So, cops are free to pretend to be part of any group and even to agitate?

mjh

Police Infiltrate Protests,

Videotapes Show – New York Times By JIM DWYER

Undercover New York City police officers have conducted covert

surveillance in the last 16 months of people protesting the Iraq war, bicycle riders taking part in mass rallies and even

mourners at a street vigil for a cyclist killed in an accident, a series of videotapes show.

In glimpses and in glaring detail,

the videotape images reveal the robust presence of disguised officers or others working with them at seven public gatherings since August

2004.

The officers hoist protest signs. They hold flowers with mourners. They ride in bicycle events. At the vigil for the

cyclist, an officer in biking gear wore a button that said, “I am a shameless agitator.” She also carried a camera and videotaped the

roughly 15 people present.

Beyond collecting information, some of the undercover officers or their associates are seen on

the tape having influence on events. At a demonstration last year during the Republican National Convention, the sham arrest of

a man secretly working with the police led to a bruising confrontation between officers in riot gear and bystanders.

Until Sept. 11, the secret monitoring of events where people expressed their opinions was among the most tightly

limited of police powers.

I know this is rude, but it is very artfully done. mjh

From www.oldamericancentury.org/ via Cocoposts.

class="mine">Note that Bush asked for powers he was specifically denied by the Senate and then went on to act as if those powers were

granted, only later to claim they were granted when he knows they were not. He does what he want, when he wants, as he wants and lies

whenever he needs to — all for our good, of course. mjh

PS: I’m perfectly willing to believe Bush

either has no idea what was asked for and denied or can’t remember now. Does it really make things better if he is forgetful or stupid?

PPS: I’m looking for a poll that asks: “If you voted for Bush a year ago, would you vote for him today?”

Power We Didn’t Grant By Tom Daschle

On the evening of Sept. 12, 2001, the White House proposed that Congress authorize the use of military force to “deter and pre-empt

any future acts of terrorism or aggression against the United States.” Believing the scope of this language was too broad and ill

defined, Congress chose instead, on Sept. 14, to authorize “all necessary and appropriate force against those nations,

organizations or persons [the president] determines planned, authorized, committed or aided” the attacks of Sept. 11. With this language,

Congress denied the president the more expansive authority he sought and insisted that his authority be used specifically against Osama

bin Laden and al Qaeda.

Just before the Senate acted on this compromise resolution, the White House sought one last change.

Literally minutes before the Senate cast its vote, the administration sought to add the words “in the United States and”

after “appropriate force” in the agreed-upon text. This last-minute change would have given the president broad authority

to exercise expansive powers not just overseas — where we all understood he wanted authority to act — but right here in the United

States, potentially against American citizens. I could see no justification for Congress to accede to this extraordinary

request for additional authority. I refused. …

[A] strong bipartisan majority could not agree to the administration’s

request for an unprecedented grant of authority.

The Bush administration now argues those powers were inherently

contained in the resolution adopted by Congress — but at the time, the administration clearly felt they weren’t or it wouldn’t

have tried to insert the additional language.

IN THE KINGDOM OF THE HALF-BLIND By Bill Moyers

It has to be said: there has been nothing in our time like the Bush Administration’s obsession with secrecy.

This may seem self-serving coming from someone who worked for two previous presidents who were no paragons of openness. But I am only

one of legions who have reached this conclusion. See the recent pair of articles by the independent journalist, Michael Massing, in The

New York Review of Books. He concludes, “The Bush Administration has restricted access to public documents as no other before it.” And he

backs this up with evidence.

For example, a recent report on government secrecy by the watchdog group, OpenTheGovernment.org, says the Feds classified a record 15.6 million new documents in

fiscal year 2004, an increase of 81% over the year before the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. What’s more, 64% of Federal

Advisory Committee meetings in 2004 were completely closed to the public.

No wonder the public knows so little about how

this administration has deliberately ignored or distorted reputable scientific research to advance its political agenda

and the wishes of its corporate patrons. I’m talking about the suppression of that EPA report questioning aspects of the White House

Clear Skies Act; research censorship at the departments of health and human services, interior and agriculture; the elimination of

qualified scientists from advisory committees on kids and lead poisoning, reproductive health, and drug abuse; the distortion of

scientific knowledge on emergency contraception; the manipulation of the scientific process involving the Endangered Species Act; and the

internal sabotage of government scientific reports on global warming

It’s an old story: the greater the secrecy, the

deeper the corruption.

When

the Cutting Is Corrupted By E. J. Dionne Jr.

Only the voters can render a judgment on a politics of favoritism that has

created a new Gilded Age. It’s clear that the national government has placed itself squarely on the side of the wealthy, the

privileged and the connected. …

The Medicaid cuts include increased co-payments and premiums on low-income Americans,

and the budget assumes savings because fewer poor people will visit the doctor. …

Ah, say their defenders, but

these cuts will be good for poor people. According to the New York Times, Rep. Joe L. Barton (R-Tex.), an architect of the

Medicaid proposals, said the higher co-payments were needed to “encourage personal responsibility” among low-income people.

Spoken like a congressman who never has to worry about his taxpayer-provided health coverage.

And that

is just one instance among many of corporate interests being shielded from cuts, while child support enforcement and foster care programs

were sliced.

