Evil Among Us

ABQjournal: Attack Puts Gay Man in Hospital By Jeremy Pawloski, Journal Staff Writer

Hate crimes are alive and well in Santa Fe, according to court records describing a vicious Sunday morning attack outside a Cerrillos Road hotel that put a 21-year-old homosexual man in St. Vincent Hospital’s intensive care unit.

Three defendants face aggravated assault and other charges connected to the attack. Santa Fe District Attorney Henry Valdez said all three also will face “hate crime” prison-time enhancements on each of their felony charges.

One of the suspects, David Trinidad, 17, already is on probation for raping a 41/2-year-old boy, according to Assistant District Attorney Heidi Pircher.

The two victims of the attack, James Maestas, 21, and another male, were at the Denny’s Restaurant on Cerrillos with several girlfriends early Sunday morning when they were chased from the restaurant by a group of five males who were throwing rocks at their car and calling them “faggots,” according to an officer’s statement of probable cause for arrests in the case.

The statement says the attackers then followed Maestas and his friend to the La Quinta Inn, where the friend was staying. Maestas is in a relationship with the other male, according to the probable cause statement.

During the beating outside La Quinta Inn, the attackers were yelling, “Let’s (mess) these faggots up,” the officer’s statement says.

Monday afternoon, Maestas was in St. Vincent Hospital’s intensive care unit, hooked up to a respirator to allow him to breathe, according to a close friend.
—–
The Thugs:
Gabriel Maturin, 20
David Trinidad, 17
Isaiah Medina, 19
two others not named

23 Square Miles for Canned Hunting of OUR Wildlife

ABQjournal: Larger Game Parks Approved in Senate By Barry Massey, The Associated Press

SANTA FE? Larger private game parks could be established in New Mexico under a measure approved Monday by the Senate.

The bill, (SB 337), would allow ranchers or others to operate game parks of up to 15,000 acres? about 23 square miles. Currently, the limit is 3,200 acres.

At a game park, people pay a fee to hunt animals, such as elk. The game park must be enclosed by a fence.

The Senate passed the bill on a 32-8 vote and sent it to the House for consideration.

The measure’s sponsor, Sen. Tim Jennings, D-Roswell, said game parks were “another type of economic development to be used to increase the return that has been dwindling from agricultural properties in New Mexico.”

“There are becoming fewer and fewer family farms, family ranches. This gives them another opportunity for a crop,” said Jennings.

Sen. Leonard Tsosie, D-Crownpoint, expressed concerns that fencing in large areas of private land could affect free-ranging and migratory wildlife.

“These are wildlife that belong to the state of New Mexico that would end up being captured by these game parks,” said Tsosie.

Voting against the measure were Tsosie and Sens. Dede Feldman, D-Albuquerque; Cisco McSorley, D-Albuquerque; Michael Sanchez, D-Belen; John Grubesic, D-Santa Fe; Linda Lopez, D-Albuquerque; Sue Wilson Beffort, R-Sandia Park; and Phil Griego, D-San Jose.
—–
Track SB337
INCREASE GAME & FISH PARKS MAXIMUM ACREAGE
Sponsor: Timothy Z. Jennings
Current Location: House Intro

Connect The Dots: 4 & 5

Four:

ABQjournal: Volcano Cliffs Builder Revises Plan By Andrea Schoellkopf, Journal Staff Writer

A developer who was initially trying to avoid the new city impact fees now says he’ll try for annexation if the Bernalillo County Planning Commission rejects his plan for an upscale West Side development.

In November, David Soule said he had applied to build a 222-lot subdivision southwest of Ventana Ranch but had faced opposition for a special use permit from nearby residents as well as the commission.

At the time, he said the city’s new impact fees? which weigh more heavily on the rapid-growing West Side to build needed parks and roads? were sending developers like him outside the city limits with their projects.

Soule had received a deferral for his request in November to resolve his issues. He said Monday he has modified his site plan, increased the number of homes to 233 instead of decreasing density and added more open space by reducing lot size.

The Planning Commission is scheduled to hear the matter during its regular meeting at 9 a.m. Wednesday at the Vincent E. Griego Chambers at the City and County building on Civic Plaza.

The area sits within a 3-square-mile island of county land that’s surrounded by land annexed by Albuquerque and Rio Rancho. …

The Ventana Ranch Neighborhood Association has written twice in opposition to the project, calling it a “leapfrog development” that doesn’t fit in with the city’s goal for planned communities with mixed-use zoning.

The city council has declared a building moratorium on much of the land surrounding his development while officials look at planning for the area west of the escarpment, called “Volcano Cliffs.” While the building ban ends in April, it could be extended.

