Category Archives: NADA – New American Dark Ages

New American Dark Ages

Even if Bush won fairly, the system is in serious trouble

ballot receiptSeattle Weekly: News: When It Doesn’t Add Up by Rick Anderson

Burton, the Ohio University prof, helped conduct an Election Day voter survey in Las Vegas. Nevada is the only state to use voter-verified paper ballot printers that issue receipts showing, in code, how a person voted and allowing subsequent online verification that the vote was counted. More than 81 percent of 362 Nevada voters said they favored the ATM-style receipt to take home with them, Burton says. Thirty percent also said they’d use it to check their vote on the Web. “As unhealthy as Florida 2000 was, it does have the effect to bring change,” says Burton. “We weren’t thinking about this before. I expect we’re going to see a more robust debate.”

CBS News | Picking The President By Mail | November 16, 2004 14:37:26 by James K. Galbraith

[I]t is an injustice, an outrage and a scandal — a crime, really — that American citizens should have to wait for hours in the November rain in order to exercise the simple right to vote.

The remedy is voting by mail, the system now in place in the state of Oregon. In Oregon, there are no election day problems, because there is no election day. Instead, ballots are mailed to voters at their registered address, filled out and returned, with a signature verification. Participation rates are high — 63 percent of the voting age population this year, against a national average of 53 percent. Fraud is virtually nil. And as the ballots are paper (they are read by a scanning machine), there is a verifiable paper trail.

The Writings of Greg Palast

Most voters in Ohio cast their ballots for John Kerry, which should, in accordance with Mrs. Gordon’s civics lessons from sixth grade, have given Kerry the Electoral College majority and the White House. Trouble is, those votes won’t be counted.

So where are these uncounted, but winning, votes? When I went to sleep the night of Nov. 2, Kerry was down in Ohio by 136,000 votes. But over a quarter million ballots had yet to be counted. Those abandoned ballots, overwhelmingly Democratic, sit in two piles, one called “spoiled” and the other “provisional.”

The ugly, secret shame of American democracy is that 2 million votes are “spoiled” in presidential elections — tossed away untallied as “unreadable.” And the nasty part is that roughly half are cast by African-Americans. To learn of this astonishing Jim Crow thumb on the U.S. electoral scales, you have to hunt through the appendixes of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission report on the Florida 2000 race. The government’s demographers concluded that of the 179,855 votes “spoiled” in Florida that year, 54 percent were cast by blacks. All other credible studies tell us that Florida is horribly typical of the nation.

High-Tech Jim Crow: Stealing Ohio’s Vote

Verified Voting: Our Position on Fraud in the 2004 Presidential Election
by Verified Voting Foundation
November 15th, 2004

In the aftermath of the Nov. 2 election, many people have promoted theories and statistical evidence of major fraud or errors. Our position on this is being distorted and misinterpreted, so we would like to take this opportunity to clarify it.

We do not believe that there is any more reason to look for problems in this election than in previous elections, but auditing of all elections should be routine. Citizens should be able to do some of these audits.

The way to encourage trust in a system is to have independent checks on a system. The best way to encourage trust is to make that system so open that anyone can check it.

We advocate the publication of detailed election statistics on the Internet, and the analysis of those statistics by members of the public. In the long run, this will result in a much healthier election system.

The current high level of scrutiny of the election is a very healthy thing.

Nationwide Election Incidents – EIRS 1.0.5

Nationwide Election Incidents [interactive map]

.Election Protection 2004.

Religion and Politics

Economist.com | American values

In 2000, 15m evangelical Protestants voted. They accounted for 23% of the electorate, and 71% of them voted for Mr Bush. This time, estimates Luis Lugo, the director of the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, they again accounted for about 23% of the electorate—which means that evangelicals did not increase their share of the vote. But overall turnout was much higher, and 78% of the evangelicals who voted, voted for Mr Bush. That works out at roughly 3.5m extra votes for him. Mr Bush’s total vote rose by 9m (from 50.5m in 2000 to 59.5m), so evangelical Protestants alone accounted for more than a third of his increased vote.

Thus, the election revealed that though the evangelical share of the electorate has not increased, evangelicals have become much more important to the Republican Party. According to a study for the Pew Forum by John Green of the University of Akron, Ohio, the proportion of evangelicals calling themselves Republicans has risen from 48% to 56% over the past 12 years, making them among the most solid segments of the party’s base.

