Category Archives: photos

Photos by mark justice hinton.

Your Subject is One You Never Tire Of

OK, this isn’t exactly a photo topic, although it involves images in an album that I’ve been meaning to assemble. This might be about the meaning of life, devotion to a subject, or obsession. My special number (not entirely lucky nor magical, nor exclusively mine) is forty-seven. I see it almost daily without looking for it. Just a couple of days ago, I was working on my computer and noticed this one:

last modification time 47-47

Yeah, 2:47:47. But, there are so many of these examples:

The Meaning of 47

  • Between the Summer Solstice and the Winter solstice, the sun moves 47 degrees (23 1/2 degrees North and South of the equator)
  • People born with Down’s Syndrome have 47 chromosomes instead of the more common 46
  • Some people believe a flying saucer crash-landed in 1947 in New Mexico, the 47th state (in order of admission)
  • DVDs have a minimum capacity of 4.7 gigabytes
  • Our randomly distributed trash receptacle has a serial number ending in “4774”
  • The Meaning of 47

    Forcing this back to photography, I love particular subjects, especially birds, bugs, and flowers. On the other hand, I’m less interested in photographing architecture, machines or people. Find the subject that captivates you. Your subject will also inspire and energize you.

    http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/category/47/

    http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1054135229466.2010981.1108374610&l=39d6859a26 (more screenshots)

    Snapshot Memories

    Photography doesn’t require great equipment: the cheapest and simplest cameras can capture an image. Nor does it require great skill: just point and click. Whether the results are great art or not, any photo may become a cherished reminder. (Or a sad one.)

    Long ago,
    it must be.
    I have a photograph.
    Preserve your memories.
    There all that’s left you.

    — Bookends by Paul Simon

    When we moved into our house over twenty years ago, we soon discovered the western exposure of the back patio made it uninhabitable on summer afternoons. So, one week, while Merri was out-of-town for the wedding of friends, I decided to build an arbor spanning much of the patio. My dad was a great carpenter by hobby (farm boy become engineer). I’m not so skilled, but this was to be my masterpiece. As it happened, I’d given up coffee some weeks earlier and experienced a drop of at least 10 IQ points. I knew I could not perform adequate carpentry without coffee. And, so, I had a cuppa and started drawing my plans and making a shopping list. I think I used the convertible to haul the extra long boards and lattice. I still use the power saw and drill I bought for the project.

    The new arbor, photo by Merri Rudd
    photo by Merri Rudd (goggles, grass, and hair now gone)

    After the first big wind, I found my neighbor looking over our common wall, himself a more-skilled carpenter. “Still standing,” he noted, perhaps a little surprised. A carpenter friend suggested ways to shore it up and advice on wood preservative treatment, neither of which I heeded. As it was, it lasted two decades.

    We got married under that arbor among friends. Eventually, wisteria grew to cover half the arbor. One year in five, magnificent flowers hung through the slats. (More often, a late freeze ruined the buds.) When the wisteria leafed out, half the patio was dappled with cool, green shade.

    half gone, half in peril

    Time passes. All solutions are temporary. A few years ago, I dismantled half of the aged arbor. In the process, I knocked a board loose that I was standing under (some things even coffee can’t help). The board bounced off my skull and through a window. (Not the first time my hard head saved me when my soft brain didn’t.) We got a new and better window, but never really replaced the lost shade. Although we continued to enjoy the remaining half of the arbor, it was increasingly a hazard to sit under, as it leaned more in several directions.

    This year, I bought a canvas topped gazebo which threatens to fly in the ceaseless wind. I bought a second one to stand sans canvas under the old arbor as scaffolding to buy it a little more time. Only a month, as it turned out. When the wind – this damn wind (listen to the poem, Unhinged) – returned yet again, I heard a dreadful sound. Expecting that the new gazebo might have flown onto the roof, I discovered the remnant arbor had blown over, taking the “scaffolding” with it, in the best direction possible. Nothing lasts forever. Take photos while you can.

    last of the arbor falls in wind

    How Much Excess is Enough?

