Category Archives: NADA – New American Dark Ages

New American Dark Ages

Send Bush to Mars!

Though you didn’t see it on the news and read almost nothing about it in print, there were protesters in Roswell confronting George Bush. We were there.

My friend Jas. proposed the trip to Roswell. He could not stand Bush bringing his fear & lies to New Mexico without any opposition. Bush, in a move taken from Cheney’s agenda, spoke to a stacked audience of military cadets bused into one of the most conservative towns in New Mexico — no worries about dissent or open opposition (isn’t the bully brave).

So, we took to the road in my camper the night before. The drive down was surreal as we passed through dense fog, past trees white with frost. A Trupact container drove by, loaded with radioactive waste (our own Pete Domenici, who introduced the president the next day, supports weaker containers, fewer inspections, more shipments).

We arrived outside of Roswell after midnight and camped off a dirt road. We snuggled in sleeping bags and set the alarm.

The next morning, we drove into town. The main street was barricaded a few blocks either side of the convention center, but the side streets were open. We picked a spot a block east of the convention center, not far from the media vehicles and just below the sightline of a half a dozen snipers. Out of the camper, we pulled Jas’ creation: a Mylar banner suspended from helium balloons painted with the message “Send Bush to Mars.” We had considered stronger messages but we both believe that humor will strip the tyrant of his veneer. It was a timely message fitting Roswell, New Mexico.

banner says 'send Bush to Mars'

As the balloons warmed, the banner lifted slowly and began to drift to the south, paralleling the main drag. We know some people on the street saw it. There can be no doubt the snipers saw it as did the helicopter pilot. We took a couple of pictures and started to leave town.

Ah, but we couldn’t just go, we had to turn back and relish sticking our thumb in Bush’s eye. We watched the banner at about sniper height drift a couple of blocks before catching on a tree. There it hung, the balloons tugging, sparkling in the sunlight.

What happened next was more serendipitous.

As we headed out of town, we stopped at the UFO Museum. All through the museum, Bush’s speech blared, much like small-town Germany 65 years ago. It was ironic to wander through a ‘museum’ that documents people’s gullibility and mistrust of government while listening to Bush. In the gift shop, a patron spoke of ”incredible things spoken of by credible people” — what, ”aliens” or ”the war on terrorism”?

It turns out we were in the museum exactly the right amount of time. As we headed out 380, we stopped at a gas station. While we gassed up, a state trooper blocked the intersection and people began to line up along what proved to be the president’s route to the airport. We never could have planned to be sitting so close. What to do? Too big a gesture, too early, would bring the cops or Bush loyalists down on us. If only we had another banner — though the materials were close at hand (and, ironically, we ended up having more time than we realized). The best I could do was draw a small sign: Patriot Act is UnAmerican.

So, after braying to the young men he will send off to die, after phoning the fanatic anti-choice crowd who powers him, after laughing with the restaurant workers and patrons he is robbing, POTUS drove past hundreds of waving loyalists and probably never saw the man in the yellow shirt holding his sign high with a tear in his eye.

It doesn’t matter. What matters is that you speak out, that you protest the direction this president is dragging the entire world. No one can stop him but all of us. Get active! mjh

Radical, but just not conservative enough (shudder)

In the middle of an attack piece on Paul O’Neill, Michael Kinsley calmly makes this comment and moves on:

”It’s true that George W. Bush has turned out to be a more radical president than everyone predicted. But O’Neill has no insights about why it turned out this way, or why we should have seen it coming.”

Wow. ”Radical”? ”We should have seen it coming.” Understand, Kinsey is not a liberal commentator.

On the same page of the Albuquerque Journal, troglo-conservative John ‘Meow’ Leo writes, ”Democrats keep saying that President Bush is governing from the right. What they mean by this is uncertain, since the Bush domestic program pretty much tramples most conservative and Republican principles….”

Speaking of Cheney saying ”Reagan proved that deficits don’t matter,” Leo the Lion writes, ”Under what theory of government does a narrow midterm victory create a right to dramatically expand the deficit?” Amen.

”Social conservatives work hard to elect a Republican president, who then tends to behave pretty much like a conventional Democrat on social issues.” Leo then castigates the President for failing to destroy Title IX (maybe next term, when the gloves come off).

