<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There Is No God</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/the-atheists-pulpit/there-is-no-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/the-atheists-pulpit/there-is-no-god/</link>
	<description>&#34;It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people&#039;s minds.&#34; -- Sam Adams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:17:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cko</title>
		<link>http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/the-atheists-pulpit/there-is-no-god/comment-page-1/#comment-58716</link>
		<dc:creator>cko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/?p=2537#comment-58716</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure he&#039;d go so far as to say the human race is a fluke of the universe, but it 

appears that after all was said and done, Einstein ended up an atheist. At least, in a letter written to philosopher Eric Gutkind in 

January 1954, a year before his death, he wrote that &quot;the word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human 

weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honorable but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure he&#8217;d go so far as to say the human race is a fluke of the universe, but it </p>
<p>appears that after all was said and done, Einstein ended up an atheist. At least, in a letter written to philosopher Eric Gutkind in </p>
<p>January 1954, a year before his death, he wrote that &#8220;the word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human </p>
<p>weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honorable but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scot</title>
		<link>http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/the-atheists-pulpit/there-is-no-god/comment-page-1/#comment-58714</link>
		<dc:creator>scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/?p=2537#comment-58714</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always 

wondered how much response distortion occurs in these polls, with some folks thinking to themselves &quot;maybe if I answer the way I really 

think, God will hear me (if such a thing exists) and find out what I really think.&quot;

I know, sounds completely irrational, but this 

is homo sapiens we&#039;re talking about here.  I&#039;d bet dollars to doughnuts the distortion percentage is fairly large.

And I think 

that 21% figure constitutes people who consider the rejection of &quot;organized religion&quot; to be atheism.  Hence the &quot;universal spirit&quot; 

claptrap.

As for me, I always liked the &quot;radical atheist&quot; answer given by Douglas Adams.  It gets past the anti-organized religion 

angle and gets at the bigger picture.

P.S.:  of course vegetarians have the same definitional problem all the time.  &quot;But do you 

eat chicken?&quot;...that sort of thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always </p>
<p>wondered how much response distortion occurs in these polls, with some folks thinking to themselves &#8220;maybe if I answer the way I really </p>
<p>think, God will hear me (if such a thing exists) and find out what I really think.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know, sounds completely irrational, but this </p>
<p>is homo sapiens we&#8217;re talking about here.  I&#8217;d bet dollars to doughnuts the distortion percentage is fairly large.</p>
<p>And I think </p>
<p>that 21% figure constitutes people who consider the rejection of &#8220;organized religion&#8221; to be atheism.  Hence the &#8220;universal spirit&#8221; </p>
<p>claptrap.</p>
<p>As for me, I always liked the &#8220;radical atheist&#8221; answer given by Douglas Adams.  It gets past the anti-organized religion </p>
<p>angle and gets at the bigger picture.</p>
<p>P.S.:  of course vegetarians have the same definitional problem all the time.  &#8220;But do you </p>
<p>eat chicken?&#8221;&#8230;that sort of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