This close association between party and evangelicals took a lock-step forward during the campaign. Mr Bush’s chief policy adviser and campaign chairman held weekly telephone conversations with prominent evangelical Christians, such as Jim Dobson, the head of Focus on the Family, and the Rev Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention. Ralph Reed, formerly the executive director of the Christian Coalition, became the campaign’s regional co-ordinator for the south-east—a move that encapsulates the integration of evangelical voters into the party.

Hitherto, evangelical Protestants have been the objects of Republican outreach. This time, they took the initiative themselves, asking for and distributing voter registration cards and collecting the signatures required to put anti-gay-marriage initiatives on the ballot. As the church organisers tell it, the Republican Party was left playing catch-up. …

Remember, too, that the religious right and religious America are far from being the same things; Mr Bush’s moral majority depended on the votes of other religious groups as well. Catholics, with 27% of voters, are more numerous than evangelicals, and, unusually this year, the Republican candidate won a majority of the Catholic vote (52% against 47%).

Though Mr Bush did especially well among white Catholics and those who attended Mass regularly, he also increased his share of the Hispanic Catholic vote from 31% in 2000 to 42%. This alone accounts for the inroads he made into the Hispanic vote, which has traditionally gone to Democrats by two to one. In all, calculates Mr Lugo, 3.5m more Catholics voted for Mr Bush in 2004 than in 2000. Thus, they were as important to his increased majority as evangelical Protestants were.

This points to another new development. The election seems to have consolidated the tendency of the most observant members of any church, regardless of denomination, to vote Republican.

Veterans Groups

Mission – Iraq Veterans Against the War

Despite being at war for nearly two years, our troops are still lacking essential supplies. There is still no clearly defined mission or exit strategy in Iraq. This must change. With your continued support of Iraq Veterans Against the War, we will push harder than ever to do what is right; to support our troops and bring them home now.

The situation in Iraq is quickly deteriorating.

Veterans For Peace | Homepage

Veterans for Peace, Inc. (VFP) is a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational and humanitarian organization dedicated to the abolishment of war.

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

We, having dutifully served our nation, do hereby affirm our greater responsibility to serve the cause of world peace.

Project for the New American Century

Welcome to the Project for the New American Century

The Project for the New American Century is a non-profit educational organization dedicated to a few fundamental propositions: that American leadership is good both for America and for the world; that such leadership requires military strength, diplomatic energy and commitment to moral principle; and that too few political leaders today are making the case for global leadership.

Born-again Voters

Christian News – The Christian Post | Survey: Born Again Christians Made Major Impact on Bush’s Re-election

The survey, which involved interviewing 1004 adults over the phone, reported that born again Christians supported President George W. Bush by a 62% to 38% margin. Non-born again voters were more likely to support Senator John Kerry than Bush, 59 to 39 percent.

Although the born again population constitutes just 38% of the national population, the survey said, it represented 53% of the vote cast in the election. The survey suggested that if the born again public had shown up proportional to its population size, Senator Kerry would have won the election by the same three-point margin of victory enjoyed by Mr. Bush.

Evangelical Christians also helped re-elect Bush, constituting 11% of the voters and chose President Bush by an 85% to 15% margin, shows the survey.

Do these statistics say that “born-again” and “Evangelical” are not the same thing? And there are more “born-again”? mjh

Pro-lifers Against Gonzales

Christian News – The Christian Post | Pro-life Group Disagrees with Gonzales as AG

Judie Brown, president of American Life League, said, “President Bush appears to be doing all that he can to downright ignore pro-life principles. There can be no other explanation for his recommendation of Alberto Gonzales as attorney general. Gonzales has a record, and that record is crystal clear. …

“Gonzales’ rulings implied he does not view abortion as a heinous crime,” commented Brown. “Choosing not to rule against abortion, in any situation, is the epitome of denying justice for an entire segment of the American population — preborn babies in the womb.”

The Most Effective Censorship is Self-imposed

BBC NEWS | Entertainment | TV and Radio | War film axed by 66 US stations

Nearly one-third of US TV stations affiliated to the ABC network dropped Oscar-winning film Saving Private Ryan for fear of facing indecency fines.

Sixty-six of ABC’s 225 affiliated stations decided not to air the film, which opens with a gritty depiction of D-Day and includes profanity.

The decision follows a recent crackdown by watchdogs.

Stations fearing punishment — welcome to America. mjh