These are weird times, when the most radically conservative president in memory controls all three branches of government, gives money to the rich, to corporations, and to conservative Christians (ahem, ‘faith-based groups’) — gives everything to the people who keep him in power, and yet, those more radical than Bush (be very afraid) are disappointed in him.mjh

The Fight Isn’t Over

From Balls 4 Dean, Brains 4 Clark Pika Brittlebush, Quirky Burque Blog

The problem is, Dean’s got the vision of a highschool robotics club dork that just lost the Science Fair to a football star. He’s MAD and he’s RIGHTEOUS. And he and his nerd-herd are totally blind to the BushCo Monster Truck Rally building violently in the highschool parking lot. Football player meat-heads with No Fear stickers on their trucks, eager to pounce.

And pounce they will, with the Heartbeat of America and all its cherry pie Christian wallop on their side. THEY WILL WIN. And the papers will gloat and the cheerleaders will fuck them and Meat-Heads will continue to rule the world.

Wonderful analogy, Pika (no sarcasm).

I’m not a Deaniac (though I like his fire), but, then, I was a nerd 35 years ago. I’m a bit disturbed that Clark has made so much money as a lobbist: over $800K; clients include the major company behind the Fatherland Security database; Clark met with Cheney to lobby for them (see citations below). Of course, doing business with fascists doesn’t necessarily hurt (ask Bush’s granddad) — you can still call yourself a businessman — Americans like that.

I strongly object to Clark’s support for a constitutional amendment to ban flag burning (not a lot of that going on, y’know). Less freedom is NOT more American, no matter what Big Brother says.

More importantly, Clark has had a free ride, which ended last night. Think endorsements from Michael Moore and George McGovern are purely positive? Kerry, in particular, will feel the need to bring Clark down a few pegs (and vice versa — did you catch Clark’s snipe about heroics from “junior” officers). Dean may step over their corpses.

I’m actually glad it isn’t a done deal. I’m such a liberal I’d gladly vote for Dean/Braun (ok, I don’t have the guts to say Kucinch/Sharpton); but I’ll vote for Kerry/Edwards or any combo. Bush gotta go.
mjh


NOW with Bill Moyers. Transcript. January 9, 2004 | PBS

BILL MOYERS: You report that when General Wesley Clark retired from the military, he earned over $800,000 lobbying former pals and peers for airline and homeland security contracts and that he didn’t tell us that when he appeared on CNN as a commentator on the war on terrorism. Why would a man do that, thinking he’s going to run for President? Because that’s bound to be harmful when it is ultimately disclosed?

CHUCK LEWIS: Well, that’s sort of what I thought. It’s the first time I know of a major Presidential candidate running who’s also currently a lobbyist. When he announced, September 17th, he was still registered in Washington as a lobbyist.

[Chuck Lewis is the founder of the The Center for Public Integrity, a non-profit, non-partisan watchdog in Washington. He was speaking to Bill Moyers, host of PBS’ Now.]

NEWSWEEK: Wesley Clark Lobbied Bush Administration for Contract for Arkansas Firm to Get Security Work

As an Arkansas businessman, Wesley Clark lobbied Vice President Dick Cheney, Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, aides to FBI Director Robert Mueller and his former chief deputy commander in Europe on behalf of a company eager to get post-9/11 security work, Newsweek reports in the current issue. The aim: to get a contract for Acxiom, a Little Rock firm whose “data mining” techniques are useful in tracking terrorists.

The lobbying — for which Clark was paid about $400,000 — must have helped: Acxiom got a contract.

Clark picks up McGovern endorsement in N.H.

Clark, at the pancake breakfast, said after Sept. 11 he considered it “his duty” to lobby for Acxiom, a homeland security company, in order to make a contribution since he was no longer wearing a uniform.

NPR : Wesley Clark Interview Transcript, The 2004 Democratic Presidential Candidates

BOB EDWARDS: You’ve accused the Bush administration of not tolerating dissent and yet you’ve said you would support a constitutional amendment outlawing flag burning.

WES CLARK: That’s right.

EDWARDS: Isn’t there a contradiction there?

CLARK: I don’t think so. I think there are many, many ways of disagreeing and expressing your concern with the government. But I’ll support just about anything that protects our flag. I love that flag.

FactCheck.org Was Wesley Clark a Republican?

