forensic photography

Did I ever tell you about my dip into forensic photography? I was at the upper cliff dwelling at Tonto Nat’l Monument last year with a ranger when a helicopter came buzzing by. It was obviously sightseeing (pausing to look at the ruins) and the ranger was furious. Apparently, the churning air generated by a chopper is really hard on the ruins (makes sense). She asked if anyone could see its number, and although I couldn’t, I got a shot of it with my zoom lens.

When I looked at the photo later, the number was really clear. BTW, another way to tell if a digital photo is an original is to look at its EXIF info — it changes when the photo changes and basically says, oh yeah, this photo’s been modified. So I kept it in its original format and sent it to Tonto Nat’l Monument (which the ranger had asked me to do). After several months of back-and-forth with them, the superintendent of the Monument emailed me and told me they’d discovered who the helicopter belonged to and had sent them a letter requesting they not do it again. The superintendent told me he didn’t expect a response but he also thought the letter would probably do its job.

So who owned the helicopter? And why didn’t the Monument take stronger legal action?

Because it was a Justice Dept helicopter.

I didn’t make any of this up, honest.:)

Lisa

doj_chopper.jpg

ps- Tonto National Monument is worth going to just for the beauty of the surrounding area (it’s really near Roosevelt Lake — or Lake Roosevelt, or something like that) but also they’re very different ruins from many of ours in NM. One of the photos on my website shows an old bee hive that was way high up in the roof of the cave — it’s pretty cool.

There are more pix of Tonto Nat’l Monument (and related places) on my website: http://www.newmexicophotos.com/gallery/arizona-2003

Flu Shots – Republicans First

You’ve seen the lists showing who served in the military and who has not (in summary, Democrats have overwhelmingly served and Republicans have avoided service).

I wonder if a similar divide occurs in those who get scarce flu shots this year:

Bingaman (D) – declined
Udall (D) – declined
Domenici (R) – got it
Wilson (R) – got it
Pearce (R) – got it

No word on whether Romero (D) or King (D) got theirs. Does anyone have national stats? (Bill Frist got his.) This would fit with a paranoid delusion that the Republicans will use flu to keep Dems from the polls. mjh

Tune Change

A few years ago, during battles over campaign finance reform, Republicans made an amazing argument: limits violate freedom of speech. Republicans literally said money is free speech and limits denied one the right to speak (spend). I guess they didn’t see George Soros coming. Now, instead of celebrating his freedom of speech, they denigrate him as a person. mjh

The Supremes Again

From http://www.electoral-vote.com/

One issue that has been totally absent from the campaign is the Supreme Court. The median age of the justices is 71. No spring chickens here except for Clarence Thomas, a mere stripling at 56. Here are the current justices.

Breyer Ginsburg Kennedy O’Connor Rehnquist Scalia Souter Stevens Thomas
Justice Appointed by Sworn in Age
Stephen Breyer Clinton 1994 66
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Clinton 1993 71
Anthony M. Kennedy Ford 1975 68
Sandra Day O’Connor Reagan 1981 74
William H. Rehnquist Nixon 1972 80
Antonin Scalia Reagan 1986 68
David H. Souter Bush 1990 65
John Paul Stevens Ford 1975 84
Clarence Thomas Bush 1990 56

It is very likely than multiple vacancies will occur on the Court in the next four years. The court will undoubtedly have to rule on cases involving abortion, the Patriot Act, and other divisive issues. If you are an undecided voter, think carefully about which candidate would make better appointments to the Supreme Court. Furthermore, a president makes far more appointment to the appellate courts than to the Supreme Court, and they hear far more cases per year. If you approve of the appointments Bush has made to the appellate courts, surely you want to give him the chance to make more. If you don’t approve, maybe somebody else should be doing the appointing. The next president’s appointments could shape the country for decades to come. It is at least worth discussing. If you have a blog, this topic might even be worth blogging about.

Do you know Bush?

click for full size image

I lifted this table from page 14 of 16 in The Separate Realities of Bush and Kerry Supporters (Acrobat PDF). Is my intent to paint Bush supporters as ignorant — well, maybe, a little. However, I’d blame Bush himself — how well does he communicate if his most devoted supporters don’t know his positions? This is shocking. mjh

Foreign Policy in the Presidential Election CFR – Council on Foreign Relations

AOL Presidential Match Compare Overview

Compare Candidates

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." — Sam Adams