mjh's blog
Congenital does not mean anatomically-correct, although the two circles overlap significantly on a Venn diagram.the Republican fist with its middle finger held erect
Sun 06/26/05 at 12:41 pmThe Independent Weekly: Shame is for sissies BY HAL CROWTHER
Bolton is simply the Republican fist with its middle finger held erect, a calculated insult aimed at the Democrats, the media and the world–a rude gesture of unprecedented arrogance and defiance. Is this a coarse joke, irony served White House-style? For America’s most visible and sensitive diplomatic post, they offer the ultimate anti-diplomat, an obnoxious bully so incapable of diplomacy or common tact that he offends everyone he encounters, Democrat or Republican, ally or enemy. …
You don’t have to be subtle, as the White House constantly reminds us. You don’t have to reckon with irony, that last refuge of the effete. Just change the words, repeat them incessantly, and disparage anyone who resists them. Incompetent, arrogant and inflexible, the Bush administration White House has scored its greatest successes changing the words America uses, and reorganizing its flow of information.
Totalitarian thinkers, Hannah Arendt once wrote, are characterized by “extreme contempt for facts as such, for in their opinion fact depends entirely on the power of the man who can fabricate it.” If you told me 20 years ago that a cocky free press, still flaunting Richard Nixon’s scalp, could be reduced to groveling impotence by the likes of George W. Bush, I guess I’d have laughed at you. …
Journalists–journalists by true vocation as opposed to some who list that occupation on IRS returns–are largely immune to ideology, rhetoric and partisan politics. We have no heroes among politicians; we’ve seen too many clowns and thieves on both sides of the aisle. We don’t vilify the president because we disagree with his philosophy; he has no philosophy. We oppose him because we’re conditioned to hate liars, hypocrites, bullies and “serial abusers of little people,” and he’s assembled the most frightening collection we’ve ever seen.
By branding all unfriendly journalists (and other Americans who criticize the president) “liberals”–embittered members of a losing team–Karl Rove and company have ingeniously compromised fair comment and legitimate dissent. …
In fact, some of the most articulate criticism of the White House has come from conservatives.
“Bush has behaved like a caricature of what a right-wing president is supposed to be, and his continuation as president will discredit any sort of conservatism for generations,” argued American Conservative magazine, endorsing John Kerry. “The launching of an invasion against a country that posed no threat to the U.S., the doling out of war profits to politically favored corporations, the financing of the war by ballooning the deficit to be passed on to the nation’s children. … It is as if Bush sought to resurrect every false 1960s-era left-wing cliché about predatory imperialism and turn it into administration policy.”
[Thanks to A&JP via MR.]
=====
The Independent Weekly: In the realms of the unreal by Hal Crowther (2004-08-04)
It turns out that Ronald Reagan’s greatest achievement was not saving us from the Soviets, but saving us from the rabid neocons in his own administration who were spoiling for World War III. Advisers like Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld seemed so crazy for nuclear confrontation that they spooked poor Reagan, the primitive optimist. He ignored their advice and negotiated with Gorbachev, and then purged most of them when they were caught in bed with Ollie North. George W. Bush, of course, brought back this whole flock of indicted and discredited chicken hawks, who then crafted the “muscular” foreign policy that lured us into our apocalyptic fiasco in Iraq. …
Americans were like moths to Reagan’s pale flame. His myth seemed to generate a hunger for illusion, a distaste for bare fact and hard truth that has become pandemic and changed the face of our culture. It’s no wonder that “leaders” like Bush tell implausible, even fantastic, lies–”We’re doing this for the Iraqis”–and expect Americans to believe them. It’s not surprising that their language reverses or obliterates meaning, like the voice of Big Brother in Orwell’s 1984. Operation Iraqi Freedom, the Clear Skies Initiative and the Healthy Forests Initiative all mean the exact opposite of what they say; when President Bush publicly thanked Donald Rumsfeld for “a superb job” in the heat of the Abu Ghraib torture scandal, what he must have meant was “You incompetent bastard, you’ve ruined us, I wish I could kill you.”
Rate this post:In Dump Duhbya:
Newer: An Open Letter to Karl Rove
Older: It’s Never Too Early or Too Late to Attack — The Karl Rove Legacy
QOTD
Sun 06/26/05 at 10:23 am“I think if you asked God, he’d say the Ten Commandments were a road map for living. Instead, you have these self-appointed pharisees who think the Ten Commandments can be turned into a stiletto to use against their political opponents.” Representative David Obey, Wisconsin Democrat
—–
Keeping Faith With Religious Freedom By E. J. Dionne Jr.
Thus did Obey offer an amendment to the military appropriations bill calling on the secretary of the Air Force to “develop a plan to ensure that the Air Force Academy maintains a climate free from coercive intimidation and inappropriate proselytizing.”
Obey’s all-American assertion of religious liberty was, for Rep. John Hostettler (R-Ind.), part of “the long war on Christianity in America [that] continues today on the floor of the House of Representatives. It continues unabated with aid and comfort to those who would eradicate any vestige of our Christian heritage being supplied by the usual suspects, the Democrats. . . . Like a moth to a flame, Democrats can’t help themselves when it comes to denigrating and demonizing Christians.”
Rate this post:Need I point out that paranoid, bellicose, radical right, evangelical Christians are turning themselves into demons without any outside help.
By the way, of our 3 New Mexico Representatives, Udall and Wilson, an Air Force Academy alumna, voted for the amendment while Steve Pearce channeled Joe Skeen and voted against it (alone, as he was, in voting against removing spying on library patrons from the Patiot Act). mjh
In Theirs:
Newer: GOPublic TV
Older: Onward, Christian Overlords!
Entries and comments feeds. 115 queries. 1.746 seconds. Back to Top

