Lost and Never Found Again

I thought the first season of Lost was fantastic. The skillful interweaving of flashback and present to explain characters was mesmerizing. Leaving behind that unhappy past that only the viewer was privy to provided redemption for characters whose “real” lives were wrecks. Those characters — those actors, really — fascinated me and I cared about them. The touches of fantasy and magic started out as a spice that came to overwhelm the series. (JJ Abrams, the creator, has an obsession with Indiana Jones-style ancient technology and magical pseudoscience – and the number 47. I think his obsession worked better in Alias.) Suddenly, other tribes appeared and, with them, senseless violence and ancient conspiracies. I left the island sometime during or after the 3rd season when the story congealed around obsessive-compulsive fanaticism, on screen and, perhaps, in the audience. Too many characters were intentionally cruel and vicious and cryptic. The mysteries seemed to pile up solely to hold the audience’s attention one more week: time travel / parallel universes. By then, I couldn’t bear the music used to inform us of the mood: the pensive piano tickling versus the harsh brass. Gag.

Once Lost reached status as a Phenomenon, the writers became more self-indulgent, with “reprise” episodes featuring running notes on screen and simul-tweets. True fans gobbled it up. Specials explained “the story so far” and featured the earnest writers explaining what they no longer seemed able to explain in the context of the show itself. There were longer gaps between new episodes and between seasons.

I repeat: that first season or two struck me as the very best television. (A friend who tried the series for the first time recently didn’t find it so fascinating. Perhaps the show’s time had already passed.) When it was clear that Season Six would be the last, I started watching again. There was good and bad in the final season. I enjoyed Ab Aeterno (Season 6, Episode 9) and Across the Sea (Episode 15) – both show how well the writers constructed a foreign past. Other episodes overdid the strong-man-bullheaded shit: I must possess/destroy/save the Island.

Because we travelled in May, I made sure the DVR would record an hour before and an hour beyond the night of the last episode, so that if some “special” shifted the show, I’d still have it when we got home. Ironically, I did not know that the biggest finale in years was itself so special that the show would shift from Tuesday to Sunday. (WTF?!) So, I didn’t see the last episode. Until today (on Roku).

Now, these finales have a lot of bases to touch, to please the audience, the writers, even the actors. Mary Tyler Moore pulled it off; Mash, not so much. Every important character – and there were many on Lost – needs his or her moment of applause, some flashbacks, and a last bow. (Michael and Walt were noteworthy exceptions. And Mr Eko. Hmmm, all black males. Probably too busy to return.) And, although the Secret of the Island was really just a maguffin for most of the series, the writers felt the need to explain, well, the unexplainable, even if it didn’t really make more sense than any of the mystery to date.

I did enjoy the symmetry with the first episode of Jack lying in the bamboo with Vincent the Dog, which gave rise to the Simpson’s excellent note on the blackboard: It was all the dog’s dream. And that final shutting eye versus the opening eye of the first episode. But everything else was shit designed to bring back everyone for one last bow. At one time, it seemed the Parallel Universe spun off from the event of NOT crashing, while the series until then had been the other Universe where the crash occurred. But then Christian Sheppard explains that this Parallel Universe is a place all the characters created so they could find each other again *after Death*. But, wait – Jack imagined a son in the Afterlife? And everyone got together before Jack died on screen? And how much time passed with Hurley as Number One, following Jack’s death, which is the last scene, but preceding the Reunion? (Jacob, Hurley’s predecessor, had the job for centuries; Jack had it for one fateful day.) So, Heaven – or the Waiting Room after death – is merely a better life than your real life was, but only somewhat? It still has all the same characters in it, each of whom is living a better life. Well, not so for Sayid. (Hmmm, another dark male.) At one time, it seemed Desmond (the actor played Jesus in a movie once – same beard and flowing hair, different accent) had to get everyone together to go back to the Island (an echo of Season 4/5?), but in the end, he seemed to be forcing them to remember the other life before they could … ahem, “move on.”

“Now, you are like me.” (Assuming you are disappointed.)

Tip: If you haven’t seen Lost, I recommend one episode: Exposé (Season 3, Episode 14, streaming or on disc #4). It is self-contained and concentrates on two minor characters to great effect. As you see flashback and present time converge, you’ll get a good sense of how well this worked on Lost. Many of the best episodes were like this, although none other worked quite this way. It has always stood out to me as a odd episode that captures the feel of the first two seasons. (Ironically, I’ve read that Nikki and Paulo were despised by fans.)

