Wolf Haters

Boo-hoo for the poor wolf-haters who couldn’t get adequate representation in public meetings like the one held in Reserve, in Catron county, not a liberal hotbed. But, fortunately, they didn’t need public meetings if politicians will rush to kiss their asses.

The late Joe Skeen was a tireless wolf opponent. Steve Pearce may feel the same way, or he may just realize how valuable those non-conserving conservative supporters can be. Money buys access to power. mjh

ABQjournal: Wolf Recovery Plan Update on Hold By Tania Soussan, Journal Staff Writer

Efforts to update a recovery plan for endangered Mexican gray wolves have been put on hold indefinitely, delaying decisions about whether to relax rules of the Southwest’s wolf reintroduction program.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service suspended meetings of the recovery planning team and has no date set to resume the work, said Tracy Scheffler, a recovery biologist and primary liaison for the team. …

[E]nvironmentalists also are criticizing the Fish and Wildlife Service for sending high-level staff to meetings called by Rep. Steve Pearce, R-N.M., to discuss a five-year review of the wolf program.

Pearce’s staff organized the meetings in Glenwood and Socorro for ranchers, hunters and guides who said they couldn’t express their concerns and opinions adequately at earlier public open houses held by the wolf recovery team.

Dave Parsons, a biologist and former leader of the wolf program, said the meetings gave wolf opponents access to higher-level decision makers than other members of the public got at the open houses.

Craig Miller of Defenders of Wildlife said the meetings illustrate the “sweetheart relationship” between the livestock industry and the Bush administration.

Oklahoma City

I remember the day after the bombing of Oklahoma City, I was at the Y. Two guys near me discussed loudly how likely it was that the government (read, “Democrats”) had blown up the building as a pretext to a coming fascist movement. I could only listen to so much of this madness before I said they were nuts. One of the two virtually exploded on the spot, pounding the adjacent stairmaster. “Do you want to take this outside?!,” he bellowed in rage. No thanks.

After he calmed down a bit, he sought me out to help me see the coming threat. “You see those little cameras above the traffic lights?” I felt sorry for him at that point, a little less afraid of him.

This guy was no liberal wacko. I doubt he voted for Kerry 9 years later. But he probably hates the Patriot Act even more than I do. Common ground in uncommon places.

Oklahoma City showed us the correct response — what we didn’t get right after 9/11. After OK City, we got the perpetrators (some of them). We did NOT turn the country into a frightened fortress. I still think the greatest threat is within. mjh

mjh’s Dump Bush weBlog: Domestic terrorism threats continue

Domestic terrorism threats continue

Domestic terrorism threats continue By Frank Davies, KNIGHT RIDDER

As the nation marks the 10th anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing today, the threat of domestic terrorism is being overshadowed by foreign terrorism, even though domestic terrorists have greater access than ever to knowledge they could use to kill large numbers of people. …

The cases of Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh and Eric Rudolph, the anti-abortion terrorist who pleaded guilty last week to four bombings, demonstrated that “lone wolves,” with little help and loose ties to organized groups, can wreak havoc and even inspire copycats.

A Poke in the Eye

Albuquerque sits in a magical location under a perfect sky. The Sandia Mountains loom large and close, the crest a mile above us and not 10 miles away, defining our eastern limit. Light and shadow play over that convoluted face all day. Where else do people look east at sunset?

From all over town, one can see the great divide of the Rio Grande flanked by the bosque, the riparian woods that survive because they are in the city, while much of the rest has perished. That fertile band slowly changes from chartreuse to green to gold then brown and gray before starting over.

To the north we see Christ’s Blood, and Redondo amid the mountains of Jemez, and, perhaps, the severed head of Cabezon.

Looking west, we see the escarpment, a lava wall, and the 5 volcanoes that produced it (from south to north: JA cone, Black Cone, Vulcan (the largest), Butte and Bond [thanks, APS!]). Volcanoes! This isn’t Hawai’i or Italy. That lava made rich soil and drew the artists whose works are in the way of someone’s faster commute.

Beyond our little volcanoes, 80 miles away, Turquoise Mountain, one of the four pillars of Dine’tah, stands above El Malpais, the dried blood of Big Monster (whose head is Cabezon), and the Zuni Mountains, recovered now from clear-cutting a century ago.

The eye glides south, stealing past Sierra Ladrones, Tomé Hill and Cielo Los Lunas. Lost in the layers, beyond sight but in mind, lie the San Mateos, San Augustin and Grandfather Gila, whose wolves have come home. Listen for a moment.

With so much timeless beauty around us, flowing into us even in the middle of town, why do we let someone poke us in the eye with a sharp stick? I’m talking about the billboards and cell towers that puncture this magnificent vista every way you turn.

These landmarks are our ancient heritage and our commonwealth. They nurture each of us every day. The landscape makes our home unique. Why do we let anyone diminish this magic? How can we sacrifice our communal good like this?

The Pragmatist will say, hey, it goes with the territory, just another feature of urban life (even though billboards and stunningly-ugly cell towers spread across empty terrain in all directions). Why do we have to give up the good that was here before us to have the benefits of a city? What kind of city requires destruction of the long view? Do people select their homes for the really great billboards nearby? Do you plan your drive to be sure you don’t miss that great billboard along Menaul? Do you think billboards contribute more to your life than they take from it? I don’t.

