Category Archives: NADA – New American Dark Ages

New American Dark Ages

Enough! Save the Middle Class.

ABQJournal Online » How Dare These Rich People Be, Well, Rich?

…We didn’t need to “level the playing field.” It was already level for everyone.

Some people got rich, some didn’t. Fair and square.

But now, in this new age of entitlement, the rich are being blamed for everything. How dare they be rich when we’re not? Well, go out and invent Windows if you’re so unhappy.

Of course that would mean actually doing something instead of complaining about it. But why not give the protesters what they want? Let’s have all the rich people take their riches and close up shop.

Yes, the head of General Motors should take his millions, Standard Oil should cash in, the owner of the Journal should close its doors ,as should all their evil rich cronies and retire on their millions to live the life of Riley.

Then Corporate America would dissolve. Unemployment would flourish. And when the protesters sit back smugly saying they’ve “won,” we can all ask the protesters for a job.

Until the liberal left-wingers get it into their thick skulls that it’s the rich people, not the poor people, that sign our paychecks, we are destined for doom.

SHERRY WENZ
Albuquerque

ABQJournal Online » How Dare These Rich People Be, Well, Rich?

Sigh. Such ignorance and anger. Let’s pretend the playing field once was level. It hasn’t been for a long time. Since the Bush Error, only the Rich have prospered and that was directly due to massive tax cuts plus tax-subsidized bailouts: Welfare for the Rich. Hardly “fair and square.”

Now, many people are fed up and have had enough and they are, in fact, doing something: yelling “Enough!” Our society may survive the deep divisions in political viewpoints, but it cannot survive the economic disparity between the Rich and everyone else, especially as the vital Middle Class gets crushed.

In response to Warren Buffett’s suggestion to raise taxes on the Rich, people like Wenz sneer that the Rich can donate whatever money they choose. I’ll borrow that sneer to say the Rich are free to “close up shop and live the life of Riley.” Like the Rich in other nations without a Middle Class and with outrageous disparity between the few Rich and the many poor, they will hire better security and stick to enclaves that exclude “those people.” I wonder which side of that fence Wenz ends up on.

The protestors do not want wreck the economy further. To say otherwise is either very stupid or self-serving. Apparently, Sherry Wenz belongs to whoever signs her paycheck.

Bank Transfer Day is November 5, 2011

Hit Wall Street where it hurts: in the wallet. Let’s make 11/5 “No Shopping or Spending Day,” too.

In light of “Occupy,” many New Mexicans switching to credit unions | New Mexico Independent

By Devon Jackson | 10.14.11 | 11:59 am

In three weeks, the Wall Street protest movement hopes to implement a November 5th walkout, the effects of which could have a far greater impact than months of sit-ins and protests. Being billed as Bank Transfer Day, and as of two weeks ago having attracted 14,000 RSVPs via Facebook to the national event, the campaign is urging Americans to close their accounts at large banks and move their money to credit unions.

In light of “Occupy,” many New Mexicans switching to credit unions | New Mexico Independent

We are the 99%

Why Occupy Wall Street Embodies The Real Values Of The Boston Tea Party | Crooks and Liars

By Susie Madrak

ThinkProgress points out how little the Koch-manufactured tea party has in common with the real thing, and how the Occupy Wall Street movement embodies the real spirit:

  1. The Original Boston Tea Party Was A Civil Disobedience Action Against A Private Corporation.
  2. The Original Boston Tea Party Feared That Corporate Greed Would Destroy America.
  3. The Original Boston Tea Party Believed Government Necessary To Protect Against Corporate Excess.
  4. The Original Boston Tea Party Was Sparked By A Corporate Tax Cut For A British Corporation.
  5. The Original Boston Tea Party Wanted A Stronger Democracy.

Why Occupy Wall Street Embodies The Real Values Of The Boston Tea Party | Crooks and Liars

Freedom of the Press belongs to the advertiser

New York Times Shifts its Framing of the Arrests at Occupy Wall Street » Sociological Images

by Lisa Wade, 3 days ago at 01:31 pm

A blogger named Aluation posted this graphic showing how the New York Times changed the first line of a story about the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations.  The change subtly shifted the blame for the mass arrest on the Brooklyn Bridge from the police to the protesters.  In the first version of the story, police allowed them onto the bridge and then “cut off and arrested” them.  In the second, there was a “showdown” in which demonstrators “marched onto the bridge.”

Adding interest, the author of the piece was changed from “Colin Moynihan” to “Al Baker and Colin Moynihan.”  Who is Al Baker?  He is the guy in charge of the police bureau at the Times.

New York Times Shifts its Framing of the Arrests at Occupy Wall Street » Sociological Images