Proof

As you may know, I’m writing a book on Microsoft Windows Vista, the next version of the operating system. You may also recall that I wrote about my encounters with a very aggressive Copy Editor who can’t believe English is my first language (or read about that, if you don’t recall).

This week, I saw a draft of the book cover. I am now going through Adobe Acrobat PDF files, looking at the text and figures as they are laid out for printing. It finally looks like a book and seems more real than ever.

These files contain comments from a proof reader (could be one word or hyphenated — I’m not the guy to tell you). Many of the proofreader’s comments have been spot on, to the point of catching extra or missing spaces and more.

One thing that frustrates me is the proof-reader “correcting” something that has been “corrected” several times already. For example, I prefer to write “websites.” However, from the beginning in this book, I have written “Web sites” and that has stood the scrutiny of the DE, TE, PE and CE. Now, the proofReader suggests “websites.” So, I have to argue against a change I approve of because it would have to be made 1000 times (insert comma, if you like — I don’t like a comma in 1000). Sure, search and replace (capitalized? italics? quotes?) makes that easy, but why are we discussing this at the bitter end?

Having been through the wringer with the CE, I thought I might be too calloused to care any more, but I do note a few of the PR’s comments here:

I wrote: The joke at the turn of the century is “The whole world is in beta.”

He notes: Are we still at “the turn of the century”?

Later, he notes: Is there maybe too much complaining in this procedure? move remarks into a sidebar?

I wrote: pronounce it like a Klingon

He notes: really sounds like that?

I wrote: Have your notary click the OK button and initial here (X ____) and here (X ____).

He notes: humor here OK?

I think that centuries turn slowly, like ocean liners. Maybe that’s because I am more than half a century old, myself, or that when I studied the turn of the 1900s it seemed to last more than a few years. As for the Klingon remark, the real joke is that the text referred to would not be pronounced at all, but spelled out (like FBI, not AWOL). Finally, I do not advertise myself as a comedian, or even a humorist; I do think a bit of levity lightens dull topics.

At this point, I would pay to see the ProofReader and the Copy Editor fight to the death. Humor here OK? mjh