<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: He doesn&#8217;t understand.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/election/he-doesnt-understand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/election/he-doesnt-understand/</link>
	<description>&#34;It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people&#039;s minds.&#34; -- Sam Adams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:17:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjh</title>
		<link>http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/election/he-doesnt-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-62408</link>
		<dc:creator>mjh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 23:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/?p=2645#comment-62408</guid>
		<description>The GOP immediately released a Web ad featuring those same remarks you note. Odd to fault a man for politeness. I think it is 

Obama&#039;s nature to make disagreements agreeable. It seems he looks beyond the moment to how are we all going to work together later. 

Quite the change from the Rovian tactics (or is that strategy, John) of slash and burn and salt the earth and rule through an agitated 

minority rather than a true majority. peace, mjh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP immediately released a Web ad featuring those same remarks you note. Odd to fault a man for politeness. I think it is </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s nature to make disagreements agreeable. It seems he looks beyond the moment to how are we all going to work together later. </p>
<p>Quite the change from the Rovian tactics (or is that strategy, John) of slash and burn and salt the earth and rule through an agitated </p>
<p>minority rather than a true majority. peace, mjh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cko</title>
		<link>http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/election/he-doesnt-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-62402</link>
		<dc:creator>cko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/?p=2645#comment-62402</guid>
		<description>On the flip 

side, and I adore Obama please don&#039;t get me wrong here, but he has a &quot;verbal tic&quot; he might want to try to avoid using so frequently. By 

way of explanation, one trial technique used by some attorneys, when questioning an expert witness, is to ask a series of questions to 

which the expert will have to answer &quot;No.&quot; This is done so that the jury is left with the impression of negativity from that witness. 

Obama might do well to reconsider his tendency to start his responses with the phrase &quot;John is absolutely right, . . .&quot; I realize he adds 

his ironic punch a while later, and, I don&#039;t mean to be insulting, but I think it&#039;s not unfair to say that his Mark Anthonyesque 

rhetorical technique may be a bit too subtle for some. Instead many viewers may be left with the impression that, well, Obama really 

thinks &quot;John is absolutely right.&quot; And that&#039;s, to apply the technique to a Martha Stewartism, a bad thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the flip </p>
<p>side, and I adore Obama please don&#8217;t get me wrong here, but he has a &#8220;verbal tic&#8221; he might want to try to avoid using so frequently. By </p>
<p>way of explanation, one trial technique used by some attorneys, when questioning an expert witness, is to ask a series of questions to </p>
<p>which the expert will have to answer &#8220;No.&#8221; This is done so that the jury is left with the impression of negativity from that witness. </p>
<p>Obama might do well to reconsider his tendency to start his responses with the phrase &#8220;John is absolutely right, . . .&#8221; I realize he adds </p>
<p>his ironic punch a while later, and, I don&#8217;t mean to be insulting, but I think it&#8217;s not unfair to say that his Mark Anthonyesque </p>
<p>rhetorical technique may be a bit too subtle for some. Instead many viewers may be left with the impression that, well, Obama really </p>
<p>thinks &#8220;John is absolutely right.&#8221; And that&#8217;s, to apply the technique to a Martha Stewartism, a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

