<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FUD You, Jim Scarantino</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/election/fud-you-jim-scarantino/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/election/fud-you-jim-scarantino/</link>
	<description>&#34;It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people&#039;s minds.&#34; -- Sam Adams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:17:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Public At Large</title>
		<link>http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/election/fud-you-jim-scarantino/comment-page-1/#comment-61173</link>
		<dc:creator>The Public At Large</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/election/fud-you-jim-scarantino/#comment-61173</guid>
		<description>Scarantino? Never heard of him.

&quot;The 

Alibi?&quot; Does anyone read that anymore?

But lots of chicken hawk [Republicans] pretend to be &quot;independents&quot; when their party looks 

bad.

They think it absolves them of responsibility for the crimes of the folks they supported and voted for, but in fact it only 

makes them seem childish and dishonest.

Like Republicans have been for at least a half century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scarantino? Never heard of him.</p>
<p>&#8220;The </p>
<p>Alibi?&#8221; Does anyone read that anymore?</p>
<p>But lots of chicken hawk [Republicans] pretend to be &#8220;independents&#8221; when their party looks </p>
<p>bad.</p>
<p>They think it absolves them of responsibility for the crimes of the folks they supported and voted for, but in fact it only </p>
<p>makes them seem childish and dishonest.</p>
<p>Like Republicans have been for at least a half century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/election/fud-you-jim-scarantino/comment-page-1/#comment-61172</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edgewiseblog.com/mjh/election/fud-you-jim-scarantino/#comment-61172</guid>
		<description>Well 

said.  Jim Scaratino flip flops as much as John McCain does- just two years ago he had his big public revelation about how awful the GOP 

is and very publicly announced his disavowal of the the party and began self-identifying as an independent.  Now when the chips are down 

Scaratino is back to his old self, bashing not only Obama but Udall and Heinrich as well.  Typical of GOP opinion makers, he has nothing 

positive to say about his favored candidates (McCain, Pearce, and White.)  Instead he chooses to smear their opponents using the Rove 

model - guilt via tenuous association.

I haven&#039;t read this week&#039;s Alibi yet but I&#039;ve been rolling my eyes all morning to get 

them good and loose so that I don&#039;t sprain them when I do read it this afternoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well </p>
<p>said.  Jim Scaratino flip flops as much as John McCain does- just two years ago he had his big public revelation about how awful the GOP </p>
<p>is and very publicly announced his disavowal of the the party and began self-identifying as an independent.  Now when the chips are down </p>
<p>Scaratino is back to his old self, bashing not only Obama but Udall and Heinrich as well.  Typical of GOP opinion makers, he has nothing </p>
<p>positive to say about his favored candidates (McCain, Pearce, and White.)  Instead he chooses to smear their opponents using the Rove </p>
<p>model &#8211; guilt via tenuous association.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read this week&#8217;s Alibi yet but I&#8217;ve been rolling my eyes all morning to get </p>
<p>them good and loose so that I don&#8217;t sprain them when I do read it this afternoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

