open season on mountain lions

ABQjournal: Rep. Introduces Cougar Hunting Measure, By Jeff Jones, Journal Staff Writer

A northeastern New Mexico lawmaker wants to declare open season on mountain lions.

Rep. Brian Moore, R-Clayton, is sponsoring legislation to remove cougars from the state’s list of game species, meaning they could be shot year-round and a hunting license would no longer be required to kill them. …

“We’re not trying to eradicate them. We’re just kind of bringing it into some kind of balance,” Moore said.

Lisa Jennings, executive director of Animal Protection Voters, criticized the bill, saying it “asks the people to support a free-for-all.”

We only have the vaguest idea how many cougars live in New Mexico, in spite of a 10 year study that was shelved on receipt. Now, we’re going to let anyone kill any cougar anytime without any record of that killing — smart, Rep. Moore, real smart. Let’s not even consider that environmental degradation is responsible for the decline of deer and elk. Let’s blame the cougar. Cougars kill the weakest, making the herd stronger; men kill the strongest, making the herd weaker.

Here we are, debating whether to allow cock-fighting to continue, while we open the slaughter of this magnificent beast. Show your humanity — tame the beast in your heart. mjh

—–
Representative: Brian K. Moore
District: 67
County(s): Cur,Hard,Quay,Roose,S.M. & Union
Party: Republican
Occupation: Grocer
Address: Box 56
Clayton, NM 88415
Capitol Office Phone: 986-4467
Office Phone: 374-9681
Home Phone: 374-2312
E-mail: brian@ranchmkt.com

Track HB47
REMOVE COUGARS FROM REGULATED GAME LIST
Sponsor: Brian K. Moore
Current Location: House Government & Urban Affairs

Cutting Trees Isn’t Cheap

ABQjournal: Forest Service Plans Cut Both Ways By Tania Soussan

The Forest Service’s Tajique plan calls for thinning with tree cutting and prescribed burns over 10 years starting this summer. The project also would create a series of 300-foot-wide fuel breaks and build 28 miles of temporary roads.

The $5.9 million effort would boost local economic development, creating 11 jobs and $600,000 in income.

The project is aimed mainly at protecting the Forest Valley and Sherwood Forest subdivisions and a private youth camp. It could help Torreon and Tajique, which are outside the forest in pi?on-juniper lowlands and less at risk.

The agency is taking public comments through March 21. [See below.]

The goals are to improve watershed health and wildlife habitat and to reduce fire danger by returning the forest to early 1800s conditions. …

[Neighbors] working with Forest Guardians, submitted an alternative plan with no new roads, no prescribed burns and a 12-inch-diameter cap on tree cutting. …

After hearing from the public, the Forest Service reduced new roads from 37 miles to 28 miles and said the temporary roads could be gated to keep out all-terrain vehicles and illegal woodcutters. The roads would be revegetated and obliterated after the project.

Still, the Forest Service plan acknowledges the potential for problems, including increased erosion and the spread of invasive plants and weeks.

So much for preserving roadless areas. Thirty miles of new roads in 17,000 acres. No way will they all be “temporary.” This “Healthy Forests” plan needs to be re-thought. mjh

Cibola National Forest – Contact Us

Send postal mail to:

Cibola National Forest
2113 Osuna Road, NE, Suite A
Albuquerque, NM 87113

Phone:
(505) 346-3900

Fax:
(505) 346-3901

Cibola National Forest – Contact Us (form)

Roadless Area Conservation

if this White House had any integrity [updated 2/11/05]

alibi . february 3 – 9, 2005

Thin Line
By Tim McGivern

Au contraire, indeed. If you caught President Bush’s live press conference on KOB-770 AM last week like I did, you heard this question from Jeff Gannon, Washington bureau chief and White House correspondent for some outfit called Talon News. After the president selected “Jeff,” this question followed: “Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the U.S. economy. Harry Reid [D-NV] was talking about soup lines. And Hillary Clinton [D-NY] was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security is rock solid and there’s no crisis there. How are you going to work—you’ve said you are going to reach out to these people—how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?”

Nevermind Bush’s fatuous response, according to mediamatters.org, “Talon News’ editor in chief, Bobby Eberle, is a Republican activist who served as a delegate to the 1996, 1998 and 2000 Texas Republican Conventions and to the 2000 national Republican Convention. In 1999, Eberle was recognized with a ’unanimously approved resolution of commendation by the Republican Party of Texas for service and dedication to the Republican cause.’ His biography on Talon’s website notes: ’Bobby has devoted considerable time and energy to the Republican effort’ and ’Bobby is a member of Texas Christian Coalition and Texas Right to Life.’ Eberle is also the president and CEO of GOPUSA.com, a ’conservative news, information, and design company dedicated to promoting conservative ideals’ that carries articles and commentary by Gannon and Talon News. GOPUSA is also affiliated with MillionsofAmericans.com, a conservative advocacy organization run by Bruce Eberle, a relative of Bobby Eberle and a conservative fundraising consultant.”

Judging by the content of Gannon’s question (no wonder Bush blissfully selected him), Talon’s purpose is no surprise. But, to make matters more disgraceful, it turns out Harry Reid never said anything about “soup lines.” Gannon got the line from America’s favorite drug addict himself, Rush Limbaugh.