Arch-conservative Krauthammer speaks about Bush “circumventing” the law. Where does “circumvent” lie

between enforcing and breaking the law? mjh

Charles Krauthammer Impeachment nonsense

Contrary to the

administration, I also believe that as a matter of political prudence and comity with Congress, Bush should have tried to get the law

changed rather than circumvent it. This was an error of political judgment. But that does not make it a crime. And only the most brazen

and reckless partisan could pretend it is anything approaching a high crime and misdemeanor.

Powell Speaks Out on Domestic Spy Program By STEVEN R. WEISMAN

Former Secretary of State Colin L. Powell said on Sunday … “My own judgment is that it didn’t seem to me, anyway, that it

would have been that hard to go get the warrants,” Mr. Powell said. “And even in the case of an emergency, you go and do it.

The law provides for that.”

But Mr. Powell added that “for reasons that the president has discussed and the

attorney general has spoken to, they chose not to do it that way.”

“I see absolutely nothing wrong with the president authorizing

these kinds of actions,” he said. …

Mr. Powell said he had not been told about the eavesdropping activity when he served as

secretary of state. … Though Mr. Powell stopped short of criticizing Mr. Bush, his suggestion that there was “another way to handle it”

was another example of his parting company on a critical issue with the president he served for four years.

I did not want to read this account

by Khaled El-Masri, who was kidnapped by Americans in Europe. I would call what he endured prolonged torture. The way his was treated

degrades us all. I refuse to endorse or tolerate a system that shrugs off this abuse. He was terrorized on our behalf. mjh

America kidnapped me – Los Angeles Times By Khaled El-Masri, KHALED EL-MASRI, a German citizen born in

Lebanon, was a car salesman before he was detained in December 2003.

THE U.S. POLICY of “extraordinary rendition” has a human

face, and it is mine.

I am still recovering from an experience that was completely beyond the pale, outside the bounds of any

legal framework and unacceptable in any civilized society. Because I believe in the American system of justice, I sued George Tenet, the

former CIA director, last week. What happened to me should never be allowed to happen again. …

Eventually my blindfold was

removed, and I saw men dressed in black, wearing black ski masks. I did not know their nationality. I was put in a diaper, a belt with

chains to my wrists and ankles, earmuffs, eye pads, a blindfold and a hood. I was thrown into a plane, and my legs and arms were spread-

eagled and secured to the floor. I felt two injections and became nearly unconscious. I felt the plane take off, land and take off. I

learned later that I had been taken to Afghanistan.

There, I was beaten again and left in a small, dirty, cold concrete cell. I

was extremely thirsty, but there was only a bottle of putrid water in the cell. I was refused fresh water. …

[read it all – America kidnapped

me By Khaled El-Masri]

America, United States, Times

Online, The Times, Sunday Times

In the end, the eagerness of a junior officer in the CIA’s Skopje office and a gut feeling on

the part of the head of the CIA’s al-Qaeda unit contrived to have Masri sent to a prison for terrorist suspects known as “The

Salt Pit” in Afghanistan.

“Masri was held for five months largely because the head of the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center’s al

Qaeda unit ‘believed he was someone else’, one former CIA official said. ‘She didn’t really know. She just had a hunch,'” The

Washington Post reported.

Wrongful

Imprisonment: Anatomy of a CIA Mistake By Dana Priest, Washington Post Staff Writer

The Masri case, with new details gleaned

from interviews with current and former intelligence and diplomatic officials, offers a rare study of how pressure on the CIA to

apprehend al Qaeda members after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks has led in some instances to detention based on thin or speculative

evidence. The case also shows how complicated it can be to correct errors in a system built and operated in secret.

The CIA,

working with other intelligence agencies, has captured an estimated 3,000 people, including several key leaders of al

Qaeda, in its campaign to dismantle terrorist networks. It is impossible to know, however, how many mistakes the CIA and its

foreign partners have made. [mjh: Because just reading this is giving aid to the enemy. Or so BushCo

claims.] …

Members of the Rendition Group follow a simple but standard procedure: Dressed head to toe in

black, including masks, they blindfold and cut the clothes off their new captives, then administer an enema and sleeping drugs. They

outfit detainees in a diaper and jumpsuit for what can be a day-long trip. Their destinations: either a detention facility operated by

cooperative countries in the Middle East and Central Asia, including Afghanistan, or one of the CIA’s own covert prisons — referred to

in classified documents as “black sites,” which at various times have been operated in eight countries, including several in Eastern

Europe.

In the months after the Sept. 11 attacks, the CTC was the place to be for CIA officers wanting in on the fight. The staff

ballooned from 300 to 1,200 nearly overnight.

“It was the Camelot of counterterrorism,” a former counterterrorism official said.

“We didn’t have to mess with others — and it was fun.” [mjh: Join the CIA. See the World. Torture for fun.]

…

The process of vetting and evaluating information suffered greatly, former and current intelligence officials said.

“Whatever quality control mechanisms were in play on September 10th were eliminated on September 11th,” a former senior

intelligence official said. …

[I]n line with the responsibility Bush bestowed on the CIA when he signed a top secret

presidential finding six days after the 9/11 attacks. It authorized an unprecedented range of covert action, including lethal measures

and renditions, disinformation campaigns and cyber attacks…. [It] played well at the White House, where the president was keeping a

scorecard of captured or killed terrorists.