D’oh-bya

Bush shows gift of gaffe at APEC summit | Politics | Reuters

Even for someone as gaffe-prone as U.S. President George W. Bush, he was in rare form on Friday, confusing APEC with OPEC and transforming Australian troops into Austrians.

Bush’s tongue started slipping almost as soon as he started talking at a business forum on the eve of an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in Sydney.

“Mr. Prime Minister, thank you for your introduction,” he told Prime Minister John Howard. “Thank you for being such a fine host for the OPEC summit.”

As the audience of several hundred people erupted in laughter, Bush corrected himself and joked, “He invited me to the OPEC summit next year.” Australia has never been a member of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.

Later in his speech, Bush recounted how Howard had gone to visit “Austrian troops” last year in Iraq. There are, in fact, no Austrian troops there. But Australia has about 1,500 Australian military personnel in and around the country.

Upon finishing his speech, Bush took the wrong way off-stage and, looking slightly perplexed, had to be re-directed by Howard to a centre-stage exit.

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN0637479920070907?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews

http://www.americanprogressaction.org/progressreport/2007/09/50_years.html

Regime Change Begins At Home: Impeach Bush & Cheney

Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction | Salon.com, By Sidney Blumenthal

On Sept. 18, 2002, CIA director George Tenet briefed President Bush in the Oval Office on top-secret intelligence that Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction, according to two former senior CIA officers. Bush dismissed as worthless this information from the Iraqi foreign minister, a member of Saddam’s inner circle, although it turned out to be accurate in every detail. Tenet never brought it up again.

Nor was the intelligence included in the National Intelligence Estimate of October 2002, which stated categorically that Iraq possessed WMD. No one in Congress was aware of the secret intelligence that Saddam had no WMD as the House of Representatives and the Senate voted, a week after the submission of the NIE, on the Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iraq. …

CIA deputy director John McLaughlin, who was “excited” about the report. Nonetheless, McLaughlin expressed his reservations. He said that Sabri’s information was at odds with “our best source.” That source was code-named “Curveball,” later exposed as a fabricator, con man and former Iraqi taxi driver posing as a chemical engineer.

The next day, Sept. 18, Tenet briefed Bush on Sabri. “Tenet told me he briefed the president personally,” said one of the former CIA officers. According to Tenet, Bush’s response was to call the information “the same old thing.” Bush insisted it was simply what Saddam wanted him to think. “The president had no interest in the intelligence,” said the CIA officer. The other officer said, “Bush didn’t give a fuck about the intelligence. He had his mind made up.”

These taps “validated” Sabri’s claims, according to one of the CIA officers. The officers brought this material to the attention of the newly formed Iraqi Operations Group within the CIA. But those in charge of the IOG were on a mission to prove that Saddam did have WMD and would not give credit to anything that came from the French. “They kept saying the French were trying to undermine the war,” said one of the CIA officers.

The officers continued to insist on the significance of Sabri’s information, but one of Tenet’s deputies told them, “You haven’t figured this out yet. This isn’t about intelligence. It’s about regime change.”

One of the former senior CIA officers told me that despite the certitude of the three Republican senators [Orrin Hatch, Saxby Chambliss and Pat Roberts], the Senate committee never had the original memo on Sabri. “The committee never got that report,” he said. “The material was hidden or lost, and because it was a restricted case, a lot of it was done in hard copy. The whole thing was fogged up, like Curveball.”

While one Iraqi source told the CIA that there were no WMD, information that was true but distorted to prove the opposite, another Iraqi source was a fabricator whose lies were eagerly embraced. “The real tragedy is that they had a good source that they misused,” said one of the former CIA officers. “The fact is there was nothing there, no threat. But Bush wanted to hear what he wanted to hear.”

http://www.salon.com/opinion/blumenthal/2007/09/06/bush_wmd/?source=whitelist

Truth to Power (as much as an editor lets pass)

Kudos again to Eugene Robinson, this time for fighting the Republican re-write of history by people who weren’t even there. (Or were high at the time.) mjh

Eugene Robinson – Good Morning, Vietnam! – washingtonpost.com

But seeking support for the war in Iraq by reminding the nation about Vietnam? I’d feel better if I thought this was just some exquisitely subtle, deeply cynical gambit, yet I have the sinking feeling that Bush actually believes the nonsensical version of history he’s peddling. I fear the man is on a mission to rewrite the past. …

[Bush said:] “Here at home, some can argue our withdrawal from Vietnam carried no price to American credibility — but the terrorists see it differently.”

