

speech Newsday.com

I finally arrived here in 1968. I had empty pockets, but I was full of dreams. The presidential campaign was in

full swing. I remember watching the Nixon and Humphrey presidential race on TV. A friend who spoke German and English, translated for me.

I heard Humphrey saying things that sounded like socialism, which is what I had just left. But then I heard Nixon speak. He was talking

about free enterprise, getting government off your back, lowering taxes and strengthening the military. Listening to Nixon speak sounded

more like a breath of fresh air.

I said to my friend, “What party is he?” My friend said, “He’s a Republican.” I said, “Then I am a

Republican!” And I’ve been a Republican ever since!

Nixon ‘a breath of fresh air’? More like ‘smoke blown up your

ass.’ He was a paranoid liar surrounded by thugs. If that’s what brought Arnie into the GOP, no wonder he praises Duhbya.

mjh

RINOs = Republican In Name Only

USATODAY.com – The GOP doesn’t reflect America By Michael Moore

I’ve often found that if I go down the list of ‘liberal’ issues with people who say they’re Republican, they are quite liberal and not in sync with the Republicans who run the country. Most don’t want America to be the world’s police officer and prefer peace to war. They applaud civil rights, believe all Americans should have health insurance and think assault weapons should be banned. Though they may personally oppose abortion, they usually don’t think the government has the right to tell a women what to do with her body.

There’s a name for these Republicans: RINOs or Republican In Name Only. They possess a liberal, open mind and don’t believe in creating a worse life for anyone else.

So why do they use the same label as those who back a status quo of women earning 75 cents to every dollar a man earns, 45 million people without health coverage and a president who has two more countries left on his axis-of-evil-regime-change list?

I asked my friend on the street. He said what I hear from all RINOs: “I don’t want the government taking my hard-earned money and taxing me to death. That’s what the Democrats do.”

Money. That’s what it comes down to for the RINOs. They do work hard and have been squeezed even harder to make ends meet. They blame Democrats for wanting to take their money. Never mind that it’s Republican tax cuts for the rich and billions spent on the Iraq war that have created the largest deficits in history and will put all of us in hock for years to come.

An Electoral Tie?!

USATODAY.com – Electoral math

offers number of nightmares

Divided government?

The Constitution outlines what follows in case of a tie, though that’s

happened only once, in 1800. The newly elected House of Representatives chooses the president from the top three finishers; each state

has one vote. The newly elected Senate chooses the vice president; each senator has a vote.

(In 1800, running mates Thomas Jefferson

and Aaron Burr each received 73 electoral votes. Four years later, the 12th Amendment was ratified to clarify that parties could nominate

tickets rather than having candidates for president and vice president in effect compete with one another.)

This time, the process

presumably would favor Bush. Republicans control 30 of the 50 state delegations in the House; the GOP almost certainly will keep control

in the November elections. Republicans now have 51 Senate seats. But if Democrats regain an edge in the Senate — which is conceivable

— the choice for vice president could get interesting.

A George W. Bush-John Edwards administration? …

For a tie: Every state

votes the way it did four years ago, except for two. New Hampshire and West Virginia, which voted for Bush last time, go Democratic this

time. Kerry is competitive in both states.

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." — Sam Adams