The Volcano Cliffs study team had also asked for a deferral in November to see how Soule’s project would fit into plans for the West Side.

Five:

ABQjournal: E. Mountain Subdivision OK’d Telegraph Staff Report

Despite protests by dozens of East Mountains residents and the group representing the area’s homeowner associations, Bernalillo County commissioners approved the Richland Heights subdivision last week.

The vote of the five-member panel was split, with Commissioners Michael Brasher, whose district includes the East Mountains, and Teresa Cordova, who represents the South Valley, voting against the proposal.

Brasher explained that his dissent stemmed from Richland Heights developer Howard McCall’s refusal to meet with residents and questions regarding the subdivision’s water supply and plans for waste-water disposal. …

The Richland Heights subdivision will have 121 houses built on 298 acres.

mjh’s Blog: Connect The Dots: 1-2-3

Stick a Fork in Him — He’s Done!

ABQjournal: Points and Counterpoints on Dendahl

Use of Column Questioned
JOHN DENDAHL’S incomprehensible rant on topics ranging from Marxist theory to Sen. Jeff Bingaman’s voting record would be laughable had it not appeared on the op-ed page of a major daily newspaper. Was it the Journal’s intent to make the conservative right look like complete morons? Are there really so few arguments against Head Start and rapid transit that one must resort to linking them to communism? And most importantly, does the editorial staff of the Journal really expect the paper to be taken seriously if it prints this sort of nonsense?
MICHAEL KARGAS
Albuquerque

Dendahl Good for a Smile
I WANTED TO let you know how much I enjoy John Dendahl’s column. He never fails to make me smile. I particularly enjoyed his “Marxists Liked Ideas Like Pre-K, Bullet Trains” article. I am very much looking forward to his next column, wherein he makes the sterling argument that Marxists enjoyed drinking milk. Gasp! And so do most Democrats. History urges caution. Anyway, I hope Dendahl keeps up the good work. It’s great to have a humorist of his caliber featured in a hometown paper.
JACKIE RUSSO
Albuquerque

I’ve been railing against Dimdahl for years. Now people are openly mocking his dim-witted world view (good guys vs communist-socialists). mjh

mjh’s blog — Search Results for Dimdahl

Not One Founder Was Born-Again

Our Godless Constitution

by BROOKE ALLEN

[from the February 21, 2005 issue]

It is hard to believe that George Bush has ever read the works of George Orwell, but he seems, somehow, to have grasped a few Orwellian precepts. The lesson the President has learned best–and certainly the one that has been the most useful to him–is the axiom that if you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it. One of his Administration’s current favorites is the whopper about America having been founded on Christian principles. Our nation was founded not on Christian principles but on Enlightenment ones. God only entered the picture as a very minor player, and Jesus Christ was conspicuously absent.

Our Constitution makes no mention whatever of God. The omission was too obvious to have been anything but deliberate, in spite of Alexander Hamilton’s flippant responses when asked about it: According to one account, he said that the new nation was not in need of “foreign aid”; according to another, he simply said “we forgot.” But as Hamilton’s biographer Ron Chernow points out, Hamilton never forgot anything important.

In the eighty-five essays that make up The Federalist, God is mentioned only twice (both times by Madison, who uses the word, as Gore Vidal has remarked, in the “only Heaven knows” sense). In the Declaration of Independence, He gets two brief nods: a reference to “the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God,” and the famous line about men being “endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights.” More blatant official references to a deity date from long after the founding period: “In God We Trust” did not appear on our coinage until the Civil War, and “under God” was introduced into the Pledge of Allegiance during the McCarthy hysteria in 1954 [see Elisabeth Sifton, “The Battle Over the Pledge,” April 5, 2004]. …

The Founding Fathers were not religious men, and they fought hard to erect, in Thomas Jefferson’s words, “a wall of separation between church and state.” John Adams opined that if they were not restrained by legal measures, Puritans–the fundamentalists of their day–would “whip and crop, and pillory and roast.” …

If we define a Christian as a person who believes in the divinity of Jesus Christ, then it is safe to say that some of the key Founding Fathers were not Christians at all. Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and Tom Paine were deists–that is, they believed in one Supreme Being but rejected revelation and all the supernatural elements of the Christian Church; the word of the Creator, they believed, could best be read in Nature. John Adams was a professed liberal Unitarian, but he, too, in his private correspondence seems more deist than Christian.

George Washington and James Madison also leaned toward deism, although neither took much interest in religious matters. Madison believed that “religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprize.”

[read the whole article — it’s worth your time]

A Conservative Just Like Duhbya

Letters

“Who defines your values?” is the heading on a Campus Progress advertisement in last week’s Daily Lobo. The villains in this ad are Ann Coulter, Bill O’Reilly and James Dobson, who are cast as “the face of today’s conservative movement.”