Lest anyone think this was merely a random rhetorical spasm, outgoing White House political czar Karl Rove wrote an article in the conservative National Review last week that included this passage: “If the outcome [in Iraq] is like what happened in Vietnam after America abandoned our allies and the region descended into chaos, violence and danger, history’s judgment will be harsh. History will see President Bush as right, and the opponents of his policy as mistaken — as George McGovern was in his time.”

What?

For the record, the illegal U.S. bombing of Cambodia destabilized that country and boosted the Khmer Rouge, who eventually took power and exterminated those “millions” in the “killing fields.” The monstrous Khmer Rouge regime was finally ousted by . . . none other than the communists who took power in Vietnam after the American withdrawal. Oh, and it was Richard Nixon who negotiated and began the U.S. pullout. Gerald Ford presided over the fall of Saigon. Both of them were Republicans, as I recall.

And George McGovern, who never got to be president, was right.

Bush, Rove, Dick Cheney and the other principal architects of the Iraq war never served in Vietnam — in fact, they went to great lengths to put distance between themselves and the military adventure they now describe as both necessary and noble. At the moment, though, I’m less concerned about their hypocrisy than their distortion of history.

To say the United States should not have withdrawn its forces from Vietnam is to say that there was something those forces could have done — something beyond napalm, carpet-bombing, destroying villages in order to save them — that would have led to some kind of “victory.” Of course, Bush and the others don’t say what that special something might have been, because they don’t know. They’re seeing nothing but a historical mirage.

Bush seems to want to return to a golden age when America confidently threw its weight around wherever, whenever and however it pleased. The problem is that no such golden age existed. American power has always had its limits, and there have always been some wars that simply couldn’t be won.

Bush and his enablers seem to forget that it was Dwight D. Eisenhower — a man with a bit more experience in running a war than the tinhorn generalissimos now occupying the White House — who realized that the most we could achieve in Korea was a stalemate. [mjh: Curiously, the Journal left this one paragraph out without inserting an ellipsis. Was “tinhorn generalissimos” too galling?]

George W. Bush wants us to remember Vietnam? Fine, then let’s remember those iconic images — the Viet Cong prisoner being executed in cold blood with a pistol shot to the temple, the little girl running naked and screaming from a napalm attack. Let’s remember how little we really understood about Vietnamese society. Let’s remember how wrong the domino theory proved to be. Let’s remember how much damage prolonging an unpopular war did to our armed forces and our nation, and how long it took us to recover.

Thanks for the reminder, Mr. President. When you talk about “victory” in Iraq and the Petraeus report discerns a light at the end of the tunnel, we’ll think of Vietnam.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/03/AR2007090300802.html

Honor Is More Important?

I recommend the full text or audio of this report on the Republican presidential candidates. mjh

NPR : GOP Presidential Hopefuls Debate, Thompson Runs, by Mara Liasson

The biggest fireworks of the night came in this exchange between Congressman Ron Paul and Mike Huckabee. Paul is the lone anti-war candidate in the Republican field and wants U.S. troops out of Iraq now.

“We’ve dug a hole for ourselves and we’ve dug a hole for our party,” Paul said. “We’re losing elections and we’re going down next year if we don’t change it, and it has all to do with foreign policy and we have to wake up to this fact.”

Huckabee responded sharply: “Even if we lose elections, we should not lose our honor, and that is more important [to] … the Republican party.”

“We have lost over 5,000 Americans killed in – we’ve lost over 5,000 Americans over there in Afghanistan, in Iraq and plus the civilians killed,” Paul retorted. “How many more you want to lose? How long are you going to be there? How long – what do we have to pay to save face? That’s all we’re doing, is saving face. It’s time we came home.”

A mixture of boos and applause that followed indicates just how divided even a Republican audience in New Hampshire is over the issue of Iraq.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=14204597

Old Man Hinton Meets Old Man River

A journey of 2,222.2 miles begins with a single step. This was a trip unlike any other we’ve taken together in the last 10 years or more. Usually, we head north, gaining altitude, seeking solitude. Miles up dirt roads, we steep in cool quiet. I’ll return from the usual trip with dozens of journal pages, hundreds of photos, and, in the best cases, a poem or two.

