Liberal or Progressive: Speak Up for Yourself

ABQJOURNAL OPINION/LETTERS: Letters To the Editor

Keep Democrats in the Capitol
        LET ME GET this straight.
        Obama and the Democrats are voted into office with a message of hope that by pulling together we can solve the problems we face as a nation. The Republicans, however, reject this and decide to put the interests of their party over the American people.
        They refuse to join the Democrats in finding the compromises that under our political system are necessary to pass law. Instead they launch a "just say no" strategy to thwart the president’s legislative agenda at every turn.
        Then, having succeeded in making the government just about ungovernable, using the threat of filibuster more times in the Senate than at any time in U.S. history, the Republicans blame the Democrats for being ineffective and "out of step."
        Sound about right?
        The Republicans and their Tea Party brethren, however, offer no solutions to our problems, just sound bites: cut government, slash spending, repeal health care.
        So what do we do without? Who makes the sacrifices? They won’t say.
        As New Mexicans we are being asked to vote for Republican House candidates so the party can take back control of Congress. And do what exactly? Bring back the good old days of policies that have hurt the middle class for so many years? That made the rich richer and everyone else poorer?
        I don’t think so. Ben Ray Lujan, Martin Heinrich and Harry Teague are doing just fine and I expect that with more time and continued support they will help to heal our wounded economy and put in place the programs our state and nation desperately need.
        No need to reward the Republican Party for its bad behavior. This November, I’m voting Democrat for Congress, and you should, too.
        DAVID CUSHMAN
        Rio Rancho

ABQJOURNAL OPINION/LETTERS: Letters To the Editor

 

ABQJOURNAL OPINION/LETTERS: Letters to the Editor

Record Shows No Reason For Working Class To Vote GOP Republican
        MY FATHER WAS the only working-class member of the town meeting —the form of government — in the wealthy suburb of Boston where I grew up.
        Whenever an issue was being debated, my father always asked the question, "What does it do for working people?"
        At the time I thought it was a little too simplistic, but as I grew older I realized it is the most important question to be asked.
        Given that, I ask: Why would any working person vote Republican?
        Here is their recent record:
        In the debate over "cap and trade," they came down on the side of the oil industry.
        In the debate over health care reform, they came down on the side of the health insurance industry.
        In the debate over credit card reform, they came down on the side of credit card companies.
        In the debate over financial reform, they came down on the side of large banks and other large financial institutions that came close to destroying our economy.
        In the debate over student loans, they came down on the side of financial institutions that were taking a "house cut" off every loan.
        In the debate over repealing the Bush tax cut for those making over $250,000, they come down on the side of the rich.
        Is there any question about who represents the interests of the rich and powerful and disregards the interests of working people?
        RICHARD MASON
        Rio Rancho

ABQJOURNAL OPINION/LETTERS: Letters to the Editor

Follow the Money: Conservative Media is Antidemocratic

Think Progress » ThinkFast: October 4, 2010

USA/

Outside interest groups are spending five times as much on this year’s elections as they did on the last midterms, and they are more secretive than ever about their donors, thanks in part to the Citizens United Supreme Court decision. Of the $80 million spent thus far, conservative groups are outspending progressive ones 7 to 1.

Think Progress » ThinkFast: October 4, 2010

Think Progress » ThinkFast: October 1, 2010

Murdoch2

Following its $1 million donation to the Republican Governors Association, News Corporation — the parent company of Fox News — has donated $1 million to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, one of the heaviest anti-Democratic advertisers in this year’s elections. Spokesmen for News Corp. and Fox declined to comment.

Think Progress » ThinkFast: October 1, 2010

dangerousmeta!

CJR: Seeing FOX for What It Is.

Wringing one’s hands at the decline of ‘objective’ journalism misses the point, because Fox can and will continue to do what it wants. What’s important, if only for the sake of simple accuracy, is simply that Fox comes to be seen for what it is.” Nothing more than a lazy mouthpiece, an echo chamber.

dangerousmeta!

This Week’s WTF?!

Think Progress » Tennessee County’s Subscription-Based Firefighters Watch As Family Home Burns Down

[In Obion County, Tennessee], Gene Cranick’s home caught on fire. As the Cranicks fled their home, their neighbors alerted the county’s firefighters, who soon arrived at the scene. Yet when the firefighters arrived, they refused to put out the fire, saying that the family failed to pay the annual subscription fee to the fire department. Because the county’s fire services for rural residences is based on household subscription fees, the firefighters, fully equipped to help the Cranicks, stood by and watched as the home burned to the ground:

Imagine your home catches fire but the local fire department won’t respond, then watches it burn. That’s exactly what happened to a local family tonight. A local neighborhood is furious after firefighters watched as an Obion County, Tennessee, home burned to the ground.

The homeowner, Gene Cranick, said he offered to pay whatever it would take for firefighters to put out the flames, but was told it was too late. They wouldn’t do anything to stop his house from burning. Each year, Obion County residents must pay $75 if they want fire protection from the city of South Fulton. But the Cranicks did not pay. The mayor said if homeowners don’t pay, they’re out of luck. […]

We asked the mayor of South Fulton if the chief could have made an exception. “Anybody that’s not in the city of South Fulton, it’s a service we offer, either they accept it or they don’t,” Mayor David Crocker said.

The fire reportedly continued for hours “because garden hoses just wouldn’t put it out. It wasn’t until that fire spread to a neighbor’s property, that anyone would respond” — only because the neighbor had paid the fee.

A local newspaper further pressed Mayor Crocker about the city’s policy, which has been in place since 1990. Crocker, a Republican who was elected in 2008 and serves with a county commission where every seat is also filled by a Republican, likened the policy to buying auto insurance. [mjh: Except that the police don’t let you die trapped in your car because you don’t have auto insurance – yet.] The paper said he told them that, after all, “if an auto owner allowed their vehicle insurance to lapse, they would not expect an insurance company to pay for an unprotected vehicle after it was wrecked.”

Ironically, in the county commission’s latest report on its fire services, which outlines which parts of the municipal area will receive fire services only through subscriptions, the commissioners and fire service officials brag that the county is “very progressive.” [mjh: Double-plus good newspeak!]

Think Progress » Tennessee County’s Subscription-Based Firefighters Watch As Family Home Burns Down

"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less."

From Alice in Wonderland. Was Lewis Carroll mocking that view?

mjh’s blog — Do children understand irony? Does Science Daily?

It took me a long time to realize that I use the word irony differently from anyone I’ve ever discussed the term with. Most people speak of irony as intentional – “I was being ironic” – which is impossible for me. I prefer to call “intentional irony” sarcasm, as in “I’m sure you agree this is interesting …” Then there is real irony, which cannot ever be intentional, as I use irony. [read more]

As an update to that earlier blog post: I followed an exchange in which a writer made a categorical statement without any clear tone. A respondent explained the fallacy of the original statement. The original writer dismissed the correction with “I was being sarcastic.” Later, someone wrote: “Best use of sarcasm ever!! (see it is funny because you were actually being facetious).”

“Best use of sarcasm,” which may be hyperbole, is not quite as good as “I never tire of your sarcasm.” (Kitty on That 70’s Show.) I was moved by the need to correct sarcasm to facetiousness.

Words mean more than any one person can fully comprehend. Language is inherently inaccurate, no matter how precisely we use it. Not that you understand what I mean, which is neither arrogance nor an insult to you, simply an acknowledgement of language’s weakness. Sadly, we blame each other for misunderstandings when it is language that is to blame. (Or our mutual and equal failure to grasp that.)

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." — Sam Adams