The Press and Freedom: Some disturbing trends, by Bob Edwards, NPR

The Press and Freedom: Some disturbing trends by Bob Edwards, NPR
(Adapted from the annual Joe Creason Lecture at the University of Kentucky.)

It’s kind of a cruel, ironic joke. The rise of cable TV and the Internet were supposed to democratize the media and give us many voices and numerous points of view. Instead, market forces and deregulation have clobbered diversity. The networks and cable channels have the same owners — Hollywood studios, mainly — and the most popular Web sites for news are those of news organizations firmly established before the Web was spun.

We are currently a nation at war and the free flow of information and ideas is never more important than it is at times like these. But monopolies choke that flow, allowing only the information and ideas that facilitate that other flow — the flow of dollars into their pockets. …

A Cleveland company called McVay Media describes itself as the largest radio consulting firm in the world. McVay developed a memo to its client stations advising them on how to use the war to their best business advantage. Called a ”War Manual,” the memo says the stations should ”Get the following production pieces into the studio NOW . . . patriotic music that makes you cry, salute, get cold chills! Go for the emotion. . . . Air the National Anthem at a specified time each day as long as the U.S.A. is at war.” The article also quotes Michael Harrison, publisher of Talkers,a journal for the radio talk business. Harrison says, ”It’s counterintuitive for hosts and program directors to pay too much attention to the antiwar movement right now.”

Some months after this speech, Bob Edwards was ”promoted” out of his job on Morning Edition, a few months before his 25th anniversary (thoughtful act). Bob Edwards’ last day on the job was also the day that a media conglomerate that donates to Bush refused to broadcast on all of their stations a news report they felt was anti-war. These bums are shameless. Time to muck out the stables. mjh

Intolerance Spreads

Inside Politics – The Washington Times: Inside Politics – April 30, 2004

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, chastised Rep. Jim McDermott, Washington Democrat, yesterday for omitting the words ”under God” while leading the House in a daily recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance on Tuesday. …

Rep. Pete Sessions, Texas Republican, accused Mr. McDermott of ”embarrassing the House and disparaging the majority of Americans who share the values expressed in the Pledge.”

McDermott spokesman Mike DeCesare said his boss learned the Pledge without the phrase ”under God.” The two words have been in the Pledge since 1954; Mr. McDermott was born in 1936.

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi

I want an apology. I don’t care what sentiment impelled you to chastise McDermott for leading the Pledge as it was for many, many years. You have exhibited religious intolerance in a public forum and, in a most unDemocratic manner, have punished someone for being different and taken pains to assure it never happens again. Shame on you. mjh

Congressman Pete Sessions

It is far more embarrassing, and alarming, how intolerant Americans have become. Your party has contributed much to this while reaping power from this ugliness. Shame on you, too. mjh

Congressman Jim McDermott-

Thank you for saying the Pledge as it should be said. You and I are not the only other people in the country who believe that is the correct form. I imagine you’re getting beaten up right now — I want you to know you did the right thing. mjh

Contact these three and your own Representative:
United States House of Representatives – Member Website Listing – By State

Alpert’s Truth

Since the phrase was added in the 1950s, not one World War II soldier, sailor or flier had pledged allegiance to the nation ”under God.” Yet, somehow, they did what they had to so well that we call them the ”Greatest Generation.” The dead and the living both. May God save us from the religious.