Billboards aren’t just along the Interstates. A block from my home a three-sided billboard hawks crap I’ll never buy. What about the irony of the beer billboards? They should have a note asking drinking drivers not to throw their bottles on the street. Don’t know where your next bland meal is coming from? Just keep one eye on the billboards, one eye on the road.

beautiful?As for the newer scourge of cell towers, why do they seem untouched by human hands? Does efficiency have to be ugly? Can’t we have an Eiffel Cell Tower or, better, repeaters hidden in street lamps and on top of buildings?
Oh, but ingenuity requires money and care. Don’t expect someone who thinks of your eyeballs as a commodity, your attention as an asset, to care about the long view.

At this point, someone mutters “socialist,” perhaps while drawing a flag tighter around his shoulders. “Private property rights,” he snarls, “the power of the market,” as if Capitalism is pure good. You don’t have the right to poke me in the eye. No one has the right to turn this great place into just another place. What are the moral values of someone who would destroy la vista? Or one who would let it be destroyed.

We are letting a few take our unique place from all of us. They will not stop until every square inch produces holy revenue. The place means nothing to them. They cannot value anything without a price.

The small group that opposes you counts on your apathy, your lethargy, and their well-placed investments. Tell them our home isn’t adspace. We have to stop them and reverse the damage, restore the public space. Love it or lose it.

The mayoral race has started. Where do the candidates stand on this?

This is our commonwealth ? don’t sell it, don’t give it away. mjh

Over at www.dukecityfix.com, my friend Johnny_Mango has written about a huge new billboard on Central and others around the State Fair Grounds (“Expo”). He said it well and with the love of someone who thinks we can do better. Read his entry for a soothing antidote to my screed.

See also The Cosmic Twins Battle on Turquoise Mountain.

The Duke City Fix Blog Collective

It’s official. A new blog collective (like a borg collective but with less hardware) has started:
Duke City Fix

You’ll recognize many of the names involved, including mine. I’ll be writing a weekly column called “Media Watch” (I’ve already got a few entries there). Look for it every Thursday — but check out TheFix every day for diverse writing and photos all around Albuquerque, New Mexico. mjh

A Defense of Liberalism

Letters – Daily Lobo – Opinion

Political arguments need more than just the facts

Editor,

The column by Andrew Price, “The true meaning of ‘liberal,'” in Tuesday’s Daily Lobo provides a good lesson to all of us at UNM on the difference between knowledge and wisdom.

Price has apparently done his homework. Apparently, the word described a set of political beliefs that at that time in history were more in line with what we would call “libertarianism” today: Free markets, limited government, etc.
I applaud that academic rigor, but that’s where knowledge without the benefit of wisdom leaves us without anything of worth.

Price says today’s liberals, or “modern liberals,” are “more accurately described as ‘welfare liberals,’ who don’t believe the average person is capable of conducting his or her life.” He further states that “bureaucrats” – the word the right loves to use to degrade our fellow Americans who work in the government – should “make all the decisions and dole out the rights and freedoms as they see fit.”

I wonder if Price has spent time with anyone who identifies himself or herself as a “liberal,” because if he had, he wouldn’t have missed the mark so widely.

While I think labels such as “liberal” and “conservative” have been rendered mostly useless by the complexity of the political landscape in America, I’ll accept that label as indicative of my own beliefs: Appropriate governmental control over profit-motivated industry, environmental protections and health and welfare “safety nets” for those of us in need.

In all of my relationships with other “liberals,” I have never heard anyone express the thought that the average person isn’t capable of conducting his or her life. Where did that come from?

Liberals feel that due to circumstances beyond their control, some among us need help. I know that’s beyond the understanding of those on the right, who feel there are always jobs for everyone who wants one and bootstraps to pull oneself up by.

And the part about doling out rights and freedoms as they see fit? I love saddling liberals with that charge when today we live under a conservative regime that thinks it can dictate the appropriate level of rights over one’s body, the right to choose when not to extend life artificially and which people are appropriate marriage partners.

Price also takes on the Democrats and their opposition to the privatization of a portion of Social Security, saying former President Clinton was in favor of such a plan. That may be true, but since that time we’ve witnessed an unprecedented rise in corporate crime, the kind that can, and did, reduce some people’s life savings to a pittance.

Surely you remember the Enron scandal? These are the people we should trust with our retirement money? Surely you jest.
Price then embarks on teaching us a lesson on representative government and how the filibuster is a threat to it. This method of allowing a measure of control to the minority has been a part of our government since around the time the word liberal had its old meaning in the 1800s. In fact, the filibuster was used during the Clinton administration by right-wing senators to defeat gun-control laws.

Wise up there, Price. Your arguments sound more like a “Best of Rush” show than an intelligent argument.

John Steiner
UNM staff

a societal change

ABQjournal: Terrorism To Affect Projects, Official Says By Miguel Navrot, Journal Staff Writer

Future buildings, roads and other public projects around the nation will be designed to minimize the effects of any attack, the new head of a counter-terrorism agency said.

“I think it’s going to be a societal change,” James Tegnelia said. …

Tegnelia acknowledged that new projects and retrofits designed to thwart terrorist attacks will incur increased building costs.

Absolutely everything is filtered through our fear now. Everything has changed because of one attack by a dozen killers. mjh