This trip was a different story. We headed east in a beeline adjacent the Mother Road, noting the symbolism of our literal descent, down towards the muggy metropolis of Memphis, almost as foreign as the ancient capital it was named for. (I grew up in another city named after a storied Egyptian town: Alexandria.) We drove through a wide swath of Flyover Country, past the northern hemisphere’s largest cross, which Merri thinks should also be a silo; past countless gospel billboards (religion being a product like any other).

We went to Merri’s birthplace to join her mother in celebrating her 80th birthday. (We expect her to outlive us both, easily making 100.) Although we’ve driven farther before, we’ve never driven so far in so few days — 640 miles on our longest day. (A typical meander up the Rockies might take us 200 miles by road but only advance us 40 miles in one direction.) We marveled at the grass growing everywhere from the Texas-Oklahoma border on — everywhere, lush, deep sod better than the finest golf courses in the West. (I swear I saw someone mowing his lawn twice in as many days!) And the trees: Though much of the land has been clearcut, where trees stand, they tower and crowd a forest into a few acres.

We arrived at the Mississippi at rush hour, clearly bad enough, but immediately after authorities closed one of two bridges across the river for miles north or south. Rerouted, compounded traffic was dumped unceremoniously into downtown Memphis with nary a sign suggesting what to do next. This was one of many occasions GPS gained favor with us.

We rarely spend more than two nights in one place and almost never in a hotel. This entire trip involved hotel-stays, four nights in a row in one which Merri had brilliantly picked between her mom’s (Irene) and her friend’s (Kathy), who put Lucky up a few hours at a time. Six nights with air conditioning were enough to last me years; AC is so noisy it stands out from the cacophony of a hotel.

Each day, we rose, ate, fed and walked Lucky, took him to Kathy, shopped and lunched with Irene, returned for Lucky and a visit with Kathy, back to Irene’s for dinner (sometimes with Lucky — they liked each other), back to the hotel. Somehow, that doesn’t fill pages.

Still, there were great moments, beyond the pleasure of the company and the celebration. When we returned to our hotel at night, we watched as a dozen or more nighthawks hunted 10 stories up in the bright lights of an adjacent building. We steered a tiny frog away from traffic; there were toads around our last hotel. I saw a cardinal and bluejays for the first time in a decade. There was all that green, all that grass!

And there was food: fillets, pastas, burgers, fried catfish, hushpuppies, and Merri’s infamous Triple+ Chocolate Cake (which her mother loved). No wonder I gained a pound.

We lingered our last morning with Irene, getting a late start to what would become the longest driving day. The bridge was reopened (hours after we first needed it) — don’t worry about that piling that sank 4 feet, there are others.

Of course, there were disappointments, like the numerous McDonald’s without coffee staffed by indifferent teens unaware of the claims that McD’s *always* has good coffee. Or the hotel where we were lectured late in the evening about using Orbitz instead of the chain’s 800 number; and the pathetic pastel fruit loops they served as breakfast. (In contrast, the Days Inn in OK City had a hot buffet for breakfast — that’s where I gained my pound.) Worst was the paucity of birds and other wildlife (exceptions already noted).

No, strike that: Worst was the unremarkable sky. Every 24 hours, the celestial canopy brightened noticeably, and darkened hours later. At times, one sensed some warping of the texture of the sky that hinted at rain undelivered. There was no huge blue expanse accented periodically by mountains of white underlain with gray-black, shot full of gold. Indeed, I did not notice the sun itself for 5 days, until it was in my face the longest day, a brilliant orange-red bulb outside of Hinton, OK, where we should have stopped, if only to see the Hinton Pentecostal Holiness Church’s marquee — but we had miles to go before that late lecture in Erick, not-so-OK.

That bloody sunset was followed by a golden dawn. It can’t just be an indication of my mood — the whole world was brightening anew. We started the shortest leg of the trip at the earliest time. Green fell away, replaced by blue — I’ll take blue! A few hours after we unloaded the car, we got the best “welcome home!” — it rained like hell. mjh

PS: We returned to learn that Justice Pam Minzner, Merri’s friend and mentor, died about the time we left Memphis. Pam epitomized graciousness. I’m reminded of a trip I returned from 14 years ago, determined to see an old friend, only to learn he’d died while I was gone. You never know when is the last time you’ll see someone, but that moment always comes.