DC Primary – FIRST in the Nation

In case you missed it, DC held a primary before Iowa or New Hampshire. In fact, DC deliberately moved ahead of all others in order to draw attention to the fact that DC has no voting representation (we had a revolution over that). Ironically, the Democratic National Committee forced DC to make their primary ‘non-binding’ — don’t want to tick off Iowa and New Hampshire (95% white). mjh

| ABQjournal News | The Associated Press |

Unofficial Returns in D.C. Primary
By The Associated Press

The latest, unofficial returns in the Democratic presidential primary in District of Columbia on Tuesday.

Howard Dean, 17,736 – 43 percent
Al Sharpton, 14,248 – 34 percent
Carol Moseley Braun, 4,824 – 12 percent
Dennis Kucinich, 3,435 – 8 percent

Declaration of Independence from the War

”A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.” — Martin Luther King

This speech by Martin Luther King is stunning. He moves through a thorough history into an uncertain future. Take out the words Vietnam and Communism, replace them with Iraq and Terrorism, and you see how little we have progressed in over 35 years. mjh

Declaration of Independence from the War in Vietnam

I watched the program broken and eviscerated as if it were some idle political play thing of a society gone mad on war, and I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic, destructive suction tube. So I was increasingly compelled to see the war as an enemy of the poor and to attack it as such. …

They asked if our own nation wasn’t using massive doses of violence to solve its problems, to bring about the changes it wanted. Their questions hit home, and I knew that I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today, my own government. …

Now, it should be incandescently clear that no one who has any concern for the integrity and life of America today can ignore the present war. …

Perhaps only his sense of humor and irony can save him when he hears the most powerful nation of the world speaking of aggression as it drops thousands of bombs on a poor, weak nation more than 8000 miles from its shores. …

I speak as a citizen of the world, for the world as it stands aghast at the path we have taken. I speak as an American to the leaders of my own nation. The great initiative in this war is ours. The initiative to stop must be ours. …

[Quoting another:] “The Americans are forcing even their friends into becoming their enemies. It is curious that the Americans, who calculate so carefully on the possibilities of military victory do not realize that in the process they are incurring deep psychological and political defeat. The image of America will never again be the image of revolution, freedom and democracy, but the image of violence and militarism.” …

Meanwhile, we in the churches and synagogues have a continuing task while we urge our government to disengage itself from a disgraceful commitment. We must be prepared to match actions with words by seeking out every creative means of protest possible. …

[T]he words of John F. Kennedy come back to haunt us. Five years ago he said, “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” Increasingly, by choice or by accident, this is the role our nation has taken, by refusing to give up the privileges and the pleasures that come from the immense profits of overseas investment.

I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. When machines and computers, profit and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.

A true revolution of values will soon cause us to question the fairness and justice of many of our past and present policies. True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a beggar; it is not haphazard and superficial. It comes to see that an edifice which produces beggars needs restructuring. A true revolution of values will soon look easily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth. …

The Western arrogance of feeling that it has everything to teach others and nothing to learn from them is not just. A true revolution of values will lay hands on the world order and say of war: “This way of settling differences is not just.”

A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death. …

Our only hope today lies in our ability to recapture the revolutionary spirit and go out into a sometimes hostile world declaring eternal hostility to poverty, racism, and militarism.

Impeach Scalia!

Let’s review: Scalia is one of the Justices who gave his ‘long-time friend’ Dick Cheney the Vice-Presidency (Scalia’s wife and son were involved in the Bush/Cheney campaign and transition team). A month later, Cheney meets in secret with energy corporations (excluding others) — including the notoriously corrupt Enron. After 3 years, Scalia is one to agree to hear about the propriety of that secret meeting. Then he camps with Cheney for days on a trip sponsored by an oil company. Finally, he can’t imagine anyone questioning his impartiality. Scalia is unworthy of the Supreme Court and should be impeached! These guys are beyond belief. mjh

ScaliaCBS News | Scalia-Cheney Trip Raises Eyebrows | January 17, 2004 11:08:19

Vice President Dick Cheney and Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia spent part of last week duck hunting together at a private camp in southern Louisiana, just three weeks after the court agreed to take up the vice president’s appeal in lawsuits over his handling of the administration’s energy task force, the Los Angeles Times says in its Saturday editions.

While Scalia and Cheney are avid hunters and longtime friends, several experts in legal ethics questioned the timing of their trip and said it raised doubts about Scalia’s ability to judge the case impartially, the newspaper pointed out.

