A Job Not So Well-done

The Daily Outrage

Last weekend, The Washington Post reported that acute malnutrition among children in Iraq has doubled since before the US invasion in March of 2003. That is just one statistic, out of many, that paints a disturbing picture of the US occupation. After reading press dispatches, think-tank reports and public opinion polling, The Daily Outrage compiled this sampling of the facts on the ground. …

Infrastructure

** Of the $18.4 billion in reconstruction funds allocated last year by Congress, the US has spent only $1.7 billion.

** Nationwide electricity levels are down 25 percent since the prewar days, and 66 percent lower in Baghdad.

** The value of the Iraqi currency–the Dinar–dropped 25 percent compared to the US dollar in the past year (which didn’t have a great year itself!)

Iraqi Public Opinion

** Only 33 percent of Iraqis think they’re better off now than before the war, as a Gallup poll discovered.

** According to military statistics, the number of insurgents has quadrupled since last year, from 5,000 to 20,000. A British general places the insurgency at 40-50,000 fighters.

Today I Am Two

Sometimes I feel like I’ve been blogging my whole life. I have been writing letters to the editor, letters to friends, and in journals for much of my life. But I began my part of the blogosphere two years ago today (mjh’s Weblog Entry – 11/24/2002: “hello, world!”). Now, I have 4 blogs, host 3 others, and read 8 more every day. From little acorns mighty addictions grow.

I’ve been tweaking the layout and functioning of this blog, including the categories and the menus down the side. …

Continue reading Today I Am Two

Honor the Fallen

Honor The Fallen Memorial

The Honor the Fallen memorial is the only one of its kind in America. The memorial features a photograph and short biography of every American who has been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan since the beginning of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraq Freedom.

‘the Republican war on reproductive rights’

Rolling Back Women’s Rights NYTimes Editorial

Tucked into the $388 billion budget measure just approved by the House and Senate is a sweeping provision that has nothing to do with the task Congress had at hand – providing money for the government. In essence, it tells health care companies, hospitals and insurance companies they are free to ignore Roe v. Wade and state and local laws and regulations currently on the books to make certain that women’s access to reproductive health services includes access to abortion. …

This represents a vast expansion of the “conscience protection” that federal law currently gives to individual doctors who do not want to undergo abortion training.

The affront to women’s rights, moreover, should not obscure the serious threat to the First Amendment involved in enacting what is likely to evolve into a domestic “gag rule” as, one by one, health care providers order doctors they employ not to provide patients with information about the abortion option. This echoes the way Mr. Bush reimposed a blanket Reagan-era gag rule for providers of reproductive health services abroad on his first full day in office back in 2001.

Unfortunately, vocal opposition from Democrats and a handful of Republican moderates was not enough to stop the pernicious assault on the rights of millions of women from becoming law in the rush to pass the spending bill. … Americans, and American women in particular, are officially on notice that post-election, the Republican war on reproductive rights has entered an ominous new phase.

Writing Software, that is, software that writes

Computers as Authors? Literary Luddites Unite! By DANIEL AKST

Consider the beginning of a short story dealing with the theme of betrayal:

“Dave Striver loved the university – its ivy-covered clocktowers, its ancient and sturdy brick, and its sun-splashed verdant greens and eager youth. The university, contrary to popular opinion, is far from free of the stark unforgiving trials of the business world: academia has its own tests, and some are as merciless as any in the marketplace. A prime example is the dissertation defense: to earn the Ph.D., to become a doctor, one must pass an oral examination on one’s dissertation. This was a test Professor Edward Hart enjoyed giving.”

That pregnant opening paragraph was written by a computer program known as Brutus.1 that was developed by Selmer Bringsjord, a computer scientist at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and David A. Ferrucci, a researcher at I.B.M.

Yeah, but will computers enjoy reading? mjh

‘ministers of justice’

Giving the Law a Religious Perspective By ADAM LIPTAK

The class in civil procedure, at the new Liberty School of Law here, began with a prayer.

“The law of the Lord is perfect, reviving the soul,” said Prof. Jeffrey C. Tuomala, quoting Psalm 19. “The statutes of the Lord are trustworthy, making wise the simple.”

But decisions of the United States Supreme Court, Professor Tuomala went on, are not always trustworthy. “Something that is contrary to the law of nature,” he said, “cannot be law.”

The school, part of Liberty University, whose chancellor is the Rev. Jerry Falwell, is for now a makeshift affair in a vast industrial building that used to be a cellular phone factory. Its students compensate for the surroundings by dressing well – many of the men wore jackets and ties – and by showing attentive enthusiasm, even for a heavy dose of civil procedure at 8 a.m.

The school, which says its mission is to train “ministers of justice,” is part of a movement around the nation that means to bring a religious perspective to the law and a moral component to legal practice.

“People are realizing that some of the biggest issues of the day are being decided in the courts – the 2000 presidential election, the question of what is marriage, abortion, stem-cell research, cloning,” said Jeffrey A. Brauch, the dean of Regent Law School, which was founded in 1986 in Virginia Beach by Pat Robertson, the television evangelist. “And maybe there are eternal principles of justice that will tell us how to approach these questions.” …

[W]here mainstream law professors tend to ask questions about judges’ fidelity to precedent and the Constitution, Liberty professors often analyze decisions in terms of biblical principles.

“If our graduates wind up in the government,” Dr. Falwell said, “they’ll be social and political conservatives. If they wind up as judges, they’ll be presiding under the Bible.”

Many of the dozen students who chatted with a reporter over two days at the school, representing a fifth of the school’s first and only class, said they were drawn to its emphasis on fundamental and enduring truths.

“We study the law that’s written on the heart, the things that no one can deny,” Brian Fraser said.

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." — Sam Adams