Want to hear a jackass bray? Read Letters to the Editor.

ABQJOURNAL OPINION/LETTERS: Letters To the Editor

Want To See Animals? Get Out of Town
        THIS IS Albuquerque — not New York City or San Francisco — and $20 million for an "urban" wildlife refuge is beyond ridiculous. Albuquerque doesn’t have or need an "urban" wildlife refuge, for the same reason Albuquerque doesn’t have or need an underground subway system.
        This is another example of misguided government. As expected, Sens. Tom Udall and Jeff Bingaman and Rep. Martin Heinrich have lined up to push this project on unsuspecting New Mexicans and Americans in large.
        This is a power grab, masquerading as a feel-good, all-American recreation and education program, coming from federal, state and local politicians that are part of or dominated by left-wing environmental activists.
        The Feds own about 30 percent of the land in the U.S., and in New Mexico it’s above 40 percent. I guess in the eyes of the New Mexico representatives and environmental activist, that’s not enough land mass for them to control. When the government designates land as a refuge or protected area, it means that you and I no longer have free access to that land or area. [mjh: Certifiable bullshit.] 
        Whether you like to hike, bike, hunt, fish, camp or just get outdoors for a picnic, it will no longer be your choice or on your terms. Any business development is completely out of the question, especially exploration and use of natural resources such as oil, gas, copper, potash, uranium or even lumber and dirt. …
        The education benefits are also a myth. … Heinrich’s observation that "there are few large undeveloped areas in the Middle Rio Grande Valley" is a very disingenuous, misleading and dishonest statement. A person can drive 30 minutes in any direction from Albuquerque and experience the great outdoors.
        If Heinrich feels the need to show a 7-year-old a goose or duck, he can drive a little further south than the South Valley to Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge, which is a 57,331-acre refuge straddling the Rio Grande Valley just off Interstate 25 south of Socorro. Not up for such a long drive, try Bernardo wildlife area or its neighbor Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, just south of Belen.
        The proposed "urban" wildlife refuge is government waste, fraud and abuse in its purist form.
JEFF HEISEL
Albuquerque

ABQJOURNAL OPINION/LETTERS: Letters To the Editor

Good grief, Jeff. Have you seen the property in question? This land is a gem of open space nestled between the curve of I-40 and the river. How on earth could this spot be improved by 5000 homes, a mall, a storage facility? This land has to stay open and it won’t if it stays in private hands. Therefore, government *must* do what only government will do: save this space for us all. Do you really think you would have more access to this land if it were a gated community? Do you not know that there is plenty of mineral extraction going on on federally held land all over the West?

Death to Death Panel Bullshit

The Albuquerque Journal is lucky to have a writer of the calibre of Winthrop Quigley. Quigley has a knack for stepping through a logical process with dispassion. I’m thankful he takes on Calcified Cal Thomas’ resurrection of the death panels, a coldly calculated effort to frighten the townfolk into raising their pitchforks at the start of the new Congress.

ABQJOURNAL UPFRONT: Doctor Discussion Hardly a Death Panel

By Winthrop Quigley
Journal Staff Writer

          It was probably too much to expect that we might enjoy at least a brief respite, now that the elections are over, from much of the nonsense that passes for public discourse. We managed to get only to the second day of the new year before Cal Thomas revived the death panel canard in his syndicated column, which the Journal publishes.

        The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, as required by the health care law passed last year, has started paying medical professionals about $111 to spend time discussing with their Medicare-eligible patients anything on their minds. CMS has issued a rule saying that these so-called wellness visits, available annually, can cover the care the patients would like to receive at the end of their lives, if that’s what they want to talk about. Patients have the discussion only if they ask for it. …

Self-described conservatives like Thomas argue in other contexts that given enough information individuals make the best choices for themselves. …

When patients’ desires aren’t known, the health care system has an incentive to provide excessive care and run up expense unnecessarily, if only to avoid a lawsuit. …

In the world of death panel fabulism, it’s better your doctor not know what your preferences are. It’s better that you not know your options. It is a world where personal freedom is threatened by information and achieved through ignorance.

ABQJOURNAL UPFRONT: Doctor Discussion Hardly a Death Panel

"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." — Sam Adams