photos

Photos by mark justice hinton.

Mom

 photos, The Atheist's Pulpit  Comments Off
May 122013
 

mjh0030 My Mom hated having pictures taken of her. Despite that, she gave cameras to people who would inevitably train them on her from time to time.

I don’t believe in an immortal soul – when you’re dead, you’re dead. (If I’m wrong, I owe you a coke.) Still, I marvel at the immortality in photographs. Yes, she lives in my memory, her voice in my head and, sometimes, coming out of my mouth, but here she is caught once so lively.

A remembrance on the 25th anniversary of her death.

My Mom
12 photos
 Posted by at 5:19 am  Tagged with:
May 072013
 

I consider myself a nature photographer, including wild landscapes, wildlife, and plants. In town, I particularly enjoy birds and one of my favorite birds is the American Robin. Here are a couple shots plus links to more.

building material

bird identification for dummies

Few birds relish a bath the way robins do. I’ve seen them slosh water out of the bath with their joyous flitting, take off, then return for more. One time we had 4 robins at the bath at once.

robin in bath

More photos

 Posted by at 4:47 am
May 062013
 

Speaking of me, you may have noticed my twin interests: photography and poetry. I think of them separately, but both are creative expressions or the Universe talking back to itself visually versus verbally. I hesitate to bring the two together in the most obvious way, which would be to associate a poem and a photo. Foremost, there is "the thing not named," a concept I get from Willa Cather, although it is older and widely practiced. I have felt that if one *needed* to explain a poem, something went wrong (possibly in the reader’s head, not mine). The urge to explain is strong in me and all of my poems arise in a context that I could document and my 3 readers might even enjoy that.

I’m certain a poem and a photo could work together, but I’m reluctant to yoke the two together, to require you to see what I see in a poem or hear what I hear in a photo. I don’t even want to do that to myself, let alone to you, Dear Reader.

However, some things go together like [insert one thing] and [insert something that goes with that]. For example,

chaco  05-06-13 0007

Of course, over a period of 30 years, I’ve taken a lot of photos of Merri, any one of which might work as well here. And, she figures into more than one poem. But these two are a good fit, you have to admit.

Likewise, the pairing of my preaching raven with Wind Makes Crazy.

Poetry and photography are always on my mind, but in particular, I’ve wanted for quite a while to produce a book of either or both. Maybe someday.

Cinco de Photomayo

 photos  Comments Off
May 052013
 

Hey, if I can’t be self-indulgent on my own blog, where can I? In May of 2010, I aspired to post a photography-related item every day. I called the project Photomayo, even if that only means something to me. I stumbled almost immediately that year, but have attempted to do better since. Today, I’m declaring Cinco de Photomayo and inviting you to explore any (or all — hah!) of these topics from prior years:

Please come back to see what happens next. peace, mjh

 Posted by at 7:47 am
May 042013
 

Most of the time, we hold our cameras horizontally, creating an image that is wider than it is high. Anytime, you can turn your camera 90 degrees for a vertical shot. Which is better? It depends …

landscape vs portrait orientation

landscape vs portrait orientation

Either of these photos could be called a landscape or a portrait, as far as the subject is concerned. But the orientation has some impact on the resulting photo. Don’t hesitate to experiment and compare the results.

DSC09175 DSC09176

 Posted by at 7:47 am
May 032013
 

These two photos were taken at about the same time of day. Although they are two different flowers, they are near each other. Neither has been manipulated after taking except for cropping. Compare the effect of the two backgrounds.

move around for different backgrounds

move around for different backgrounds

Move around your subject, if you can. Be mindful of the background. Point and shoot cameras have such a deep depth of field that you may not be able to blur the background to minimize it. Depth of field refers to the area in focus in front of and behind the subject. Shallow depth of field blurs foreground and background to emphasize the subject and minimize distractions. (Although some people find the blur distracting. You can’t please everyone.) With deep depth of field, everything is in focus. However, try moving away and using zoom, and moving in close and using macro – both of these change the depth of field and the area of the background.

A skilled photo editor can do a lot in post production. I prefer to focus on taking photos. Look. See. Move. Take lots of pictures. Show only your best.

May 022013
 

In particular, this photo caught the eye of my old friend and Droog, John Merck, originator of the eponymous Merck shot, an extreme close-up that extends beyond the frame of the photo. I consider John the first skilled photographer I knew personally. I learned a lot from him and his photos, including the rule “Take lots of photos but show only your best.” I’m still learning the second half of that rule.

near Tingley Beach

This was taken near one of the Tingley Ponds in Albuquerque. I used a zoom lens. I also cropped it tight even for me (nah, this is typical for me, especially on the Web. I don’t usually crop square but it suited this subject. (No, it is not a “box” turtle. It’s a red-eared slider, I believe.) Check out those nails.

 Posted by at 10:17 pm