PPS: One aspect of the trip was like every other: Lucky hasn’t stopped grinning since we got home.

Added 9/7/07: photos at
http://mjhinton.net/photos/main.php/show/memphis/

The Trib

Even in this digital age, I still like newspapers. I grew up with one of the best: The Washington Post. In the evening, we read the Alexandria Gazette, a decent local rag. In those days, DC had another evening paper, too: The Evening Star. My first Letter to the Editor was published in my high school’s daily newspaper.

For all the grief I give my friends at the Albuquerque Journal, I start each day with it. Granted, it has an awful ratio of news to ads (what nerds call the “signal to noise ratio”). And, too often, when I follow a story to the Web, I find the Journal has truncated it without any notice. (I know, that’s what editors do, but it still shocks me.)

We both wanted very much to like the Tribune. As with the Journal, there were people at the Trib we like. (And some I despise, like Jeffrey Granger.) But the Trib always seemed even less substantial than the Journal, hardly worth waiting for or occupying an evening with. On the other hand, the Trib had a better website than the Journal, which still doesn’t seem to “get it.”

Perhaps, Rupert Murdoch (I bet he got beat up a lot on the playground) will buy the Trib and rename it the Evening Conservative. (“Twilight of the Conservatives” has a nice ring to it.) Stranger things have happened, like Reverend Moon buying the Washington Times, another bastion of deep thinkers.

So, though I didn’t subscribe, I’ll miss the Tribune and Albuquerque will lose something important if it passes. mjh

Keep Your Friends Close and Your Enemies Out of Sight

ABQjournal NM: Bush Manual Shows Disparities, By Jeff Jones, Journal Politics Writer, Copyright © 2007 Albuquerque Journal

One hundred seventy yards. A distance approaching the length of two football fields.

That’s how far away police kept protesters from President Bush’s motorcade in Los Ranchos de Albuquerque on Monday while a smaller group of Bush supporters waved flags within a few feet of the presidential procession.

None of the major law agencies involved in security for Bush’s $350,000 fundraising stop for Sen. Pete Domenici— including Albuquerque police, the Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Department and the Secret Service— had a clear explanation for the distance disparity. …

Bernalillo County Sheriff Darren White, county chairman of Bush’s 2004 re-election effort, said the Secret Service makes the final calls for security at presidential events.

Sheriff’s Department Chief Deputy David Linthicum said the Secret Service, in consultation with the Sheriff’s Department, decided the small pro-Bush group could stay in its location across from the Abraham driveway.

Linthicum said the Secret Service, Albuquerque police and the Sheriff’s Department agreed on where the protesters would gather.

He said that to his knowledge, keeping the protesters out of the president’s sight didn’t factor into the decision but that he wasn’t at the
meeting at which the decision was made.

Eric Zahren, a spokesman for the Secret Service, said he was not familiar with all the specifics from the Los Ranchos event. But he said his agency by policy doesn’t discriminate between Bush protesters and Bush backers.

“We work in concert with our local (police) partners in identifying … public viewing areas outside our secure perimeters,” Zahren said. “We make no distinction as far as purpose, message or intent of any particular group.”

http://www.abqjournal.com/news/state/590148nm08-30-07.htm

ABQjournal Opinion: Bush Yardstick Keeps Foes Out of Sight, Mind

Should a country founded on citizens’ right to political dissent have an official measurement for keeping protesters out of sight and out of mind while flag-waving supporters get a front-row spot?

If the treatment of critics and supporters who turned out for a visit from President Bush in Los Ranchos last week is any indication, the answer is yes. …

[P]ut the anti-war folks in the floppy hats on the dirt shoulders of Rio Grande NW, 170 yards away from the entrance to Los Ranchos’ Mayor Larry Abraham’s home where a GOP event is scheduled. Put the pro-Bush folks in the school uniforms across from the gate where everyone attending the fundraiser for Sen. Pete Domenici goes through. …

[N[one of the agencies involved in security for Monday’s event explained why, exactly, the 70 folks with the neon-pink peace signs, the “Impeach Cheney” placards and the “Good Riddance to Gonzales” signs were kept almost two football fields away from the motorcade’s route while the flag-waving kids with the “God Bless George Bush! We Pray for You!” poster were posed a few feet from the motorcade.

http://www.abqjournal.com/opinion/editorials/590986opinion09-01-07.htm