Snatching Stupidity from the jaws of Duhbya

Think Progress » Bush incoherently praises Odierno for ’snatching defeat.’

President Bush thanked Lt. Gen. Ray Odierno, who until recently served as the No. 2 commander in Iraq, for his service in Iraq. In attempting to apply the phrase “snatching defeat from the jaws of victory,” Bush offered this nonsensical praise for Odierno:

I appreciate the fact that you really snatched defeat out of the jaws of those who were trying to defeat us in Iraq.

Think Progress » Bush incoherently praises Odierno for ’snatching defeat.’

On the Campaign Trail, Few Mentions of McCain’s Bout With Melanoma – New York Times

 

By LAWRENCE K. ALTMAN, M.D.

Along with his signature bright white hair, the most striking aspects of Senator John McCain’s physical appearance are his puffy left cheek and the scar that runs down the back of his neck.

The marks are cosmetic reminders of the melanoma surgery he underwent in August 2000. …

Mr. McCain has had four melanomas. …

The most serious melanoma was spotted on his temple in 2000 by the attending physician at the United States Capitol after it had escaped the eye of Mr. McCain’s personal physician at Mayo Clinic Scottsdale. (The Capitol physician also spotted another melanoma that was in situ.) …

In Mr. McCain’s case, the Mayo Clinic team of surgeons reconstructed the skin and soft tissue overlying the left temple, face and neck by pulling up skin to close the wound. …

Mr. McCain is occasionally asked on the campaign trail about his age. But he is almost never asked about his health.

On the Campaign Trail, Few Mentions of McCain’s Bout With Melanoma – New York Times

BushCo

Think Progress » KBR Dodges $500 Million In Social Security And Medicare Taxes In Cheney-Backed Scheme

No private contractor has financially profited from the Iraq war more than Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR), which until last year was a subsidiary of Halliburton. The firm currently has more than 21,000 employees in Iraq, and between 2004 and 2006, received more than $16 billion in government contracts — far more than any other corporation.

Yet KBR hasn’t been passing on these enormous profits to American taxpayers or even its own employees, thanks to a plan that Vice President Cheney helped establish. Today, the Boston Globe reports that KBR has avoided paying more than $500 million “in federal Medicare and Social Security taxes by hiring workers through shell companies” based in the Cayman Islands. …

KBR’s practices are extreme, even compared to its competitors. Other top Iraq war contractors — including Bechtel and Parsons — pay Social Security and Medicare taxes for their employees.

The Bush administration has aided this tax dodging. One of KBR’s shell companies is Overseas Administrative Services, which was set up two months after Cheney became Halliburtion’s CEO in 1995. Since at least 2004, the Pentagon has known about KBR’s practices, but chosen to ignore the issue.

Of course, KBR is more than happy to claim workers as its own in one instance: when seeking “legal immunity extended to employers working in Iraq.”

Think Progress » KBR Dodges $500 Million In Social Security And Medicare Taxes In Cheney-Backed Scheme

It’s the End of the World, as we know it

Change Could Usher in Extinction
    CHANGE IS in the air— or so we hear. That is the mantra. All our presidential candidates, to some extent or another, are promising change. But change to what, and for whom?
    Plans for additional governmental control over human activity seems to be the theme. Education and health care are major topics. Yet increasing bureaucratic involvement in these areas has resulted in poor performance, fraud and a waste of taxpayers’ dollars.
    Producers of current energy supplies will be hampered by more regulations and taxed to near extinction in favor of subsidized “designer” alternative fuel companies. Damn the market, the politicians and environmentalists know what is best.
    Do not question them, they are inspired and determined and not deterred by facts. Producers of goods and services will face energy shortages, government manipulation of the money supply and blatant political favoritism.
    Businesses asking for handouts will be the norm. Integrity will become an antiquated notion. Stores filled with food, clothing and consumer goods will be a thing of the past. Shortages will abound, lines will form and primitive man will emerge. We may be the most prosperous nation in history to self-destruct and the last generation to enjoy what we have today.
    What we eat, drink, drive and do will be controlled by our saviors. Crises will be constant and control absolute. What is left of property rights and individual liberties will finally be laid to rest. We will live in fear, unable to think beyond our own survival. As in most of the world, and throughout the history of man, life will be brutal and brief.
    AB

ABQjournal Opinion: Letters to the Editor

Response to Hillary’s 3AM Red Phone Ad

A red phone is ringing in the middle of the night as a voice-over intones “who do you want to answer the call in the middle of the night?” As a woman’s hand reaches for the phone, a man’s hand reaches it sooner. Bill Clinton says, “Let me get this, Honey; you need your rest.”