But Scalia rejected that concern Friday, telling the Times, “I do not think my impartiality could reasonably be questioned.”

Federal law says “any justice or judge shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might be questioned,” the Times notes. …

The Times notes that pair arrived Jan. 5 on Gulfstream jets and were guests of Wallace Carline, the owner of Diamond Services Corp., an oil services company in Amelia, La. …

“The duck hunting was lousy …,” the justice said in his written response to the [Los Angeles] Times. “I did come back with a few ducks, which tasted swell.”

[See google news for latest on this]

‘vote Bush out of office’

Notice that those who support Bush’s appointment of Pickering identify Pickering as a pro-life judge. Bush makes another sneaky move to serve the religious right. mjh

Bush Installs Pro-Life Judicial Nominee Foiling Filibusters by Pro-Abortion Senators

Following years of bickering and stall tactics by pro-abortion Senators, pro-life judge Charles Pickering has finally been installed to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals today. President Bush got around the stalling tactics of the Senators who refused to allow his nomination to come up for a vote, by making a recess appointment which is valid until January 2005.

American Life League (ALL) was the first group to advocate for recess appointments. Joseph R. Giganti, ALL’s director of media and government relations commented on the Pickering appointment saying, “Clearly the White House has realized that the militant, pro-abortion zealots in the Senate will neither listen to reason nor recognize the limit to their own power in this matter.” Guganti added, “The president has four more days to make more recess appointments. We hope he will take advantage of this opportunity to ensure that pro-life judges are appointed to the bench.”

Gary L. Bauer, Chairman of the Campaign for Working Families commented on the move saying, “It is unfortunate that the president was forced to take such action in response to Senate radicals like Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton and Tom Daschle, who are desperate to maintain the liberal stranglehold over our federal courts, but we are pleased to see him do so. Frankly, it was long overdue. Hopefully, today’s surprise move signals a renewed commitment by the White House to spotlight the Senate’s liberal obstructionists who are abusing Senate procedures and running roughshod over the Constitution.”

FRC Praises Recess Appointment of Charles Pickering to Federal Bench

In response to news that President Bush will use his recess appointment authority to place Charles Pickering on the federal bench, Family Research Council (FRC) President Tony Perkins released the following statement:

“This is a bold and necessary move by President Bush. Left-wing groups and their allies on the Senate Judiciary Committee have worked overtime these past three years to besmirch the character and record of Mr. Pickering. Charles Pickering is exactly the type of judge this country needs on our federal bench.

“Perhaps this move by the President will show Planned Parenthood, NARAL, People for the American Way and all the other extremist groups on the left that their allies in the Senate — Sens. Chuck Schumer, Ted Kennedy and John Edwards — will not be able to use their obstructionist tactics to unconstitutionally deny President Bush his power to place qualified jurists on the federal bench.

“At a time when our courts at every level are over stepping their bounds by sanctioning same-sex marriage and infanticide and stripping us of our religious freedoms, President Bush has taken the first step to ensure that our federal courts are filled with jurists who understand their role is to follow the Constitution, not reinvent it.”

U.S. Newswire – National Organization for Women ‘Outraged by Bush’s Underhanded Appointment of Pickering’

“The National Organization for Women is outraged by George W. Bush’s installation of Charles Pickering on the federal appeals court while Congress is in recess,” said NOW President Kim Gandy. “We’re no longer surprised by the underhandedness of this President-Bush apparently thinks that he can act unilaterally wherever and whenever he pleases.”

“NOW has vigorously opposed Pickering’s nomination to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals for more than two years, and the Senate Judiciary Committee rejected this foe of women’s rights once before,” said Gandy. “We will certainly work to ensure that this unmerited appointment is overturned when the next Congress takes office in January 2005.”

Pickering, a district court judge from Mississippi, has a long record of opposing civil rights and civil liberties, demonstrating significant judicial activism from the bench. He was an opponent of the Equal Rights Amendment and has expressed his support for a constitutional amendment banning abortion. As a state senator, Pickering repeatedly voted against measures that would expand electoral opportunities for African Americans after passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965.

“Bush’s total disregard for the Democratic members of Congress who rightfully blocked Pickering’s nomination, his disregard for the women of this country and for democracy in general are appalling,” said Gandy. “All the more reason for women’s rights supporters to get active and to vote Bush out of office in November.”