Category Archives: NADA – New American Dark Ages

New American Dark Ages

The American Taliban

The American Taliban

Randall Terry (Operation Rescue)

“I want you to just let a wave of intolerance wash over. I want you to let a wave of hatred wash over you. Yes, hate is good…Our goal is a Christian nation. We have a biblical duty, we are called by God to conquer this country. We don’t want equal time. We don’t want pluralism.”

“Our goal must be simple. We must have a Christian nation built on God’s law, on the ten Commandments. No apologies.”

[mjh: follow the link above to a huge list of jaw-dropping quotes from the Radical Wrong. via Democracy for New Mexico]

Which Side Are You On?

Bill O’Reilly: The limits of dissent

No country can win a conflict the way the USA is fighting the war on terror. Every move the Bush administration makes is scrutinized, criticized and roundly chastised by dissenters who firmly believe the president, himself, is responsible for much of the anti-American hatred around the world. The chorus is deafening. Bush “lied” about Iraq. Bush is violating civil liberties by supporting the Patriot Act. The president sanctions torture and is a major human rights violator. Every day there is another page one story telling Americans we are the bad guys.

The dissenters claim that what they’re doing is patriotic, that they love America and just want to improve it. They claim that loyal dissent is one of the finest traditions of democracy.

But there is a difference between dissenting from a war and trying to undermine a war….

It is time for Americans to decide exactly who is looking out for them. The government and military, both of which are trying to defeat vicious killers, or those who are on a jihad to undermine the war on terror in the name of patriotism? The battle lines are clearly drawn. Which side are you on?

Which side are you on? In support of a fallible adminstration that has, in absolute fact, lied and certainly made tremendous errors. How dare you speak your mind! mjh

An Open Letter to Karl Rove

picked up 9/1/08 by
www.bushinbox.com

Dear Karl Rove,

Thank you for reminding us that 9-11, like Jesus, belongs forever to the Republican Party. I know you know that the public seldom punishes dim-witted, chest-thumping chickenhawks (just where were you in Vietnam? Dodging the draft like Dick or buzzing the Gulf of Mexico like Duhbya?).

I will not speak for anyone but myself. And, so I must say:

After 9-11, I wondered what happened.
The Neo-cons wondered how soon they could invade Iraq.

I wondered how anyone could hate us so much as to kill thousands of people.
Pseudo-conservatives proceeded to kill hundreds of thousands.

I wondered what would prevent this from ever happening again.
The Radical Right moved quickly to curtail our freedom and hide everything they could.

I wondered about the Saudis, who carried out the attack, who were given a free ride by Duhbya, who holds their hands and kisses their … cheeks.
The Bushites wet themselves over all that oil in Iraq that would pay for everything.

I thought Religious Fanatics will plunge the world into war.
America’s Religious Fanatics continued to build the Christian Nation of America.

Yeah, it’s true, the Left and the Wrong did respond differently. The Left wondered about our place in the World; the Wrong wondered how to shift the blame to the Left.

None of this could have happened without you. It was a surprise to see you come out from the shadows as you try to pimp yourself to the next idiot. Go fuck yourself. mjh

the Republican fist with its middle finger held erect

The Independent Weekly: Shame is for sissies BY HAL CROWTHER

Bolton is simply the Republican fist with its middle finger held erect, a calculated insult aimed at the Democrats, the media and the world–a rude gesture of unprecedented arrogance and defiance. Is this a coarse joke, irony served White House-style? For America’s most visible and sensitive diplomatic post, they offer the ultimate anti-diplomat, an obnoxious bully so incapable of diplomacy or common tact that he offends everyone he encounters, Democrat or Republican, ally or enemy. …

You don’t have to be subtle, as the White House constantly reminds us. You don’t have to reckon with irony, that last refuge of the effete. Just change the words, repeat them incessantly, and disparage anyone who resists them. Incompetent, arrogant and inflexible, the Bush administration White House has scored its greatest successes changing the words America uses, and reorganizing its flow of information.

Totalitarian thinkers, Hannah Arendt once wrote, are characterized by “extreme contempt for facts as such, for in their opinion fact depends entirely on the power of the man who can fabricate it.” If you told me 20 years ago that a cocky free press, still flaunting Richard Nixon’s scalp, could be reduced to groveling impotence by the likes of George W. Bush, I guess I’d have laughed at you. …

Journalists–journalists by true vocation as opposed to some who list that occupation on IRS returns–are largely immune to ideology, rhetoric and partisan politics. We have no heroes among politicians; we’ve seen too many clowns and thieves on both sides of the aisle. We don’t vilify the president because we disagree with his philosophy; he has no philosophy. We oppose him because we’re conditioned to hate liars, hypocrites, bullies and “serial abusers of little people,” and he’s assembled the most frightening collection we’ve ever seen.

By branding all unfriendly journalists (and other Americans who criticize the president) “liberals”–embittered members of a losing team–Karl Rove and company have ingeniously compromised fair comment and legitimate dissent. …

In fact, some of the most articulate criticism of the White House has come from conservatives.