I know — it’s pretty insulting to both of them. I toss this idea into the Cloud. Let me know if it turns up on YouTube.

More seriously, whatever Hillary does to put down Obama is *nothing* compared to what the Republicans will do. This is a useful exercise, though it will be galling to see the same ad run by McCain in the fall. peace, mjh

Obama Reader

For Obama, a Taste of What a Long Battle Would Hold – New York Times

Yet the shifting tone offers a glimpse of the Republican playbook as the party adapts to the prospect that it will be running against Mr. Obama rather than Mrs. Clinton.

It is a reminder that should Mr. Obama win the nomination, he will be playing on a more treacherous political battleground as his opponents — scouring through his record of votes and statements and his experiences before he entered public life — look for ways to portray him as out of step with the nation’s values, challenge his appeal to independent voters and emphasize his lack of experience in foreign policy and national security.

Some of this will almost certainly take the shape of the Internet rumors and whispering campaigns that have popped up against Mr. Obama since he got into the race, like the false reports that he is Muslim. Others will no doubt come from the types of shadowy independent committees that have played a big role in campaigns in recent years.

But others will simply draw on Mr. Obama’s voting record and speeches, interviews and debate appearances. Mr. McCain’s aides said their first line of attack would be to portray him as a liberal

For Obama, a Taste of What a Long Battle Would Hold – New York Times

Chicago Reader | Obama-rama: What Makes Obama Run?
December 8, 1995

Barack_Obama_Welcome_Back.jpgWhat makes Obama different from other progressive politicians is that he doesn’t just want to create and support progressive programs; he wants to mobilize the people to create their own. He wants to stand politics on its head, empowering citizens by bringing together the churches and businesses and banks, scornful grandmothers and angry young. Mostly he’s running to fill a political and moral vacuum. He says he’s tired of seeing the moral fervor of black folks whipped up–at the speaker’s rostrum and from the pulpit–and then allowed to dissipate because there’s no agenda, no concrete program for change.

While no political opposition to Obama has arisen yet, many have expressed doubts about the practicality of his ambitions. Obama himself says he’s not certain that his experimental plunge into electoral politics can produce the kind of community empowerment and economic change he’s after.

“Three major doubts have been raised,” he said. The first is whether in today’s political environment–with its emphasis on media and money–a grass-roots movement can even be created. Will people still answer the call of participatory politics?

“Second,” Obama said, “many believe that the country is too racially polarized to build the kind of multiracial coalitions necessary to bring about massive economic change.

“Third, is it possible for those of us working through the Democratic Party to figure out ways to use the political process to create jobs for our communities?” …

Obama is the product of a brief early-60s college romance and short-lived marriage between a black African exchange student and a white liberal Kansan who met at the University of Hawaii. His critical boyhood years–from two to ten–were spent neither in white nor black America but in the teeming streets and jungle outskirts of Djakarta. Obama’s boyhood experiences in Indonesia–where his mother took him when she married another foreign exchange student–propelled him toward a worldview well beyond his mother’s liberalism.

“The poverty, the corruption, the constant scramble for security . . . remained all around me and bred a relentless skepticism. My mother’s confidence in needlepoint virtues depended on a faith I didn’t possess. . . . In a land where fatalism remained a necessary tool for enduring hard-ship . . . she was a lonely witness for secular humanism, a soldier for New Deal, Peace Corps, position-paper liberalism.”

Chicago Reader | Obama-rama: What Makes Obama Run? Lawyer, teacher, philanthropist, and author Barack Obama doesn’t need another career. But he’s entering politics to get back to his true passion–community organization. December 8, 1995

Obama: No warrantless wiretaps if you elect me | Tech news blog – CNET News.com

For one thing, under an Obama presidency, Americans will be able to leave behind the era of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and “wiretaps without warrants,” he said. (He was referring to the lingering legal fallout over reports that the National Security Agency scooped up Americans’ phone and Internet activities without court orders, ostensibly to monitor terrorist plots, in the years after the September 11 attacks.)