    How many photos do you have time for? More than just time, how many photos can you enjoy before your eyes glaze over?

    This is a serious concern of mine and probably every photographer. We all have our limits. We all have lots of things competing for our attention. I have 38000+ photos in my photo gallery taken over the past 9 years. No one but me has seen all of those (and I’ve seen all many times). Merri has seen most, bless her.

    Of my photos, 35000 have no rating. I’ve only been diligent in the past two years with deleting the worst and rating all of the remaining. Of the the 3000 that are rated, 119 have 5 stars, as decided by both Merri and me – let’s call those my best. Another 900 have 4 stars. (Mind you, I fervently hope that of the 35000 without ratings, there are more than a few 4 and 5 stars. And even a 3 star photo has some merit.) But, who *wants* to look at 100 photos, let alone 1000+.

    Obviously, I don’t shy from showing my photos. In fact, by my standards, I’ve become rather pushy, dare I say, aggressive. Along with this blog and other websites, I have two digital frames in my house and every computer monitor and TV displays photos. I have photo books, note cards, and business cards. I even have a dozen prints beside the front door so there is no escape without seeing some of my photos. Are you sick of this yet? Perhaps I’m the one who is sick.

    I have a hodgepodge of photo locations because no one method satisfies me. Flickr is great for getting exposure to photo enthusiasts, one photo at a time. Picasa on the Web (I don’t use the application) is great for organizing albums, especially because of its options for linking to and embedding albums. Facebook provides a friendly audience, although I don’t really like or trust FB (i.e., FB itself is not my Friend and I Unlike it).

    I like the control and customization possible in hosting my own web services, such as this blog. But a blog entry is a message in a bottle – most sink unseen. Glug…

    Panoramas

    double rainbow in los lunas, new mexico

    Panoramas are made by combining two or more images. Some cameras include this function, but it may be best to take a series of pictures, then use software to stitch the images together. I use Windows Live Photo Gallery. (Select two or more photos – all the ones you intend to stitch. On the Create tab, click Panorama.)

    I’ve read that is essential to use a tripod for a panorama, but I seldom do, although I used a tripod on the double rainbow above. I shoot, turn my body slightly (without moving my feet), shoot again, and repeat. I pick out areas to overlap, so that 20%-30% of the right-hand portion of the current frame will also be 20%-30% of the left-hand portion of the next frame, and so forth.

    Panoramas are great for landscapes, but don’t be afraid to try panoramas with other subjects.

    Some distortion in the image is common, in my experience. Most people will crop the resulting stitched panorama to eliminate the jagged black edge, which is created as the software compensates for the photographer’s inability to hold steady, which, in turn, is why you are advised to use a tripod. However, I like the black, jagged edges and the record of my movement from frame to frame. Sometimes those edges enhance the image, I think, but others may think that’s crazy / lazy.

    Pueblo Bonito, Chaco Canyon, New Mexico

    Digiscopy

    bosque eagleDigiscopy or digiscoping involves combining a camera with a (tele)scope for far-reaching zoom close-ups. The best shots probably involve a mechanism for mounting the camera to the scope. (Or one of Zeiss’ awesome but expensive photoscopes – not a product placement.) I just hold the camera up to the scope eyepiece and jiggle, twist, and zoom in or out until I think I see an image on the LCD, then shoot. As a result, these are my very best digiscope shots. Still, I’m intrigued by the possibility. (And would accept a nice scope as a gift.) I’m sure someone would prefer to crop these photos, but I actually like the shape of the scope. (No doubt, there is a Photoshop mask to “make you photos appear as if digiscoped.”)

      Guatemalan bird owlbuquerque

    The owl photo was taken by holding the camera up to one part of a pair of binoculars. Very difficult. Ironically, this shot isn’t any closer than my normal zoom would get. Whereas, that eagle shot above is much closer than my zoom could get.