“Bush has behaved like a caricature of what a right-wing president is supposed to be, and his continuation as president will discredit any sort of conservatism for generations,” argued American Conservative magazine, endorsing John Kerry. “The launching of an invasion against a country that posed no threat to the U.S., the doling out of war profits to politically favored corporations, the financing of the war by ballooning the deficit to be passed on to the nation’s children. … It is as if Bush sought to resurrect every false 1960s-era left-wing cliché about predatory imperialism and turn it into administration policy.”

[Thanks to A&JP via MR.]
=====
The Independent Weekly: In the realms of the unreal by Hal Crowther (2004-08-04)

It turns out that Ronald Reagan’s greatest achievement was not saving us from the Soviets, but saving us from the rabid neocons in his own administration who were spoiling for World War III. Advisers like Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld seemed so crazy for nuclear confrontation that they spooked poor Reagan, the primitive optimist. He ignored their advice and negotiated with Gorbachev, and then purged most of them when they were caught in bed with Ollie North. George W. Bush, of course, brought back this whole flock of indicted and discredited chicken hawks, who then crafted the “muscular” foreign policy that lured us into our apocalyptic fiasco in Iraq. …

Americans were like moths to Reagan’s pale flame. His myth seemed to generate a hunger for illusion, a distaste for bare fact and hard truth that has become pandemic and changed the face of our culture. It’s no wonder that “leaders” like Bush tell implausible, even fantastic, lies–“We’re doing this for the Iraqis”–and expect Americans to believe them. It’s not surprising that their language reverses or obliterates meaning, like the voice of Big Brother in Orwell’s 1984. Operation Iraqi Freedom, the Clear Skies Initiative and the Healthy Forests Initiative all mean the exact opposite of what they say; when President Bush publicly thanked Donald Rumsfeld for “a superb job” in the heat of the Abu Ghraib torture scandal, what he must have meant was “You incompetent bastard, you’ve ruined us, I wish I could kill you.”

It’s Never Too Early or Too Late to Attack — The Karl Rove Legacy

A Premature Attack – FactCheck.org

Pro-Bush group’s ad faults Democrats for criticisms they haven’t yet made, about a Supreme Court nominee who hasn’t been named, to a vacancy that doesn’t yet exist. …

To support its case, the ad cites editorial blurbs from Republican newspapers criticizing Democrats over their treatment of Supreme Court nominees in the past. But the ad fails to note that the blurbs were about the Robert Bork nomination fight that happened nearly 18 years ago.

Estate Tax Malarkey

Estate Tax Malarkey – FactCheck.org

Misleading ads exaggerate what the tax costs farmers, small businesses and “your family.”

Summary

In TV and radio ads two conservative groups greatly overstate the burden that the federal estate tax puts on heirs to a family farm or business.

One ad claims the federal estate tax “can bury your family in crippling tax bills,” which is untrue for nearly all of those who will see the ad, including the large majority of farm and business owners. Both ads claim the estate tax is a “double tax,” which is only partly true, and mostly false when it comes to very wealthy families.

We take no position on whether the estate tax should or should not be repealed permanently. The claims made in these one-sided ads, however, present a misleading picture of who is actually affected by the tax.

Deep Throat’s Other Legacy

Deep Throat’s Other Legacy
By Colbert I. King

Felt’s devotion to J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI caused him, I believe, to place the bureau ahead of the Constitution and his own faithfulness to the Bill of Rights.

Felt’s Watergate heroics notwithstanding, he was also on board when the FBI’s series of covert action programs against Americans was well underway. He was a high FBI official when the bureau, arrogating unto itself the role of judge, jury and vigilante, trampled with impunity on the rights of citizens. Felt was there when the FBI sought to get teachers fired, when it tried to stop people from speaking on campus, when it prevented the distribution of books and newspapers and when it disrupted peaceful demonstrations and antiwar marches. Those shameful activities are cited in stark detail in Book III of the April 1976 Final Report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations With Respect to Intelligence Activities of the United States Senate.

In the name of protecting national security and preventing violence, the FBI tried to promote factionalism and violence between groups it regarded as domestic threats. It planted informants to spread false rumors, labeled innocent people as “snitches” and passed along derogatory information to the families and friends of investigative targets, sometimes through anonymous letters or telephone calls. These despicable actions were carried out under COINTELPRO, an FBI acronym for “counterintelligence program.”

Mark Felt knew all about it. …

[W]ithout talking to the prosecution, consulting the judge or conducting the customary Justice Department review, President Ronald Reagan, asserting that Felt and Miller were motivated by “high principle to bring an end to the terrorism that was threatening our nation,” pardoned the two high-ranking FBI officials.

To be sure, Mark Felt’s role as “Deep Throat” earned him a place in history. So, however, did his complicity in COINTELPRO, the FBI’s dirty little secret war against Americans.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/03/AR2005060301451.html?referrer=email