I am more conservative than any of these people, and I can tell you they don’t speak for me. Besides, Campus Progress didn’t even have the presence of mind to define “conservative.”

According to Clyde Prestowitz, a former member of the Reagan administration, conservatism in the United States means support for small government, balanced budgets, fiscal prudence and great skepticism about overseas adventures.

Coulter appears to wholeheartedly support Bush’s war on Iraq, so she can’t be a conservative. I know nothing about O’Reilly, so I won’t comment on him. Based on what I have seen of Dobson and his Focus on the Family group, he doesn’t qualify either. Coulter and Dobson seem to be naive middle-of-the-roaders who go along with the Republican Party no matter what it does.

Whether one accepts this definition, if it is applied to President Bush, he is certainly not a conservative. Based on his record, it should be patently obvious to anyone he is the opposite of conservative.

Steven Dapra
UNM community member

Dapra clearly has no clue who Coulter or Dobson are. “Naive middle-of-the-roaders”? Ha — just like Atilla the Hun.

I’m continually amazed by Conservatives who disown Bush and his ilk. Sorry — from Duhbya on down, they call themselves conservatives.

I feel some sympathy for those conservatives who feel their philosophy and party have been hijacked. Ironically, those with the power within the Conservative Movement call you RINOs — Republicans In Name Only — and are working to exclude you completely. It’s much better to be in opposition to this gang than to try to explain how they’re not really what they say they are — surprise! they lie constantly. But who put them in power? Not the Liberals. If you don’t want to be tarred with the same brush, you blew your chance to take the power from BushCo last fall. Now you’re going to have to endure the shame of being ‘a conservative just like Bush.’ mjh

Update: Printed in the Lobo Letters on 3/1/05 under the wrong headline and with some very curious edits.

Connect The Dots

One:

ABQjournal: Bill Would Fund New Coors Rules By Andrea Schoellkopf, Journal Staff Writer

City Councilor Michael Cadigan, who represents the upper West Side, has introduced a bill that would fund a $150,000 update of the Coors Corridor Plan? adopted by the council in 1984.

The council is scheduled to consider the resolution at its March 7 meeting.

Under the resolution, the updates would establish high-quality design standards regarding development, open spaces and other public areas and increase “visual harmony” between new and existing buildings and the natural environment.

Last year, West Siders called for a revision of the plan after walls began appearing on both sides of Coors. As it turned out, the area on the west side of Coors and the area south of the La Luz neighborhood did not have view protections built into the Coors Corridor plan.

“A lot of those empty parcels are starting to fill up,” Cadigan said….

Coors “was supposed to be more of a parkway, more like Tramway,” Valles said. “… People that were involved in creating the Coors Corridor plan are nothing but disappointed with the way the city has enforced it.”

Rae Perls, president of the La Luz Landowners Association, which is southeast of Monta?o and Coors, said the other issue is whether the view from Coors is inclusive of the bosque and the city lights, or is limited to the mountain range.

“We have some major concerns about huge walls and double story buildings being built flush up to Coors and totally blocking all views,” she said. “… It’s a tragedy to those of us who live on the West Side, to see it destroyed by the greediness of developers.”

She said unless the Coors Corridor plan is updated, developers will be able to build however they want.

Two:

ABQjournal: 3 Six-Story Buildings in Project By Rory McClannahan, Journal Staff Writer

The West Side could be home to three six-story buildings in the next couple of years.

Interstate Development Co. is proposing to develop a 426,000-square-foot village center called Fountain Hills Plaza on 36 acres near the intersection of Paradise and Eagle Ranch. The development, which would be done in six phases would include retail and office space, a hotel and two condominiums. The hotel and condos are proposed to be six-story buildings, according to plans submitted to the city’s Planning Department.

The developers plan to unveil their plans and take comments at a public meeting scheduled at 6:30 p.m. Tuesday at the Taylor Ranch Community Center.

Three:

ABQjournal: Wal-Mart Purchases 20 Acres for Store By Joshua Akers, Journal Staff Writer

There has been no announcement and no fanfare from retail giant Wal-Mart’s corporate office. But all indications are the company is coming to Rio Rancho.

The mega-retailer recently purchased just over 20 acres of commercial land from AMREP Southwest in the northwest corner of Unser and Southern Boulevard, according to documents filed at the Sandoval County clerk’s office.

The land purchase comes as the company’s building permit is under review in the city’s Development Department.

According to that plan, Wal-Mart is planning a 214,000- square-foot Supercenter for the site. …

Because the land is already zoned commercial, no public hearings are planned for the project.

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." — Sam Adams