Only hours later, Limbaugh told his audience: “I said earlier today in the program, shortly after we began, that somebody in the White House press corps listens to this program. It is Jeff Gannon from Talon News. Here is his question, which is a repeat, a rehash, of a precise point I made on this program yesterday. … I’m not upset by this, folks. I’m honored. I’m thrilled. Don’t misunderstand. I’m not accusing anybody of anything. I just think it’s fabulous here. Now, you may think that my ego is out of control. Au contraire, my friends. I have no ego. Not of the kind you’re talking about, anyway, or thinking about. No, what makes me think that the reporter was listening to the program is that Harry Reid never actually said ’soup lines.’ That is my characterization of their portrayal of America. He never actually said it.”

Of course, if the White House had any integrity, partisan hacks (What the hell is Talon news, anyway?) would not be selected to pose questions at a rare presidential press conference. But instead, this clown Gannon gets himself a seat in the front row. That’s just pitiful.
— [update] —
alibi . february 10 – 16, 2005 [follow this link for more links]

Total Freaking Loser!
Tim McGivern

In last week’s “Thin Line” I mentioned Jeff Gannon’s presumed reporting work at a Jan. 26 White House press conference where he borrowed a line from Rush Limbaugh and asked Dubya how he is going to deal with Democrats who divorce themselves from reality. It turns out Gannon is actually James “J.D.” Guckert and he’s such a freaking loser that he had to resign his job from Talon News — a GOP house organ pretending to be a real news agency — when the truth of his real identity was revealed. Guckert, while denying Gannon was a pseudonym, was barred from receiving a congressional press pass when he couldn’t convince authorities he represented a real news agency, which should have barred him from attending White House press conferences as well. But the Bush administration gave him a front row seat anyway, and now it’s alleged, according to the blog MediaCitizen, that other websites such as hotmilitarystud.com, militaryescorts.com, and militaryescortsm4m.com, were registered to the same owner as Gannon’s home Web site.

An article posted in Editor&Publisher has all the latest.

“Congresswoman Asks for Probe After ‘Gannon’ Quits WH Reporting Post”
By Joe Strupp

Meanwhile here’s an excerpt of a letter from Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) sent to the White House yesterday calling for an investigation into Gannon-Guckert’s credentials.

Singing the Same Song Since ’78

A Shrub Grows in Midland BY KAREN OLSSON, 6/25/1999 – The Texas Observer

According to Gary Ott, who was then a reporter for the Plainview Daily Herald, Bush … warned that Social Security would go bust in ten years unless people were given a chance to invest the money themselves [in 1978!]

[mjh: some will see this as a positive sign of Bush’s constancy; others as his inability to change/adapt and an old use of ‘crisis’.]

Which part of the silence are they claiming you nicked?

You can’t say that, because the bullies own it BY HENRY KISOR

Then there was Michael Batt, the avant-garde composer who was sued for creating a work called “One Minute’s Silence,” which was exactly that: a moment of nothing. He was charged with infringing on a similar piece by John Cage, a period of silence that lasted more than four minutes. “Mine is a much better silent piece,” Batt declared. “I have been able to say in one minute what Cage could only say in four minutes and thirty-three seconds.”

According to Bollier, Batt’s mother asked him, “Which part of the silence are they claiming you nicked?”

Unfortunately Batt settled, yielding a “six-figure sum” to the other side. It was cheaper than fighting.

Hands Off Otero!

Editorial: Keeping Out of the Otero Mesa

This is part of a familiar scene in the West. The Bush administration has set its sights on dozens of ecologically valuable areas that could easily be declared off limits without imperiling the country’s supplies of oil and natural gas. As it is, 85 percent of the petroleum resources on public lands in the Western states are already leased or available for leasing. Any oil or gas found in the Otero grasslands is likely to make only a minuscule addition to America’s domestic energy supply, but could desecrate irreplaceable natural wealth.

Not even a miniature mandate for reactionary measures

A Democratic Blueprint for America’s Future by US Senator Ted Kennedy

I categorically reject the deceptive and dangerous claim that the outcome last November was somehow a sweeping, or a modest, or even a miniature mandate for reactionary measures like privatizing Social Security, redistributing the tax burden in the wrong direction, or packing the federal courts with reactionary judges. Those proposals were barely mentioned – or voted on – in an election dominated by memories of 9/11, fear of terrorism, the quagmire in Iraq, and relentlessly negative attacks on our Presidential candidate.

In an election so close, defeat has a thousand causes – and it is too easy to blame it on particular issues or tactics, or on the larger debate about values. In truth, we do not shrink from that debate. …

Unlike the Republican Party, we believe our values unite us as Americans, instead of dividing us. If the White House’s idea of bipartisanship is that we have to buy whatever partisan ideas they send us, we’re not interested.

In fact, our values are still our greatest strength. Despite resistance, setbacks, and periods of backlash over the years, our values have moved us closer to the ideal with which America began – that all people are created equal. And when Democrats say “all,” we mean “all.”

We have an Administration that falsely hypes almost every issue as a crisis. They did it on Iraq, and they are doing it now on Social Security. They exploit the politics of fear and division, while ours is a politics of hope and unity.

In the face of their tactics, we cannot move our party or our nation forward under pale colors and timid voices. We cannot become Republican clones. If we do, we will lose again, and deserve to lose. As I have said on other occasions, the last thing this country needs is two Republican parties.

Today, I propose a progressive vision for America, a vision that Democrats must fight for in the months and years ahead – a vision rooted in our basic values of opportunity, fairness, tolerance, and respect for each other.

These founding beliefs are still the essence of the American dream today. …
—–
An Address by Senator Edward M. Kennedy at the National Press Club
January 12, 2005

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." — Sam Adams