It’s hardly a new stance for Obama, who has made similar statements in previous campaign speeches, but mention of the issue in a stump speech, alongside more frequently discussed topics like Iraq and education, may give some clue to his priorities.

In our own Technology Voters’ Guide, when asked whether he supports shielding telecommunications and Internet companies from lawsuits accusing them of illegal spying, Obama gave us a one-word response: “No.”

(Democrats Hillary Clinton and John Edwards and Republican Ron Paul, for their part, came to the same conclusion in our survey.)

Obama: No warrantless wiretaps if you elect me | Tech news blog – CNET News.com

Obama pledges Net neutrality laws if elected president | Tech news blog – CNET News.com

Posted by Anne Broache

If elected president, Barack Obama plans to prioritize, well, barring broadband providers like AT&T and Comcast from prioritizing Internet content.

Affixing his signature to federal Net neutrality rules would be high on the list during his first year in the Oval Office, the junior senator from Illinois said during an interactive forum Monday afternoon with the popular contender put on by MTV and MySpace at Coe College in Iowa.

Net neutrality, of course, is the idea that broadband operators shouldn’t be allowed to block or degrade Internet content and services–or charge content providers an extra fee for speedier delivery or more favorable placement.

The question, selected through an online video contest, was posed via video by small-business owner and former AT&T engineer Joe Niederberger, a member of the liberal advocacy group MoveOn.org. He asked Obama: “Would you make it a priority in your first year of office to reinstate Net neutrality as the law of the land? And would you pledge to only appoint FCC commissioners that support open Internet principles like Net neutrality?”

“The answer is yes,” Obama replied. “I am a strong supporter of Net neutrality.”

Obama pledges Net neutrality laws if elected president | Tech news blog – CNET News.com

Two Obits

William F. Buckley, Jr

You wouldn’t necessarily guess it, but I used to watch Buckley’s Firing Line occasionally. I think it was on late Saturday night when I was a pre-teen. I found him insufferable, which was good, because we had a few things in common, including a love of language — specifically, big or obscure words — an admiration of wit — especially, one’s own — and a tendency to pontificate. Buckley had many of the worst attributes of an intellectual, as well as an upper-class twit. And yet, he was, in fact, the best conservative ever. Now, the “stars” of the conservative firmament are Buckley’s bastard lack-wit descendants, like Lush Limbaugh, proof-positive of the force of devolution.

Over the last few years, Buckley’s columns had become almost unreadable, as if his intellect were being crushed under its own weight. Still, I will always remember Buckley as an advocate for the legalization of marijuana and gay marriage, as well as one the many who recognized Duhbya as an idiot. Rest in peace, old top.

The Albuquerque Tribune

Unlike conservatives, I don’t regard corporations as living beings with all the rights of mere mortals and then some. Still, I have mourned the passing of a few businesses. The Tribune is not one of those, however.

Mind you, I’m not dancing on the Tribune’s grave (see how easy it is to anthropomorphize heartless, mindless, soulless businesses). I’ve read many eulogies for the Tribune this week and I don’t wish to add to the pain of the bereaved.

I wanted to like the Trib. I’m a part of that dwindling demographic: a newspaper reader. I grew up with a morning paper, an afternoon paper and a local paper every day. Even as an RSS-convert and webster, I appreciate that newspapers have always exposed me to things I didn’t know, unlike a highly-tailored Web-portal, filtering just what you want to know (which is more of what you already know). Hell, I even enjoy reading the Albuquerque Journal every day, which is like someone claiming to be a connoisseur of wine while nursing a bottle of Ripple.

Merri and I both gave the Tribune repeated chances. We both liked many of the columnists and reporters. (Though I despise Jeffrey Gardner, I find it valuable to read views I can’t stand. No shortage of that in the Journal.) We found a couple of comics to like. There just wasn’t enough of a paper there. It seemed even thinner than the Journal, if you can imagine.

On the other hand, the Trib’s website was far superior to the Journal’s. I agree with many others who wish the Trib would continue to live a virtual life. I felt the same way about Crosswinds, which I miss much more than I’ll ever miss the Trib.

peace,
mjh

PS: While conservatives also worship the holy Market as the bringer of all good things, I doubt continuing competition from the Trib would prevent things like this from appearing in the Journal.

between *he* and him